Haiti's gangs have 'near-total control' of the capital as violence escalates, U.N. says
A U.N.-backed mission led by Kenyan police arrived in Haiti last year to help quell gang violence, but the mission remains understaffed and underfunded, with only about 40% of the 2,500 personnel originally envisioned. U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres' proposal in February to have the U.N. provide drones, fuel, ground and air transport and other non-lethal support to the Kenya-led mission has languished in the council.
In response to the gangs, the UNODC's Waly said there has been a rapid growth in the number and activities of private security companies and vigilante self-defense groups, with some trying to protect their communities while others act illegally and collude with gangs.
"Over the last three months," Jenca said, "these groups reportedly killed at least 100 men and one woman suspected of gang association or collaboration."
He said the last three months have also seen an increase in sexual violence by gangs with the U.N. political mission in Haiti documenting 364 incidents of sexual violence involving 378 survivors just from March to April.
A new report by U.N. experts covering the period from last October through February said the gangs have exploited political turmoil and the disorganized response to Haiti's security crisis, pointing to competing political ambitions and allegations of corruption within Haiti's transitional governing bodies that have stymied action.
"While the expansion of territorial control brings gangs additional sources of revenue and bargaining power," the experts said, "these attacks are also backed by individuals trying to destabilize the political transition for their own political goals."
One major result is that very little progress has been made toward restoring public security or implementing the roadmap for organizing national elections by February 2026, the experts monitoring an arms embargo on Haiti and sanctions against key gang leaders said in the report to the Security Council.
With a weak national police force facing acute tensions in its leadership, an army that needs rebuilding, and the limited ability of the multinational force, the experts warned that the gangs will continue "to have the upper hand unless stronger international support is provided."
As for vigilante groups, the experts said, they "often include local police officers, some of whom actively participate in human rights violations."
The Haitian National Police have also carried out "a worrying number of extrajudicial killings … with suspected gang members often summarily executed," the experts said, pointing to 281 summary executions by specialized police units in 2024 including 22 women and 8 children.
Despite the U.N. arms embargo on Haiti, gangs continue to obtain more powerful weapons not only from regional civilian markets but from police stockpiles in Haiti and the neighboring Dominican Republic, the experts said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Channel 4
4 hours ago
- Channel 4
Epstein scandal looms over Washington DC
I land in Washington DC with the capital engulfed in the Epstein saga. The years-long scandal has inflamed again over the summer and President Trump, who is the master of the media blizzard, can't seem to move on from it. The questions about his ties to the convicted sex offender won't go away. And unhelpfully for the president, many of the loudest voices calling for the release of the 'Epstein files' are from within his loyal base (egged on in the years before the election by none other than Donald Trump Jr and now Vice President JD Vance). But this week the story moves in the direction of another president: Former President Bill Clinton. He's been subpoenaed, along with Hillary Clinton, to give testimony on his links to Epstein. President Clinton is on record saying he regrets ever meeting Epstein and never visited his notorious private island and had no knowledge of his crimes. So has the Republican-led committee that issued the subpoenas just done President Trump a huge favour, drawing the Clintons and the Democrats into the saga? Possibly not, the same committee is also demanding the release of more Epstein-related documents from the Department of Justice, a reminder that plenty among the MAGA base believe they were promised far more transparency on Epstein from this president. I'm no stranger to the US beat, having been back and forth several times over the years, often in the summer months. My first impression this time is that the inflation that dominated the election cycle is very real. Prices are high, and so are the stakes for President Trump. He was elected to fix the Biden economy and consumer patience may well be running thin. It's August, but for the Trump White House, there's no time for silly season. Not in your first year of re-election. Sidebar: Joe Biden's numbers tanked during the Afghanistan debacle of his first August in power and never recovered. So while the Epstein issue has the social media algorithms in overdrive, Trump's second term will likely be defined by the state of the economy. To that end, Donald Trump has just fired a top official because he didn't like the latest stats on jobs added in the United States. Without evidence, he accused her of faking the stats to make him look bad and inflating them before the election to make Biden-Harris look good. The only problem? Biden's last jobs numbers before the election were actually worse than Trump's now. This is all pretty revealing about the mindset of President Trump. He knows he won