
Allegations of slave labour and a tsunami of waste: The dark side of Labour's solar energy crusade
As we move away from fossil fuels, as part of the Government's net zero initiatives, solar is likely to play a key part in the transition. Under plans to be published this autumn, almost all new homes will be fitted with solar power, unleashing what Ed Miliband has called a 'rooftop revolution'.
One that could save householders hundreds of pounds off their energy bills, we are promised.
'So many people just don't understand why this doesn't already happen,' the Energy Secretary said last month when announcing the proposed changes.
Yet uncomfortable questions hang over almost every stage of the process of switching to solar, which currently receive relatively little attention.
From the manufacture of a solar panel to the end of its operational life, ethical and – ironically – environmental considerations are often overlooked in the rush to do the right thing, some warn. Complications include everything from forced labour in the supply chain to a lack of recycling capacity, representing a dark side to solar that often goes unaddressed.
The problems begin right from the point at which the materials for the panels are made. Polysilicon, a type of silicon produced from small silicon crystals extracted from quartzite rock, is a key component. Between a third and half of the world's supply is estimated to come from the resource-rich Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) of China – where it is made using coal-based energy.
'Polysilicon [and] solar panels are not produced sustainably in the Uyghur region,' says Yalkun Uluyol, the China researcher at Human Rights Watch.
'That's why [it's] cheap and therefore creates unfair trade practice. For customers hoping to protect the environment, and aiming for a better transition [to green energy], it's coming at the cost of the environment and human rights elsewhere.'
The potentially unsustainable production behind our sustainable future isn't the only problem with the world's reliance on Xinjiang-sourced polysilicon. Reports that it is made using state-sponsored forced labour involving Xinjiang's Uyghur Muslims have also posed a dilemma for countries trying to scale up their solar energy use.
Many of the factories employing 'supposedly free' citizens in the XUAR are 'surrounded by razor-wire fences, iron gates and security cameras and are monitored by police or additional security', according to 2021 research by Sheffield Hallam University.
This applied to factories generally in the region (and therefore implicated various end products), the report suggested. But by 2020, four of the six highest-capacity polysilicon producers were companies with significant manufacturing bases in the north-western XUAR – and all 'utilise state-sponsored labour transfers, the end products of which are sold into the international solar module market', the authors of Sheffield Hallam's In Broad Daylight report wrote.
State-imposed labour transfer programmes involve 'indoctrination and other forms of human rights abuses,' Uluyol says.
The Chinese authorities have denied that such coercion is involved in obtaining polysilicon, saying they are tackling separatism and Islamist militancy in the XUAR.
Although Western governments have been aware of the situation for some time, action has been slow. In March this year, ministers in Britain rejected an amendment to a bill that would have prevented Great British Energy from spending money on solar panels where there was 'credible evidence of modern slavery' in the supply chains.
By April, following a U-turn, the Government's plans were changed, to prevent the publicly-owned clean energy company from using solar panels linked to alleged Chinese slave labour.
In the US, the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act was signed into law in 2021.
'Some countries are implementing forced labour regulations but it's not enough, as supply chains tainted with forced labour are shifting to the jurisdictions with no or weak regulation,' says Uluyol. 'The green transition should not come at the cost of crimes against humanity. And it should be green not just for the UK but for the globe.'
If legislation is slowly moving in the right direction on human rights, it still leaves a potentially enormous problem at the other end of a solar panel's life: namely, what happens when it's no longer in use.
The panels don't last forever – they last about 25 to 30 years. By the early 2030s, an estimated eight million worldwide will be reaching the end of their life, creating what has been called a tsunami of solar panel waste. Some of the earlier models are already reaching the end of their working lives now.
'Manufacturers are responsible for making sure they're recycled properly but it's very difficult,' says Jane Richardson, head of sustainability at Waste Experts, a waste management firm.
The solar panel recycling industry in Britain is extremely limited, with few places currently offering the service. The panels are classed as electronic waste, so can't legally be dumped in landfill – but this is sometimes where they end up nonetheless.
'There are some that just go to landfill as people try and save money,' says Richardson. 'Landfill is the cheapest option.'
A lot of e-waste is, alternatively, shipped abroad and 'not processed correctly,' she says. 'A lot ends up in Africa and Asia.'
