
'If I wasn't here, people could die': Trump public media cuts could hit rural America
"Winter is not a joke here, it is life and death," she tells the BBC. "As a reporter I try not to make emotional statements like, if I wasn't here, people could die, but that is a reality."On the other side of the country in Washington DC, however, a historic vote could bring federal support for KOTZ to an end.The Senate must decide by the end of the week whether to claw back $1.1bn (£800m) from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the body that distributes federal funding to public radio and television stations. While the public media cuts are part of a broad spending package, which includes requests to rescind $8.3bn from the United States Agency for International Development and other foreign aid programmes, they are especially dear to President Donald Trump, who frequently accuses media of bias. The president has now threatened to pull his support from any Republican senator who does not support the cuts.
"It is very important that all Republicans adhere to my Recissions Bill and, in particular, DEFUND THE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING (PBS and NPR), which is worse than CNN & MSDNC put together," Trump posted on Truth Social Thursday night.Executives at National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting System (PBS) reject accusations of bias and say they abide by all journalistic standards.Republican voters, however, are about three times less likely than Democrats to consume or trust news coverage from either outlet, according to the Pew Research Center. While the cuts will affect national broadcasters like NPR and PBS, more than 70% of federal funding goes to local media stations and about 45% of the stations that received funding in 2023 are in rural areas.For half of those rural stations, federal grants made up a quarter or more of their revenue. At KOTZ in Kotzebue, public funding constitutes 41% of its income.
The impacts of the cuts on rural constituents have made some senators balk. "By no means is it assured of being passed in the Senate, where many of the Republican senators represent rural states that really do benefit from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting," Democratic congressman Dan Goldman, co-chair of the Public Broadcasting Caucus, told the BBC World Service's Weekend programme.Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska has said she opposes the cuts to public media stations, warning that "what may seem like a frivolous expense to some has proven to be an invaluable resource that saves lives in Alaska"."Almost to a number, they're saying that they will go under if public broadcasting funds are no longer available to them," Murkowski told a Senate hearing last month. Other Republican senators, including Susan Collins of Maine and Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, have expressed concern about cuts to foreign aid programmes.
Cutting federal funding for public broadcasting has been an ambition of Republican administrations for decades and was regularly raised by President Trump during his first term. "It is unfair to ask conservative Americans to pay for a service that mocks them, that has nothing but a derisive attitude towards them," says Mike Gonzalez, senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. Last year, a senior NPR editor resigned after accusing the outlet of favouring left-wing voices.Gonzalez wrote a chapter in the Project 2025 policy blueprint calling for an end to all federal funding for public media."If there is a demand for local news, the market will meet it," Mr Gonzalez says. "The idea that the taxpayer is the only surviving business model, I don't think that is the case."According to Northwestern University, the number of counties in the US without a local news source has risen to 206, with 1,561 counties having just one source. Almost 55 million Americans now live in these news deserts, three-quarters of which are predominantly rural. Rural America strongly backed Donald Trump in November's election, leading some to claim that the president's own voters could be hardest hit by cuts to public media.
Travis Bubenik is the news director at Marfa Public Radio in rural west Texas. Nearly every county where the station airs overwhelmingly voted Republican in the last election.Where there is anger about public media, Mr Bubenik says it is directed at the national outlets. "All I know is that in my experience here at this local station doing local news, people talk to me, they like what we're doing, they understand that we are local, that we live here and that we care about the region," he says.
More than a third of the funding for Marfa Public Radio comes from the federal grants that are now under threat."It's scary," admits Mr Bubenik. "In the not too distant future this station might be either off the air or just not able to do the same quantity and quality of local news."The bill has to pass the Senate before 18 July and any changes must be approved by the House before it can make its way onto Trump's desk. If four Republicans decide not to vote for the bill, it won't move forward.
