Rome's 'Hollywood on the Tiber' plans comeback despite Trump tariff threat
*
Cinecitta plans to boost production capacity by 60% by 2026
*
Trump's proposed tariffs threaten global film industry setup
*
Italy's tax credit attracts international film productions
ROME, - Europe's largest film studio Cinecitta is aiming to re-launch Italy as a movie powerhouse, even as U.S. President Donald Trump's proposed tariffs on foreign productions cast a shadow over the film industry globally.
Cinecitta, the homonymous company that manages Rome's historic film studio, approved a five-year plan this week backed by the EU's post-COVID Recovery Fund, which includes building new high-tech sound stages and boosting production capacity by 60% by 2026.
"We want to lead the game," said CEO Manuela Cacciamani. "Cinecitta must be a factory that works at full capacity... with excellence as a minimum standard."
Founded in 1937 under Benito Mussolini's fascist rule, Cinecitta became known as the "Hollywood on the Tiber". It has hosted over 3,000 films, attracting world-renowned directors such as Martin Scorsese, Federico Fellini and Francis Ford Coppola.
The company is targeting revenue of 51.9 million euros in 2029, almost double the 2024 figure, and aims to turn a 4.3-million-euro net profit after a loss of 11.6 million euros last year.
Trump has said he will impose a 100% tariff on movies produced outside the United States to save Hollywood from "a very fast death", but has issued few details on how the levy would work.
The tariff plan threatens to disrupt the current industry set-up, in which big U.S. productions rely on the services of studios around the world that can provide expertise, cheaper costs and striking location scenery.
Trump's sweeping tariffs were temporarily reinstated by a federal appeals court on Thursday, a day after a U.S. trade court blocked them, ruling Trump had exceeded his authority.
Cacciamani told Reuters Cinecitta was monitoring "with the utmost care" developments regarding the tariff threat.
"The hope is that two historic powers of cinema worldwide, which owe so much to each other, will continue to cooperate," she said.
Italy's tax credit of up to 40% for film production is "among the most competitive worldwide", Cinecitta said, helping attract some of last year's international successes such as "Emilia Perez" and the papal thriller "Conclave".
Among projects slotted for filming in Cinecitta this year is Mel Gibson's "The Resurrection of The Christ", a sequel to his 2004 "The Passion of The Christ".
Gibson is one of Trump's "Special Ambassadors" in Hollywood, tasked with rescuing the U.S. film industry alongside actors Jon Voight and Sylvester Stallone. His next film, being shot in Italy, would be exposed to the tariff.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Why stricter voting laws no longer help Republicans
'The Republicans should pray for rain'—the title of a paper published by a trio of political scientists in 2007—has been an axiom of American elections for years. The logic was straightforward: each inch of election-day showers, the study found, dampened turnout by 1%. Lower turnout gave Republicans an edge because the party's affluent electorate had the resources to vote even when it was inconvenient. Their opponents, less so. The findings offered an empirical reason for Republicans to make voting harder for marginal or 'low propensity' voters. The party and its conservative allies had already adopted voting restrictions as an ideological plank, one previously advanced by southern Democrats courting white support in the Jim Crow era. In 2013 the Supreme Court gutted the preclearance system under the Voting Rights Act that had forced most southern states to vet changes to their voting rules with the federal government. Alabama, Mississippi and Texas immediately enacted voter ID laws that had been previously blocked. Over the next decade 29 states passed nearly 100 bills to restrict voting and Donald Trump's obsession with 'election integrity' became Republican doctrine. Yet Mr Trump's takeover of the Republican Party has scrambled the voting coalitions that underpinned the pray-for-rain logic. Rich people used to vote Republican and poor people Democrat. But the correlation started to wane in the 2000s and ultimately flipped for white voters when Mr Trump ran, according to research by Michael Barber and Jeremy Pope at Brigham Young University. Poor blacks and Hispanics still voted Democrat, but in 2024 they too moved to the right. At the same time, voters without college degrees took to the Republican Party and the college-educated moved in the other direction. Today voters who may or may not bother to turnout for elections no longer vote overwhelmingly for Democrats. Having embraced voting restrictions for so long Mr Trump and his party are reluctant to abandon them, even if they no longer help them win elections. In his second term the president is jostling for even tighter rules. Amongst his barrage of executive orders just one has dealt with elections, but it is