Columbia scientists develop world's first prototype ‘Universal Antiviral'
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Rare disorder reveals hidden defense
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Turning biology into therapy
A temporary but powerful shield
Challenges ahead
A team of Columbia University scientists says it may be closer than ever to creating a universal antiviral , a treatment designed to temporarily shield people against a wide range of viruses, from influenza to COVID-19.The experimental therapy, detailed August 13 in Science Translational Medicine , is inspired by a rare genetic mutation that gives a small number of people an extraordinary ability: resistance to nearly all viral infections About 15 years ago, Columbia immunologist Dr. Dusan Bogunovic began studying patients with a rare immune condition known as ISG15 deficiency . Though these individuals were more prone to certain bacterial infections, they seemed to shrug off viral illnesses without ever developing symptoms.Closer study revealed that the mutation caused a constant, low-level state of immune activation, a kind of background inflammation that was highly effective at blocking viruses. 'The type of inflammation they had was antiviral,' Bogunovic recalled in a Columbia University statement.Instead of reproducing the harmful aspects of ISG15 deficiency, Bogunovic's team identified 10 specific proteins responsible for most of the antiviral protection. They then engineered an mRNA-based therapy, similar in design to COVID-19 vaccines, that prompts cells to briefly produce those proteins.Delivered through the nose into the lungs of mice and hamsters, the treatment significantly reduced replication of both influenza and SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. In cell culture tests, the therapy appeared to resist a wide variety of viruses.Unlike a vaccine, which builds lasting immunity to a specific pathogen, this treatment provides only short-term protection, estimated at three to four days in animals. Researchers say that could make it particularly valuable at the beginning of outbreaks, giving first responders, health workers, and high-risk populations an immediate layer of defense while vaccines are still in development.The therapy also does not interfere with long-term immunity, meaning patients could still develop protective memory after infection or vaccination.The concept remains in early stages. Researchers say improving the delivery system, ensuring enough of the proteins are produced in the right tissues, is the biggest hurdle before moving into human trials. More work is also needed to determine how long protection lasts and how safe repeated dosing might be.Still, experts say the findings are promising. By activating the body's own antiviral machinery, the therapy could offer a virus-agnostic defense that works even when the identity of a new pathogen is unknown.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
8 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Delhi's stray dog crisis demands a One Health response
Delhi is once again at war with its dogs. The Supreme Court's recent order to remove stray dogs has reignited a long-running debate. The fear driving it is, of course, real. The city is home to nearly a million strays, dog bite cases surged almost 277% between 2022 and 2024, and January 2025 alone saw a 52 percent spike over the previous year's monthly average. Yet the Court's response is less a cure than a reflex, aimed at symptoms rather than causes. This is where the One Health framework becomes critical – as it recognises human, animal and ecological health are deeply interconnected and that only integrated solutions can deliver real safety. The Covid-19 pandemic should have made that lesson unmissable. Also Read: Dogs and laws: On street dogs and the Supreme Court order Understanding the crisis Rabies is a zoonotic disease that passes between animals and humans, and it thrives in urban systems like Delhi. The city generates more than 11,000 tonnes of solid waste every day, nearly half of which is mismanaged. These open garbage heaps are permanent food sources for dogs, allowing their numbers to persist regardless of how many are caught or removed. The 'catch and kill' method, introduced by the British in the 19th century and heavily used after Independence, proved disastrous. A Municipal Corporation of Delhi study from 1980 to 1990 found that despite slaughtering 8 lakh dogs over the decade, the city's stray population remained at 1.5 lakh. By 1993, authorities admitted the approach had failed, as rabies deaths had risen and the dog population continued to grow. The problem lies in the city's disrupted urban ecology, where unmanaged waste sustains multiple disease-carrying scavengers and the sudden removal of dogs destabilises the system further. When dogs are displaced, other scavengers like rodents, pigs or monkeys, move in to occupy the same ecological niche. Rodent populations in particular thrive on unmanaged waste and are reservoirs of diseases such as leptospirosis. Any strategy that ignores these connections risks replacing one public health crisis with another. These ecological vulnerabilities are compounded by gaps in human health systems. Post-exposure treatment can prevent almost all deaths, yet access remains patchy. Clinics often lack vaccines and immunoglobulin, epidemiological and laboratory surveillance is limited, healthcare professionals receive inadequate training, community awareness is low, and coordination across sectors is weak. Therefore, the issue moves far beyond dogs. India's own Animal Birth Control Rules, updated in 2023, require sterilisation, vaccination and release precisely to avoid these outcomes. The Supreme Court's directive cuts against this, undermines years of legal reform, and risks exposing India again to the charge of cruelty. One Health approach Viewed through the One Health lens, Delhi's challenge is not a choice between humans or dogs, but how the city manages the interconnected systems that affect both. Waste management shapes the conditions in which rabies spreads, dog vaccination protects both animals and humans, and post-bite treatment saves lives. None of these measures can succeed in isolation, and climate change intensifies the stakes. Rising temperatures and erratic rainfall alter waste decomposition, influence rodent populations, and affect dog behaviour, making fragile urban ecosystems even more unstable. Treating dog removal as a technical fix ignores the reality that the most serious health risks in the coming decades will emerge where human, animal, and environmental health intersect, and a One Health approach emerges as the pathway to tackle them effectively. There is also mounting evidence from India itself that large scale vaccinations can rapidly lower exposure even before sterilisation programmes achieve scale. Goa became India's first state to eliminate human dog-mediated rabies through a programme that combined mass dog vaccination, public education, and surveillance. Vaccinating each dog in India costs a mean of U.S. $3.45, slightly above the global average of U.S. $2.18 due to labour-intensive methods like hand-catching strays - yet, over 10 years, the programme prevented 121 human deaths and 3,427 DALYs (disability-adjusted life years, which measure years of healthy life lost due to illness or premature death) at just U.S. $567 per DALY, making it a highly cost-effective public health intervention. Jaipur's two-decade programme of sterilising and vaccinating stray dogs cost about U.S. $658,744 and saved more than 36,000 years of healthy life from rabies and dog bites at just U.S. $26–40 per year of life preserved, far below the World Health Organization's benchmark of U.S.