Human rights panel steps in after elderly Gurugram couple found living in neglect
The Haryana Human Rights Commission (HHRC) has taken suo motu cognizance of the alarming condition of a 96-year-old man and his 86-year-old wife, who were allegedly neglected by their son, Rajesh Mitra. The couple has reportedly been left to fend for themselves in their home at Ridgewood Estate, DLF City Phase IV, Gurugram, under the care of two untrained female attendants and without any meaningful medical supervision.
Acting on a complaint filed by residents and representatives of the Ridgewood Estate Condominium Association, the commission noted that the couple had been living in a state of grave neglect. Residents reported hearing the elderly man frequently cry out in pain, causing emotional distress not only to his wife but also to other senior citizens living nearby.
In response, HHRC chairperson Justice Lalit Batra directed the Gurugram deputy commissioner to form a multi-disciplinary team. This team is to include the Gurugram police commissioner, sub-divisional magistrate, civil surgeon, and district social officer. The team has been tasked with visiting the couple's residence to conduct a comprehensive medical, psychological, and social assessment of their condition. The findings must be submitted to the commission before the next hearing on July 3.
The commission's order noted that despite multiple appeals made to the son and local authorities, no substantial action had been taken, necessitating the commission's intervention.
Justice Batra expressed grave concern over the prolonged physical and mental suffering endured by the elderly couple. He underscored that such neglect amounts to a violation of Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to live with dignity. He emphasised that this issue should not be dismissed as a private family matter but recognised as a serious public human rights concern, especially when society and the state fail to protect vulnerable citizens.
Justice Batra also referenced the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, particularly Section 20, which obligates the state to ensure adequate healthcare services for senior citizens—such as reserved hospital beds, separate queues, and subsidised treatment.
'If the neglect is found to be intentional, criminal liability under Section 24 of the Act may be invoked against the responsible individual,' Justice Batra added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
HC quashes govt. order on collection of fees from medical interns
The Kerala High Court has set aside the State government's order imposing internship fee on foreign medical graduates for doing their compulsory rotatory medical Internship (CRMI) in government hospitals. Justice N. Nagaresh passed the order recently while allowing writ petitions filed by students who completed their medical degree courses in countries such as Russia, Bulgaria, the Philippines, and Guyana. According to the petitioners, no fees can be collected from the foreign medical graduates in light of the circular of the National Medical Commission. The government was collecting ₹5,000 a month as fees. The court observed that when the National Medical Commission (NMC) Act mandated payment of stipends to medical interns for their services, the State government was not justified in imposing internship fees on them.
Time of India
18 hours ago
- Time of India
High court affirms medical reimbursement as fundamental right
Chandigarh: Punjab and Haryana high court has held that the right to life includes the right to medical facilities, and the denial of medical reimbursement violates Article 21 of the Constitution. Emphasising that medical bills must be processed and reimbursed promptly, the court observed that requiring an individual to have their medical bills re-certified by the hospital or doctor, after they were already duly submitted, would constitute a grave injustice. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa passed these orders while allowing a petition filed by Rajesh Kaushik, seeking directions to consider and release the medical reimbursement of over Rs 2.12 lakh along with interest, which was sanctioned via order dated Jan 9, 2014. He also sought directions to quash the letters by the department asking him to re-submit the verified bills after seven years of submitting the original ones. The petitioner was an employee of PEPSU Road Transport Corporation, Nabha Road, Patiala. His wife got a knee transplant at Fortis Hospital, Mohali, on June 27, 2013. Following this, the counsel for the petitioner, Vikas Chatrath, submitted that medical bills were duly submitted by the petitioner for the purpose of medical reimbursement. This was duly sanctioned and approved by the competent authority in 2014. Even the petitioner submitted duplicate medical bills for release of medical reimbursement. "However, after almost seven years, it is not possible for the petitioner to get the medical bills certified again from the concerned doctor. Once the medical bills are sanctioned, the respondents are duty-bound to release these," Chatrath submitted. Contesting the plea, the state govt submitted that the medical bills were misplaced, and as such, the impugned letters were issued to the petitioner to get the medical bills certified again from the concerned authority/doctor. As such, the action of the department in not releasing the medical reimbursement is legal and valid, the HC was informed. The HC quashed all the letters through which the state was asked to re-submit the bills and directed the authorities to release the sanctioned and approved medical reimbursement amount of Rs 2.12 lakh to the petitioner within four weeks. "The action of the respondents in not releasing the amount of medical reimbursement to the petitioner violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution," observed the judge in its order released last week.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Food dept cracks down on meat shops in Ghaziabad
Ghaziabad: Food safety department has launched a crackdown on illegal slaughtering, poor hygiene and unregistered food business operators (FBOs) in Ghaziabad. This led to closure notices, seizure of equipment and penalties under the Food Safety and Standards Act on Wednesday. During an inspection at Halal Chicken Shop in Shastri Nagar, chicken slaughtering was found to be taking place despite the outlet having no registration for a slaughterhouse, assistant commissioner of food (Grade II), Ghaziabad, Dr Arvind Yadav told TOI. "The FBO had a registration for a meat shop but not for slaughtering. As a preventive measure, the slaughtering equipment was seized while he was allowed to continue the shop and sale of meat. A penalty was imposed on him as per provisions of the Food Safety Act," Dr Yadav said. In Indirapuram's Kanawani Pulia area, a meat shop, run by Guddu Qureshi, was found operating without any food registration. Legal proceedings under Section 58 of the Act were initiated and the shop was shut down immediately. Another meat shop in the area, Pappu Mutton Shop, was issued a notice for violating registration conditions. Officials said its licence may be suspended if hygiene issues are not resolved within the given timeline. At Windsor Street Market in Indirapuram, Lucknow Wale Kababi Non-Veg Restaurant was pulled up for displaying roasted meat in the open and poor cleanliness, Yadav said.