one of his most constitutionally ambitious. In it Mr Trump criticises America's 'patchwork of voting methods' and calls for a national set of rules that require voters to prove their citizenship before registering. The attorney-general, it said, would also force states to stop counting absentee ballots that arrive after election day. A judge blocked the order, writing that Congress and the states set election rules under the constitution, not the president. She noted that Congress is considering a similar bill and Mr Trump should not 'short-circuit' that. The SAVE Act, which cleared the House in April, also makes voters prove citizenship. But it is very unlikely to pass the Senate. States, however, are passing voter restrictions with gusto. Since January at least 25 states have introduced new voter ID bills, 30 have ones related to citizenship verification and 26 are trying to change the rules around absentee voting. Florida lawmakers decided to punish non-citizens who vote with up to five years in prison and Wisconsin voters enshrined a voter ID requirement in their state's constitution. Americans want it to be harder to cheat in elections and 'that's why states aren't waiting for a solution from Washington,' says Lee Schalk of the American Legislative Exchange Council, a conservative group that writes model legislation. Indeed, Gallup polling shows that more than 80% support stricter ID and citizenship rules. In every country in Europe, where politics tends to be more liberal, voters must show ID at the polls. Would even stricter rules affect election outcomes in America? Consider Georgia, a swing state controlled by Republicans. When an omnibus election bill that tightened voter ID rules passed in 2021 Stacey Abrams, a Democrat who had run for governor, warned that it would disenfranchise black voters. She called it 'Jim Crow in a suit and tie'. But turnout in the next year's midterms surged and a consensus grew among election wonks that the suppression effect was negligible. Analysis by the Brennan Center for Justice, a public-policy institute, found that the turnout gap between white and black voters did widen in Georgia between 2020 and 2024. But the new rules may not have been to blame. The drop-off was mostly limited to younger black men, who were particularly unenthused by Kamala Harris. Fewer young women of both races voted for the first time, but white women slid more than black women. Democrats across the country argue that new citizenship verification policies will cause mass confusion and get citizens tangled up in bureaucracy. The hassle would be more justifiable if the new laws solved a big problem, but non-citizens rarely vote. An audit by Georgia's secretary of state from the summer of 2024 found just 20 non-citizens out of 8.2m on the voter rolls. Most were registered before Georgia checked for citizenship and had never cast a ballot. The best evidence seems to be that the impact of restrictive laws is minimal. An analysis published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics of 1.6bn voting records from every state in America found that strict voter ID rules, on average, neither significantly suppressed votes nor prevented fraud. Nor do ID laws hurt Democrats any longer, other research by Jeffrey Harden and Alejandra Campos shows. While in 2010 voter ID laws reduced Democratic vote share by 3%, by 2020 they increased it slightly. Because of the changes in party voting coalitions, the overall effect of the next phase of even tighter voting rules could now 'easily be a wash' when it comes to benefitting one party or the other, says Nicholas Stephanopoulos, who studies elections at Harvard University. Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
China is waking up from its property nightmare
CHINA'S ECONOMY has been through a stress test in the past six months with the trade war shredding nerves. The tensions over tariffs are not over yet. On May 29th Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, said that ongoing talks had 'stalled' and President Donald Trump complained that China 'had totally violated' the preliminary agreement to reduce duties reached between the two sides in Geneva on May 12th. Yet even as the trade war staggers on, two things are proving reassuring for China. One is that so far the economy has been resilient. Private-sector growth estimates for 2025 remain in the 4-5% range. The other is that one of China's biggest economic nightmares seems to be ending: the savage property crunch. To get a glimpse of that, consider a gated home in Shanghai's Changning district. It has an air of traditional German architecture and a large front garden, a feature of the city's most ritzy neighbourhoods. But what really stands out is the price. On May 27th the property sold for a stonking 270m yuan ($38m), creating a sensation in the Chinese press. At 500,000 yuan per square metre, it is one of the priciest home auctions in recent memory. That the wealthy are prepared to pony up such an exorbitant price is being interpreted as a sign that China's