Worcester residents bolt park gate after altercation
Billy Welch, a spokesperson for the traveller community, stressed attacks like Sunday's are "extremely rare", but said due to a lack of legal traveller pitches it was something that appeared to be getting worse. He also stressed there were "two sides to every story". Councillor John Renshaw, of St Peter's Parish Council, said: "As soon as the last of the travellers left on Sunday evening, some of the local residents came out."One of them put a lock on the gate, another one wrapped a heavy duty cycle chain around the gate, and another put some screws through."If any of [the travellers] try to come back they're going to have a hard time getting back into the park."
Discussing the attack, Mr Renshaw said one man suffered a "deep gash" underneath his left eye."The medics who treated him said had that gash been two or three centimetres higher, he'd have probably lost his left eye."
'Two sides to every story'
Mr Renshaw has now started calls for an "urgent look at security" for open spaces and warned that "something needs to be done". Mr Welch added: "Some of [the travellers] had got onto the park and then someone parked their vehicle in front of the gate stopping them from leaving, and they wanted to leave. "And apparently they had only turned up there for a few days for a funeral, there was a funeral a few miles up the road, that's what they had come for. "There was nowhere else for them to stay but when they tried to leave they were blocked, that is when the altercation happened."
Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
23 minutes ago
- Metro
Woman sexually assaulted on a plane denied compensation because of loophole
A woman who was sexually assaulted on a flight to the UK can't be compensated due to a legal loophole. Kelly – who is using a fake name for anonymity – was attacked on a Qatar Airways flight from Doha, Qatar, to Gatwick in September last year. Momade Jussab, 66, of Feltham, was sitting next to her and put his hands down her trousers. He was arrested at Gatwick and jailed in May. Kelly, who was 24 at the time of the attack, has been denied a payout under the Criminal Injuries Compensation (CIC) scheme. Officials said that because the incident happened on a plane not registered in Britain, Kelly cannot make a claim. Her lawyers have written to the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, urging her to close what they believe is a gap in the law. Kelly, a Londoner in her 20s, told the BBC that Jussab pulled a second blanket over them both as she slept. She said: 'His hands were down my trousers and I said to him, 'What are you doing?' I said, 'Stop'. He said, 'No, please'. 'And I had to force his hand out of my trousers and that just made me get up straight away. I left my phone, I left my bag, I left my passport, I left everything. I left my shoes and ran into the toilet, left the door open [and] told the flight attendant.' Kelly said she should be entitled to compensation as the incident was investigated and prosecuted by the British authorities. 'I haven't been out in almost a year – to events or summer parties with my friends. I can't do that. I'm too scared,' she added. 'I don't want to be touched or looked at. So it's never leaving me. It's literally there every single day before I sleep, I'm thinking about what happened.' The CIC scheme provides compensation for people 'physically or mentally injured because of a violent crime in England, Scotland or Wales', according to its website. Kelly applied for the payout in April, only to receive a letter from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, which processes applications, denying the claim as it did not happen in a 'relevant place'. Such a 'place' is defined by section 92 of the Civil Aviation Act 1982, which concerns 'British-controlled aircraft'. As the incident happened on a Qatari-registered plane, officials told Kelly, she was ineligible for compensation. Leigh Day says that the law was updated in 1966 to allow crimes that occur on UK-bound foreign aircraft to be prosecuted in British courts. Yet a near-identical loophole in the compensation scheme has not been closed. Solicitor Claire Powell said: 'Our client suffered a horrific sexual attack on a UK-bound flight. 'She was refused compensation under the Criminal Injuries Compensation scheme simply because it was a foreign flight and the rules have not been amended in line with the updates to the Civil Aviation Act. 'It is a gap that needs closing urgently and we trust the Justice Secretary will agree, particularly in light of this Government's commitment to addressing violence against women and girls.' Jussab was jailed for six and a half years as part of an extended sentence in May for one count of sexual assault by penetration and two counts of sexual assault. In-flight sexual assault incidents have been rising for years – in the US, the FBI investigated 27 sexual misconduct cases aboard aircraft in 2018. More Trending By 2022, that number had more than tripled to 90 cases. A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'Our thoughts remain with this victim, and we remain resolute in our mission to halve violence against women and girls in a decade. 'The rules that the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority follows, and the values of payments for injuries, are set by Parliament. 'Other routes are available for victims to receive support.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: EasyJet pilot suspended after walking 'drunk and naked' around five star hotel MORE: Airspace closure that grounded over 120 flights caused by 'software collapse' MORE: London airspace closure: Your rights if your flight is delayed or cancelled
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Judges trained to protect themselves from violence in court
