
Lunch bags left behind: The ICE raid in Nebraska that shocked officials and split families
Rina Salado's coworkers had just popped confetti.
They surprised her with the news that she'd been promoted to supervisor at the credit card manufacturing plant where she's worked for nearly three years. Her team asked her for a photo so they could blow it up and post it on the wall with her new title.
Elated and overwhelmed, Salado, 25, ran outside to her car to retrieve a photo on her phone and call her family. She couldn't wait to share her big update.
But then her world stopped. She saw a stream of missed calls and voicemails from her mother. A barrage of texts from her family members. A wide range of people trying to alert Salado that her mother had been detained. Her mom, Rina Ramirez, had been swept up that morning by immigration officials in a raid at Glenn Valley Foods, a meatpacking plant cross town in Omaha — the largest worksite enforcement operation in the state since President Donald Trump was inaugurated in January.
Salado called her mom right away, and to her surprise, she answered. She was in a room with other employees at the plant where she'd worked for 13 years, surrounded by armed federal agents with their faces covered, but still able to use her phone.
'My mom said, 'Take care of yourself, take care of your sister. Immigration is here. I don't know what will happen,'' Salado told CNN, describing the conversation.
Salado returned to her coworkers in tears. She told them she had to go and walked out bawling, with no explanation. 'I didn't even clock out. I just left,' she said. She raced to her mother's home to be with her father and younger sister. 'I don't know how fast I was driving, but I felt I couldn't drive fast enough.'
Salado's mother was one of more than 70 workers detained by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement last Tuesday. Salado said her mom, a Mexican national, has been in the US for 25 years, working and raising a family, and never even receiving a speeding ticket.
Many of those detained from the plant could be charged on various issues including misuse of visas, illegal reentry, resisting arrest, and misuse of social security numbers, according to federal authorities.
That morning, news of the raid spread fast. Immigrant rights groups followed through on plans they'd made after Trump won his second term in November. About a dozen organizations formed Omaha Rapid Response, arranging legal support and private 'safe spaces' for families to meet up. The coalition had also raised money to help families with things like rent, supplies and childcare when a family's principal breadwinner is taken into custody.
Juan Carlos Garcia, director of Hispanic outreach at the Missionary Society of St. Columban, said their work was not finished.
'There will be more raids. We have to adjust to what ICE is doing,' he said. 'We have to be tactical as well.'
Even those without a close connection to the raid were frightened. Some businesses in South Omaha immediately shut down upon learning that ICE was in town, according to residents. A library and a community college closed their doors due to 'public safety concerns.' One day after the raid, city officials cited reports from employers in the region's construction, food and agriculture industries, saying many of their workers didn't show up. Some students didn't arrive for summer school.
It was like a 'shockwave' of fear, said Lina Traslaviña Stover, executive director of Heartland Workers Center, a group that's been educating workers on their rights. At a news conference on Wednesday, the city's mayor said the raid created 'chaos.'
Attorneys and legal groups learned Thursday night that 63 of those in custody, including Salado's mother, were transported to North Platte, Nebraska — nearly 300 miles away. So far, Salado's mother has only been charged with a civil immigration violation of being in the US without authorization, her attorney told CNN on Monday. She has a bond hearing scheduled in Omaha next month.
Another 11 were deported or sent to other locations for processing, according to the Center for Immigrant and Refugee Advancement in Omaha. For much of last week, attorneys were unable to speak to those in detention, raising concern about due process and representation, they said.
On Thursday, Olga Lorenzo Palma got a surprising phone call from her husband, who'd been taken during the raid along with her brother, and she learned that he had already been deported to Mexico. She said she still hasn't heard any update on her brother.
Lorenzo Palma said her husband worked at the meat packing plant for two years.
'It was the worst day of my life,' Lorenzo Palma said, while sobbing. 'They have left me destroyed.'
The couple's 1-year-old girl is too young to understand but their 6-year-old daughter has been asking why their father hasn't come home from work yet. 'I tell her he went to work someplace else and that he will be back for us soon,' Lorenzo Palma said.
Her husband signed paperwork for immediate deportation, Lorenzo Palma said. He told her on the phone call that immigration agents had told him he was facing charges of identity theft, and that even if he spent a lot of money on lawyers, he would likely end up being deported anyway.