the election with a promise to 'make America affordable again.' Which takes us to tariffs. Another 25% just whacked on India for buying Russian oil. Make that 50% when you take into account hikes he'd already announced for a slew of countries taking effect this week. The economic wisdom is that tariffs, which of course are largely paid by US consumers, are inflationary. And yet President Trump is sticking with them. It's a big risk. Kamala Harris was punished for rocketing inflation in the Biden economy. Voters could see it with their own eyes and feel it in their own pockets. But the official numbers told the same story and Biden-Harris paid the price. And who posted those numbers? Only the stats chief President Trump just fired. Bill and Hillary Clinton subpoenaed in widening Epstein probe President Trump defends sacking of head of US labour stats bureau
Spectator
12 hours ago
- Spectator
Donald Trump is humiliating Switzerland
The Swiss president and economy minister are rushing to Washington in a last-ditch attempt to reverse Donald Trump's decision to impose a devastating 39 per cent tariff on Swiss exports. That decision landed in Bern with the force of a punch to the stomach. Officials were blindsided and the stock market and Swiss franc slumped. The tariff, higher than what the EU or UK received, threatens the very foundations of Switzerland's export-led economy. With just one days before the tariffs come into effect, the mood in Bern is one of quiet panic. Right up until the announcement Switzerland thought it had done everything right. It sent billions in investment to the US and removed nearly all industrial tariffs on American goods. It signed up early to US-led sanctions against Russia, and in recent years all but dismantled its once-sacrosanct banking secrecy regime at Washington's request. Switzerland went from being a truly neutral country to towing the line on pretty much everything the US requested. And now none of this deference appears to have counted at all. The Swiss have been hit with one of the harshest tariffs imposed on any US trading partner. In truly humiliating fashion, the new tariffs were announced by Trump on Switzerland's national day. Now, in a move that smacks of desperation, the Swiss president is making a last-minute, uninvited dash to Washington to plead for mercy. Her mission is so urgent it was launched without a formal White House invitation, in the hope perhaps of securing a face-to-face meeting. The blow could hardly have landed harder. The US is by far Switzerland's largest export market. Pharmaceuticals, luxury watches and precision machinery are all heavily reliant on American buyers. Shares in flagship companies like UBS, Richemont and Roche tumbled after the announcement. Analysts immediately downgraded growth forecasts. The Swiss franc fell. What was once a model trade relationship now threatens to upend the country's economy. Swiss officials had expected perhaps 10 or 15 per cent tariffs, but nothing on this scale. What makes the blow even harder to swallow is who got off lightly. The EU, of which Switzerland isn't a member, secured a 15 per cent tariff in its deal with Washington. The UK got a 10 per cent rate. Swiss officials entirely expected to be treated on similar terms, if not better. Switzerland had gone further than most, scrapping all industrial tariffs on US imports and pledging nearly $150 billion in American-bound investment. Instead, it was hit with a 39 per cent levy, one of the highest Trump has imposed on any country. The sense of humiliation is acute. Switzerland believed it was a trusted ally. It's now wondering if that trust was hopelessly naïve. The humiliation wasn't just economic. It was personal. Last Thursday President Karin Keller-Sutter held what officials now describe as a 'disastrous' phone call with Trump. For weeks, Swiss negotiators believed they were on track to secure a deal close to the UK's 10 per cent at most. Instead, Trump made it clear that was off the table. 'The woman was nice, but she didn't want to listen', he told reporters after the call. He raged about the trade deficit. Reports from Washington suggest that all Trump had focused on was that Switzerland's deficit was 'stealing money' from the US. The next day, when he imposed the 39 per cent tariff, the Swiss press called it Keller-Sutter's 'greatest fiasco'. Blick compared it to the country's worst military defeat, at the Battle of Marignano in 1515, when Swiss forces were decisively defeated by the French. At the centre of Trump's wrath is Switzerland's vast pharmaceutical sector. Companies like Novartis and Roche dominate Swiss exports to the US. Pharmaceuticals alone account for nearly 50 per cent of Swiss exports. Trump wants the Swiss to cut prices and shift production to America. But the real trigger for the tariffs was the trade imbalance: a $39 billion deficit. Much of that imbalance comes from gold bullion, which merely passes through Switzerland to be refined. More confusing still, both gold and pharmaceuticals are, at least for now, exempt from the new tariffs. Which leaves the Swiss scratching their heads – if the problem isn't what's being taxed, what's Trump punishing them for? The answer may be that Switzerland was playing by the wrong rulebook. In Bern, officials approached the talks with the US as technocrats, expecting that transparency, fairness, and compliance would be rewarded. They believed in offers that made sense on paper, pledging investment, scrapping tariffs, and upholding the international order. But Trump didn't focus on that. Perhaps he just wanted spectacle. Perhaps he just wanted to win. 