Panel To Study Feasibility Of Periodic Reviews Of DU Staff
The panel, headed by executive council (EC) member Indra Mohan Kapahi, will assess whether such a policy can be adopted within the university framework.
The proposal, tabled during the EC meeting on Friday, referred to an office memorandum issued by the department of personnel and training in June 2024. The memorandum lays down guidelines for quarterly reviews of central govt employees—including those working in autonomous bodies and statutory institutions—with a report to be submitted each month on staff identified as ineffective or of "doubtful integrity.
" The rules permit premature retirement in public interest for employees aged 50 or 55, or those who have completed 30 years of service.
While university officials say the move is aimed at strengthening administration, sections of the teaching community have raised red flags, alleging that such provisions may be misused to target dissenters.
"The university administration has overstepped its authority by attempting to adopt the DoPT circular without clearance from the ministry of education or UGC.
This raises serious concerns about procedural violations and the motive behind such haste," said Rudrashish Chakraborty, executive member of Delhi University Teachers' Association and associate professor at Kirori Mal College.
Mithuraj Dhusiya, a former EC member, submitted a dissent note arguing that the memorandum applies only to central govt employees under the Central Civil Services Rules, which do not govern DU staff.
"The notification has not even been officially forwarded to universities, making the administration's urgency highly questionable," he wrote.
Maya John, member of the DU academic council, echoed similar concerns during a protest organised by DUTA outside the EC meeting venue. She alleged that the criteria listed in the memorandum—such as "doubtful integrity" and "ineffectiveness"—are vague and susceptible to misuse.
"This conflation of teaching staff with central govt employees violates DU's institutional autonomy and risks creating a culture of fear and compliance," she said.
EC member Aman Kumar also objected, noting that DU already has robust mechanisms for staff evaluation, including annual performance appraisal reports, the UGC's career advancement scheme, and annual departmental reviews. "The imposition of additional layers through central administrative procedures is unwarranted and threatens academic freedom," he said.
The committee's recommendations are expected to be tabled in a future EC meeting.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Brother's Day wishes
,
messages
and quotes !
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Refused to answer hard questions': Opposition hits out at EC in joint statement
Opposition parties on Monday issued a joint statement regarding the Election Commission (EC) press conference, saying that the apex poll body has 'completely failed in discharging its constitutional duties.' Opposition MPs stage a protest against the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, during the Monsoon session of Parliament, in New Delhi, Monday.(PTI) Apart from Congress, other parties that were a part of this joint statement are the Samajwadi Party, TMC, Shiv Sena (UBT), DMK, NCP (SCP), RJD, Aam Aadmi Party, JMM, CPI, CPI(M), CPI(ML), IUML, National Conference, and others. "ECI has completely failed in discharging its constitutional duty of ensuring a free and fair electoral system in the country. It has now become clear that the ECI is not being led by officers who can ensure a level playing field. To the contrary, it is now clear that those who lead the ECI divert and thwart any attempt at a meaningful inquiry into voter fraud and instead opt to intimidate those who challenge the ruling party. This is a serious indictment."
