Did India attack on Nankana Sahib gurdwara, birthplace of Guru Nanak? Here's The Truth
Such content was being circulated to create communal hatred in India, it said. It is to be noted that Nankhana Sahib is the birthplace of Guru Nanak, the founder of Sikhism, and the gurdwara is a revered shrine and pilgrimage centre for Sikhs.
'A video shared on social media is claiming that India has carried out a drone attack on Nankana Sahib Gurdwara. #PIBFactCheck ❌ This claim is completely fake. ▶️ Such content is created to spread communal hatred. ▶️ Please be cautious. Do not forward such videos,' the post reads.
सोशल मीडिया पर साझा किए गए एक वीडियो में दावा किया जा रहा है कि भारत ने ननकाना साहिब गुरुद्वारे पर ड्रोन हमला किया है। #PIBFactCheck
❌यह दावा पूरी तरह फर्जी है।
▶️ सांप्रदायिक विद्वेष फैलाने के लिए ऐसे कंटेन्ट बनाए जाते हैं।
▶️ कृपया सतर्क रहें। ऐसे वीडियो फॉरवर्ड न करें।… pic.twitter.com/59omIJx9r6
— PIB Fact Check (@PIBFactCheck) May 10, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Marching in the name of legacy: Sikh regiment debate rekindled in Britain
1 2 3 4 5 6 The debate over whether there should be a Sikh regiment in the British Armed Forces has resurfaced, but the UK ministry of defence (MOD) insists there are no such plans. The debate was triggered after Lord Sahota asked British defence minister Lord Coaker in the House of Lords on July 7 whether there was any progress of having a Sikh regiment in the British Army, given the loyalty of Sikh soldiers in both world wars. Coaker replied: "Let me consider that request from my noble friend. I am quite happy to meet him to see what more we can do to recognise the contribution of soldiers such as Sikhs." This led to UK headlines such as 'Minister open to British Army Sikh regiment proposal'. Lord Sahota is the title given to British-Sikh Kuldip Singh Sahota, a member of the House of Lords. Contrary to the headlines, MOD sources told TOI that over the years there had been conversations about this, but such a move would breach Britain's anti-discriminatory laws. "There are no current plans for a Sikh regiment as it goes against the Equality Act. We want to do something to recognise Sikh contributions in some way, but not through a Sikh regiment," said sources. Lord Sahota, whose grandfathers served in the British Indian Army, including the 15th Punjab Regiment, told TOI: "I don't think it would go against the Equality Act." He pointed out the British Army had the Staffordshire regiment and currently has the Brigade of Gurkhas, the Royal Yorkshire Regiment, Royal Welsh and Royal Regiment of Scotland and so on. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo "It doesn't mean other faiths like Hindus, Muslim or Christians wouldn't be able to serve in a Sikh regiment. If you are in the Royal Regiment of Scotland, it doesn't mean you have to be Scottish." Lord Sahota said the regiment would give Sikhs a reason to join. "We are struggling to recruit ethnic minorities in this country," he said. "They would wear turbans and have beards, and it would reflect Sikh heritage and values. It would foster a better relationship with other countries such as India and South Asia as well." There are estimated to be only 200 Sikhs in the British Armed Forces. "People tend to go in the army if their grandfather was in it. Sikhs don't have that role model here," Sahota said. Sahota added that if there was a Punjab or Sikh regiment, they would have that role model. "There are more than 700,000 Sikhs in the UK. I am sure quite a few would be prepared to follow in their great grandfather's footsteps. King Charles even told a Sikh soldier he wanted to see more Sikhs in the British Army," the Labour life peer added. India-born Sahota (74) said he plans to meet Lord Coaker after the summer recess and will take Sikhs in the British Army and MPs with him. Birmingham Edgbaston MP Preet Kaur Gill, who has met the armed forces minister many times, to raise the issue, said no decision had been made yet. "It is being looked at. There have been existing Sikh regiments in the army. It's not anything new," she added. The Indian Army has a Sikh Regiment which continues to recruit from the community and a Punjab Regiment. The regiment is one of the most decorated and traces its origins to the first Sikh Battalion raised by the East India Company in 1846. But veteran army reservist Captain Jay Singh-Sohal OBE is against the idea. "Even if they did this, they wouldn't fill out a regiment with recruits. We struggle with getting young Sikhs into the military as it is. A Sikh regiment isn't going to change this and would become massively understaffed. A single-battalion regiment requires 700 plus. A Sikh regiment will fail as it won't get 700 plus young Sikhs joining. And if the answer is to look beyond Sikhs, what's the point of a race-specific regiment?" he said. "These British-Sikh politicians need to make the argument for the benefit of Sikh-specific regiments in the context of the threats we face today," Sohal added. "It's not about harking to past glories, but