huge and interminable property crisis might finally be ending. Speculation about a turnaround has been building over dinner tables, in boardrooms and at state-planning symposia. The excitement is hardly surprising. Property, broadly defined, contributed about 25% of GDP on the eve of its crash in 2020. It now represents 15% or less, showing how the slump has been a huge drag on GDP growth. The depressive impact of falling prices on ordinary folk is hard to overstate. In 2021 80% of household wealth was tied up in real estate; that figure has fallen to 70%. Hundreds of developers have gone bust, leaving a tangle of unpaid bills. The dampening of confidence helps explain sluggish consumer demand. But while the market is still falling, for the first time since the start of the crisis, you can make a decent case that the end is in sight. In the first four months of 2025 sales of new homes by value fell by less than 3% compared with the year before. In 2024 the decline was 17%. Transactions will continue to drop only modestly for the rest of the year, reckon analysts at S&P Global, a rating agency. One of the biggest problems was that millions of flats were built but never sold. Last year as many as 80m stood dormant. Now in the 'tier-one' cities of Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen, that problem is easing. At the end of January the inventory held by developers in those cities would have taken around 12 and a half months to shift at current sales rates, according to CRIC, a property data service. That is down from nearly 20 months in July 2024, and not far from the average of ten months in 2016-19 across the country's 100 largest cities. In other words, the overhang is starting to look less terrifying. Shanghai's renaissance illustrates the trend. Transactions rose slightly each month from February to April compared with the year before, making it one of the few cities where prices have risen year on year for months in a row. It still has controls over who can buy properties and how many. But luxury homes are starting to be snapped up quickly, says Ms Fang, an estate agent. The prices of standard properties will probably continue to grow this year, she says, but the most expensive homes are increasing in value even faster. What explains the bottoming out of the market? Partly, just the passage of time. The average housing crash takes four years to play out, according to a study by the IMF of house-price crashes around the world between 1970 and 2003. Officials in Beijing started deflating the bubble by tightening developers' access to credit in mid-2020 and investors started to panic about the solvency of the monster developers at the end of that year. But as well as time, the government is more determined than ever to put an end to the downturn. Local governments have been encouraged to buy unused land and excess housing with proceeds from special bonds. Some are handing out subsidies for buying homes. A plan to renovate shantytowns could create demand for 1m homes. The central bank cut interest rates in May, reducing mortgage rates for new home purchases. This has boosted property sales activity, says Guo Shan of Hutong Research, a Beijing-based consulting firm. There are still dangers. The trade war is a drag on confidence. Home prices across 70 cities surveyed by the National Bureau of Statistics declined by about 2% in April from a month earlier. Sales of new homes and the starting and completion of housing projects all fell month on month. Fewer cities in April notched month-on-month price increases compared with the month before. Things are not getting much worse but they will probably not get better without more government support, says Larry Hu of Macquarie, an investment bank. In Wenzhou, a manufacturing city on China's southeastern coast, price declines are still sharp. Locals say the trade war with America is shaking confidence. Mr Zhou, a restaurant owner, says the official data do not capture huge discounts of more than 50% on some new homes in overbuilt areas. He blames a manufacturing downturn, and Mr Trump's trade war. In all probability the crisis is over in big rich cities, such as Shanghai, but may last longer in smaller cities, such as Wenzhou. New-home prices in first-tier cities will be flat this year and increase by 1% next year, according to S&P. But in third-tier cities and below they will fall by 4% this year and 2% next. Small cities are full of unwanted homes. China is escaping its property nightmare. Even so, the Communist Party must ensure it is not only big-ticket mansions in Shanghai that look appealing. Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
Hans India
12 minutes ago
- Hans India
RBI's policy meet to set tone for volatile mkts
