JRFU demands reinstatement of chairman to Asia Rugby, apology for ban
In a strongly worded statement released Thursday, JRFU President Masato Tsuchida said the finding by a World Rugby-appointed disciplinary officer of no wrongdoing by Iwabuchi was a rebuke to Asia Rugby over its suspension of the 49-year-old former Japan flyhalf.
"The JRFU is delighted that through this independent World Rugby-led investigation, Mr. Iwabuchi's reputation has been restored, and Asia Rugby has been called out for its significant governance failures and lack of transparency," Tsuchida said.
Asia Rugby on Feb. 24 announced its temporary suspension of Iwabuchi as vice president over "a potential code of conduct breach" while providing no further details.
World Rugby said the allegation stemmed from Iwabuchi raising queries with Asia Rugby "regarding the contents of documents" he was asked to sign as an executive, and that these were "entirely reasonable queries" showing "good governance practice on his part."
"While the outcome is a relief for both Mr. Iwabuchi and the JRFU, the reckless behavior of Asia Rugby in suspending Mr. Iwabuchi without any due process and issuing a vague and potentially defamatory press release at the time is very damaging to the reputation of Asia Rugby," Tsuchida said.
World Rugby has notified Asia Rugby that it expects Iwabuchi to be reinstated.
The JRFU said it will request that the president of Asia Rugby, Qais Al-Dhalai, issue a public apology to Iwabuchi.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
20 hours ago
- Japan Today
California pushes left, Texas to the right, with U.S. House control and Trump agenda in play
By MICHAEL R. BLOOD, TRN NGUYỄN and NADIA LATHAN A political standoff in Texas over proposed House maps that could hand Republicans five new seats is poised to enter a new phase Friday, while heavily Democratic California plans to release its own new maps intended to erase all but a sprinkle of the state's GOP House districts in the fight over control of Congress. The hectic maneuvering in the nation's two most populous states underscored the stakes for both parties in the narrowly divided House that could determine the fate of President Donald Trump's agenda in the second half of his term. On Thursday, Texas Democrats moved closer to ending a nearly two-week walkout that has blocked the GOP's redrawing of U.S. House maps before the 2026 election. The Democrats announced they will return to the state provided that Texas Republicans end a special session and California releases its own redrawn map proposal, both of which were expected to happen Friday. However, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott is expected to call another special session to push through new maps. Democratic lawmakers vowed to take the fight to the courts. In California, Gov. Gavin Newsom said his state will hold a Nov. 4 special election to seek approval of redrawn districts intended to give Democrats five more U.S. House seats, in a counterpunch to undercut any gains in Texas. 'We can't stand back and watch this democracy disappear district by district all across the country,' Newsom said at what amounted to a campaign kickoff rally for the as-yet unreleased maps that Democrats have been shaping behind closed doors. 'We are not bystanders in this world. We can shape the future.' The two states have emerged as the center of a partisan turf war in the House that could spiral into other states — as well as the courts — in what amounts to a proxy war ahead of the 2026 elections. Newsom's announcement Thursday marked the first time any state beyond Texas has officially waded into the mid-decade redistricting fight. The Texas plan was stalled when minority Democrats fled to Illinois, New York and Massachusetts on Aug. 3 to stop the Legislature from passing any bills. Elsewhere, leaders from red Florida to blue New York are threatening to write new maps. In Missouri, a document obtained by The Associated Press shows the state Senate received a $46,000 invoice to activate six redistricting software licenses and provide training for up to 10 staff members. Newsom encouraged other Democratic-led states to get involved. 'We need to stand up — not just California. Other blue states need to stand up,' Newsom said. Republicans hold a 219-212 majority in the House, with four vacancies. New maps are typically drawn once a decade after the census is conducted. Many states, including Texas, give legislators the power to draw maps. California is among states that rely on an independent commission that is supposed to be nonpartisan. The California map would take effect only if a Republican state moves forward, and it would remain through the 2030 elections. After that, Democrats say they would return mapmaking power to the independent commission approved by voters more than a decade ago. In Los Angeles, Newsom and other speakers veered from discussing the technical grist of reshaping districts — known as redistricting — and instead depicted the looming battle as a conflict with all things Trump, tying it explicitly to the fate of American democracy. An overarching theme was the willingness to stand up to Trump, a cheer-inducing line for Democrats as the party looks to regroup from its 2024 losses. 'Donald Trump, you have poked the bear, and we will punch back,' said Newsom, a possible 2028 presidential contender. Some people already have said they would sue to block the effort, and influential voices including former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger may campaign against it. 