Independent councillor defects to Reform UK
Chester-le-Street South councillor Paul Sexton's joining the party means it has pushed its overall majority back up to 65 councillors, following Andrew Kilburn's resignation on Monday.
Sexton, who has been an Independent with Durham County Council since 2017, was re-elected alongside fellow Independent councillor Bill Moist on 2 May.
Speaking about the switch in allegiance, he said Chester-le-Street "needed a voice on the inside".
Instead of sitting in opposition, he will work alongside the party's 64 other members in overall control of the authority.
Sexton previously held the role of cabinet member for adults and health services but resigned in protest at the management of the council by the former joint administration, made up of Liberal Democrats, Conservatives and Independents.
Andrew Husband, also of Reform UK, was elected to the neighbouring Chester-le-Street North ward.
Sexton said: "Reform has a huge mandate to effect the much-needed change in County Hall and I have the experience to support this initiative.
"Chester-le-Street needs a voice on the inside if we're to achieve the much-needed investment that our fabulous town deserves."
Local Reform officials said they expected more county councillors to join the party, the Local Democracy Reporting Service said.
A Reform spokesman said: "We're delighted Paul Sexton has joined us.
"We welcome anyone who shares our vision for integrity, accountability, and meaningful change to join us."
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Reform councillor resigns one week after election
Three independent councillors defect to Reform UK
Durham County Council
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Republican civil war erupts over earmarks in funding bills
The return of earmarks to the annual appropriations bills has sparked a battle among Republicans on Capitol Hill, pitting fiscal hawks against members of the Appropriations Committees and their allies. It's a serious battle and one that could scuttle the chances of passing appropriations bills ahead of the Sept. 30 government funding deadline. Republican responsibility for the huge federal deficit has become a hot political issue after President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which is projected to add $3.4 trillion to the debt over the next decade, into law. Conservatives are deeply disappointed that Trump's bill did not make deeper cuts to federal spending, and they want to make a statement with significant reductions in the annual appropriations bills for fiscal 2026. Adding to the frustrations of fiscal hawks, those bills are already loaded with earmarks directing the Trump administration how to spend funds. Conservatives view the return of earmarks as a return to the days of pork-barrel spending and a bad look for Republicans when the party is taking fire from Democrats for exploding future deficits. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), a leading conservative, argued that earmarks are still prohibited by Senate Republican conference rules, even though some members of the conference choose not to follow them. 'It's still prohibited by conference policy, and I think we need to stick to that,' Lee told The Hill. Lee said the proliferation of earmarks in the spending bills are 'incompatible with our approach as Republicans, and it's also incompatible with having $37 trillion in debt.' Some conservatives are pushing for Congress to pass a yearlong stop-gap spending measure that would freeze federal funding levels as a strategy to keep spending in check and the next wave of earmarks in limbo. Senate Republicans voted for a 'permanent ban' on earmarks in May 2019, when the proposal passed by a 28-12 vote after a heated debate behind closed doors. But earmarks have since made a big comeback. The House, then controlled by Democrats, voted in March 2021 to reverse an internal ban on earmarks. Senate Republicans, who were in the minority at the time, decided in April 2021 to stick with their conference pro forma ban on earmarks but left open a big loophole by allowing individual GOP senators to request money for home-state projects. That decision still rankles some Republicans years later. They believe they're in a position to change the rising tide of earmarks now that their party controls the White House and both chambers of Congress. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) called the earmarks buried in the spending bills 'offensive.' 'It is offensive that I don't know what they are yet,' he said of earmarks. 'I'm asking my staff and we don't have the specifics on this. 'That's the problem. This stuff is all secret until you're ready to vote on it,' he added. Johnson has a proposal that would automatically rescind earmarks if lawmakers 'brag' about the millions of dollars in federal funding they're steering to projects back home in any kind of political context. Under his proposal, 'the only time members can talk about the earmarks, their congressionally directed spending, is as part of official Senate business — a hearing, a subcommittee hearing and on the floor,' he said. 