
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs denied bail for fifth time ahead of sentencing
'Combs fails to satisfy his burden to demonstrate an entitlement to release,' Judge Arun Subramanian wrote in a letter Monday.
Combs's attorneys have repeatedly tried to get him released from the Metropolitan Detention Center, making their most recent appeal in July, less than a month after he was convicted on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. He's expected to be sentenced to between 0 and 10 years in prison for each count on Oct. 3.
After a wave of civil sexual assault lawsuits and Homeland Security Department raids on two of his mansions, Combs was indicted and arrested in September. The judge denied a proposed bail package that included a $50 million bond, deciding that Combs's release would leave his accusers vulnerable and that his history of drug use meant he wasn't trustworthy.
The defense team appealed the decision shortly after, adding that Combs would be subject to weekly drug testing, any women other than family members would be barred from visiting him, and his visitors would be monitored by a private security company. But another judge denied the appeal, deeming him a flight risk and stating that security wouldn't be enough to stop him from potentially sending coded messages.
He was denied bail a third time in November by Subramanian, who presided over Combs's racketeering and sex-trafficking trial, because of evidence suggesting Combs could be violent and tamper with witnesses.
Combs's attorneys renewed their efforts after the verdict in his nearly two-month federal trial. They asked that he be immediately let out on a $1 million bond co-signed by family members, noting that the jury had acquitted him on the most serious charges: racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. But Subramanian again denied the request, citing the defense team's own admission that Combs had a history of violence.
In a letter opposing Combs's release, former Bad Boy employee and celebrity stylist Deonte Nash argued that freeing Combs on bail would 'send a dangerous message: that wealth and influence can shield someone indefinitely from accountability.'
Nash, who testified at Combs's trial, added, 'It will also endanger those who cooperated with this investigation under subpoena, who are already living in fear of retaliation.'
In late July, the defense proposed Combs's release with a $50 million bond secured by his Miami home, adding that he would travel only between Florida and New York to confer with his lawyers. His attorneys cited similar cases in which the defendants were released pending sentencing.
His bail petition was notably supported by ex-girlfriend Virginia Huynh, whom federal prosecutors attempted to subpoena for Combs's criminal trial, alleging that Huynh was another victim of sex trafficking and physical abuse. According to the government, Huynh and her attorney were unresponsive after multiple attempts to contact her.
Huynh, in a 2019 podcast, accused Combs of punching her in the head and stomping on her stomach. A former personal assistant to Combs also testified that he had witnessed Combs being physically aggressive with Huynh.
But in August, Huynh submitted a letter of support for Combs, saying she did not consider him 'a danger to me or the community.'
'Our relationship, like many, was not always perfect,' she wrote, 'but he was willing to acknowledge his mistakes and make better decisions in the future.'
'Allowing him to be at home will also support the healing process for all involved,' Huynh argued.
Janay Kingsberry, Shayna Jacobs and Herb Scribner contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Monthly Curriculums Are Trending on TikTok — Are They Worth the Hype for Parents?
Parents, you don't need to schedule every day of your month or have a perfectly curated curriculum to grow as a person. I'm a strong believer in the value of hobbies, especially now, when boredom can be cured with a single tap. Hobbies offer a fresh perspective, a chance to learn something new, and often a well-needed distraction from life's less pressing moments (like the Jet2 holiday sound we all can't stop singing). Whether it's reading a subject you wished you studied in college or dropping into a local workshop to sculpt a mug, setting aside time for yourself—especially as a parent—can be deeply rewarding. And now that no one's grading us, we get to explore topics that genuinely interest us, at our own pace, without fear of failure. So I was excited when I first came across TikTok's new monthly curriculum trend. Most videos start with creators setting their goals for the month, many of which centered around reading new books, exploring hobbies, and building better habits. But, as with most things online, this wholesome trend has split into two directions. The Monthly Curriculum Trend Sparks a New Type of Self-Care The monthly curriculum trend took off in early August as users (many of them moms and teens) began flooding the hashtag #monthlycurriculum with videos of their August goals. The goals range from what types of books they hope to finish by the end of the month, to setting time aside to journal and move their body. As one Tiktoker put it in her video, "I think it holds us accountable to not let the month go by without doing anything that stimulates our brains." Many #monthlycurriculum videos are incredibly wholesome, and some even feel a bit therapeutic. Some creators make goals to learn topics they were too self-conscious to explore during their time at school. In one video of a stay-at-home-mom sharing the list of books she hopes to read, she explains that she selected one on finances and even cheekily mentions that it is likely intended for high schoolers. "I'm a 32-year-old stay-at-home-mom and I decided to go through [the book] because I've never really been good with money and it's time to get my finances in order. So this is my economics unit." I've seen video after video of folks sharing what books they plan to read, what they hope to learn, and ways to hold themselves accountable (while still giving themselves grace—of course). Many are finding books at local libraries, recreating recipes to share