Panel To Study Feasibility Of Periodic Reviews Of DU Staff
New Delhi: Delhi University has set up a nine-member committee to examine the feasibility of implementing periodic performance reviews of its employees. This is in line with a central govt notification that allows premature retirement of staff deemed underperforming or lacking integrity.
The panel, headed by executive council (EC) member Indra Mohan Kapahi, will assess whether such a policy can be adopted within the university framework.
The proposal, tabled during the EC meeting on Friday, referred to an office memorandum issued by the department of personnel and training in June 2024. The memorandum lays down guidelines for quarterly reviews of central govt employees—including those working in autonomous bodies and statutory institutions—with a report to be submitted each month on staff identified as ineffective or of "doubtful integrity.
" The rules permit premature retirement in public interest for employees aged 50 or 55, or those who have completed 30 years of service.
While university officials say the move is aimed at strengthening administration, sections of the teaching community have raised red flags, alleging that such provisions may be misused to target dissenters.
"The university administration has overstepped its authority by attempting to adopt the DoPT circular without clearance from the ministry of education or UGC.
This raises serious concerns about procedural violations and the motive behind such haste," said Rudrashish Chakraborty, executive member of Delhi University Teachers' Association and associate professor at Kirori Mal College.
Mithuraj Dhusiya, a former EC member, submitted a dissent note arguing that the memorandum applies only to central govt employees under the Central Civil Services Rules, which do not govern DU staff.
"The notification has not even been officially forwarded to universities, making the administration's urgency highly questionable," he wrote.
Maya John, member of the DU academic council, echoed similar concerns during a protest organised by DUTA outside the EC meeting venue. She alleged that the criteria listed in the memorandum—such as "doubtful integrity" and "ineffectiveness"—are vague and susceptible to misuse.
"This conflation of teaching staff with central govt employees violates DU's institutional autonomy and risks creating a culture of fear and compliance," she said.
EC member Aman Kumar also objected, noting that DU already has robust mechanisms for staff evaluation, including annual performance appraisal reports, the UGC's career advancement scheme, and annual departmental reviews. "The imposition of additional layers through central administrative procedures is unwarranted and threatens academic freedom," he said.
The committee's recommendations are expected to be tabled in a future EC meeting.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Brother's Day wishes
,
messages
and quotes !
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Now is the time to disclose the entire truth known to the ECI
On June 8, this newspaper carried a report ('Rahul's attack on EC doesn't match poll data, officials say bid to 'defame'') contradicting an op-ed on its Ideas Page ('Match-fixing Maharashtra', IE, June 7). The report was accompanied by a 'Special to The Express' article by the Chief Minister of a state governed by a political party different from that of the op-ed writer. In the June 7 op-ed, the writer claims to have provided various instances of irregularities in the 2024 Maharashtra Vidhan Sabha elections. While this op-ed attributed the irregularities to the Election Commission of India (ECI) and the ruling party/coalition in Maharashtra, this paper's analysis quoted ECI reports and 'sources'. Both articles have been somewhat economical with the truth. They have chosen to tell a part of it. Let us consider the first issue raised in both the op-ed and this paper's report. The op-ed subtitles this: 'Step 1: Rig the panel for appointment of umpires'. The report calls this: 'Appointment of Election Commissioners'. The op-ed states, 'The 2023 Election Commissioners Appointment Act ensured that Election Commissioners are effectively chosen by the Prime Minister and the Home Minister by a 2:1 majority since the third member, the Leader of the Opposition, can always be outvoted. These gentlemen are also the top contestants in the contest whose umpires are being chosen…' The relevant section of the report starts with: 'The fact is that successive governments across party lines — including the UPA — had opportunities to institutionalise a more transparent appointment mechanism but failed to do so.' After quoting two recommendations, made in 2007 and 2015, which were not accepted by the government, it quotes 'a senior EC official' as saying, 'Now for the first time, a law made by Parliament under Article 325 is in place since 2023 for the appointment of CEC and ECs. Which is better — the earlier system or the new one?' It is a fact that successive governments across party lines did not avail themselves of opportunities to institutionalise a more transparent appointment mechanism, and Parliament did make a law in this regard for the first time in 2023. There is, however, more to it. The entire truth is a little more than these two 'facts' combined. The Supreme Court, in a 378-page judgment on March 2, 2023, said, 'The refusal of Parliament, despite what was contemplated by the Founding Fathers, and what is more, the availability of a large number of reports, all speaking in one voice, reassures us that even acting within the bounds of the authority available to the Judicial Branch, we must lay down norms.' It added,'We declare that as far as appointment to the posts of Chief Election Commissioner and the Election Commissioners are concerned, the same shall be done by the President of India on the basis of the advice tendered by a committee consisting of the Prime Minister of India, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha and, in case there is no such leader, the leader of the largest party in the Opposition in the Lok Sabha having the largest numerical strength, and the Chief Justice of India. This norm will continue to hold good till a law is made by the Parliament.' The chronology of the events indicates that the law had to be made because the Supreme Court took the matter into its own hands and decided to 'lay down the norms'. Just for the record, a petition challenging the constitutionality of the law, which is clearly tilted in favour of the executive, is pending in the Supreme Court. The entire truth about the first of the five issues is quite clear. It needs to be revealed for the remaining four issues