Britain isn't ready to recycle the volume of solar panels it will need to in the near future, she believes, and major investment will be required to build the necessary facilities.
While others point out that the amount of solar panel waste expected in the coming years is still dwarfed by the waste generated by fossil fuel energy, that doesn't mean it isn't an issue.
'It's a problem that's going to appear [and] it's going to be huge,' says Chris Sansom, prof of concentrating solar power at the University of Derby. 'Clearly as the numbers [of solar panels reaching the end of their lives] increase, they are going to pile up and that's going to be pretty visible.'
And while most of the component materials can be reused – the glass, the metal, the silicon – the panels haven't actually been designed for easy recycling, he says. 'If you were to ask any of us scientists and engineers to redesign them for recycling, we could do that, but they're [currently] built for low cost, not recycling.'
Then there's the question of where we put our solar farms. A train journey through Britain now quite often takes you past once-green fields entirely given over to them. Quite apart from the 'nimby' arguments against them, questions remain over the carbon impact of these sites, Prof Sansom points out.
'If you've got a green field, it's absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and very often I don't think that gets considered,' he says. 'If you cover [fields] with panels, you're virtually killing off the grass and the soil underneath and stopping it from absorbing CO2.'
Pouring public money into solar farms has not always gone smoothly either. In Essex, bankrupt Thurrock Council sold off its last 53 solar farms last year, having been left with about £1.4bn of debt following a string of failed investments. Last month, the Serious Fraud Office announced it had launched an investigation into a company that sold a bond investment scheme linked to solar farms, into which the council had invested millions.
None of this amounts to a conclusive argument against solar energy per se, but it does highlight the trade-offs involved and the possible pitfalls of rushing into this evolving market.
The likelihood is that, as the solar energy industry matures, many of these issues will be resolved. Waste industry insiders are reasonably confident that recycling facilities can be scaled up to handle the tidal wave of e-waste soon to come crashing upon us..
But it is argued that we should be clear-eyed about the true cost of the new rush for solar.
'I think we fool ourselves sometimes,' says Prof Sansom. 'If you ignore that the panels have a carbon footprint when they arrive in the UK, you can… appear very green. But that's cheating because you're not considering the embedded carbon that's gone into making the panel in China in the first place.'
At the same time, you could end up convincing yourself that you shouldn't transition to renewables at all. 'You have to make the investment somewhere to decarbonise the grid or you won't get anywhere,' Sansom says. 'But you have to be careful, when you're moving things around the world, that someone is picking up the carbon footprint.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Furious Crystal Palace fans launch UEFA protest amid club's Europa League appeal
Crystal Palace fans protested UEFA 's decision to demote their club from the Europa League to the Conference League. The demotion was due to a breach of multi-club ownership rules, specifically concerning co-owner John Textor's involvement with both Palace and Lyon. Members of the Holmesdale Fanatics travelled to UEFA's headquarters in Nyon, Switzerland, to hand-deliver a letter to president Aleksander Ceferin demanding the ruling be overturned. The fan group also presented UEFA with a suitcase of fake money, symbolising perceived contradictions in the organisation's values and conduct. Following the protest, Palace lodged an appeal against UEFA, Nottingham Forest, and Lyon with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), with a decision anticipated by 11 August.


