First-time buyers and retirees ‘could gain from possible mortgage rule changes'
First-time buyers, people borrowing into retirement and those who are self-employed could benefit from possible changes to mortgage rules, as the City regulator kicks off a 'public conversation' into the future of the market.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has launched a discussion paper on the potential benefits and risks that changing rules could see.
The paper highlights parts of the market where changes could help support wider access to sustainable home ownership as well as economic growth, and where allowing more flexibility could make it easier for lenders to tailor their products to customers' needs.
David Geale, executive director for payments and digital finance at the FCA, told the PA news agency: 'We're starting a public conversation on the future of the mortgage market, to see what we can do to help consumers navigate their financial lives and to support growth.
'So it's very much at that discussion end of: Here are some thoughts, where should we be on the spectrum of balancing risk versus opportunity?'
He added: 'The areas we've opened up for discussion I think will benefit a wide group of people.
'But we are particularly looking at some of the constraints we see around people who are self-employed, people with volatile or unpredictable incomes, people maybe in vulnerable circumstances, who may be a good mortgage risk from a lending perspective, but the rules may be too rigid to allow lenders to look at them a bit more holistically.'
Mr Geale said: 'It's looking at people for whom society has evolved in terms of the ways that they're paid and the ways that they live.'
He said that the FCA is looking at whether there is more that can be done to help first-time buyers, people who are long-term renters with aspirations to get into the housing market, as well as people in later life who may have significant equity in their home but who 'may be income-constrained'.
Mr Geale later added: 'What we're saying is we think there are perhaps better ways of assessing who is a good mortgage borrower. So, for example, if you've been paying rent on a regular basis, had no problem paying your rent, and a mortgage would actually be cheaper, well, could we be more explicit about the ability to take that into account?'
He said the FCA will take what comes out of the discussion paper and 'reflect on that as feedback and then decide which areas we actually think we may need to change the rules, if at all'.
Mr Geale described the discussion paper as 'an exciting way into' the debate about finding the right balance.
He added: 'We are aiming to do this quickly, we are not hanging around. We have already acted in some places where we think there was room to do that.'
The regulator's data shows that in 2024, more than two-thirds (68%) of first-time buyers borrowed for terms of 30 years or longer.
The paper said: 'Many people's patterns of employment in the UK are now very different to those of earlier generations. There is more use of short-term contracting, zero-hours contracts and more people are self-employed.'
The regulator wants to hear feedback on what further changes are needed to support mortgage access for those who are self-employed or with volatile income, both for home purchase and in later in life.
The FCA is also seeking opinions on whether the stress test for mortgages should be changed. The stress test requires lenders to consider the potential impact of likely future changes to interest rates, to help make sure a borrower can afford their mortgage.
Firms were made responsible for setting their stress rate, but the paper suggested a central stress rate could be set, with a forecasting model updated at regular intervals.
However, there could be some drawbacks to this suggestion, including firms losing flexibility to adapt their test to different products, the paper said.
The document also put a spotlight on homeowners increasingly needing to access their housing wealth to help fund them through retirement.
It said that with 38% of working-age people projected to be under-saving for retirement, 'access to mortgages could be key to helping people achieve their financial goals in later life'.
Many lenders will now accept earned income up to the age of 75 in their affordability assessments.
But the paper said that some products tailored to older borrowers can generally be more expensive than standard mortgages – and older people may not know about the full range of options available to them.
The FCA said it wants to help ensure its rules are not creating a barrier to innovative products.
As an example, equity release products allowing borrowers to draw down on a monthly basis, rather than in a lump sum, may be a cost-effective option for some people who do not have a reliable income in retirement, the paper suggested.
Other discussion points in the wide-ranging paper include whether the regulator should intervene to support the take-up of long-term fixed-rate mortgages; whether a rent-based affordability assessment would be a responsible basis to assess a consumer's ability to repay a prospective mortgage; and whether the regulator should take further steps to support part interest-only and part capital repayment ('part and part') mortgages.
