Third-country asylum plan shows UK is in ‘a very dark place', says Albanian PM
A UK plan to send refused asylum seekers to 'return hubs' in third countries shows post-Brexit Britain is 'in a very dark place', Albania's prime minister has said.
In his first interview with the international media since leading his socialist party to a historic fourth term in office, Edi Rama said the idea of the UK wanting to 'look for places to dump immigrants' would have been inconceivable a decade ago.
But it was in keeping with the shift in public discourse in Britain since Brexit, in which the 'totally unacceptable, totally ridiculous, totally shameful' had become normalised, he said.
Announced last month by Keir Starmer during a visit to the Balkan state, the 'return hubs' scheme would involve centres in a third country processing the claims of people refused asylum who have exhausted legal pathways in the UK.
'It's one of those things that 10 years ago would simply not have not been imaginable … that Britain would look for places to dump immigrants,' Rama said from Tirana, the Albanian capital.
'The fact that today it's not just imaginable, it's happening, is not because of Keir Starmer or [Rishi] Sunak doing something outrageous; it's because of the country being in a very dark place.'
Rama, who is renowned for his outspoken and contrarian views, voiced dismay at the level of public discourse in the UK. As a committed anglophile, he said, it was hard to take in.
'Eighty per cent of the things that are said, or are written, or are accepted as a normal part of the discourse in today's Britain are things that [before Brexit] would have been totally unacceptable, totally ridiculous, totally shameful,' he said.
Under former Tory governments, relations between the UK and Albania became increasingly strained, overshadowed by boat crossings and accusations of illegal Albanian immigrants 'invading' British shores.
Starmer's visit in May – the first ever by a British prime minister – – was aimed at putting bilateral relations on a new footing. While in Tirana, the Labour leader said talks were under way 'with a number of countries' to set up the hubs. But, in a move seen as a gentle rebuke to his guest, Rama said in a joint press conference that Albania would not be participating in the scheme.
Seeking to put the record straight in the interview, Rama said that Starmer, a 'very decent [and] a delightful person', had neither made the request publicly nor been the first British leader to privately broach the subject. Rama said his response had always been the same: 'I have been clear about this since Boris Johnson asked me and Rishi asked me … I've always said no.'
That Albania had previously agreed to a similar scheme with Italy's prime minister, Giorgia Meloni, was different because of the 'very special relationship' the two countries had. That deal, which envisaged intercepting people at sea and taking most of them not to Italy but to a reception centre in Albania for their asylum claims to be processed, has so far been obstructed by legal objections.
From the day Albania's brutal Stalinist regime collapsed in 1991, Italy had stood by his country, Rama said. As a result his compatriots had 'a weak spot' for Rome.
'Practically we are one country made of two independent countries … Italy has been there for us in every dark moment and difficult situation since the day we got out of the hell of [being] the North Korea of Europe,' he added. '[We] have a weak spot for Italy, so when Italy asks us for something we say yes, full stop.'
Rama's stance coincides with a newfound confidence as the small country, among Europe's poorest states, makes once-unthinkable strides towards joining the EU. With a dramatic change of pace and tone that he attributes to the new 'geopolitically driven spirit' of European policymakers since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, accession negotiations have accelerated as Brussels finally seeks to embrace the western Balkans. The region has long been viewed by Moscow as falling into Russia's sphere of influence.
Sign up to This is Europe
The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment
after newsletter promotion
Rama, who turns 60 in July, ran his election campaign on the promise he would push ahead with pursuing accession to the EU. He now believes negotiations will be wrapped up by 2027 and 'within 2030 we'll be an EU member'. Albania, which joined Nato in 2009, has been an accession candidate for more than a decade.
'The whole approach to the process has dramatically changed,' he said. 'Now they [the EU] are very eager to go forward … With the Russian aggression everything changed, so somehow Vladimir Putin also did this, he made Europe much more interested in unifying.'.
He sees a similar effect on the EU from the new occupant of the White House and is '100% convinced that Donald Trump's election is a good thing for Europe'. Rama said Trump's victory jolted Europe out of its languor and had brought 'an unsettling spirit' that the world needed.
'I think that when Trump says God saved him because he had a plan for America, I think he says only half the truth. God saved him because he had a plan for Europe too, to wake Europe up,' he said.
Later this year, the Albanian painter turned prime minister will launch a 'thank you' tour of diaspora communities who, in a first, were able to vote in last month's election, helping him secure a landslide victory. More than 500,000 ethnic Albanians are thought to live in Greece alone. Rama's hope is that he can lure them back 'because now our salaries are very close to [those in] Greece and it's home'.