Watching an iceberg float by her office window in Kotzebue, Desiree Hagan is hoping enough senators will cross the aisle. She tries not to think about the alternative."Even when there's a few moments of dead air here, people think, 'What's wrong?" laughs Ms Hagan.Around 90% of her audience is Inupiat, an Alaska Native community. Much of the programming is delivered by Elders in the Inupiat language."The station is so interwoven into the community," Ms Hagan says. "These cuts would have ripple effects across every aspect of society.""It would be devastating," she adds.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Republican leading inquiry into Biden's autopen use has digitally signed letters
A Kentucky Republican leading the Trump administration's investigation into Joe Biden's mental capacities during his time in office, including Biden's reliance, like many other presidents, on an automatic signature machine, has been shown to have used a digital signature himself in the course of the investigation. NBC reported that some letters and subpoena notices issued by James Comer, which were sent out in connection to his investigation into Biden's use of the so-called autopen, bore a digital signature. Comer has sent 16 letters to former Biden White House officials requesting transcribed interviews, NBC said. Metadata analysis showed that all appeared to be signed with a digitally inserted signature. Further letters requesting testimony from the White House physician Dr Kevin O'Connor and Anthony Bernal, a senior aide to former first lady Jill Biden, were also signed with digital images, NBC said. The actual subpoenas were not shared by the committee, which just released a photo of them instead. The findings are likely to intensify the political battle over Biden's use of the autopen. Donald Trump has claimed that his predecessor had little knowledge of what he was signing, including pardons, clemencies and executive orders, and that the autopen was controlled by 'radical left' actors in the White House. On Monday Biden ridiculed those accusations, telling the New York Times in his first on-the record interview with the paper since he was elected president in 2020 that he 'made every decision' on his own. 'We're talking about [granting clemency to] a whole lot of people,' he said, explaining why autopen was used on the thousands of pardons that were issued. Trump himself has admitted using the autopen on some documents. Nevertheless, he attacked Biden again in the Oval Office during a meeting with the Nato secretary general, Mark Rutte, saying: 'I guarantee you he knew nothing about what he was signing, I guarantee you.' Trump has repeatedly pushed the autopen conspiracy theory to further the narrative that Biden was somehow not fully in command of his administration or its policies. Last month Trump ordered an investigation, calling it 'one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history'. Biden has maintained that the allegations are 'ridiculous and false'. Comer's apparent use of a digital signature now threatens to cloud Republicans' efforts. A spokesperson for the House committee on oversight and reform, the body Comer heads, said using a digital signature for correspondence was common practice. 'Chairman Comer has never hidden the fact that he uses a digital signature when appropriate, and he approves all official correspondence that is signed digitally,' a spokesperson for the committee told NBC News, but added that 'legally binding subpoenas issued by Chairman Comer always bear a wet signature and are never signed using an autopen or digital signature.'


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Trump backs Texas plan to redraw voting maps to benefit House Republicans
WASHINGTON, July 15 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he believed Republicans could pick up five seats in the U.S. House of Representatives by redrawing districts in Texas, which could boost his party's odds of defending its thin majority in next year's midterm elections. Republicans currently hold a 220-212 majority in the 435-seat House, with three vacancies in strongly Democratic districts. Incumbent presidents' parties typically lose House seats in midterm elections, but Trump argued that redistricting Texas could improve its chances. "I think we get five," Trump told reporters at the White House. "And there could be some other states where we're going to get three or four or five. Texas will be the biggest one.' House districts are typically redrawn every 10 years following each U.S. Census, to account for changes in population. Republicans currently hold 25 of Texas' 38 House districts. Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican and strong Trump ally, earlier this month added redistricting to the agenda of a special legislative session on July 21. He said he was doing so "in light of constitutional concerns raised by the U.S. Department of Justice." Abbott announced his decision days after receiving a letter from Harmeet Dhillon, U.S. assistant attorney general of the civil rights division, expressing concern that four majority-minority Texas congressional districts won by Democrats were unconstitutionally drawn along racial lines in 2021. The move is not without risk for Republicans as redrawing some Democratic-held districts to make them more winnable for Republican candidates would make existing Republican districts more competitive. Representative Marc Veasey, a Democrat whose Fort Worth-area seat is one of the four targeted by the Justice Department, labeled the redistricting effort a "craven power grab" and a "coordinated political stunt" between Trump and Abbott. Democratic House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, in a joint press conference in Washington on Tuesday with several Texas Democrats, said: "Donald Trump, House Republicans here in Washington, and Governor Abbott are conspiring to rig the Texas congressional map as part of an effort to disenfranchise millions of people in Texas." Asked whether he was concerned that Democratic-leaning states like New York and California could launch redistricting efforts of their own, Trump said he was not concerned. "Well, that's fine too," he said.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