'The suffering is too great,' Lorenzo Palma said. 'You fight it, and you get deported anyway is what he told me.'
It was a typical morning at Glenn Valley Foods when a group of federal agents showed up at the front entrance, around 9 a.m. Men wearing tactical vests and camouflage neck gaiters over their faces approached the front door with a battering ram, but set it down on the ground, as seen in edited video released by ICE.
They knocked on the door, and a stunned plant manager let them in, according to company president, Chad Hartmann. The agents served the company with a federal warrant, then began searching the property — a process that Hartmann called 'extremely uncomfortable.'
'It was a complete surprise to us. We had no idea this was going to happen,' Hartmann told CNN.
Despite the Department of Homeland Security's crackdown on immigration this year, Hartmann said he never thought Glenn Valley would be in the mix. He was using DHS' own system, E-Verify, to vet his workers. E-Verify allows employers to check an individual's eligibility to work in the US.
'We are not like other companies,' he said. 'There are some companies that do not E-Verify.'
In a statement, the office of US Rep. Don Bacon, a Republican whose district includes Omaha, said it confirmed with ICE that Glenn Valley Foods complied with E-Verify and was not being charged with a crime, describing the company as 'a victim in this as well.'
As the agents spread out across the facility last Tuesday, many employees scattered into hiding spots, some reportedly taking cover in a freezer. First responders could be seen tending to those workers and warming their hands, according to the edited video released by ICE. In another clip, a federal agent draped a space blanket around a person's shoulders.
Agents coaxed people out from large storage areas, demanding to see their hands. They walked past tables with large slabs of red meat and wrangled workers into a cafeteria. The video also showed agents escorting workers to a white bus with their hands bound with handcuffs and zip ties.
Local law enforcement officials cooperated with federal requests to block certain streets and create a perimeter around the facility. When word spread of an ICE operation, concerned community members began showing up. Some people arrived with legal documents for their friends or family members, according to Sara Schulte-Bukowinski, a faith leader who came to the plant and held up a sign that read, 'We are friends of the immigrants.'
'People were just clearly upset and not able to get in contact with their loved ones,' she said. 'They were just kind of frantic, wanting to get information.'
All told, about a dozen state and federal law enforcement agencies were on the scene. As they started to depart later in the afternoon, the Flatwater Free Press captured video of three people trying to stop a black SUV from driving away.
Hartmann, the company's president, said only 30% of his workforce came to work the next day. The rest had either been detained or were too scared to return. With dwindled resources, the plant – which processes beef, pork and chicken for restaurant chains and grocery stores — could only operate at 20% capacity, he said.
'These are wonderful people that I've had a chance to work with over the years that now aren't going to work here anymore because of what happened,' he said of those detained. 'And not knowing or expecting that — it's like losing somebody you care about. It's out of your control. It's very uncomfortable. It's unfortunate. It saddens me.'
Officials and residents say the fear is palpable across Omaha's immigrant community and those with ties to it. Ally, a 21-year-old citizen who's afraid to use her last name because she's worried for undocumented family members, said eight of her aunts and uncles were detained in the Glenn Valley Foods raid and other recent ICE incidents.
She said she's been picking up groceries for her remaining family members who worry that if they go to their local Mexican grocery store, they won't come back. 'They've just been staying home for fear of anything happening to them and being torn apart from their families.'
Ally grew emotional thinking about her large family cookouts and parties suddenly shrinking. 'We've always hung out together and to think that in the future, half of them would be gone or maybe none of them would be here at all is just very scary to think about.'
On the border with Iowa, Omaha is one of the largest cities in this part of the country that relies heavily on immigrant workers in the agricultural and food industries, particularly pork and dairy producers. Nebraska farms were part of a large, multistate ICE raid during the first Trump administration in 2018. And in another large-scale raid across six states in 2006, known as Operation Wagon Train, more than 250 people were detained at a meatpacking plant in Grand Island, Nebraska.
Still, the June 10 raid in Omaha — in the face of protests in Los Angeles against the administration's deportation push — rattled a community in this corner of Nebraska and raised fear to new levels, officials said.