Daily Record
7 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Continued support from MP with visit to proposed Selms Muir Project site near Livingston
The MP was briefed on plans for a 20-megawatt green hydrogen electrolyser The proposed site of the Selms Muir Green Hydrogen Project near Livingston was recently visited by constituency MP Gregor Poynton as he continued his support for the landmark clean energy development. Accompanied by representatives from Hygen and European Energy, the joint venture behind the project, the MP was briefed on plans for a 20-megawatt green hydrogen electrolyser co-located with the already consented Selms Muir Solar Farm. The innovative development, shortlisted in the UK Government's Second Hydrogen Allocation Round (HAR2), would produce up to six tonnes of low-carbon hydrogen a day and play a key role in decarbonising transport and construction across West Lothian and Central Scotland. Gregor Poynton MP said: 'This is exactly the kind of ambitious, job-creating green infrastructure West Lothian and the Livingston constituency needs. The Selms Muir project has the potential to power our buses and construction sites, drive us towards clean energy by 2030, and create skilled local employment in the process. 'I'm pleased to be backing this project in Westminster and in the constituency and will keep pressing Ministers to ensure hydrogen funding decisions are made on time so that this vital development can move forward.' The project team confirmed that work is progressing with the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) on final due diligence, and that discussions with potential offtakers including Lothian Buses, JCB and Wrightbus are already under way. By pairing on-site solar power with hydrogen production, Selms Muir aims to demonstrate how locally generated renewable electricity can support the decarbonisation of sectors that are traditionally hard to electrify. The development could reach Final Investment Decision shortly after a successful HAR2 outcome and be operational within two years. The project also aligns with the UK Government's 10GW hydrogen target and the Scottish Government's net zero commitments. The MP for Livingston has previously written to Minister of State for Industry Sarah Jones MP to advocate for the project, and has committed to further pressing DESNZ on timeline commitments and support for transport-sector hydrogen in the forthcoming UK Hydrogen Strategy refresh. Mark Evans, European Energy Vice-President for UK & Ireland, said: 'We were delighted to welcome Mr Poynton to the Selms Muir site last week, to outline how our proposed 20MW green hydrogen project can complement the consented Selms Muir Solar Farm to drive the decarbonisation of key sectors in West Lothian and Central Scotland. 'Having been shortlisted for HAR2 funding earlier this year, we are now working with DESNZ on the next phase of the process, and we look forward to continued engagement with local people and industries as the project progresses'. Kevin Selleslags, Hygen CEO, added: 'The Selms Muir project is a key part of a long-awaited, nationwide hydrogen supply network and the visit from Gregor recognises the importance both of this scheme and of the role hydrogen will play in our journey to net zero. 'This project is unique in its ambition. It will enable deployment of the UK's first fully zero-carbon municipal bus fleet, while simultaneously enabling the business case for the delivery of a fully-consented renewable energy project.'


BreakingNews.ie
7 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Minister defends plans to cut VAT for hospitality sector 'to keep it sustainable'
Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment Peter Burke has been defending plans to cut VAT for the hospitality sector. 'The tourism sector is a very important part of the economy. At this point in time, over 200,000 people are employed in it. It's a €9 billion sector. And it's so important to try and keep that sector sustainable,' he told RTÉ radio's Today show. Advertisement 'We've seen over the last number of years a very significant number of independent small food outlets and coffee shops come under pressure, many restaurants closing their doors. But this is a jobs measure to sustain the employment in that sector, which is critically important to me as Minister for Tourism and critically to get that regional balance because many of these jobs are located in regional parts of Ireland and it's so important that we have that growth in those key sectors.' Mr Burke said that the cut in VAT would be a stimulus measure. 'It is a viability measure, they are under significant pressure. We've had a lot of additionality from government, part of it over the last three years, in terms of regulatory requirements in the trajectory to a living wage and sick pay in so many areas that have put significant pressure on the sector and have reduced their margins. 'I've been in coffee shops and indeed restaurants where I've seen their margins diminish and some making a very significant loss that they weren't the prior year, considering in many cases their trade and turnover has sustained. 'So critically it's very difficult to ask everyone to pass it on but we need to ensure that we keep the jobs in the first place and that's the prism I look through when I have a sustainability piece like this. This is to protect all of those over 200,000 jobs. To try and grow the sector because there's a very exciting new tourism plan which we'll be bringing out in September and part of that will be an all-island food strategy and also giving Failte Ireland the power to develop the restaurant sector as well.' Advertisement The Minister said that the best value for money would be to sustain jobs. 'We've learned one thing in this economy and we've proven it. And we have been almost Teflon as a government on this. We've pushed 90,000 jobs into the economy over the last 12 months. And considering when we're at or about full employment, to put 90,00 extra households with additional income into them with more jobs is very significant. 'We have a huge amount of jobs, almost 600,000 put in since the pandemic. And that's been the premium of this government, because for any household, the route to give you a chance and opportunity to realise your ambition in life is a job. And the more good quality jobs we get into the economy as well, that's what I'm focused on with many of the different sectors we're working on, trying to ensure that we have the building blocks to sustain the high-level of high-quality jobs we have in our economy.'