about practical ways in which Sikhs today can make an impact through military service. I believe Sikhs do make an impact as we serve alongside those who represent Great Britain as a whole," Johal said. He said the Sikh identity was already recognised as a strength in the British Army and protected by UK law. "We don't need special treatment. We already practice our faith in the army. A modern army is about bringing capabilities and insights from different walks of life and backgrounds to create a synergy into a whole team setting. Sikhs can contribute a lot to that. Having a Sikh-specific regiment won't motivate more youngsters to join. What would, is if they see value in soldiering or developing themselves as a leader through military experience. I challenge Preet Gill and Lord Sahota to find me 20 Sikhs willing to sign up to the British Army right now, regardless of whether we have a Sikh regiment or not. They won't be able to do it," Sohal added. Slough MP Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi, chair of the defence committee that scrutinises the work of the MOD, said he had supported the establishment of a British Sikh regiment for several years, given the extraordinary history, martial traditions and sacrifices of Sikh soldiers, especially during both world wars. "While the campaign has not achieved success thus far, we will certainly continue to make the case," he added.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
BJP Rewards Ex-Congress Ministers With Key Posts
New Delhi: Two former Congress ministers, who switched sides ahead of the Lok Sabha polls last year and won assembly elections on BJP tickets earlier this year, were rewarded and made chairpersons of two separate development boards. Raj Kumar Chauhan, who won from his traditional seat of Mangolpuri, was made the chairperson of the Delhi Village Development Board. Gandhi Nagar MLA Arvinder Singh Lovely was made the chairperson of the Trans Yamuna Development Board. Sources said the decision was taken in the cabinet meeting, chaired by chief minister Rekha Gupta, earlier this week, and a gazette notification is likely to be issued soon. The other members of the boards will be nominated by govt. The cabinet decisions mentioned that the two boards will advise govt on issues related to infrastructure development in those areas. Their appointment to the boards marks their return to govt after a gap of 12 years. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi Lovely was made a minister by then chief minister Sheila Dikshit in 2003. He held several important portfolios during his 10 years in office, including education, transport and revenue. Chauhan, who was brought into the cabinet by Dikshit in a reshuffle in 2001 during her first term as CM, remained a minister for 12 years and held PWD , irrigation and flood control, and revenue portfolios. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Swelling and internal bleeding in the brain, help this baby Donate For Health Donate Now Undo Both bring with them vast experience in governance, which will come in handy while working as the chairpersons of the village development board and Trans Yamuna Development Board, respectively. Lovely quit Congress in protest against the alliance with AAP in the Lok Sabha polls in 2024 and joined BJP. Chauhan left Congress after he was denied a Lok Sabha ticket in 2024. This was the second time for both Lovely and Chauhan to join BJP. The Gandhi Nagar MLA joined BJP in May 2017 but returned to Congress in Feb 2018, saying he was a "misfit" in the saffron party. Chauhan left Congress in May 2019 but returned within a few months. Both Lovely and Chauhan played significant roles in mobilising voters in favour of BJP in the Lok Sabha polls last year and the assembly elections earlier this year. While Lovely holds sway among voters in east and north-east Delhi and among the Sikhs, Chauhan is a well-known face among scheduled castes, besides being a popular politician in outer Delhi. Lovely won four consecutive assembly polls in 1998, 2003, 2008 and 2013, and lost in 2015 and 2020, before getting elected again in 2025, this time on a BJP ticket. Chauhan also won four consecutive elections between 1993 and 2008. He lost the 2013 and 2015 elections and got re-elected again in 2025. Their political acumen and administrative experience are considered a major asset for BJP and Delhi govt. Sources said both were accorded the status of cabinet ministers. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
The Print
2 days ago
- The Print
ThePrint Exclusive: Government ID cards, family testimony nail Pakistan links of Pahalgam killers
