Deaf people still struggle, Brighton TikTok star's inquest hears
A nurse involved in the care of a deaf TikTok star has told an inquest into her death there is a "huge shortage" of British Sign Language (BSL) interpreters and she still sees people struggling.Carmen Jones, a nurse involved in Imogen Nunn's care, said "it would be very difficult" for a deaf person to communicate the crisis they were in without an interpreter.Ms Nunn, known as Immy, died in Brighton, East Sussex, on New Year's Day 2023 after taking a poisonous substance she had ordered online.The 25-year-old, who was born deaf, raised awareness of hearing and mental health issues on her social media accounts, which attracted more than 780,000 followers.
On Tuesday, the inquest at West Sussex Coroner's Court in Horsham heard from Ms Jones, a nurse for the deaf adult community team (DACT) at South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust.Communicating through a BSL interpreter, she said: "Even in my current job I still struggle to get interpreters for my role in my work and because I've seen deaf patients requiring access to mental health teams, I see that they are also struggling."Just days before Ms Nunn's death, she received a check-in visit at her home from care professionals after sending a text message saying she had had an increase in suicidal thoughts.No BSL interpreter was brought to the meeting as there was not enough time to arrange it, the court was told in March.
Consultant psychiatrist Simon Baker, who visited Ms Nunn on 29 December 2022 at her home, previously told the court he was "surprised" how well the meeting had gone.The inquest into Ms Nunn's death was previously adjourned for two months because there were no BSL interpreters available to translate for two members of DACT."It's based around language, how can anyone understand another person if they don't share a language?" Ms Jones added.
Senior coroner Penelope Schofield's prevention of future deaths report regarding Ms Nunn's care also highlighted the lack of availability of BSL interpreters to support deaf patients being treated with mental health difficulties.She said: "This was particularly apparent when mental health staff were seeking an interpreter at short notice for a patient who was in crisis."The lack of interpreters available has meant that urgent assessments are being carried out with no interpreters present."The inquest continues on Wednesday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Belfast Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Midwife struck off after claiming vaccines ‘attacked babies' on social media
Seana Mary Kerr, of Newry, Northern Ireland, also told a pregnant woman in a shop that she should not be wearing a face mask during the Covid-19 pandemic, according to a Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) tribunal panel judgment. Ms Kerr, who had been a registered midwife since 2007, was found by a panel to have placed the woman at 'significant risk of harm' with her views, while she had 'risked seriously undermining the public confidence' in her profession at a crucial time with her posts. In the first of three social media posts in September 2020, Ms Kerr said that babies were being attacked in the womb through vaccination of mothers during pregnancy. Then, in March 2021, she claimed healthcare professionals were being 'complicit' in the national response to Covid-19, and that the health crisis was 'a Trojan horse intend[ed] to introduce a new era for humanity'. A further post in December that year made reference to how a group of people, described as 'they', had been 'planting the seeds' about Covid-19 over Christmas 2020 by referring to 'some bat in China'. Ms Kerr's advice and social media comments were given when she had identified herself as a midwife and was 'promoting her opinion on matters of clinical importance', the panel found. 'The panel considered that the actions of Ms Kerr took place during an exceptionally unusual time, where the entirety of the NHS was mobilised to protect the public from the international Covid-19 pandemic,' they said. 'Therefore, by expressing the view that other healthcare professionals, who Ms Kerr was working with in the Trust, were acting in ways which may cause harm, a view Ms Kerr held which was against the recognised guidance at the time, Ms Kerr risked seriously undermining the public confidence in the profession. 'It further noted that by making these accusations that Ms Kerr's colleagues may have suffered harm while working in an unprecedented and challenging situation.' The midwife approached the pregnant woman in the shop, which was her place of work, during the other allegation in question in August 2020. She identified herself as a midwife before advising the woman that she should not be wearing the face mask as it reduced the amount of oxygen her baby was receiving. Ms Kerr went on to tell the woman that she should not receive a flu vaccination as this would increase the risk of her baby being stillborn. The panel found the pregnant woman and her family were caused 'significant emotional harm' as a result of Ms Kerr's behaviour. 'The panel noted that it is a reasonable expectation of everyone working in a public environment, such as a shop, that they will not be approached and given personal, clinical advice and that such advice would normally only be given during a private clinical appointment or at an antenatal class,' they said. 'Therefore, by approaching Patient A in her place of work, outside a clinical relationship, unsolicited, Ms Kerr placed her at significant risk of harm.' The panel found Ms Kerr's fitness to practise was still impaired and that there was a risk of the individual repeating her behaviour. Ms Kerr did not show any remorse for her misconduct or demonstrate any insight into her previous actions, and had not engaged with the NMC since June 2022, the panel said. It made an order to strike Ms Kerr's name from the register, after a 12-month suspension order had previously been imposed last year.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Time to face the harsh realities of spending orthodoxy