'Gavin Newsom's latest stunt has nothing to do with Californians and everything to do with consolidating radical Democrat power, silencing California voters, and propping up his pathetic 2028 presidential pipe dream,' National Republican Congressional Committee spokesperson Christian Martinez said in a statement. 'Newsom's made it clear: he'll shred California's Constitution and trample over democracy — running a cynical, self-serving playbook where Californians are an afterthought and power is the only priority.' California Democrats hold 43 of the state's 52 House seats, and the state has some of the most competitive House seats. In California, lawmakers must officially declare the special election, which they plan to do next week after voting on the new maps. Democrats hold supermajorities in both chambers — enough to act without any Republican votes — and Newsom said he is not worried about winning the required support from two-thirds of lawmakers to advance the maps. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
The Diplomat
3 days ago
- The Diplomat
Facing Charges of Pro-Government Bias, India's Election Commission Hinders Transparency
Over 100,250 fake voters were included in the electoral roll of one assembly segment, Mahadevapura. Such voter list fraud happened in other constituencies too, the opposition alleges. A woman casts her ballot at a polling station in Nuh Mewat during the Haryana Assembly election on October 5, 2024. The Election Commission of India (ECI) is at the receiving end of a barrage of charges questioning its credibility as an independent institution. On August 8, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, who is also the leader of the opposition in the lower house of India's Parliament, alleged that the ECI was colluding with the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to 'steal seats and elections' in the country. Accusing the ECI of 'committing massive fraud' in the 2024 parliamentary elections, Gandhi said that over 100,250 'fake voters' were included in the electoral roll of one assembly segment, Mahadevapura, which falls under the Bangalore Central Lok Sabha constituency. Gandhi said that while such voter list fraud was reported from many places, they zeroed in on one constituency — Mahadevapura — to investigate and present a case study before the nation. 'We will prove — India's prime minister has become prime minister by stealing [votes],' he said. The Congress party plans to 'expose' similar voter list 'frauds' in 48 parliamentary constituencies across the country in phases. Modi returned to power for a third term in 2024, albeit with a weaker mandate. Now, almost all of India's opposition parties have joined hands to accuse the ECI of pro-government bias. They are demanding a recall of the ECI's controversial Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral roll in the poll-bound state of Bihar — an exercise slated to be replicated in other states, should the ECI have its way. The SIR is currently under the Supreme Court's scrutiny, though the top court has not stayed the exercise. On the ground, protests are gaining ground. The poll panel's response to the barrage of allegations leveled against it is remarkable. Instead of facilitating scrutiny and answering charges, the ECI is focusing on hindering any examination of the electoral roll. It has used rather threatening language against opposition leaders and claimed that it is not legally obligated to furnish the information sought. Political activist Yogendra Yadav said that any credible election commission would investigate the charges, fix the list, and punish the guilty. 'Instead, it is threatening the Leader of the Opposition,' he wrote, adding, 'The nation deserves an answer. And history will remember this.' Yadav alleged that such voter list fraud happened in the western state of Maharashtra 'quietly,' whereas the case of Bihar is 'daylight robbery.' Unusual or suspicious changes in the electoral roll were reported from Maharashtra in the aftermath of the November 2024 assembly election, which a BJP-led alliance swept, surprising many poll pundits. Gandhi had demanded machine-readable digital voter rolls from the ECI at that time, too, but it was not entertained. In June this year, Gandhi pointed out that in five months between the general elections in May-June 2024 and the Maharashtra assembly elections in November, the number of voters increased in the state by 410,000, whereas the figure for such additions in the last five years stood at only 310,000 voters. After his recent detailed presentation on vote fraud in Mahadevapura, several media houses conducted independent enquiries on Gandhi's allegations and found the charges to be true. Newsportal India Today's ground check found 80 voters registered at a 10-15 sq ft house, whose current occupant denied any links to those listed in his address. In Bihar, regarding the SIR, independent news portal Reporters' Collective reported spotting over 5,000 'double and dubious voters' from the neighboring state of Uttar Pradesh in the ECI's recently-released draft roll of an assembly constituency in Bihar. The Newslaundry portal showed how a single house in Bihar was listed as having over 230 electors. Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist)-Liberation, one of the key components of the opposition alliance in Bihar, highlighted, among other irregularities, how names of 180 voters in just one village had been removed from the list as 'dead.' Amid all these irregularities coming to the fore, the ECI's response to various allegations itself has triggered suspicion about its intentions. First, while the ECI said that their SIR exercise is not unprecedented and was done previously in 2003, orders and guidelines concerning the 2003 exercise have gone missing from the public domain, including the ECI website. The ECI told journalists that these documents could not be traced. Second, after 6.5 million names were removed from Bihar's draft electoral roll published on August 1, including 2.2 million as 'declared dead,' political parties asked for a list of persons whose names were removed upon declaring them dead. While the ECI said that no name will be deleted without notice to the individual, it refused to furnish a separate list of the 'dead.' The poll panel told the Supreme Court that the law 'does not require sharing details of persons not included in the draft electoral roll.' It added that the rules do not mandate it to furnish reasons for the non-inclusion of any individual in the draft roll. This resistance to disclosure makes it almost impossible for parties and people to verify whether the deletions are justified or if eligible voters have been disenfranchised. Third, after opposition political parties and journalists started reporting wrong inclusions and deletions, the ECI, instead of addressing the faults, decided to hinder their search for irregularities by replacing machine-readable original PDFs with non-machine-readable, scanned copies, examination of which will not only take a longer time but also require use of premium software services. Fourth, the ECI has decided to destroy CCTV footage and other visual records, including photographs and webcasts, in and outside polling stations 45 days after the election results, unless an election petition is filed within that period. Earlier, they used to be kept for at least three months. This has also come under heavy criticism, with democratic rights activists accusing it of being another step against transparency. The ECI's apparent lack of love for transparency is not surprising, though. The Modi government itself is known for blocking the flow of information using various means, including hastening the death of the RTI, a landmark legislation that was enacted by the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance in 2005. This law was a milestone toward transparency and accountability. Writing for The Hindu, transparency activists Anjali Bhardwaj and Amrita Johri pointed out that the deletion of 6.5 million names from the electoral roll in Bihar after the first phase of the SIR amounted to an average deletion of about 27,000 voters per constituency. In a state where most seats are won by a slender margin, this number exceeds the winning margin in two-thirds of seats in the 2020 assembly elections. 'This scale of deletions could potentially swing the electoral outcome in most assembly constituencies,' they said, adding that such a lack of transparency has real and potentially grave implications for electoral democracy. 'Such disenfranchisement not only undermines the legitimacy of elections but also weakens faith in institutions that are meant to safeguard the democratic process,' they opined. Krishangi Sinha and Sanjay Kumar of Lokniti-Center for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS) highlighted that when Lokniti-CSDS conducted a post-poll survey of the National Election Study 2024, it revealed a 'concerning trend' of 12 percent of the respondents saying they 'don't much' trust the ECI, and 7 percent saying they do not trust the poll body 'at all.' 'At a time when public trust in institutions is under great strain, the ECI cannot afford to be so opaque and must take measures to ensure transparency,' they argued. When people's trust in institutions declines, it can trigger enormous unrest. India has to simply look east to Bangladesh for evidence. Irregularities in several successive elections triggered unrest that culminated in the toppling of the Awami League government there last year.
3 days ago
Ex-Japan PM Suga Trying to Exert Influence in LDP
Tokyo, Aug. 13 (Jiji Press)--Former Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga, also vice president of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, is considering ways to increase his presence ahead of an extraordinary parliamentary session in autumn. "We must rebuild our party," Suga stressed at a meeting with the two other former prime ministers of Taro Aso and Fumio Kishida as well as incumbent Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba on July 23 in the wake of the LDP's stunning defeat in the election for the House of Councillors, the upper chamber of the Diet, Japan's parliament. Aso urged Ishiba, also current LDP chief, to resign, saying the party will not be able to win elections under his leadership. The Ishiba-led ruling coalition has already lost its majority in the House of Representatives, the all-important lower chamber. But Suga did not show his explicit opposition to Ishiba's continued leadership at the meeting. Later, he told people around him that the party "should give consideration to the social atmosphere." Since the Upper House election loss, mainly LDP members who had belonged to a now-defunct intraparty faction once led by former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe have stepped up calls for Ishiba's resignation. On the other hand, opinion surveys by media organizations have found that many people want him to stay in power. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.]