Influenced by persistent global trade tensions, anticipation around keydomestic policy announcements, mild uncertainty over FII inflows andrenewed Trump tariff tantrums; markets continued consolidating in a definedrange for second successive week. Benchmark indices the Sensex and theNifty experienced sharp swings before ending in the red at 81,451.01 and24,750.70 during the week ended. Despite intermittent selling in last fewsessions, Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) turned net buyers in Indianequities for the second consecutive month, showing a net inflow of Rs18,082 crore. Cash volumes in May surged to an eight-month high, drivenby a broad-based recovery in equity markets. The average daily tradingvolumes for the cash segment, combining the National Stock Exchange(NSE) and BSE, increased11percent from the previous month. In the pastthree months, markets witnessed broad based gains. Midcaps andsmallcaps, which had been beaten down, presented opportunities in under-valued stocks. Moreover, FIIs have been net buyers in the past two months,and this bullish sentiment has influenced retail investors. However,observers caution against interpreting this as a sign of a sustained return ofthe retail investor or a resurgence in long-term investing based on cashvolumes alone. Corporate results have yet to show significant improvementalthough they were not as bad as initially anticipated for the the outcome of the monsoon remains to be seen. Boosted bystronger performance in the manufacturing and construction sectors, theIndian economy grew by 7.4 per cent in the January March quarter (Q4) offiscal year 2024-25, up from 6.4 per cent in the previous quarter(October–December), according to a government report released last Q4 growth was the highest in four quarters, the full FY25's 6.5 percent was a four-year low, down sharply from the 9.2 per cent growthrecorded in FY24. Looking ahead, all eyes will be on the outcome of theRBI's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting scheduled for June 6. Thecentral bank's stance on the rate trajectory, especially amid mixedmacroeconomic signals, will be critical in shaping market direction. FUTURES & OPTIONS / SECTOR WATCH Settlement week in the derivatives segment mirrored the consolidation in theunderlying cash market. The Nifty rollover rate was flat at 79.10 per cent, almostsame compared to last month's 79.08 per cent but marginally below the three-month average of 79.58 per cent, suggesting similar momentum for the Juneseries. The Bank Nifty rollover stands at 79.29 per cent, higher than last month's75.05 per cent and above the three-month average of 77.89 per cent, indicating strongermomentum than the Nifty. Looking at Options data, the highest Call openinterest was observed at the 25,000 and 24,800 strikes, while Put writerswere active at the 24,800 and 24,500 strikes. Implied volatility (IV) for Nifty'sCall options settled at 14.79 per cent, while Put options concluded at 15.27 per cent. TheIndia VIX, a key indicator of market volatility, concluded the week at 16.42 per Put-Call Ratio Open Interest (PCR OI) stood at 1.00 for the week. Niftyrollovers suggest that positions were carried forward at current levels, withmost occurring in the 24,800–24,750 futures range. In Bank Nifty, the55,400–55,450 futures range is a key level where rollovers have takenplace. For the upcoming sessions, Nifty has support at 24,500 whereasresistance is placed at 25000-25200 zone. The Nifty appears to continuebeing in a well-defined trading range between 25100 and 24500 levels. Thisalso implies that a directional trend would emerge only if the Nifty takes out25100 convincingly or ends up violating the 24500 level. Unless either ofthese two things happens, the markets will remain devoid of directional biasand will continue staying in this defined range. Traders are advised tomonitor these levels closely and track open interest developments, as theycould further influence market direction. Stocks looking good are CDSL, Grasim, JSW Steel, Paytm, Pidilite, SBI and Tata Steel. Stocks looking weak are Alkem, Bajaj Auto, Cyient, Hindalco, JSW Energy, Havells and Tata Communications. Welspun Corp Limited Welspun Corp Limited is engaged in the line pipes and home solutions,along with other lines of businesses in infrastructure, pipe solutions, buildingmaterials, warehousing, retail, advanced textiles and flooring solutions. Thecompany is engaged in the manufacturing of large diameter pipes globallyand has established a global footprint across six continents and fiftycountries by delivering key customized solutions for both onshore andoffshore applications. It offers end-to-end products, comprehensive pipesolutions and ancillary services. It also manufactures Bureau of IndianStandards (BIS) -certified steel billets, thermo-mechanically treated (TMT)rebars, ductile iron (DI) pipes, stainless steel pipes, and tubes & bars. Thecompany has manufacturing facilities in Anjar (Gujarat), Bhopal (MadhyaPradesh), Mandya (Karnataka) and Jhagadia (Gujarat) in India. Overseas,the company has a manufacturing presence in Little Rock, Arkansas, UnitedStates. The strategic acquisition of Sintex-BAPL has enabled the companyto enter building materials sector and transforming its business model fromcommodity to brand space. Buy on declines for medium term target ofRs1500.
