
Second 'people power' lessons for Sara Duterte trial from Joseph Estrada's fall
But while it ended well, Estrada eventually walked out of prison, only a few weeks after his conviction for two counts of plunder, and for a UP Diliman professor of political science, it was a clear indication that 'the powerful have advantages.'
The 'revolution' on Jan 16 to 20, 2001 was a show of dissent — people believed that the trial in the Senate, marked by the refusal of 11 senators to open an envelope that could serve as the smoking gun to convict Estrada, will not hold him liable.
Like the one in 1986 that ended a 20-year dictatorship, millions of people crowded the streets and called on Estrada to resign. It was a protest against corruption, a display of power that will always be greater than the presidency and any one in government.
With the refusal of 11 senators, Aquilino 'Nene' Pimentel Jr. resigned as Senate president and walked out of the session hall, together with nine other senators who voted to open the 'second envelope.'
This triggered Filipinos to converge on EDSA on the night of Jan 16. The next day, Manila Archbishop Jaime Cardinal Sin, as he did in 1986, called on the people to take part in the protest, which grew immensely.
ALSO READ PART ONE: The rise and fall of Joseph Estrada: From people's champion to disgraced Philippine president
As more people came, a kilometres-long human chain was formed from Ayala Avenue in Makati City to the EDSA Shrine on Jan 18, signalling to Estrada that millions of Filipinos were already demanding his resignation.
But even as the police and the military withdrew their support and eventually took part in the protest, Estrada asserted that he will not resign, calling on TV for a snap presidential election on May 14 but without him as candidate.
This, however, was only viewed as his way to still hold on to the presidency.
Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, who was then the vice president, took her oath of office as president before Supreme Court Chief Justice Hilario Davide on Jan 20, the same day Estrada left Malacanang without making an official resignation.
A few months after his ouster, the Ombudsman filed two charges against Estrada before the Sandiganbayan: one for plunder and one for perjury, which is a case he was later cleared from.
The plunder charge consisted of four cases:
> Receiving P545 million worth of payoffs from illegal gambling
> Diverting P130 million in excise tobacco taxes to his own use
> Bagging P189 million worth of commission from the sale of the shares of Belle Corporation to government pension funds
> Maintaining a P3 billion bank account with the name 'Jose Velarde'
Republic Act No. 7080, as amended, penalises public officials who 'amass immense wealth through a series or combination of overt or criminal acts described in the statute in violation of the public trust.'
Estrada and his son, Jinggoy Estrada, were eventually arrested.
They were both initially detained at the Veteran's Memorial Medical Center, but when the younger Estrada posted a P500,000 bail, his father was moved to Fort Sto. Domingo in Sta. Rosa, Laguna.
He was placed on house arrest at his rest house in Tanay, Rizal, close to a military camp. It was where Estrada stayed until and even after the Sandiganbayan rendered its decision on the case.
It took over six years for the Sandiganbayan to reach a decision.
Estrada, in 2007, was convicted of two counts of plunder — the acceptance of 'protection money' from illegal gambling and bagging commission in the sale of shares of a real estate company to government pension funds.
He was cleared of the other two. His son, Jinggoy, was acquitted.
As a result of the conviction, Estrada was sentenced to reclusion perpetua. The verdict likewise barred him from holding public office again, while millions worth of resources were ordered forfeited.
> Over P545 million, with interest and income earned, inclusive of the amount of P200 million deposited in the name and account of the Erap Muslim Youth Foundation
>P189 million, inclusive of interests and income earned, deposited in the 'Jose Velarde' account
>The real property 'Boracay Mansion' located in New Manila, Quezon City
The period within which Estrada has been in detention was credited to him.
For political analyst Maria Ela Atienza, there was 'moral and legal victory in the fact that Estrada was impeached, forced out of the presidency, and convicted in court.' But his eventual release proved how powerful the elite are.
Not even a year had passed when Arroyo, who rose to the presidency in the same 'revolution' that ousted Estrada, gave the latter an executive clemency through a pardon, which Estrada accepted on Oct 26 of the same year.
It was believed that Arroyo's move was made for her to get advantage from the opposition and to deflect the charges of corruption within her own administration, as stated in a report by Reuters.
But the pardon and his eventual release from detention paved the way for his political resurrection, even when his conviction carried a penalty of perpetual disqualification from public office.
This, as he initiated a bid for the presidency in the 2010 elections, having then Makati Mayor Jejomar Binay as his candidate for vice president. While he lost to Benigno Aquino III, he received over nine million votes.
Estrada, three years later, won as mayor of Manila. While his win was met with opposition, considering that he was barred from holding public office again, the Supreme Court said he was eligible.
While Associate Justice Marvic Leonen pointed out that Estrada 'continues to suffer the penalty of perpetual absolute disqualification,' the Supreme Court, in an 11-3 vote, stressed that Estrada had the right to seek public office.
Estrada was mayor of Manila for six years until 2019, when he lost his reelection bid to Isko Moreno-Domagoso, who was once his candidate for vice mayor back in 2013, the year that marked his political comeback.