US university leaders challenge campus antisemitism claims in House hearing
Rich Lyons, the University of California, Berkeley, chancellor, challenged US House Republicans on Tuesday as they questioned Lyons and leaders of Georgetown University and the City University of New York in the latest hearing on antisemitism in higher education. The committee accused the schools of failing to respond adequately to allegations of bias or discrimination, however the university leaders said that disciplinary action had been taken where appropriate and stressed the importance of protecting free speech. Lyons pushed back on the suggestion that antisemitism was more present on college campuses than anywhere else. 'If somebody is expressing pro-Palestinian beliefs, that's not necessarily antisemitic,' he said. Lyons, in his first year as chancellor is also the first UC leader to face the House committee during the Trump presidency. In his opening remarks, he defended the campus' commitment to free speech. 'As a public institution, Berkeley has a solemn obligation to protect the quintessential American value of free speech,' Lyons said. 'This obligation does not prevent us, let me repeat, does not prevent us from confronting harassment and discrimination in all its forms, including antisemitism.' The hearing was the ninth in a series Republicans have held to scrutinize university leadership over allegations of antisemitism on campuses after a wave of protests over Israel's indiscriminate bombing of Gaza, which has killed more than 60,000 people, in retaliation to Hamas' 7 October 2023 attack on Israel. Widely criticized testimony before the committee by the presidents of the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard University in 2023 contributed to their resignations. At Tuesday's hearing, Democrats blasted Republican committee members for their focus on antisemitism while not speaking on the dismantling of the education department, which is tasked with investigating antisemitism and other civil rights violations in schools. 'They have turned this hearing room into a kangaroo court, where they spend our time litigating a predetermined outcome to do nothing, actually, to help Jewish students, just make public theater out of legitimate pain,' said the California representative Mark Takano. Republicans said university leaders have allowed campus antisemitism to run unchecked. 'Universities can choose to hire antisemitic faculty, welcome students with a history of antisemitism, accept certain foreign funding, and let the behavior of antisemitic unions go unchecked,' Tim Walberg, a Michigan representative and committee chair, said in his opening statements. 'But we will see today they do so at their own risk.' The hearing was periodically interrupted by protesters, who shouted pro-Palestinian slogans before being removed by Capitol police. Randy Fine, a Florida representative, berated the college presidents and said they were responsible because of the attitudes they had permitted on their campuses. Republicans pressed the three college leaders on whether they had disciplined or fired faculty and employees for behavior they said was antisemitic. Elise Stefanik, a Republican representative of New York, pressed the CUNY chancellor, Félix Matos Rodríguez, on the employment of a law professor who worked on the legal defense of Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist the Trump administration attempted to deport over his role in protests at Columbia University. Stefanik pushed Matos Rodríguez to answer whether the professor should be fired. Without responding directly, Matos Rodríguez defended CUNY and said antisemitism had no place at the school. He said any student or employee who broke CUNY rules would be investigated. University leaders also emphasized the importance of free speech on campuses for students and faculty. Richard Groves, the interim president at Georgetown, said that as a Jesuit university, fostering interfaith dialogue and understanding was a key part of the school's mission. He said the university has not experienced any encampments or physical violence since the Hamas attack in October 2023. 'Given our Jesuit values, we expose students to different viewpoints on the Middle East,' Groves said. 'In addition to speakers on Gaza, we've hosted IDF soldiers, families of Israelis and Palestinians who've lost their lives. US families of US hostages in Gaza. Georgetown is not perfect, and as events evolve, we've had to clarify rules of student behavior.' Lyons, as well, said his campus has 'more work to do' to prevent antisemitism. 'I am the first to say that we have more work to do. Berkeley, like our nation, has not been immune to the disturbing rise in antisemitism. And as a public university, we have a solemn obligation to protect our community from discrimination and harassment, while also upholding the first amendment right to free speech,' he said.