The regulator wants to hear feedback on whether changes to interest-only mortgage provisions could help first-time buyers.
It also wants to know whether more could be done to support survivors of economic abuse who are in a joint mortgage with their abuser.
The FCA is also looking at whether there are any regulatory interventions to the mortgage market that could help with addressing climate change challenges.
There are around 8.96 million regulated mortgages across the UK and 3.6 million renting households who aim to buy a home in the future, according to the FCA.
Lending rules were toughened following the 2008 financial crisis. The FCA said this has led to a more resilient market, with fewer borrowers in arrears and more than 99% of mortgages originated since 2014 being on track.
The discussion paper added: 'However, this more cautious approach may also have unduly restricted consumer access to the market. As house prices have grown much faster than wages, home ownership has become an increasingly challenging aspiration for many – particularly those without financial support from family.
'Increasing numbers of consumers are finding it hard to meet affordability criteria, access a mortgage and consequently own a home.'
The regulator said that while it may amend its rules in future, oversight and monitoring of the market and the Consumer Duty, which requires firms to put consumers at the heart of what they do, will continue to be central to its approach.
It said it will continue to hold firms to high standards and closely monitor trends.
Those with an interest in the paper will include mortgage lenders, intermediaries, trade bodies, consumer groups, homeowners and people aiming to become homeowners, the regulator said.
Feedback will close on September 19. The regulator said it will focus on how consumers and the market are protected before recommending any rule changes.
Matt Smith, Rightmove's mortgage expert, said: 'It's really promising that the regulator is opening up these discussions and continuing to look at targeted regulatory changes that could help people in different circumstances to borrow what they need to buy a home.
'We particularly welcome the potential to help more first-time buyers that can afford it to borrow more responsibly, and have access to sustainable home ownership.'
He added: 'There are also some significant regional differences in property prices to be mindful of in discussions about enabling people to borrow more, with the gap between average earnings and property prices more stretched in the south of England than the north of England, Scotland and Wales.
'The desire to support more people in achieving their home ownership aspirations needs to be balanced against the potential risks of allowing people to borrow more, so that mortgage lending continues to be responsible.
'This balance is complex and is why we welcome the FCA's approach to open up a wide-ranging discussion on what is right.'
Charles Roe, director of mortgages at UK Finance, said: 'We welcome the FCA's discussion paper on the future of the UK's mortgage market, and its recognition that changes to current regulations are needed to support sustainable home ownership to stimulate economic growth.
'Whilst mortgage firms will always lend responsibly, we look forward to working with our members to identify ways the FCA could amend its rules to help more individuals get on to, and move up or down, the housing ladder.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
The government must push through its welfare bill at all costs
Few matters are so important that a government should risk its future to get its way. The bill to reform the welfare system is one such. Rebel Labour MPs are threatening to kill the bill in a vote next week. The government should do its utmost to stop that happening, even if it means turning the issue into a vote of confidence. Britain's economic future depends on welfare reform. Government debt is the size of the entire economy. With growth stagnant and the war in Ukraine forcing unexpected increases in the defence budget, getting a grip on public spending is essential. The most obvious candidate for cuts is welfare expenditure. Spending on sickness benefits has grown from less than £50 billion a year before the pandemic to £80 billion now. The government's bill would make it harder to access personal independence payments and would reduce the higher level of incapacity benefit. Even after those changes, the cost of sickness benefits is expected to reach £98 billion by 2030. Reasonable people might therefore conclude that the main problem with the government's plan is that it does not go far enough. However, 108 Labour MPs, including 10 select committee chairs, regard these modest economies as excessive. They have signed an amendment which would, in effect, sabotage the bill. Privately, a dozen members of the government have threatened to resign over the proposed cuts. Despite the government's large parliamentary majority, the revolt is big enough to defeat the proposed legislation. Rebels have been emboldened by the U-turn which the government performed earlier this month when it rowed back on an intended cut to pensioners' winter fuel payments. If the government caved on that, surely they can persuade it to back down on this? • Looming welfare rebellion is a battle Starmer can't