South Elmsall waste site operator appeals health hazard decision
She said: "The environmental permit will now stay in place until the Planning Inspectorate has announced the outcome of this appeal."The suspension notice, however, remains in place during this time. [This will] prevent more waste being brought onto the site and requires the removal of waste that is in breach of the permit conditions."If the operator does not comply with the suspension notice, it will be committing an offence."She added the EA "understood the impact this site is having on the community and our increased regulatory response continues".
Last month, Wakefield Council refused permission for the facility to continue operating.According to documents, almost five times the permitted amount of materials had been stored on the land.The permit had allowed a maximum of 50,000 tonnes to be stored at the facility.However, information provided by Minore between 2016 and 2023 revealed there were 233,772 tonnes at the site, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
The EA has called for the removal of at least 180,000 tonnes of non-inert material.A planning inspector said in a report published last month that the facility also posed a risk to nearby watercourses, including Frickley Beck.Minore previously said it was "disappointed" with the decision from the Inspectorate.The company added it planned to transform the land into wildflower meadow, wetland, ponds and public open space.A spokesperson for the firm said: "Currently the site is excavating materials and processing them, which is not in contravention of the notices issued by the EA but in compliance with them."The site has been here since the late 19th century as Victorian brickworks, ash pit and council tip for the deposit of coal ash from domestic fires, up until the late 1950s."The company samples the water regularly as part of the monitoring regime and has found no effect on Frickley Beck when taking water samples."Our employees have been working at the site for over 12 years and now fear for their jobs due to this escalation."
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
The Sycamore Gap felling could help rescue British woodland
James Canton spent two years sitting beneath an 800-year-old oak tree near his home in Essex, watching acorns fatten and butterflies land on the massive knurled grey trunk. Sometimes he sat in the branches a lecturer at the University of Essex, recalls how it helped him feel a "sense of connection". "We're happier sat in an oak tree ten foot from the ground, watching blue tits feeding on caterpillars – involved and immersed in that natural world." He went on to write a book called The Oak Papers about that time spent studying the Honywood years, it was easy to forget that we used to be a woodland nation: around 6,000 years ago untouched swathes of oak, hazel, birch and pine blanketed an estimated 75% of the UK. But in recent months the felling of the Sycamore Gap tree next to Hadrian's Wall in Northumberland has put our relationship with trees, and the natural world more widely, back under the men are due to be sentenced today for the crime that has been called a "mindless destruction". Canton calls it a "symbolic" moment. The felling of the Sycamore Gap has prompted calls for stricter legal protections for trees, not only to help prevent similar crimes in future but also to help the public appreciate the value of trees at a time when many of our woodlands are in poor health and targets for tree-planting are not being met. But even if the government were to back calls for greater legal protections, other questions remain - namely, which trees should be afforded greater legal protection? And arguably even more pressingly: should Britain be thinking more broadly about how to save our depleting woodlands - and is legal protection enough or is a fundamental rethink required? UK's 'odd relationship' with trees The Sycamore Gap wasn't a particularly ancient tree, nor a native species, but its position gave it a totemic status. Tucked into a fold of the hills in an area of outstanding beauty, the tree was famous around the world. People went there to have picnics, propose marriage, scatter ashes and to seek solace during at Northumbria University say the single tree's "dramatic and photogenic setting made it a culturally significant landmark", and it was often used as a symbol of the surrounding Northumberland region. Local people spoke of their sense of devastation at its loss, while Northumberland National Park Authority received thousands of emails, letters and messages. And yet despite being a nation of tree lovers, we live in one of the most nature-depleted countries on Earth - while we still aren't planting enough trees, despite calls by successive governments. The UK has 13% woodland cover, compared to an average of 38% in Europe, according to Prof Mary Gagen of the University of been planting more woodland in recent decades, with woodland creation rates much higher now than they were in the 2010s, yet even they remain off track, according to statistics from Forest Research. The target set by the previous Conservative government was to plant 30,000 hectares a year by 2025 across the UK, in line with the heyday of tree planting in the show that 20,700 hectares of new woodland was created in the UK between April 2023 and March 2024, a big achievement. However, this fell to 15,700 hectares over the year to March 2025, largely as a result of a drop-off in planting in Scotland. Rates in England, Wales and Northern Ireland went up – though from a low base. And the woodlands that already exist aren't in great shape. Only 7% of it is in good ecological health, says Prof is among those who think that this all nods to an "odd relationship" with trees – one of "simultaneously adoring and denuding woodlands".Andrew Allen of the Woodland Trust warns there could be a knock-on effect: "While money goes into getting new trees in the ground, we continue to spend very little on looking after the trees we already have - and this risks serious consequences." 