This week, though, hard evidence emerged from the bodies of the three terrorists killed in Kashmir's Dachigam, firmly establishing ties between the perpetrators of the Pahalgam massacre, Pakistan and the Lashkar. Two of three terrorists alleged to have carried out the attack in Pahalgam, intelligence sources told ThePrint, carried copies of their digital Pakistan government-issued identification, enabling their precise identification with stored biometric information. There was no one, back in the summer of 1998, seeking vengeance for Leela's sindoor. The then Union home minister Lal Krishna Advani had promised to punish the perpetrators of the wedding procession massacre at Chapnari, among the first in a series of communal mass killings that have claimed the lives of more than 700 Hindus and Sikhs in Kashmir. The prosecution of men accused of involvement in the massacre, though, collapsed for want of evidence. New Delhi: Leela Devi was sitting by the side of the bullet-riddled body of her husband of one day, Khem Raj, when the police finally arrived, clutching the only thing that remained of her marriage—Khem Raj's cheap rubber sandals. The body of the second bridegroom killed that day, Leela's brother Sesh Ram, who had been married to Dugdi Devi three days earlier, lay nearby. There were over 20 others dead, all members of the wedding procession from the hamlet of Kadal, who were accompanying another of Leela's brothers, Om Parkash, to his wedding at Korda. Evidence independently obtained by ThePrint also shows the Government of Pakistan has been aware of ongoing terrorist operations by the Lashkar and Jaish-e-Muhammad in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, but has done nothing to shut them down. The evidence of involvement of Pakistani nationals in Pahalgam, a senior Indian intelligence official told ThePrint, will enable India to push the international community harder for action against top jihadist leaders, like Hafiz Muhammad Saeed and Masood Azhar Alvi. 'The Pahalgam investigation shows that Pakistan-based terrorist groups have not only been involved in these killings,' he said, 'but that the government has been lying when it tells the international community that they have been shut down.' Following threats of sanctions by the multinational Financial Action Task Force, Pakistan had jailed some senior jihadists alleged to have links to the 26/11 attack on Mumbai. The country also promised action to end operations by the Lashkar and Jaish, which it had earlier proscribed. The NIA's evidence shows that the promise has been flagrantly violated. Also Read: Weeks after India's Operation Sindoor strikes, JeM reopens pool at Bahawalpur terror centre Killers in the database Evidence now gathered by India centres around national identification cards, issued by Pakistan's National Database Registration Authority or NADRA, to two of the terrorists killed in the Dachigam forests—cards mistakenly described by Union Home Minister Amit Shah as election identification cards in Parliament this week. The NADRA card system is the equivalent of India's Aadhaar cards, linked to a database with biometric information. Each card entry also holds geographical information on the holder, their family and cellphone records. The NADRA cards show that one of the perpetrators was Habib Tahir, from the village of Koiyan near Khaigala in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir—a former college student who dropped out of college in Rawalakot. Long involved with the Jama'at-e-Islami political party, local WhatsApp messages circulated among Jam'aat cadre in Khaigala and obtained by ThePrint show, Tahir then joined the Jama'at-ud-Dawa, the parent organisation of the Lashkar. Family sources told ThePrint that the Lashkar chief in Rawalakot, Rizwan Anees, had called Tahir's brother, who works in Saudi Arabia, to tell him of the firefight in Dachigam, where troops of the 4 Paracommando Regiment shot dead the Pahalgam perpetrators on 28 July. The following day, Rizwan visited the family in Koiyan, the family said, and asked to conduct a memorial prayer service for the slain terrorists. However, the terrorist's maternal uncles, Asif Akram and Jannat Akram, demanded that Rizwan leave the village, the family told ThePrint. 'Asif and Jannat said that the Lashkar was responsible for brainwashing their nephew and sending him to his death,' a witness said. 'There was an argument with Rizwan and his guards, which ended in a scuffle.' The second NADRA card—which was stored on a high-frequency encrypted communication device used by the terrorists—identifies the second perpetrator as Bilal Afzal. The card, seen by ThePrint, bears numbers suggesting Afzal was a resident of the Lahore area, and his father's name is Muhammad Afzal. Afzal is believed to have operated in Kashmir for several years under the code-name Suleman Shah, carrying out a succession of operations in last year's killings of construction workers in Gagangir. The three men, according to two Indian intelligence officials, were part of several teams operating under the command of Sajid Saifullah Jatt, a senior Lashkar operative who served in south Kashmir's Kulgam for several years from 2005. Sajid is believed to live in the village of Changa Manga near Lahore, with his ethnic-Kashmiri wife. Pakistan govt complicity Even though Pakistan's government has repeatedly claimed to have ended the operations of the LeT and JeM, documents obtained by