
A New Requirement for Oscar Voters: They Must Actually Watch the Films
It has not always been necessary to read the book in order to write a book report, as many a devious middle schooler familiar with CliffsNotes or A.I. can attest. And it turns out that Oscar voters have not always had to watch all the films they passed judgment on.
But now the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is trying to change that.
The academy announced a new rule this week that most filmgoers could be forgiven for assuming was already in place: From now on, members of the academy will be required to actually watch all the nominated films in each category they vote in.
Cue the collective side eye.
'Like 'Casablanca,' I am shocked, shocked to discover that there are academy members who don't watch all the movies,' said Bruce Vilanch, a comedian who has written for 25 Oscar shows, who added that the new rule was 'kind of hysterical.'
Skyler Higley, a comedy writer who was on Conan O'Brien's writing team when he hosted the Oscars last month, called the new requirement 'un-American.'
'What we do in this country is we sort of vote based on vibes and preferences and biases,' he said. 'So to suddenly require that these guys know what they're talking about when they're voting, it's just not what we do in this nation.'
Doug Benson, a stand-up comedian and host of the podcast 'Doug Loves Movies,' said the rule was 'crazy' because most voters were too busy making movies to watch them. 'This sucks for academy members,' he said. 'But the upside for moviegoers? Maybe award-bait movies will start clocking in at a more reasonable 88 minutes. If they implemented the rule this year, 'The Brutalist' would have won squat.'
Laurie Kilmartin, a comedian who wrote for the most recent Oscars, noted that she had watched each movie just to be able to write jokes about them. 'I can't believe they couldn't be troubled to watch every movie to vote,' she said.
The change will require commitment when it comes to voting for best picture, since the category now includes 10 nominees, up from five in the past.
On social media, the move has been met with a mixture of relief and disbelief. 'It took them nearly a century to make this law?' Peter Howell, a film critic for the Toronto Star, remarked. In discussion threads on Reddit, some users noted how unfair it was that academy members could have voted for — or overlooked — films they had not seen. Some wondered which movies might have been robbed in the past.
And in some academic circles, the subject revived critiques that the system has long been flawed. Racquel Gates, an associate professor of film and media studies at Columbia University, said she was not optimistic about the changes.
'It's a very necessary acknowledgment of the fact that the awards have not been based on the merits of the films or the performances,' she said, adding that too many awards had been won in the past based on the strength of the Oscar campaigns waged by studios, the popularity of films, or the familiarity voters have had with filmmakers.
How will the new system work?
Past writers for the telecast had a few ideas.
Vilanch mused that it would be entertaining to watch academy officials try to round up and penalize people for not being honest about their Oscar ballots. 'The honor system has always worked very well in Hollywood,' he observed dryly.
Kilmartin suggested that voters should be asked to write a short summary of each film before being allowed to vote.
The academy plans to keep track of what members have seen in its digital screening room, and to require members to fill out a form noting films seen elsewhere, including in theaters or at festivals. If any film in a given category has not been viewed, the member will not be able to vote in that category.
The new rule comes as the academy has grown in recent years. It now has roughly 10,000 voting members, up from about 6,700 in 2017.
It is not the only awards show trying to make sure that voters actually see the works they are weighing in on.