'Why would a tree older than Stonehenge go unprotected?'' Ancient trees provide a home to hundreds of different bird, insect and mammal species, yet they have no automatic right of protection. This is unlike some other countries, including Italy and Poland, where so-called "heritage" trees have specific legal UK trees are protected through being in a nature reserve or a site of special scientific interest, while Tree Preservation Orders can be made by a local planning authority to protect specific trees or woodland from deliberate damage or destruction. Yet many fall through the gaps. Only a fifth of our "oldest and most important veteran trees" are in protected areas, says Prof Gagen. Veteran trees are trees that through their own decay act as a habitat for other species, promoting Tree Council charity has written a report calling for greater protections for the country's "most important trees", such as at the Sycamore Gap. The outpouring of emotion and anger after the felling of the tree shows how valued these "socially, culturally and environmentally important trees are", says Jess Allan, science and research projects manager at the the back of a Heritage Trees Bill, introduced in December 2023 as a private members bill in the House of Lords, the charity is calling for legislation to create a statutory list of the most valuable trees and to impose stricter penalties for damaging them, mirroring the system for listed this could protect trees that are much-loved and culturally important because of their place in the landscape, as well as protecting ancient trees that are vital in preserving nature. Jon Stokes, the charity's director of trees, science and research, points out that in Portugal, the maximum fine for destroying a notable tree is €500,000 (£433,000).He says protecting our "most celebrated trees" is a no-brainer. "There are yew trees in this country that are older than Stonehenge – nobody would ever contemplate not protecting Stonehenge so why would a living thing that's older than Stonehenge not receive some protection?"He hopes something positive could come out of the felling of the Sycamore Gap: it's made people realise that some of the UK's trees are "truly vital to our culture and heritage and history – and our biodiversity - we should be looking after them better than we are at the moment".The Tree Council's report is currently being assessed by the government, but there is no date on when any decision will be released. 'You can't stop reckless acts' There are some who believe legal reforms are not enough. Even the proposed new measures might not have saved the famous sycamore: its felling involved trespass onto land owned by the Northumberland National Park. And a Tree Preservation Order wouldn't have made a difference either, says Sarah Dodd of Tree Law in Barry, Wales, a law firm that specialises in legal issues involving trees."Ultimately, you can put all the protection you want on trees, but some people are just going to break the law, you can't stop some people doing some reckless acts," she says. The bigger question, she says, is how we get people to appreciate the value of trees and therefore not want to fell them. She hopes that giving trees special legal status will raise their profile, and therefore make people recognise their Stokes, of the Tree Council, says if we are to maximise the biodiversity value of our trees we've got to celebrate and protect the old ones. And we need to build up new trees next to our older ones, so that wildlife can flow "from these ancient bastions into the new woods and hedges and individual trees that we're planting", he says.A recent report by the Woodland Trust found that the current health of our woods and trees is "concerning", and proposed solutions include more woodland creation, better woodland management, agroforestry (combining agriculture and trees), ancient woodland restoration, and natural flood management, whereby trees are planted to slow down water flow. Difficult choices ahead This will not be easy and Prof Gagen of Swansea University says saving the UK's woodlands is a complex problem that demands difficult choices around building."Unfortunately, for most people if asked if they'd like more new, cheaper housing or faster transport, or to protect nature, they are going to sacrifice a woodland," she says there is a need to ensure people are aware of the "true value of nature"."A single big tree in the right place is providing thousands of pounds worth of carbon store, flood protection, free air conditioning, habitat, wellbeing provision, pollution control and a hundred other benefits, and no one is asked to pay those costs if the tree is felled for development. That needs to change to save UK woodlands." As for Canton, he stills visits the Honywood Oak near his home, and is involved in projects to turn around the fortunes of the "forgotten forests", areas of ancient woodland that were historically turned into timber plantations and now need to be hopes that years from now we will have learned from the loss of the Sycamore Gap tree and others like it, and changed our attitude."I'd really like to think that in a generation's time, there will be rights for trees – trees that are over say 100 years old that you cannot do this, and you get much worse punishments than currently exist," he says."Hopefully in time we will gradually get there – our society is naturally catching up with our natural emotional connection with the natural world."Top image credit: Joe Daniel Price via Getty BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can send us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The important recycling rule that most Aussies break on bin night