afford to lose But the benefits bill is far more important than winter fuel, and not just in monetary terms. It represents the most serious attempt yet by ministers to rein in spending. If a bill as modest as this cannot get through parliament, there is no hope of getting the public finances under control. The bond market will be watching the bill's progress closely. Britain's reputation for financial management is already poor enough that the government pays 4.5 per cent on its debt, compared with Germany's 2.5 per cent and France's 3.3 per cent. Further evidence of fiscal irresponsibility could trigger another rise, which would push up interest costs further still. At £108 billion per year, the government already spends about twice as much on debt interest as it does on defence. Neither the government nor the country can afford to see the welfare reform bill fall. If Sir Keir Starmer performs another U-turn or loses the vote, his credibility, already weakened, will be destroyed. If borrowing rates rise further, Britain's finances will be further destabilised. • Welfare U-turns may jeopardise Rachel Reeves's fiscal rules An opposition that placed the country above political advantage would vote for the planned cuts. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, has promised to back the bill, but only if the prime minister promises in the Commons to levy no new taxes in the autumn, and to cut the welfare budget rather than merely restrict its growth. Given this heavily-qualified offer, Sir Keir must use this week to bring his rebels to heel. To do so, he must rediscover the ruthlessness he demonstrated before the election when he purged Labour's candidates list of left-wingers, and when he suspended seven MPs for opposing his plan to keep the two-child benefit cap. He should make it clear that he is prepared to turn the vote on the benefits bill into one of confidence in his government. That is the nuclear option: if he lost, an election would be called. This bill is not just a tweak to the welfare system. The country's future is at stake. Sir Keir must make it clear to the rebels that for Labour, and for Britain, this is make or break.
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
More Britons than ever struggling to make ends meet, report warns
More people than ever are struggling to live on their current income - while just a third say they are living comfortably, according to new research. Rising prices and sluggish pay increases have put many people's finances under strain in recent years. A record 26% now say making ends meet is difficult. Before the pandemic, it was 16%. 2:32 Two-thirds also say their incomes haven't kept up with inflation, according to the British Social Attitudes report. That's only marginally better than the 70% recorded during the height of the cost of living crisis in 2023. Frozen tax thresholds also appear to be hitting home, with 61% saying taxes on low earners are too high, while 44% believe middle income earners also pay too much. Those figures are up nine points and 13 points respectively since 2016. However, when it comes to the highest earners, 44% believe their taxes are too low. 2:01 The report also asked people about the welfare system - a timely insight with Labour MPs currently rebelling over plans to save £5bn from the budget. It found support for more spending on disability benefits is at a record low of 45%, down from 67% in 2017 - but only 11% think spending should be reduced. About 29% of those polled think it's "too easy" for people to get disability benefits - but the same percentage also feel it's "too difficult". Meanwhile, long waiting times appear to have played a part in the finding that a record 59% are now dissatisfied with the NHS. In 2019, it was just 25%. Only 21% said they were satisfied with the health service. 3:50 The report is based on a representative, random sample of more than 4,000 people in the UK and was produced by the National Centre for Social Research. It's the longest-running measure of public opinion in Britain, having started in 1983. Professor Sir John Curtice, senior research fellow, said: "The public are well aware of Britain's problems - not least those of a failing health service and an economy in which many are struggling to make ends meet. "Yet rather than turning their back on the state, for the most part, the public are still inclined to look to government to provide solutions." 1:05 Defence was also a key theme of the report - and researchers found about 40% of Britons support spending more money on weapons and troops. A fifth (20%) said they would like to see a reduction. It comes as the government revealed it was buying at least 12 stealth jets that can carry nuclear weapons, and as NATO countries, including the UK, promise to increase defence spending. The National Security Strategy also said the UK must prepare for the potential of a "wartime scenario" in the "UK homeland" for the first time in many years. Almost everyone surveyed (90%) considered Russia a serious threat to world peace, followed by Iran (78%), North Korea (77%), Israel (73%), and China (69%). The percentage supporting more defence spending remains relatively unchanged since 2016, before Russia invaded Ukraine. However, the share supporting an increase is significantly higher now than that in 2006 (28%) and in the 1990s (17%).