Judges and magistrates are to get compulsory security training to protect them against rising violence and abuse from members of the public in civil courts. They have been issued with 'essential' training, which must be completed by March next year, to protect them from PVPs, or 'potentially violent people'. The new package is designed not to counter criminals but to protect the judiciary from ordinary members of the public participating in civil courts such as employment tribunals, family and coroner courts. It includes guidance from the HM Courts and Tribunal (HMCTS) on physical security based on five key actions – 'deter, detect, delay, mitigate and respond'. Role play films Judges are also shown a series of shocking 'role play' films where people lose their temper in court. In a tribunal, an employer shouts: 'Call yourself a judge? You're a f---ing disgrace.' In the family court, a swearing man aggressively approaches the judge, before the film freezes. And in a coroner's court, the father of a child who has died by suicide shouts at the judge: 'Just make a f---ing decision. I just want to see my son buried, for Christ's sake.' The training also includes personal testimony from senior judicial figures who have faced dangerous real-life scenarios. District Judge McIlwaine recounts how someone in his court threw water over a barrister and sprayed water around the court before hurling the jug. Judge Barry Clarke, the president of the employment tribunals (England and Wales), recalls one litigant attacked the opposing counsel before chasing the judge down the corridor. Senior coroner Heidi Connor describes how the mother of a child who took their own life smashed the courtroom door before banging her head against the wall threatening to kill herself. She was involved in a second case when there was a 'riot' in the court until someone was found with an 'improvised Taser'. An expert from the College of Policing gives vital tips in each case on how to deal with the escalating tensions while Matthew Braham, the HMCTS security chief, points to measures taken to ensure physical security with emergency plans, panic alarms and experienced court security officers on hand. The guidance states: 'HMCTS operates a holistic, multi-layered approach to physical security, utilising the national protective security authority's 'deter, detect, delay, mitigate, respond' methodology. 'In brief, this refers to the need for multiple 'layers' of security controls, each layer being made up of several individual security controls acting as part of an overall system wherein the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.' Deterrence means creating a 'hard target' so an attacker decided not to act in the first place, detection allows security officers to intervene, while delaying involves introducing barriers and obstacles to slow the progress of an attack. Mitigating an incident reduces its impact and responding brings it to an end. Lord Justice Green, the senior presiding judge, said: 'Judicial security is of the utmost importance. Threats to security come from many sources, which includes litigants, and those associated with them. 'Your ability to do right, by all manner of people, without fear or favour, which is the very essence of your judicial oath and your function, is placed at risk if threats are made which seek to sway you one way or another in the difficult decisions you take on a daily basis. 'This training package focuses upon your safety in court and hearing rooms and is, but one component of a much broader strategy designed to protect the judiciary. The training is intended to assist you, in a practical way, to remain safe whilst you perform your judicial tasks.'
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Police officer who Tasered suspect during a chase in Covid lockdown has spent FIVE YEARS barred from front-line duties as he awaits disciplinary hearing result
A police officer who Tasered a runaway suspect during the Covid lockdown has been unable to return to front line duties for five years. PC Imran Mahmood caused Jordan Walker-Brown, 27, to break his back and left him paralysed after a police chase through Harringay, north London, on May 4, 2020. The officer had feared Mr Walker-Brown - who was running away and unarmed at the time - had a knife and believed he needed to be 'contained'. Following the incident, PC Mahmood was placed on restricted duties, barring him from working on the front line. The officer was cleared of GBH following a trial in May last year, although he is set to appear at a misconduct hearing next month. There are currently hundreds of police officers who have been suspended on full pay over alleged wrongdoing – at a cost of £2.6million a month. Allegations against the 750 officers ordered to stay away from work while they are being investigated range from sexual misconduct to brutality and corruption. Giving evidence at the crown court trial in 2023, PC Mahmood described how he was one of a group of nine officers from the Met's territorial support group who were in a police vehicle when they saw Mr Walker-Brown walking down the road. He told jurors he thought Mr Walker-Brown was wearing a small bag around his waist, and his suspicion was 'heightened' because such bags were often used to conceal weapons or drugs and Mr Walker-Brown did not seem to be out for shopping or exercise. The court heard that PC Mahmood and a colleague began following him on foot when Mr Walker-Brown started running away from them, climbing on top of a wheelie bin and scrambling on to an adjacent wall. It was at this point Mr Walker-Brown was Tasered, fell and hit his head on a footpath. The moment PC Mahmood fired his Taser at Mr Walker-Brown was captured on body-worn camera. Prosecutor Ben Fitzgerald KC told jurors: 'Mr Walker-Brown did not present a physical threat to Mr Mahmood or anyone else. He did not produce a weapon or try to attack anyone; he was trying to get away. 'Mr Mahmood fired the Taser at the moment when it looked as if Mr Walker-Brown might get away over the wall. 'He discharged the Taser when Mr Walker-Brown was up on the wheelie bin, with the obvious risk of injury from an uncontrolled fall, which is exactly what happened, with catastrophic results. 'Mr Mahmood should not have used the Taser. It was not, the prosecution say, a reasonable use of force in the circumstances he faced. It was not lawful.' The officer had received training highlighting the fact that Tasers cause 'intense pain' and trigger an inability to control the muscles, and that Tasering someone at a height is especially risky. However the cop was cleared after he told the jury Mr Walker-Brown had reached for his waistband while running and did not respond when asked to stop. PC Mahmood denied he acted illegally, saying he believed Mr Walker-Brown was cornered with a knife and 'about to attack'. In a press release from his lawyers, Mr Walker-Brown said he ran from the police because he had 'a small amount of cannabis in my possession for personal use' but said he believed he was more at risk of being stopped by police because he is black.