Labour came to power fatuously parroting the word 'change' and yet has shown itself to be the same old tax and spending party it has always been. What it meant was a change of party in office not a change of direction. Not only have taxes gone up but so-called protected spending is set to rise despite record debt levels. Yet if ever a public policy has been tested to destruction surely it is the notion that the NHS will improve if only more money is thrown at it. Even Sir Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, are on record as saying that higher health spending is not the answer to the endemic flaws in the health service and yet another £30 billion is to be announced for the next three years on top of the £22 billion handed over after last year's general election, much of which went on pay and showed nothing in the way of productivity improvement. No mainstream politician is prepared to acknowledge that the problem with the NHS is the fact it is a nationalised industry with all the inherent inefficiencies associated with such. Most other advanced economies in Europe and elsewhere have social insurance systems which work better. But the insistence in Britain of cleaving to the 1948 'founding principle' that treatment should be free at the point of delivery has become a quasi-religious doctrine that few dare challenge. Only Nigel Farage has questioned the wisdom of continuing with a system that patently fails to achieve what others manage to do but has been noticeably quiet on the subject recently because Labour will exploit it mercilessly to see off the Reform threat. Telling people that they will have to pay for something they have always had for free is even more difficult when political parties are prepared to see the health system get worse rather than reform it. The same is true of welfare. Taking benefits from people, even when they are payments introduced just a few years ago like the winter fuel allowance, is hard if the reasons are not explained and the issue is 'weaponised' by opponents. Yet unless the welfare budget is brought under control it will bankrupt the country. If change is to mean anything then we need politicians finally to understand the extent of the country's difficulties and make decisions accordingly. Will we see that from the Chancellor on Wednesday?
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Midwife who told pregnant shop keeper that wearing a facemask during the height of the pandemic would harm her unborn baby is struck off
An award-winning midwife has been struck off the register after she urged pregnant women to avoid COVID vaccinations and face masks during the height of the pandemic. Northern Ireland NHS worker Seana Kerr told a pregnant shopworker not to wear a mask in August 2020 in case it harmed her unborn child. Ms Kerr, who had been a registered midwife since 2007, approached the 27-week pregnant woman and said that a face covering would 'reduce the amount of oxygen her baby was receiving'. She had introduced herself as a midwife and further suggested to the mother-to-be that she should consider rejecting the offer of a flu vaccination in case it increased the risk of her baby being stillborn. The pregnant woman, known only as Patient A, said she was left 'highly distressed' by the incident because it was her first pregnancy and she 'wanted to ensure she was doing the best for her child'. A Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) tribunal suspended Ms Kerr for 12 months last year, and said she placed the woman at 'significant risk of harm' and 'risked seriously undermining the public confidence' in her profession at a crucial time. The panel also took issue with the midwife's social media posts throughout that period. Ms Kerr, who won Northern Ireland 's Excellence in Midwifery award in 2018 and was nominated for a further award in 2020, said that babies were being attacked in the womb through vaccination of mothers during pregnancy. Ms Kerr's statements on Facebook were also investigated Nursing and Midwifery Council She also claimed in March 2021 that healthcare professionals were being 'complicit' in the national response to Covid-19, and that the health crisis was 'a Trojan horse intend[ed] to introduce a new era for humanity'. A further post in December saw her make reference to how a group of people, described as 'they', had been 'planting the seeds' about Covid-19 over Christmas 2020 by referring to 'some bat in China'. Ms Kerr's social media comments were posted when she had identified herself as a midwife and was 'promoting her opinion on matters of clinical importance', the panel found. Ms Kerr last year said she 'did not deny any of it' and 'cannot regret a word I said', adding: 'I stood on principle, for what I believed in. And I still believe that this matters.' 'The panel considered that the actions of Ms Kerr took place during an exceptionally unusual time, where the entirety of the NHS was mobilised to protect the public from the international Covid-19 pandemic,' they said. 'Therefore, by expressing the view that other healthcare professionals, who Ms Kerr was working with in the Trust, were acting in ways which may cause harm, a view Ms Kerr held which was against the recognised guidance at the time, Ms Kerr risked seriously undermining the public confidence in the profession. 'It further noted that by making these accusations that Ms Kerr's colleagues may have suffered harm while working in an unprecedented and challenging situation.' The panel found the pregnant woman and her family were caused 'significant emotional harm' as a result of Ms Kerr's behaviour. 'The panel noted that it is a reasonable expectation of everyone working in a public environment, such as a shop, that they will not be approached and given personal, clinical advice and that such advice would normally only be given during a private clinical appointment or at an antenatal class,' they said. 'Therefore, by approaching Patient A in her place of work, outside a clinical relationship, unsolicited, Ms Kerr placed her at significant risk of harm.' The panel found Ms Kerr's fitness to practise was still impaired and that there was a risk of her repeating the behaviour. Ms Kerr did not show any remorse for her misconduct or demonstrate any insight into her previous actions, and had not engaged with the NMC since June 2022, the panel said. It made an order to strike Ms Kerr's name from the register, after a 12-month suspension order had previously been imposed last year.