ThePrint show both groups have continued to hold public functions in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Three days before the Lashkar terrorists were killed in Dachigam, Jaish commanders in Bairmang had asked local administrators to do a Ghaibana Namaz, or funeral rites conducted without the presence of a dead body, for a terrorist killed in Kashmir. Led by Noman Shahzad, the JeM's head in the Pakistan-occupied district of Bagh, the organisation had requested District Magistrate Raja Muhammad Zulfiqar Khan for permission to hold Ghaibana Namaz. A letter signed by Khan on 26 July had denied permission for the rally on the grounds that personnel displaying weapons might disturb the peace. Following the district administration's orders, the Jaish held a small prayer meeting in Barmang, residents told ThePrint. However, weapons were not allowed to be displayed. The district magistrate's letter, though, establishes that Pakistan is aware that proscribed jihadist groups continue to send operatives to engage in violence in Kashmir, but chooses not to crack down even after the Pahalgam massacre. Last year, ThePrint had reported the Lashkar's announcement of a Ghaibana Namaz for Lashkar terrorists Abdul Wahab, also known by the alias Abu Saifullah, and Sanam Jafar, who were killed near Sopore in north Kashmir in a firefight with Indian forces. The Lashkar had claimed Wahab was the fifth resident of Barmang to be killed fighting with the group in Kashmir. The terrorist group called the slain men 'great warriors who were martyred fighting the tyrannical Indian Army'. Video obtained by ThePrint also showed armed Jaish cadre firing shots in the air at a Ghaibana Namaz for slain terrorist Hafiz Mohammad Arsalan in 2022. Lashkar leader Naseer Ahmad told a gathering in Muridke, held soon before the Pahalgam massacre, that 'the ideological offspring of Hafiz Mohammed Saeed will continue his jihad'. Earlier, Lashkar co-founder Amir Hamza, internationally sanctioned for his role in raising terrorism funding, delivered a sermon in Murdike urging 'jihad against the infidels'. Local Lashkar leader Rizwan Hanif, speaking in Khaigala, close to Pahalgam attacker Tahir's village, urged followers to prepare for 'our jihad against the cow-worshippers'. Failed investigation in previous cases Lack of evidence, like the NADRA cards, has previously led to the investigation of massacres of Hindus in the Jammu region being stonewalled. The investigation into the wedding procession in Chapnari illustrated the problems. Abid Husain, known by the code name Abu Maaz, the LeT commander held responsible for the massacre and two other mass killings of Hindus that summer at Sarawan and Chhana-Thackrai, was shot dead in 1999. There was no hard evidence, however, to link him to Pakistan or the Lashkar. Five Indian nationals from the Doda area were prosecuted for their role in enabling the massacre, but all were acquitted for lack of evidence. Local resident Farooq Ahmed, arrested in 1998 but acquitted in 2006, left the village of Kastigarh soon after, and is now believed to be living in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, police say. Abdul Qayoom Hajam, Mohammad Rafiq and Ataullah Mohammad, all residents of the hamlet of Bhatta Deesa, were also arrested in 1998, but again acquitted. 'Even the persons, who in fact had disclosed the names of the accused, did not support the case of the prosecution and specifically denied their involvement in the occurrence,' the Jammu and Kashmir High Court had recorded while acquitting the accused. 'They went to the extent of saying that the accused facing the trial were not the assailants.' Local resident Manzoor Ahmad Gujjar was sentenced to life imprisonment for allegedly assisting another Lashkar-e-Taiba massacre—the killing of 22 children, women and men at the village of Prankote in April 1998. Later, though, the high court had acquitted Manzoor, saying there was 'no evidence to connect him with the alleged occurrence'. Manzoor, however, continued to be held under preventive detention laws, on the grounds that he was a threat to the security of the state. The high court, however, ordered his release in 2007. The most egregious failure to secure justice was in the case of the massacre of 36 Sikh residents of the village of Chattisinghpora in Kashmir on the eve of a visit by then-United States President Bill Clinton. Lashkar operative Muhammad Suhail Malik, who had confessed to the media to killing 36 Sikh residents of Chattisinghpora, was acquitted for lack of evidence and repatriated to Pakistan in 2015. 'All these cases had to be investigated by police, who had no access to suspects across the Line of Control, nor assistance from Pakistani authorities,' an official involved in the Doda investigation told ThePrint. 'The fact that we finally have hard evidence will hopefully lead the international community to step up and pressure Pakistan.' (Edited by Mannat Chugh) Also Read: Pakistani accomplices, shootouts, sealed chargesheet—how the 7/11 blasts case fell apart