Have you ever gone to toss something into the recycling bin – a jam jar, a pizza box, a takeaway container encrusted with yesterday's lunch – and wondered if you're doing it right? Perhaps you asked yourself: should I scrub the jar with hot water? Scrape the mozzarella off the box? Wash off that palak paneer? Research shows most Australians believe they are good recyclers. But only 25% of people separate waste correctly and up to 35% of recycling goes to landfill unnecessarily. And one in four Australians tends not to rinse or empty food containers before sending them to the bin. The problem is not helped by different recycling practices between councils, which causes public confusion. So just how well does recycling need to be rinsed? What should you do with your plastic lids and pizza boxes? And will robots one day work it all out for us? The problem of contamination Mechanical recycling methods – such as shredding and melting – struggle to operate when food and other residues are present. In fact, one spoiled item might ruin the entire cycling batch. Queensland's Goondiwindi Regional Council, for example, said nearly a quarter of its kerbside recyclables collected in 2022–23 was contaminated and sent to landfill. Some councils use 'advanced materials recovery' that can tolerate lightly soiled recyclables. These facilities use mechanical and automated sorting processes, including optical sorters and artificial intelligence. But other councils still rely on human sorting, or basic mechanical systems, which require items to be relatively clean. Be a tip–top recycler While local recycling capabilities come into play, as a general rule, rinse containers when you can. As well as avoiding contamination, it helps reduce smells and keep bins clean. The best pre–cleaning method for recycling depends on the type of packaging. Paper and cardboard: these items must be clean and dry – no exceptions. Paper and cardboard absorbs contamination more than other materials. So if it gets wet or greasy, it can't be recycled – though it may be compostable. So for pizza boxes, for example, recycle the clean parts and bin the parts that are greasy or have food stuck to them. Unfortunately, traditional cardboard coffee cups are not usually recyclable in Australia. That's because the plastic lining inside is bonded tightly to the paper, making it difficult to separate during standard paper recycling. However in some areas, programs such as Simply Cups collect coffee cups and recycle them into sustainable products such as asphalt, concrete and building products. And in some states, such as South Australia and Western Australia, single–use cups lined with polymer are banned and only compostable cups can be used. Glass and metals: these items are washed and processed at extremely high temperatures, so can tolerate a bit of residue. But too much residue can contaminate paper and cardboard in the bin. So rinse glass and plastic to remove visible food and empty liquids. Just a quick rinse is enough – there's no need to scrub or use hot water. But not all glass and metals can be recycled. Mirrors and light bulbs, for instance, are treated in such a way that they melt at different temperatures to other glass. So check before you chuck. Plastics: rinse plastics before putting them in the recycling bin. It's important to know that the numbers 1 to 7 on plastics, inside a recycling symbol, do not necessarily mean the item can be recycled in your area. The number is a code that identifies what plastic the item is made from. Check if your council can recycle that type of plastic. Complicating matters further is the question of plastic lids. On this, guidelines differ across Australia, so check your local rules. Some councils recycle plastic coffee–cup lids while others don't. Likewise, the rules on plastic bottle lids differ. Some councils allow bottle–lid recycling, but even then, the processes vary. In the Australian Capital Territory, for example, a lid larger than a credit card can be put in the recycling bin, but consumers are asked to remove the lid from the bottle. But Brisbane City Council asks consumers to leave the lids on. Meanwhile, organisations such as Lids4Kids collect plastic lids and make them into new products. The future of recycling Recycling methods are evolving. Advanced chemical recycling breaks plastic down into its chemical building blocks. It can process plastic types that traditional methods can't, such as soft plastics, and turn it into valuable new products. AI and automation are also reshaping recycling, by improving sorting and reducing contamination. And closed–loop washing systems, which filter and reuse water, can clean lightly soiled recyclables. Other innovations are emerging, too, such as dissolvable packaging and AI–enabled 'smart bins' that might one day identify and sort materials – and maybe even tell consumers if items need rinsing! And goods can also be 'upcycled' into higher value products such as 'nanomaterials' or hydrogen. But upcycling still requires clean, well–sorted streams to be viable. And until all these technologies are widespread, each of us must help keep our recycling systems working well. Pooria Pasbakhsh is a research fellow in polymer upcycling at The University of Melbourne.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed for the first time in the damning words of the Family Court judge, the litany of violence, drugs and selfishness that show in horrifying detail why Constance Marten and Mark Gordon... should NEVER have been parents
From the dock of the Old Bailey, Constance Marten repeatedly insisted that she and Mark Gordon were good parents. 'There is literally nothing I would not do for my children,' she said, adding: 'Mark and I love our kids more than anything in the world.'