with friends, and finally setting aside time to finish watching their favorite shows and movies. And while there's a strong focus on activities that promote learning, there's also a side of the trend that leans heavily into beauty enhancements and some curriculum videos are packed with activities that promise to help women "look better"—that is to be more conventionally attractive through dramatic weight loss or adhering to expensive skincare routines. The Not-So-Wholesome Side of the Monthly Curriculum Trend As with most online trends, it didn't take long before it went from inspiring to questionable. In one video, an influencer begins by opening her laptop and showing a slideshow that starts with a slide entitled "Monthly Curriculum"—which is how most of these videos start. But beneath it reads "Miami Girl Glow-Up Guide." She begins to explain that this video will help people "become the best version of themselves." In the video, she runs through over a dozen different things women should start doing, including hot yoga/sauna/steam room two or three times a week, daily red-light therapy, castor-oil-Epsom-salt baths, drinking natural juices every single morning, buying new workout sets (to motivate you to workout), a 10-mile walk once a week, hot pilates four or five times a week, doing a hair mask once or twice a week, scheduling a lymphatic drainage facial (or micro-needling), and much much more. The video is over six minutes long and doesn't mention any creative or intellectual goals until five minutes and 30 seconds in. In another video, another creator emphasizes going to the gym five times a week as her non-negotiable goals in her monthly curriculum, "I'm starting to get older and genetics can only help with so much," she says. However, she does include goals like learning a new instrument. At its worst, this trend veers into "looksmaxxing" territory—a term used online to describe doing everything possible to optimize physical appearance. The shift from encouraging personal growth to enforcing appearance-based perfectionism is subtle but significant and while many of these beauty goals are rooted in personal choice, the messaging—whether intentional or not—can imply that self-improvement is only valid if results in being more conventionally attractive. The idea that we must spend every moment becoming smarter, more interesting, and more beautiful can feel exhausting, especially for women already navigating unrealistic societal expectations. So, Is It Harmful or Harmless? The monthly curriculum trend might be one of the most positive movements I've seen come out of TikTok in recent memory. Folks are rediscovering their love for learning, finding ways to heal their inner child, and holding themselves accountable for what they know (and what they don't fully get yet). But as it gets swept into the tide of algorithm-driven beauty standards, it risks reinforcing the idea that every moment must be optimized, and that we must always be improving ourselves. While many of these curriculum videos are harmless and even healing, others include strict expectations to finish several lengthy books or master a new hobby—all within 30 days. The desire to learn more isn't inherently bad, but when improvement is treated like a full-time job, it can leave people feeling inadequate or burned out. You don't need to schedule every day of your month or have a perfectly curated curriculum to grow as a person. In fact, sometimes the most meaningful progress comes from slow, meandering learning and quiet wins that aren't captured on a TikTok slideshow. (You should still try to finish that book, though). Read the original article on Parents Solve the daily Crossword


CNN
6 minutes ago
- CNN
Video: Nicaraguan migrant narrowly outruns ICE, barricades himself at home
Fontana resident Robert Reyes, his three children, his wife and mother-in-law have remained inside their apartment after security cameras captured the moment Reyes sprinted through his apartment door just moments before a California Border Patrol agent could apprehend him. CNN is trying to verify the status of the case with authorities in California.

Associated Press
7 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Minnesota man gets 28 years for pandemic-era food fraud
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday sentenced a leader of a sprawling, pandemic-era food fraud plot in Minnesota to 28 years in prison. Abdiaziz Shafii Farah, 36, must also pay nearly $48 million in restitution. He faces potentially more years in prison at a later sentencing hearing after previously pleading guilty in a juror bribery case involving a bag of $120,000 in cash. Farah is one of dozens of people charged in the Feeding Our Future case in which prosecutors alleged a scheme to steal $300 million from a federally funded program meant to feed children during the coronavirus pandemic. Farah and several co-defendants went to trial last year where he was convicted of 23 of 24 counts against him. Those offenses include multiple counts of federal programs bribery, wire fraud and money laundering. Prosecutors said Farah exploited the program by opening fraudulent sites where he claimed to be serving meals to thousands of children a day. Farah and his associates falsified meal counts and invoices, including fake children's names, prosecutors said. He directed the stolen money to others and perpetuated the fraud through a 'pay-to-play' system,' prosecutors said. He and his associates stole more than $47 million in program money, and Farah took more than $8 million over a year and a half period, according to prosecutors. He used that money to buy five luxury vehicles and real estate, including property in Kenya, prosecutors said. That overseas property and money prosecutors say Farah laundered via China are out of reach of U.S. law enforcement. In a statement, Acting U.S. Attorney Joseph Thompson said Farah 'has done untold damage to this state' by 'robbing us blind' after finding opportunity in Minnesota. The Associated Press left a phone message with and sent an email to an attorney for Farah for comment. Seventy-three people have been charged in connection with the Feeding Our Future case; 51 have been found guilty.