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Ex-TMC MP seeks urgent Calcutta HC hearing on EC's move to collect BLA details for SIR a year before Bengal Assembly polls
Former Trinamool Congress MP Subhasish Chakraborty's counsel challenged the Election Commission's decision to seek information on Booth Level Agents (BLAs) a year before the West Bengal Assembly elections at the Calcutta High Court. The counsel for Chakraborty, who was a Rajya Sabha member, mentioned the matter on Monday before the single bench of Justice Amrita Sinha, seeking an urgent hearing. According to Chakraborty's counsel, Arko Nag, it is not within the Commission's jurisdiction to seek this information now. Nag submitted: 'The EC (Election Commission) has announced that they will implement SIR (Special Intensive Revision) in West Bengal. District Magistrate has given notice to all political parties to submit names of BLAs. It was usually done seven days prior to voting day. Now, they are asking to disclose names of BLAs one year prior to elections. It is beyond the power of EC as per the People Act. DMs, acting as District Election Officers, are asking political parties to submit names.' Justice Sinha observed: 'So where is privacy involved here? It is not only for you but for all other parties as well.' Nag submitted, 'We are assailing the cause. Others might have accepted it.' The Election Commission in August had sent a letter to the CEO of West Bengal stating that the list of BLAs should be submitted to the Commission. The Commission directed political parties to keep a list of booth-level agents ready so that if anything unusual happens during the SIR, it could be 'easily noticed'. At the same time, parties were also told to send that list to the Commission in advance. Nag submitted in court that since the Commission has announced SIR in the state, the case should be heard quickly. However, the court rejected the request for an urgent hearing, with a possibility of it happening next week. On Sunday, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar at a press conference in Delhi stated that the SIR of electoral rolls in West Bengal and other states will be announced in due course. He said the SIR exercise was aimed at removing shortcomings in the voter list, and that it is a matter of 'grave concern' some parties are spreading 'misinformation' about it, 'firing from the Election Commission's shoulder.' The Trinamool Congress has expressed doubts about the 'efficacy' of the SIR exercise in Bengal and vowed to oppose any move by the EC to delete names of genuine voters.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Opposition says Chief Election Commissioner acted like BJP spokesperson, dodged questions on voter list irregularities
Accusing Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar of acting like a BJP spokesperson, opposition parties on Monday said he failed to answer their questions on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and issues related to voter list irregularities . Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency Addressing a joint press conference here after a meeting, representatives of eight prominent opposition parties like the Congress, TMC, SP, DMK and RJD hit out at the CEC, alleging that instead of responding to questions raised by them, he chose to attack them at his presser on Sunday. "The right to vote is the most important right given by the Constitution to a common citizen. Democracy depends on it. EC is the body meant to protect it... But we can see that the CEC did not reply to the important questions being raised by the political parties, and is running away from its responsibility," Congress leader Gaurav Gogoi said. He should have answered valid questions asked by the Opposition. "On the contrary, he raised questions on political parties and attacked them," he alleged. "It would have been better if they had told why SIR was done in such a hurry, when elections are just three months away, without discussing with political parties; why are they in a rush to announce SIR?" he said. Live Events He reminded the EC that its constitutional duty is to ensure free and fair elections and claimed that the officials at the helm are not allowing an inquiry into the Opposition's allegations. " It's clear that EC is in the hands of some officials who are taking sides. Such officials are against any inquiry," he alleged. Samajwadi Party leader Ramgopal Yadav said that while the EC is asking Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi to give an affidavit with his complaint, his party SP had submitted affidavits with complaints of around 18,000 voters being removed from the list in 2022, but no action was taken. "In the 2022 UP polls, when Akhilesh Yadav said names of SP supporters have been removed from the voter list, we gave affidavits, but no action has been taken," he said. Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader Mahua Moitra said that if the voter list, on which the last general election was conducted, is not correct, the Lok Sabha should be dissolved. "Is the list on which the Lok Sabha election was done fraudulent? If that is true, the current and previous Election Commissioners should be prosecuted, and this Lok Sabha should be dissolved immediately," she said. Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Manoj Jha attacked the CEC, saying, "Yesterday we were looking for our CEC, we found a new BJP spokesperson". Arvind Sawant of Shiv Sena (UBT) also accused the CEC of "behaving like a BJP spokesperson". Addressing a press conference in Delhi on Sunday, CEC Gynaesh Kumar said the electoral roll revision going on in Bihar is aimed at removing all shortcomings in voter lists and that it is a matter of grave concern that some parties are spreading misinformation about it, firing from the EC's shoulder. The CEC rejected as "baseless" the allegations of double voting and "vote theft" and asserted that all stakeholders are working to make SIR a success in a transparent manner.
