E-scooter woman who attacked sister-in-law and neighbour learns fate
Claire Redmond, 26, of Forestwood Avenue, Santry, Dublin 9, pleaded guilty to charges of assault causing harm to two women in 2022.
She walked free from court and avoided a criminal record.
Dublin District Court heard that the incidents occurred at the Post Office on Ballymun Road, and the other involved her next-door neighbour, who has since passed away.
Judge Treasa Kelly had heard that the first incident on February 10, when her 35-year-old neighbour went to collect a child from school. Redmond passed her on an electric scooter and "called her a tramp".
She repeatedly used the slur before the attack. The woman fell to the ground, where Redmond kicked her in the stomach and head.
The accused then grabbed the woman by her hair and punched her, resulting in cuts, bleeding and bruising.
The court was informed that they had got on well growing up, but at the time, Redmond had suffered a breakdown.
The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week
Judge Kelly had heard the incident left the victim, who has since passed away, in a distressed state and suffering from anxiety.
The second attack happened on November 10. Redmond's sister-in-law, 25, was waiting in line when she was tapped on the shoulder, and the accused told her she would be "waiting outside".
She then said, "Fuck it, I'll do it here" and grabbed the woman's face with her fingernails, punched her, and kneed her in the face while holding her by the hair.
Bystanders yelled, "Get off her, get off her," and the assault stopped when two staff members dragged Redmond away.
Gardai obtained CCTV evidence, but victim impact statements were not forthcoming, with Judge Kelly noting that the neighbour has since passed away.
The defence understood her sister-in-law may not have reconciled with Redmond, but had no ill feelings towards her now.
She had no prior convictions but had been given the benefit of the Probation of Offenders Act and spared a criminal record last year for a public order offence.
The judge said defendants typically receive that just once.
Her solicitor, Andrew Broderick, stated that Redmond was extremely remorseful. In pleading for leniency, he explained that when his client was younger, she had been put out of her family home and stayed in hostels. She developed drug and alcohol problems, including cocaine and tablet abuse.
Around the time of the assaults, Redmond returned to Ballymun to try and get back into her family home, but "things escalated".
Mr Broderick submitted that the attacks were not premeditated, and Redmond's emotions got the better of her while she was in the throes of drug addiction and had mental health difficulties.
The solicitor emphasised that she was ambitious and, now that she has recovered, wished to train to become an addiction counsellor, rebuild her life and move to Australia. She was anxious to avoid a recorded conviction so that she could go there.
He provided letters showing Redmond had completed a five-month residential treatment course, which also addressed anger management, and had quit alcohol and drugs.
He added that she had not offended since and had become a very different person.
She had also co-operated with the Probation Service about restorative justice and stopped coming to Garda attention, the solicitor said.
She also brought €500 to court, which the judge ordered to be given to her sister-in-law.
Noting the reports on her progress and the mitigation plea, she held that she could again apply the Probation of Offenders Act.
However, she stressed that it was "very, very unusual" to get this chance and warned her that if she ever appeared in court again, she would face a much harsher penalty.
Redmond did not give evidence, thanked he judge at the conclusion of the hearing.
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
18 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Student, 20, accused of 14 counts of rape and sexual assault of male
A 20-year-old student has been charged with multiple counts of rape and sexual assault of another male in Dublin four years ago. The man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was aged 16 and a juvenile, at the time of the sexual abuse over a three month period in 2021. He was arrested yesterday and charged with six counts of rape and eight for sexual assault at a specific address in south Co Dublin. He appeared before Judge John Brennan at a late sitting of Dublin District Court. Detective Garda Liam Conway said the young man replied "No" when each charge was put to him. The court heard that the Director of Public Prosecutions has directed that the man would face "trial on indictment". That means, due to the nature of some of the charges, he will be tried in the Central Criminal Court. Detective Garda Conway confirmed that the accused was a minor when the alleged offences occurred and there was no objection to bail provided he obeyed a series of conditions. Judge Brennan ordered him to provide gardaí with a contact phone number, remain contactable at all times, notify them of any address change, sign on at a north Dublin Garda station, and surrender his passport. Furthermore, he told the man that it was as conditions of bail that he must not communicate with the complainant, directly or indirectly, including by social media. Defence counsel Kevin McCrave consulted with the accused who did not address the court, before telling the judge that his client consented to those terms. Judge Brennan warned there would be consequences for breaching them and the barrister stressed that he would explain that to his client, who has yet indicate a plea. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week Bail was set at €750 and he was ordered to appear at the Children's Court in September to be served with a book of evidence and returned for trial to the Central Criminal Court. Legal aid was granted after the court heard the accused was a student, on social welfare and unemployed. Sign up to the Irish Mirror's Courts and Crime newsletter here and get breaking crime updates and news from the courts direct to your inbox.