raised in the op-ed as well. Elsewhere, I have described in detail what I call the National Electoral System, which has four aspects; Voter/electoral rolls; poll scheduling, post-poll activities, electronic voting machines. Possibilities of manipulation or mischief exist at every one of these major stages. It is impossible to prove beyond doubt that they did not actually happen. That's because physical access to all the components of the system is exclusively with the ECI, and the agency is less than willing to share information with voters. When pushed, it has maintained that laws and rules exist for everything and it scrupulously follows them. But things may not actually work this way. A case in point is Form 17C, which contains the details of the total number of votes recorded on the day of polling, and the total number of registered voters. The ECI maintains that it follows the Conduct of Election Rules and provides copies of this form to all candidates or their polling agent. What often happens on the ground is that all candidates do not have polling agents — only candidates representing major political parties, or who are rich themselves, can afford to have polling agents. So in fact, not all candidates get copies of Form 17C. In addition, voters do not have access to this form. Therefore, citizens interested in the electoral process cannot use the forms from all polling booths and all constituencies to meaningfully analyse the integrity of the electoral process. Now is the time to disclose the entire truth that is known only to the Election Commission of India. Not doing so would mean that arguments would rely on incomplete information. The writer is a founder-member of the Association for Democratic Reforms
United News of India
5 hours ago
- United News of India
Employees under Unified Pension Scheme now eligible for retirement, death gratuity benefits: Govt
New Delhi, June 18 (UNI) The Government on Wednesday said that all central government staff covered under the Unified Pension Scheme (UPS) will now be eligible for retirement and death gratuity benefits available under the Old Pension Scheme. 'This is in keeping with the long-pending demand by a large section of government employees, he said. The move addresses a significant demand of government staff and brings parity in retirement benefits, Minister of State for Personnel Jitendra Singh said here. He further said the new provision reflects the government's commitment to ensure social security for all categories of employees under the National Pension System. The central government employees covered under the UPS will now be eligible for retirement and death gratuity benefits, as per the provisions of the Central Civil Services Rules, 2021, Singh said at a press conference here. The Department of Pension and Pensioners' Welfare, under the Personnel Ministry, on Wednesday issued an order on the "options to avail benefits under Old Pension Scheme on death of government servant during service or his discharge from government service on account of invalidation or disability for central government servants covered under Unified Pension Scheme". The DoPPW had notified the Central Civil Services Rules, 2021, to regulate service-related matters of central government employees covered under the NPS. The Minister also deliberated in detail on the "transformational" journey of the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions over the last 11 years, stating that "a series of reforms aimed at simplifying governance, empowering citizens, and humanising administration had been undertaken." Dr Singh said, "for instance we have repealed over 1,600 outdated provisions—many of them colonial-era legacies—as a strong message of trust in citizens, particularly India's youth." UNI AJ SS
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Appointment process begins for new VC at Gurukul Kangri Univ amid ongoing legal issues
Haridwar: Gurukul Kangri (Deemed to be) University in Haridwar is set to appoint its new vice-chancellor – two months after the Arya Pratinidhi Sabha (APS) units of Punjab, Haryana, and Delhi appointed its chancellor – settling a long-standing controversy over the appointment of the top two university functionaries. However, authorities said legal proceedings in the matter are still ongoing. APS Delhi secretary, Vinay Arya said that the appointment of the VC will be made under University Grants Commission (UGC) rules, with the university's board of management (BoM) initiating the process. Notably, the authority to appoint the university's chancellor and VC was restored to the APS bodies on May 21, after previously being restricted under UGC Regulations 2023. A letter from the Union education ministry dated March 3 this year allowed the university to continue with its existing memorandum of association (MoA) under the UGC Regulations 2019, while exempting it — for now — from the UGC Regulations 2023. The university is required to sign a revised MoU with the ministry, UGC, and itself. Crucially, the exemption is conditional. If the university fails to meet the requirements by FY 2027–28 — which includes the creation and maintenance of a corpus fund by the sponsoring bodies — it will be required to fully adopt the 2023 regulations. A senior university official said that this condition is yet to be met by the sponsoring bodies, which could impact the university's compliance status in the future. In another condition laid down in the ministry's letter, it was stated that the university must present duly audited books of account indicating that its total receipts and expenses are more than twice the govt grants received. While the sponsoring bodies are confident of achieving it by the deadline, the university staff's optimism rests on their failure to do so. "They will not under any circumstance be able to raise their contribution to the level and must necessarily adopt the 2023 regulations," said Rajaneesh Bhardwaj, president of the university non-teaching staff union. "Adoption of the regulations will pave the way for the appointment of both the chancellor and VC by the govt. This will be in the best interest of the university," he added. A university official, on account of anonymity, took exception to the MoA drafted by the sponsoring bodies. "According to the draft, the ownership of Gurukul Kangri will vest with the sponsoring body. Secondly, it creates a society which will be above the BoM. These provisions are clearly against the 2019 regulations," he said. The university's officiating VC Hemalatha K said she would not like to comment as the matter was still sub judice. "All that I can say is that the matter should be decided in the best interest of the university."