But the socialist party leader, at 6ft 7in (2.01 metres), a basketball player in his youth, also has his critics. Charges of corruption in Albanian society are widespread. So, too, are accusations of creeping authoritarianism – Rama will be the longest-serving leader since Enver Hoxha, the country's former brutal dictator – though the allegations are labelled farcical by admirers and mandarins in Brussels.
One former EU minister said: 'Edi is larger than life. His problem is that he is too big for his country and I am not referring to his height.'
If Albania succeeded in its membership bid, Rama said it would be 'the right and most wonderful moment to pass the torch'. It would be a personal achievement but also 'help Europe be less boring and more sunny'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer seeks to quell revolt to speed through welfare reforms
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer looks set to offer concessions to Labour rebels in order to speed his welfare reforms through the Commons. Downing Street insiders said talks were taking place with Labour MPs about the legislation after 126 of them publicly backed a move to block it. The first vote on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill will take place on Tuesday and a concerted effort has been launched by ministers to win round potential rebels. If the legislation clears its first hurdle it will then face a few hours' examination by all MPs – rather than days or weeks in front of a committee tasked with looking at the Bill – with a plan for it to clear the Commons a little over a week later on July 9. Ministers have said they will listen to suggestions to improve the legislation but opposition appears entrenched and the swift timetable for the Bill could add to critics' concerns. Commons Leader Lucy Powell told MPs: 'As the House would expect, the Government actively engages with parliamentary opinion throughout a bill's passage, as we are doing intensively with the Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill.' A No 10 source said: 'Delivering fundamental change is not easy, and we all want to get it right, so of course we're talking to colleagues about the Bill and the changes it will bring, we want to start delivering this together on Tuesday.' Overnight six more Labour MPs added their names to the rebel amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks. The reasoned amendment argues that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. The new signatories include the Commons Environmental Audit Select Committee chairman Toby Perkins, Stoke-on-Trent Central MP Gareth Snell, Newcastle upon Tyne MP Mary Glindon and Tamworth MP Sarah Edwards. North Ayrshire and Arran MP Irene Campbell and Colchester MP Pam Cox, both of whom won their seats in the party's 2024 landslide election victory, have also added their names. The new names take the total number of Labour backbenchers supporting the amendment, tabled by Treasury Select Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier, to 126 out of a total of 162 backers from all parties. The plans restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit. The Government hopes the changes will get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year. Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. But the fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the 'reasoned amendment' calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains. One backbencher preparing to vote against the Bill told the PA news agency: 'A lot of people have been saying they're upset about this for months. 'To leave it until a few days before the vote, it's not a very good way of running the country. 'It's not very grown-up.' They said that minor concessions would not be enough, warning: 'I don't think you can tinker with this. They need to go back to the drawing board.' The Daily Telegraph reported that potential concessions being considered include a commitment to speed up payment of support to help people back into work and offering assurances that reviews of policies in this area will be published. Meanwhile, The Times reported some MPs opposed to the plans had blamed Sir Keir's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney and suggested the time had come for 'regime change' in Downing Street. Asked about attacks on Mr McSweeney, trade minister Douglas Alexander said: 'I'm much less interested in the gossip about SW1 than whether this legislation works on the streets, in the towns, in the communities right across the country.' He told Sky News it was 'for the Prime Minister to make his judgments' about who works in Downing Street but 'the fact is that team delivered us an historic victory only last July, against expectations'. He told ITV's Good Morning Britain: 'If there are practical ways that we can improve this legislation, we should. 'We should do it not to buy off rebels, but because it's a Labour thing to do and that's the conversation that I expect ministers will be engaged in in the coming days.' Analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) think tank indicated overall, 800,000 fewer working-age people are expected to receive a Pip daily living award in 2029–30 as a result of the reforms. The tighter criteria are set to lead to 430,000 new applicants – who would have received an award without reforms – receiving no award, and 370,000 existing claimants losing out following reassessment. Most of the 800,000 losers will receive £3,850 per year less in Pip. The 2.2 million existing claimants of the health element of universal credit who are expected to still be claiming in 2029–30 are estimated to see a £450 real decline in their support in that year because of the freezing of the payment. There are also set to be 700,000 new claimants who will typically receive £2,700 a year less than they would have done under the current system, the IFS said. It will be well into the 2030s before the reforms are fully rolled out and, in the long-term, the savings could amount to around £11 billion a year, the IFS said. A little over a quarter of the public are supportive of the proposed reforms, according to polling published on Thursday. Of 2,004 people surveyed by More in Common over the weekend, just 27% said they supported the planned changes to the benefits system and half (51%) said they believe the cuts would worsen the health of disabled people. A similar proportion (52%) said the cuts would increase pressure on the NHS while six in 10 said the Government should look at alternative cost-saving measures instead. Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said the Government should pull the Bill and 'go back to the drawing board' instead of 'cutting vital support from thousands of vulnerable people'.