'They can't then go out and brag about it in the media … if they do that, if they issue a press release, if they put it in a campaign ad, that spending gets automatically rescinded,' Johnson explained. Twenty-one Republican senators voted for Johnson's amendment when he offered it to the appropriations bill funding military construction and the Department of Veterans Affairs, a bill that was expanded to fund the Department of Agriculture and the legislative branch. Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) and Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio), Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Lee were among the Republicans who voted for Johnson's proposal. The conservatives' backlash against earmarks in the package came after Punchbowl News reported that Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) loaded more than $810 million in earmarks and directed spending for Maine in the fiscal 2026 spending bills crafted by her committee. Collins, who faces a tough reelection battle next year, argues she has a better sense of her state's funding needs than unelected bureaucrats in Washington who otherwise would get to decide how to dole out federal funds without congressional guidance. Other Republicans are working hard behind the scenes to steer more money to their home states. More Republican senators have requested congressionally directed spending, aka earmarks, for the fiscal 2026 spending bills compared to last year. And earmarks have exploded in the Republican-controlled House. One Republican source familiar with the details of the spending bills noted House Republicans are also requesting more earmarks than they did last year and pointed out that Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris (R-Md.), an outspoken House conservative, has requested more than $55 million for his district. An analysis by Roll Call found House Republicans have packed the appropriations bills for next year with nearly $8 billion in earmarks. Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) — the chair of the Senate Steering Committee who voted for Johnson's proposal to rescind earmarks if senators use them to score political points — said conservatives will make additional efforts to pull earmarks out of the spending bills and find other ways to reduce federal spending. 'Hopefully we have time to review the bills [and] not get rushed into votes on these things,' he said. 'We've got to understand we have a $2 trillion [annual] deficit, so we've got to get spending under control. That's what I'm going to try to do, and there are a lot of people in the same camp that I am.' Scott indicated he sees the battle against earmarks as part of a broader effort to curb federal spending after conservatives failed to include bigger spending reforms in Trump's megabill. 'People are doing everything they can to try to get spending under control,' he said. Lee, Johnson and Scott pushed an amendment to Trump's bill in June to reduce Medicaid spending by another $313 billion by preventing new enrollees in Medicaid expansion states from receiving the 9-to-1 enhanced Federal Medical Assistance Percentage if they are not disabled or don't have dependent children. They delayed a key procedural vote to advance the bill in hopes of gaining Republican support for the proposal, but despite assurances of help from Senate GOP leaders and Vice President Vance, the amendment didn't receive a vote.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Canada's conservative leader faces crucial election test
Pierre Poilievre is facing a crucial by-election test as leader of Canada's Conservative party after losing his constituency in the last general election. Poilievre is widely expected to win the race for the rural Alberta riding and regain a seat in the House of Commons, despite facing a record 214 candidates, many associated with a protest group seeking electoral reform. It is the second time the group has targeted Poilievre in a campaign, and voters in the riding will need to fill out a write-in ballot due to the unusually high number of names. Poilievre, facing a mandatory leadership review in January, will have to show he can win the Conservative stronghold by a significant margin. The Conservative party leader has been out of the House since April, when his party was defeated by Mark Carney's Liberals and he lost the Ottawa-area riding he had held since 2004 to Liberal Bruce Fanjoy. Losing his seat has left him sidelined and focused on winning the Battle River-Crowfoot riding as Carney, who is new as prime minister, enjoys a honeymoon with the Canadian public. Opinion polls suggest that the Liberals have around 40% support with the Conservatives trailing slightly behind. In June, former member of Parliament (MP) Damien Kurek resigned to allow Poilievre to run in the sprawling, largely agricultural constituency almost the size of Nova Scotia. Kurek won the riding with more than 80% of the vote. The political move faced some pushback in the region, including by independent candidate Bonnie Critchley, a retired army veteran who said it motivated her to mount a challenge against Poilievre. She has accused him of seeking to win the riding as "nothing more than a means to an end". Political analyst and former Conservative Alberta MP Joan Crockatt told the BBC that "at the beginning there was some question among people's minds of whether [Poilievre] was a parachute candidate". But she