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Heat pumps and EVs making progress, UK climate advisers say
More people are buying electric cars and installing heat pumps than ever before, but those numbers need to increase even further, according to the government's climate independent Climate Change Committee said that the government needed to make sure that households benefit from the switch to cleaner technologies through lower bills."The government has made progress on a number of fronts, including on clean power, [but] they need to do more on making electricity cheap," Emma Pinchbeck, chief executive of the CCC, told BBC response Energy Secretary Ed Miliband thanked the committee for its advice and said it was committed to bringing down bills. By law, the UK must stop adding to the total amount of planet-warming greenhouse gases in the atmosphere by 2050. This is known as "net zero".Reaching net zero carbon dioxide emissions globally is widely seen as essential to limit further warming. Previous political consensus around the UK's target has broken down, however, with Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch branding it "impossible" and Reform using the phrase "net stupid zero". But the committee argues it is achievable and could lead to long-term economic benefits. "[The UK] can absolutely meet net zero by 2050," said Ms gas emissions within the UK's borders have already fallen by more than half since that's mostly because polluting fossil fuels – particularly coal – have been increasingly replaced with renewable energy like wind and solar for electricity generation. The UK's biggest emitters last year were transport and buildings, which will also need to get cleaner to help reach net CCC sees signs of progress, including a near doubling of the number of electric cars on UK roads in the past two years. Nearly one-in-five new cars sold in 2024 was has helped to reduce emissions from transport – not counting planes and ships – for the second year in a row, even though traffic levels rose last new electric cars remain more expensive to buy than their petrol equivalents, the CCC expects them to cost the same in a couple of second-hand models are already as cheap, and electric cars can be more economical to run too."We see these transitions happen surprisingly fast once they get going, usually starting slowly and accelerating rapidly, where falling prices and rising demand reinforce each other," said Dr Emily Nurse, the CCC's head of net zero."When that's combined with effective policy, it really can lead to this rapid change." Heat pump progress but a long way to go Sales of electric heat pumps are growing quickly too, up by more than half last year, thanks partly to grants introduced under the Conservatives, the CCC said. But they still remain well below committee also praised the new government's relaxation of planning rules, which it says should encourage more people to install heat even after grants, they can be expensive to install and while they are much more efficient than a gas boiler, they are not necessarily cheaper to because the cost of electricity is so high, something the CCC has repeatedly said needs tackling. Make electricity cheaper The single largest reason for the rise in household electricity prices in recent years is the increase in wholesale costs, driven by international gas prices, the CCC says."The only way to get bills down for good is by becoming a clean energy superpower and we continue to work tirelessly to deliver clean power for families and businesses," argued Energy Secretary Ed the committee adds that electricity bills are artificially high because charges are added to them to support largely older renewable energy projects – which were more expensive – as well as energy efficiency Monday the government announced plans to remove these costs for some them from household electricity bills too would be a quick fix to the UK's high prices, making it much cheaper to run an electric car or heat pump, the committee these costs would have to go somewhere, potentially onto general would take "about £200 off the average [household] bill but at a cost of about £6bn per year to the Exchequer," said Adam Bell, director of policy at Stonehaven Consultancy and former head of energy strategy at the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. Additional reporting by Jonah Fisher and Miho Tanaka Sign up for our Future Earth newsletter to keep up with the latest climate and environment stories with the BBC's Justin Rowlatt. Outside the UK? Sign up to our international newsletter here.