Several years ago, the Tonys implemented rules requiring voters to see every nominated Broadway production and mark their attendance in an online portal.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fans Are Reacting To Miley Cyrus Being Heckled And "Bullied Into Singing" At Her Film Premiere
Last night, Miley Cyrus attended the Tribeca Film Festival to debut her new film, Something Beautiful. It's a companion piece for her album of the same name, which came out last Friday. She was onstage discussing the film with producer Panos Cosmatos when an attendee interrupted the conversation from the crowd. "We thought this was a concert!" the person yelled. "Are you actually going to sing?" Related: Donald Trump's Apparent Baldness Is Going Viral In A New Photo Initially, Miley tried to ignore them, but eventually, she gave in and performed "The Climb" at a fan's request. Related: People Are Talking About The Most Shocking Celebrity Deaths That Don't Get Enough Attention A guest shared footage of the moment on TikTok, where it quickly went viral, amassing hundreds of thousands of views and tons of angry comments. "The way they bullied her into singing," one comment read. "Yall lucky this isn't the bangerz Miley," said another, referring to Miley's wild 2013 era. "people have no decorum anymore," someone else wrote, "like READ WHAT YOU GOT TICKETS FOR." "She owes these people nothing. She handled this with such class and grace. Shame on them," a fourth fan said, while others accused the hecklers of overshadowing Miley's premiere. "They stole her moment," one person said. "That was ROTTED." The backlash also continued on Reddit, with users praising Miley for the way she handled it while also saying "she should never have been put in that situation." "She handled that so gracefully but she should never have been put in that situation," one user wrote. "She's not a puppet and people need to learn some damn manners before leaving the house." "How can you buy 800$ tickets and not read what is the thing you are buying tickets to?" another wondered, while someone else argued, "There is no way it was advertised as a full fledged concert smh people can be so entitled….Miley is a class act ♥️" She really is, but my god was that rude. What do you all make of the moment? Tell me in the comments. Also in Celebrity: 14 Celebrities Who Have So Many Kids, They're Basically Running Their Own Daycare, And 11 Who Said "Hmm, Hard Pass" Also in Celebrity: 21 Times Celebrities Revealed Wildly Juicy, Shady, Or Even Disturbing Things In Interviews Also in Celebrity: Kylie Jenner's First Met Gala Dress Made Her Bleed, And 20 Other Red Carpet Looks That Took "Beauty Is Pain" Wayyyy Too Far


Buzz Feed
4 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Miley Cyrus Gets Heckled At Movie Premiere
Last night, Miley Cyrus attended the Tribeca Film Festival to debut her new film, Something Beautiful. It's a companion piece for her album of the same name, which came out last Friday. She was onstage discussing the film with producer Panos Cosmatos when an attendee interrupted the conversation from the crowd. "We thought this was a concert!" the person yelled. "Are you actually going to sing?" A guest shared footage of the moment on TikTok, where it quickly went viral, amassing hundreds of thousands of views and tons of angry comments. "The way they bullied her into singing," one comment read. "Yall lucky this isn't the bangerz Miley," said another, referring to Miley's wild 2013 era."people have no decorum anymore," someone else wrote, "like READ WHAT YOU GOT TICKETS FOR.""She owes these people nothing. She handled this with such class and grace. Shame on them," a fourth fan said, while others accused the hecklers of overshadowing Miley's premiere. "They stole her moment," one person said. "That was ROTTED." The backlash also continued on Reddit, with users praising Miley for the way she handled it while also saying "she should never have been put in that situation." She really is, but my god was that rude. What do you all make of the moment? Tell me in the comments.


Buzz Feed
7 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
13 Photos That Defy Logic And Explanation
Hello again, and welcome to our roundup of the most confusing photos we found on Reddit this week. Check out last week's if you missed it — and let's get right into it! This dog pic has got me confused to no end. Redditers can't even agree on an explanation, can you? HELP IN THE COMMENTS! Wait, how is this happening to this house?! It is actually two conjoined houses, painted very differently in Sweden. It is hard to explain, so here is a better picture from Google Earth. This scooter is not floating. What is going on? There is a pole under it, holding it up. Just look closely! This is not half a person fishing. Where is the rest of their body? They are wading in the water. If you zoom in, you can see the ripples around them. Yikes! But this is not an iron-clad scary person. Where is their face? Their face is actually facing away from the camera and you are looking at the back of their hood! This looks like a sweet little kitty, but it is not! What is it? Just a log. Did someone punch this wall? Nope, it is shaped that way — just erosion! Just simplify this photo, please. The cat is indeed using an inhaler, but the back part just happens to be a rug that matches its fur (making it look like a giant cat). This is not a cat in a giant bobby pin. Where is it at? It is looking down from a staircase! How is this person walking on this tiny boat? It is a statue, and the boat is in the distance! Are these cars how is this happening? The reflection is causing this! AH! Stop! What is it!? Someone's finger bent back against a wall. And, finally, this is not a one-eyed full ball. What is it? A flooooooooofy dog. And that is not an eye, it is its nose! Which one of these photos stumped you the most? Let us know in the comments!