Western Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Trio of trade deals ‘restored identity' of UK, PM says as trade plan unveiled
Since Donald Trump's tariff announcements in April, the UK has reached new agreements with the US, India and the EU. Sir Keir said the deals showed 'that even in this volatile world, Britain is proudly, unashamedly, defiantly even, open for business, and today's trade strategy builds on that'. US President Donald Trump (left) holding a UK-US trade deal with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (Stefan Rousseau/PA) The Government's Trade Strategy aims to boost opportunities for UK businesses, particularly in the service sector, to export internationally, and vows to protect domestic firms from global threats to free trade. It comes at a time of heightened uncertainty following Donald Trump's tariff announcements in April, which have hiked charges on most US imports in a bid to boost home-grown production and support US businesses. In the paper, ministers pledge to 'confront the threat that protectionism poses to the UK by significantly upgrading our trade defence toolkit'. This includes clamping down on unfair trading practices, such as the 'dumping' of goods at low costs in foreign markets, which is believed to disadvantage domestic businesses. In the wake of the tariff announcements, some British retailers raised concerns that Chinese products were being rerouted from the US and deposited on UK and European online marketplaces like Shein and Amazon. Meanwhile, the strategy outlines measures to make it easier for UK firms to export, including reducing barriers to trading overseas and improving access to finance. Sir Keir suggested he would pursue a series of small deals rather than solely focusing on major trade agreements with countries. 'But perhaps most importantly, in this uncertain and challenging world, we will also give ourselves new powers on trade defence,' he said. 'To make sure that if your businesses are threatened by practices like dumping, that we have the right powers to defend you.'
Daily Mirror
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Brits' terrifying WW3 survival guide - rations, nuke hotspots and 'Armageddon'
Countries including Sweden, Finland and Norway are handing out pamphlets advising citizens on how to survive a potential nuclear attack - and now an expert has urged Keir Starmer to do the same The UK government ought to release a manual warning the public how to survive to World War III, an expert has urged. It comes as the French public is set to receive a booklet, which contains 63 measures among its 20 pages, telling them how to protect themselves and their loved ones in a number of terrifying situations, including armed conflict, a nuclear leak, and natural disasters. Last year, countries including Sweden, Finland and Norway began distributing pamphlets advising citizens to stockpile food and water in preparation for a potential nuclear attack amid rising fears of World War III. A total of five million copies of the 32-page Swedish booklet, titled If Crisis or War Comes, were sent to households across the country. It provided detailed instructions on how to gather supplies and find shelter in the event of war. It told households to store food and water so they're ready if conflict comes knocking. Meanwhile, Finland put up a government website explaining how people should prepare for a number of catastrophes. "An insecure world requires preparedness. The military threat to Sweden has increased and we must prepare for the worst - an armed attack," the Swedish book states in its introduction. Professor Anthony Glees, an academic in security and defence and a lecturer at the University of Buckingham, feels strongly that the British government should follow suit and produce "a short, decently written booklet" about what might happen in order for the public to prepare for war. He said: "It should stress at the outset, of course, that the whole of our national defence strategy is about deterrence, that our foreign policy is defensive not offensive and that if we become as strong as we now want to be, thanks to Starmer and his European colleagues and thanks (yes!) to the goading from president Trump, then WW3 can surely be averted." The Professor highlighted that the booklet should include details of how events could unfold, what might happen, including cyber attacks, drone attacks and possibly missile strikes. "The government would have to admit that we are woefully lacking in 'Iron Dome' systems round our key cities, as I understand we have five warships that could intercept incoming missiles but one or two are in the Gulf and one or two are being repaired.... We have no fixed systems at all," he claimed. "Everything to date depends on our Vanguard subs (in a decade to be Dreadnought subs) and their Trident nukes. If they are fired it will be Armageddon day so no survivors. "But if, more likely, there's a conventional attack that's something we can prepare for — a week's supply of food, bottled water, paracetamol and loads of emergency Snickers bars as well as battery operated devices and a couple of charging units, loaded for a few days from the electricity supply which will probably be turned off. Recalling survival tactics of his youth, Professor Glees said: "When I was a school boy, 70 years ago, we school kids were told to take cover under our desks, having painted the windows with sour milk to keep out the radiation. I think we were far more afraid of the headmaster than the Russians - it'll be different today. "More like the hippies used to say in the 1960s you needed to do when 'the bomb' dropped: 'Bend over, and then kiss your ass goodbye.'"