believes many in the riding have come to view Calgary-born Poilievre as "a guy who does want to represent them, has core values that match their core values". The campaign has also brought attention to a region of the country with a significant energy sector that has long felt overlooked by politicians in Ottawa - and comes amid an emergent separatist sentiment in the western province. "You may see some votes on the right of where Pierre is, because he wants to keep Canada together," Ms Crockatt said. "He's loyal to Canada. And there are sentiments of separation here that do run pretty deep. People are starting to lose their patience." In Canada's Alberta, national unity is on the ballot Canada's Carney talked tough on Trump - now some say he's backing down After a blown deadline, what next for US-Canada trade? This is also the second race where Poilievre has faced the Longest Ballot Committee. The group advocates for a review of Canada's first-past-the-post electoral system, which it says doesn't adequately represent the vote. It has targeted a number of high-profile races in recent years with campaigns to flood ballots with candidates in protest. He has decried the group as a "scam" and has proposed rules changes to curb the protests. Critchley and other independent candidates have also criticised the group. In order to avoid an unwieldy ballot, the elections agency managing the vote announced in July that it would implement a write-in ballot to replace one that typically lists candidates by name. A full list of candidates will be available at polling stations. Almost 14,500 people have already cast ballots in advanced voting. Even if Poilievre wins, his margin of victory will be closely scrutinised. Conservative candidates in the riding have in the past received at least 70% of the vote. While Poilievre had the personal blow of losing his seat in April's election - and blowing a more than 20-point lead over the Liberals - the party saw a significant rise in their share of the national vote compared to the last national vote four years ago. Due to the election loss, Poilievre faces a mandatory leadership review in the new year. "He'll have to perform when he gets back in the House," Ms Crockatt said. "I think there's very little doubt that he will, but the eyes will all be on him." Poilievre has been auditioning lines of attack against Carney and the Liberals, who he accuses of not doing enough to support Canadians hit by trade wars with the US and China, which recently imposed a 76% tariff on Canadian canola - a penalty that is affecting his potential future constituents. "Mark Carney promised he was an international man of mystery who is going to negotiate deals and end tariffs," Poilievre said last Friday. "Well, what's the result been so far?"
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
'What a fool I was to vote Labour' - man blasts York MP
'What a fool I was to vote Labour' - Letter to York Press IT was very generous of you to give Luke Charters, the hapless Labour MP for York Outer, a full page (August 14) to tell us about how well he, and Labour, are doing. I have rarely read such rubbish. This Labour Government has been a complete and utter disaster. From complicity in genocide in Gaza to the outrageous proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation; from Rachel Reeves' wrecking ball of the budget, which has destroyed businesses up and down to the country, to the cruel cuts in winter fuel payments for pensioners, the attack on farmers and botched welfare reforms; from the £30bn bill for the 'sale' of Chagos Islands to unfettered immigration and eight million people on benefits, this shambolic Government has – within a year – betrayed the entire country. Quite an achievement. And before Mr Charters accuses me of political point-scoring, I voted Labour at the last election. Sick of the exhausted and rudderless Tories, horrified by Nigel Farage and Reform and unimpressed by the Liberal Democrat's wishy-washy views on gender and the economy, I had hoped that Keir Starmer's promised brand of enlightened socialism combined with compassionate conservatism would restore the UK's pride and prosperity. What a fool I was. Clearly Mr Charters is enjoying his time as Keir Starmer's lapdog. But unless he follows the lead of his fellow York MP Rachael Maskell, who is fearless in devotion to her principles and refuses to toe her party's discredited line, his time as an MP will be brutally cut short at the next General Election. And that can't come quickly enough. What do you think? FEEL strongly about an issue? Send your views by email to: letters@ Write no more than 250 words and please provide your full name, address and mobile number. 'Refuse bins' call CONGRATULATIONS to the residents of St John's Street and the Groves for standing up to the council's attempt to impose huge and hideous wheelie bins on their narrow streets, even when the household consists only of one or two people. The council wants us to believe that we have no option but to accept these but we do: we can simply say no. Not only do the bins create unacceptably squalid conditions visually but the policy contradicts the longstanding CYC attempts to discourage unnecessary amounts of waste disposal. I suggest a campaign slogan of: 'Refuse bins!'.