For Atienza, this is the reason that 'we have to impress upon presidents who have the power to pardon that it is not in their interest to pardon officials who commit high crimes.' - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Prosecution: Philippines VP Sara Duterte impeachment trial ‘not optional,' Senate must proceed
Sara Duterte. - Photo from Inday Sara Duterte/Facebook MANILA: A member of the House prosecution team said the Senate impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte is 'not optional.' Last June 25, Senate President Francis Escudero said the chamber, sitting as an impeachment court, can dismiss the case against Duterte if a motion is made and passed by a simple majority, or at least 13 votes. However, in an interview over DZMM on Friday (July 4), Bukidnon Rep. Jonathan Keith Flores said mostly in Filipino, 'It [trial] is not optional. As soon as it is filed, as I understand it, it is the Senate's obligation to hear and decide the case.' Flores is a member of the House prosecution team. The Senate convened as an impeachment court on June 10 and remanded the articles of impeachment to the House to verify that it did not violate the 'one-year bar rule' and that the 20th Congress still intends to pursue the case. A day later, the House adopted a resolution certifying that the impeachment complaint against Duterte adhered to Article XI, Section 3, Paragraph 5 of the 1987 Constitution, satisfying the first requirement. The constitutional provision states: 'No impeachment proceedings shall be initiated against the same official more than once within a period of one year.' But as for the second requirement, Flores said, 'No certification or compliance can be done until the 20th Congress is organized and starts.' The 20th Congress is set to formally open its session on July 28, starting with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s fourth State of the Nation Address. Last Saturday, House prosecution panel spokesperson Antonio Bucoy said that if the Senate dismisses the impeachment complaint without a trial, their team may file a petition for certiorari with mandamus before the Supreme Court. Duterte is accused of culpable violation of the Constitution, bribery, graft and corruption, betrayal of public trust, and other high crimes—particularly her alleged misuse of P612.5 million in confidential funds. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN


The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
2nd LD Writethru: U.S. House passes Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill
NEW YORK, July 3 (Xinhua) -- The U.S. House of Representatives passed President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill with a vote of 218 to 214 on Thursday. The bill will be sent to the president's desk for signing by the deadline of July 4, which was set by Trump. Two Republican representatives, Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, voted against the bill. The House passed an earlier draft of the bill in May and sent it to the Senate, but the draft was broadly revised there and narrowly passed senators' vote with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie on Tuesday. The tax and spending bill includes tax cuts and funding boosts for military expenditure and border security. What's contentious is that the bill is forecast to add 3.3 trillion U.S. dollars to the national debt currently at a high level while stripping millions of people of Medicaid and food stamps. This is Trump's first major legislative achievement in his second term. Republican Congress members were widely divided on the bill, which passed the Senate and House voting only after the president and his Capitol Hill allies pressured those Republicans with different ideas to stand in line. When signing the legislation that will be sent to the president, House Speaker Mike Johnson said that with the passage of the bill, "we'd have to quite literally fix every area of public policy." "Everything was an absolute disaster under the Biden-Harris, radical, woke, progressive Democrat regime, and we took the best effort that we could, in one big, beautiful bill, to fix as much of it as we could," he added. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt hailed the passage of the bill Thursday, commenting in a statement that "President Trump's One Big, Beautiful Bill delivers on the commonsense agenda that nearly 80 million Americans voted for -- the largest middle-class tax cut in history, permanent border security, massive military funding, and restoring fiscal sanity." "The pro-growth policies within this historic legislation are going to fuel an economic boom like we've never seen before. President Trump looks forward to signing the One Big, Beautiful Bill into law to officially usher in the Golden Age of America," she added. She said that the bill-signing ceremony is planned in the White House at 5 p.m. Friday Eastern Time (2100 GMT), which happens to be the Independence Day holiday. The White House posted on its website that "Now, the largest middle-class tax cut in American history -- and so much more -- is on its way to President Trump's desk." "Again and again, Democrats tried to block historic tax relief, increased border security, higher wages, an expanded Child Tax Credit, No Tax on Tips, No Tax on Overtime, No Tax on Social Security, savings accounts for newborns, and so much more -- but again and again, President Trump and Republicans fought and won for the American people," the post said.


The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
1st LD: U.S. House passes Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill
NEW YORK, July 3 (Xinhua) -- The U.S. House of Representatives passed President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill with a vote of 218 to 214 on Thursday. The bill will be sent to the president's desk for signing by the deadline of July 4, which was set by Trump. Two Republican representatives, Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, voted against the bill. The House passed an earlier draft of the bill in May and sent it to the Senate, but the draft was broadly revised there and narrowly passed senators' vote with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie on Tuesday. The tax and spending bill includes tax cuts and funding boosts for military expenditure and border security. What's contentious is that the bill is forecast to add 3.3 trillion U.S. dollars to the national debt currently at a high level while stripping millions of people off Medicaid and food stamps. This is Trump's first major legislative achievement in his second term. Republican Congress members were widely divided on the bill, which passed the Senate and House voting only after the president and his Capitol Hill allies pressured those Republicans with different ideas to stand in line.