'The problem is the Swiss believe we have to make reasonable and honest offers', one person close to the negotiations told the FT. 'We are not good at international power politics'. That misreading of the moment has left Switzerland exposed and scrambling. The goal now appears to be to offer Trump something, anything, that might convince him to reverse course. Behind closed doors, the Swiss government is hurriedly assembling a package of concessions. Agriculture is said to be on the table, despite fierce opposition from Swiss farmers who have already vowed vehemently to fight any changes. There's also talk of revisiting the contentious deal for the F-35 fighter jets Switzerland ordered from Lockheed Martin, after Washington requested up to CHF 1.3 billion more than the agreed price. Analysts say opening the contract to further concessions could become part of Bern's pitch. Officials are also said to be pushing pharma giants to pledge fresh investment in the States, and to lower prices of pharmaceuticals sold there, though the Swiss government has no legal means to compel them. Energy purchases, particularly American LNG, may also be part of the mix. However, Switzerland is a landlocked and nuclear-powered country, and barely uses gas. In short, it seems the Swiss now are preparing to offer a little bit of everything. Whether that's enough for Trump remains to be seen. The deeper reckoning is with Switzerland's foreign policy. In recent years, Switzerland has gradually surrendered its cherished neutrality, not just in rhetoric but in action. It caved on bank secrecy when Washington demanded it. It signed up to US-led sanctions on Russia, aligning itself with Nato positions it once studiously avoided. The once proudly neutral country has become, in effect, a loyal US satellite state, but without the protection or reciprocity the Swiss government thought that status was supposed to guarantee. And now, the Swiss find themselves targeted with the harshest tariffs. It turns out that compliance may not afford privileges. A country that once prided itself on independence is learning that deference earns no favours in the age of Trump. Analysts speculate that Trump's tariff is less about economics and more about projecting strength against an easy target. The spectacle of Switzerland grovelling for a better tariff rate, rushing to Washington with watches, LNG pledges and budget sweeteners, is more than a diplomatic embarrassment. It marks the end of an era. A small, rule-abiding country can no longer rely on predictability in global affairs. Switzerland believed that concessions would shield it from geopolitical storms. But it now finds itself alone, humiliated, and economically exposed. Trump's tariff is a brutal reminder that global trade isn't governed by fairness, it's governed by leverage. And in this game, the Swiss have discovered, deference counts for nothing.
North Wales Chronicle
a day ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Hezbollah threatens to resume firing at Israel if it intensifies Lebanon action
Naim Kassem's comments came as Lebanon's Cabinet was meeting to discuss Hezbollah's disarmament. Beirut is under US pressure to disarm the group that recently fought a 14-month war with Israel and was left gravely weakened, with many of its political and military leaders dead. Since the war ended in November with a US-brokered ceasefire, Hezbollah officials have said the group will not discuss its disarmament until Israel withdraws from five hills it controls inside Lebanon and stops almost daily airstrikes that have killed or wounded hundreds of people, most of them Hezbollah members. Israel has accused Hezbollah of trying to rebuild its military capabilities. Israel's military has said the five locations in Lebanon provide vantage points or are located across from communities in northern Israel, where about 60,000 Israelis were displaced during the war. Since the ceasefire, Hezbollah has claimed responsibility for one attack on a disputed area along the border. In a televised speech on Tuesday, Kassem said Hezbollah rejects any timetable to hand over its weapons. 'Israel's interest is not to widen the aggression because if they expand, the resistance will defend, the army will defend and the people will defend,' he said. 'This defence will lead to the fall of missiles inside Israel.' Since the war ended, Hezbollah has withdrawn most of its fighters and weapons from the area along the border with Israel south of the Litani river. Last week, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun reiterated calls for Hezbollah to give up its weapons, angering the group's leadership. The ceasefire agreement left vague how Hezbollah's weapons and military facilities north of the Litani river should be treated, saying Lebanese authorities should dismantle unauthorised facilities starting with the area south of the river. Hezbollah maintains the deal covers only the area south of the Litani, while Israel and the US say it mandates disarmament of the group throughout Lebanon. Kassem said Hezbollah rejects a government vote over its weapons, saying such a decision should be unanimously backed by all Lebanese. 'No one can deprive Lebanon of its force to protect its sovereignty,' Kassem said. Hezbollah's weapons are a divisive issue among Lebanese, with some groups calling for its disarmament. The Israel-Hezbollah war started a day after the October 7 2023 Hamas-led attack against Israel from Gaza. It left more than 4,000 people dead and caused 11 billion dollars (£8.3 billion) of damage.