Irish Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Man sent sexually explicit messages from colleagues' phones - but he gets compo
A financial services executive who was fired after posting sexually explicit messages from the mobile phones of two female colleagues has been awarded €22,500 in compensation for unfair dismissal The Workplace Relations Commission ruled that the procedures used to dismiss the operation's manager were flawed and unfair 'from beginning to end.' The WRC found that the company's conclusion that the manager's conduct was 'highly severe sexual harassment' was 'excessive' and 'not proportional.' It heard evidence that the manager had taken the phone from the desk of a colleague – known as Employee A – on January 30, 2024 and sent a sexually explicit WhatsApp message to her husband. The WRC ruled that the identities of the parties should not be disclosed due to the potential collateral damage to the company and its staff. The manager owned up to sending the message as a joke after the woman discovered it on her phone. She asked the company's chief executive for a meeting to discuss what had happened as both she and her husband had found the message 'vulgar and disgusting' and was worried other content from her phone had been accessed. The WRC heard the operations manager was suspended after a meeting on February 6, 2024 after she had submitted a formal complaint. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week Another female colleague, known as Employee B. who attended the meeting said afterwards: 'I can't believe this is happening again.' The company's chief executive told the WRC that he had forgotten there had been a previous incident in September 2022 when the manager had accessed Employee B's phone while she was on holidays. Employee B had left her phone at work to allow the chief executive to access a banking app to authorise transactions. Employee B noticed two sexually offensive messages appeared to have been posted by her on one of her social media accounts as well as a message to one of her friends saying 'Hi, how are you?' The WRC heard the manager admitted he had posted the messages as a joke when Employee B contacted him to express concern that her phone had been hacked. Employee B said that her husband and father who were on holiday with her were also disgusted by the messages. While Employee B did not accept it was a joke, she acknowledged she did not take the matter further at the time. The WRC heard that the manager admitted he had done 'two stupid things' to an external investigator hired to examine the complaints. However, he claimed Employee B was conflicted by having used what she heard at the meeting on February 6, 2024 to make her own complaint and its inclusion was unfair. 'In the heat of the moment, I made two bad choices' he told an appeals committee and claimed his actions were in line with 'jokes or stuff' between staff. He claimed the use of the term 'sexual harassment' was grossly untrue and said he felt like 'the fall guy' for widespread sexual comments and innuendo between staff. The manager – who was regarded as 'number 2' in the company – asked the appeals committee not to let 'two moments of madness' define him when he had been portrayed as 'some kind of evil predator.' His counsel, Michael Kinsey BL, claimed the process used to dismiss him was 'pre-judged, biased and procedurally flawed.' However, counsel for the financial services company, Lauren Tennyson BL, maintained the manager had been dismissed for gross misconduct due to findings of sexual harassment. Ms Tennyson said the sanction of dismissal was fair and proportionate and 'an inherently reasonable decision.' In her ruling, WRC adjudication officer, Catherine Byrne, observed that the manager had submitted no evidence to support his contention that sexual banter was commonplace among staff. Ms Byrne acknowledged that any reasonable employer would regard the manager's action in relation to Employee A as 'grossly inoffensive and irresponsible.' The WRC adjudicator said Employee B had dealt with the manager's conduct with maturity and forbearance over his use of her phone and had put him on notice that she would not tolerate such action in future. Ms Byrne said it was reasonable for the two women to have been angry, embarrassed, shocked and disappointed by his conduct which she agreed had met the definition of sexual harassment under the company's policy. 'He made unwanted sexual remarks which were offensive and degrading and which had no regard for the dignity of his colleagues,' she observed. However, Ms Byrne, she claimed the finding that what happened was a high severity of sexual harassment was 'too extreme.' She stressed that she did not wish to minimise the impact of the two incidents. Ms Byrne pointed out that the incident with Employee B was originally considered 'done and dusted.' She also observed that the chief executive had not taken any action to address the manager's conduct back in September 2022. Ms Byrne said it was difficult to understand why the chief executive had not 'at the very least' had a conversation with the complainant at the time about his conduct even in the absence of a formal complaint. 'His failure to do so lends some credibility to the complainant's assertion that there was a culture of doing nothing about unacceptable sexual banter,' she remarked. Ms Byrne claimed the retrieval of the earlier incident to bolster the case for dismissal was unfair, given the second incident was sufficiently serious to warrant consideration on its own. Ms Byrne said it was not open to the independent investigator to reach a conclusion regarding the scale of the offence or the severity of the sexual harassment. She claimed the disciplinary panel had relied on the investigator's opinion and failed in their duty to consider the manager's defence, while he also had not been allowed to appeal the investigation report. 'It is my view that a reasonable, prudent and wise employer may have reached a different decision and the complainant may have gone on to make a positive contribution to the organisation,' said Ms Byrne. Although the manager suffered €74,500 in lost earnings over the two years following his dismissal, the WRC limited the award of compensation to €22,5500 – representing 30% of the total – as he had contributed significantly to the decision to dismiss him. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.
Sunday World
2 days ago
- Sunday World
Man caught with Stanley knife claimed he needed it ‘for his own protection'
Sean Thackaberry (32) had his case adjourned at Dublin District Court for a community service suitability assessment. A man caught carrying a Stanley knife thought he needed it for his own protection, but it was 'totally the wrong way to go about things', his defence said. Sean Thackaberry (32) had his case adjourned at Dublin District Court for a community service suitability assessment. Thackaberry, of Maryville, Melitta Road, Kildare, pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a knife. The court heard he was arrested at O'Donoghue Street, Inchicore, on October 24, 2021, and the knife was found in his possession. He had previous convictions including one for a similar charge in 2018. A Stanley knife. Stock image: Getty News in 90 Seconds - August 15th Thackaberry's lawyer said his client 'felt it was necessary at the time' to carry the blade for his protection, 'but it was totally the wrong way to go about things'. Thackaberry had a 'good upbringing' but had addiction issues and was now on methadone, the court heard. He also had mental health issues and was on medication. Judge Hughes said the accused should have been aware, having been sentenced once for having a knife, that there was a 'good chance' he would be jailed if caught again. However, he ordered a community service report and adjourned the case.