$2,000 for cost-effectiveness in India. The city saved U.S. $5.6 million, nearly nine times its investment, when the value of lives saved is included, making it one of the most cost-effective public health strategies documented in India. Similarly, modelling in Tamil Nadu shows that vaccinating just 7% of stray dogs annually could reduce human rabies deaths by 70% within five years, while expanding coverage to 13% could reduce deaths by nearly 90%. Both cases highlight that targeted canine vaccination under a One Health framework is feasible, affordable, and highly effective at preventing human rabies deaths while maintaining animal welfare. Delhi's reliance on mass removals is short-sighted, and does not offer solutions to tackle the root cause, which is rabies rather than dogs. It offers only temporary relief, undermines animal welfare, and risks disrupting the urban ecosystem. Evidence from Goa, Jaipur, and Tamil Nadu shows that targeted canine vaccination, combined with sterilisation, public education, and effective waste management - is both feasible and highly cost-effective. By embracing a One Health strategy, Delhi can protect human lives, uphold animal health and welfare, while restoring ecological balance - providing a sustainable path to eliminate rabies. (Sharon Sarah Thawaney works with the Observer Research Foundation, Kolkata. sharonthawaney04@
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
US health officials urge Kennedy to stop spreading vaccine misinformation
Washington: Hundreds of current and former employees of US health agencies on Wednesday accused President Donald Trump's health secretary of putting them at risk by spreading false information. In an open letter, the federal officials criticized Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. -- a noted vaccine skeptic -- nearly two weeks after an armed attack on the headquarters of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the main US health agency. A gunman who blamed the Covid-19 vaccine for sickening him targeted several buildings at the Atlanta-based CDC on August 8, killing a police officer. The attack "was not random," the signees of the open letter said, pointing to "growing mistrust in public institutions, driven by politicized rhetoric that has turned public health professionals from trusted experts into targets of villainization -- and now, violence." Kennedy, who has repeatedly aired false information about vaccines and slammed the agencies he heads as corrupt, was accused of fueling the mistrust. Kennedy "is complicit in dismantling America's public health infrastructure and endangering the nation's health by repeatedly spreading inaccurate health information," the open letter said, imploring the health chief to change his stance. Since taking office, the nephew of assassinated president John F. Kennedy has made numerous pronouncements that run counter to scientific consensus, particularly about vaccines. This shift toward vaccine skepticism has been denounced by many experts. A petition calling on Congress to impeach Kennedy had gathered more than 12,600 signatures as of Wednesday. The latest open letter from US civil servants, many of whom signed anonymously, comes on the heels of other similar texts backed by federal employees denouncing actions of the Trump administration. Taking such a step was not without risk: nearly 140 staffers at the Environmental Protection Agency who spoke out publicly were placed on leave in last month.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
People with sensitive personalities more prone to anxiety, depression
Have you ever been told you're 'too sensitive'? It turns out that this trait could be more than just a personality quirk. A new study, titled The Relationship Between Environmental Sensitivity and Common Mental-Health Problems in Adolescents and Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ' published in peer-reviewed Clinical Psychological Science, has found that highly sensitive people are significantly more likely to experience depression and anxiety. It also highlighted that this same sensitivity also makes them more responsive to therapy and positive experiences, offering hope for better mental health outcomes. What do researchers mean by 'sensitivity'? According to the study, sensitivity, also known as environmental sensitivity or sensory-processing sensitivity, is a personality trait that reflects how strongly someone reacts to environmental and emotional stimuli. This could mean noticing subtle changes in a room, being easily moved by music, or feeling emotionally affected by the moods of others. 'Highly sensitive individuals process sensory input more deeply, which makes them more vulnerable to stress but also more responsive to support,' explained Professor Michael Pluess, lead researcher at the University of Surrey and Visiting Professor at Queen Mary University of London, in a statement published on the university website. The research team, led by Queen Mary University of London, conducted the first-ever meta-analysis on sensitivity and mental health, reviewing 33 studies with 12,697 participants across multiple countries. The results showed a strong association between sensitivity and common mental health problems, especially depression and anxiety. Other conditions, such as PTSD, agoraphobia, and avoidant personality disorder, also showed significant links. 'This is the most extensive systematic review on sensitivity and mental health in adolescents and adults to date,' said Tom Falkenstein, psychotherapist and PhD student at Queen Mary University, in the statement. Why does being highly sensitive affect mental health? Researchers suggest that because highly sensitive people notice and feel more, they can easily become overstimulated and overwhelmed. This heightened awareness may lead to rumination, emotional reactivity, and feelings of helplessness, all of which increase the risk of depression and anxiety. At the same time, sensitivity also means a greater capacity for positive emotional experiences—making supportive environments and therapy especially powerful for them. Can therapy help highly sensitive people? Yes. Sensitivity could be a strength in therapy. The study suggests that highly sensitive people respond particularly well to interventions like: Mindfulness practices Applied relaxation techniques Cognitive-behavioral therapies 'Our findings show that around 31 per cent of the general population is highly sensitive and more likely to respond better to some psychological interventions than less sensitive individuals,' Falkenstein noted. 'Therefore, awareness of sensitivity should be improved among mental health professionals, so treatments can be tailored accordingly.' So, according to the study, if you identify as highly sensitive, you may be more prone to stress and mental health struggles, but you are also more likely to thrive in the right environment and with the right therapy.