'Family members were not expecting to have their spouses and mothers disappear,' said Roger Garcia, a Douglas County commissioner. 'That's how it leads towards trauma in the wider community. Nobody expected this to happen when they were just going to work.'
The incident hit close to home for Garcia. His wife's aunt was among those detained at the plant, someone who's worked here for decades and raised her family here, he said.
'She definitely does not fit the profile of a high-level criminal or criminal of any kind,' he said. 'She's just somebody that went to work on Tuesday morning and got caught up in all this.'
Last Tuesday afternoon, after her mother was taken from Glenn Valley Foods to a DHS holding facility, Rina Salado went to the plant to pick up her mother's pink lunch bag. She spotted it in a photo that went viral, showing a table full of lunch containers left behind.
Salado said after she came home from her 12-hour shift, her mom would make fresh tortillas every night.
'I feel so guilty even sleeping on a bed,' Salado said. 'I don't know where they have her sleeping. I feel like I'm not able to enjoy things because I don't know where she is. I don't know in what kind of conditions they have her. I just worry about her.'
Salado was a child when she was brought to the US and is protected from deportation through the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program initiated by the Obama administration. But as a DACA recipient, leaving the country is risky and not allowed without meeting strict criteria.
She was last with her mother on June 8, two days before the raid, when she sat at the dinner table for an hour to catch up with her parents. She fears that might have been — unknowingly — their final time together.
'I can't go to Mexico. She can't come here,' she said. 'I don't know what's next.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Karen Read retrial: Jury ends first full day of deliberations with no verdict
Editor's note: This is a summary of jury deliberations in the Karen Read trial for Monday, June 16. For the latest on the deliberations, visit USA TODAY's story for Tuesday, June 17. Jurors in Karen Read's second murder trial ended their first full day of deliberations Monday without a verdict in the case over whether the Massachusetts woman killed her Boston police officer boyfriend. Judge Beverly Cannone sent jurors home for the evening, telling them to come back refreshed Tuesday at 9 a.m. The 12-person panel began discussing Read's fate Friday, June 13, for about two hours, after lawyers finished delivering closing arguments in the eight-week-long murder retrial. By 4:25 p.m. on Monday, after more than nine hours of deliberations, they still had not reached a decision. Read, 45, has pleaded not guilty on three charges, including second-degree murder, vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and leaving the scene of a collision resulting in death. Discover WITNESS: Access our exclusive collection of true crime stories, podcasts, videos and more Prosecutors accuse Read of backing into John O'Keefe with her Lexus SUV after a night out drinking in January 2022. Her defense team has suggested she was framed for the crime by sloppy and biased investigators. 'Don't you have questions?' one of her lawyers, Alan Jackson, said, prodding jurors in his final message to them. He told them their confidence in the case against Read needed to be 'unshakeable' to convict her. Catch up with our coverage and analysis from the most pivotal moments of the retrial. Why Karen Read is a true-crime obsession Karen Read screams: Jennifer McCabe, prosecution's star witness, testifies Scratches, taillight shards, hair: Jurors get a look at Karen Read's SUV The dog did it? What to know about the German Shepherd tied to the Karen Read trial Karen Read claims police bungled the investigation. What did they supposedly do wrong? Was John O'Keefe struck by a baseball bat? Doctor testifies about cops injuries Karen Read Trial in hands of jury: Which evidence could tilt the case? What did lead investigator Michael Proctor say about the case over text? Lewd messages revealed The deliberations come nearly a year after the prosecution's first case against Read ended in a mistrial, when a jury could not come to a unanimous verdict on the charges against her. Crowds of people dressed head to toe in pink, Read's favorite color, milled outside the Dedham, Massachusetts courthouse Monday to cheer for Read as they waited for a verdict. The demonstrations have become a common site, as the years-long legal saga has garnered massive intrigue and captivated true-crime fans, This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: No verdict from Karen Read jury after first full day of deliberations
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A broken taillight, a dead cop, a bombshell admission: Karen Read trial in hands of jury
Karen Read's voice boomed through the courtroom speakers. 'Could I have clipped him?' she asked. 'Could I have done something that knocked him out, and in his drunkenness, and in the cold, he didn't come to again?' It's a question the jury in Read's murder retrial is now considering as they decide whether she is responsible for the 2022 death of her police officer boyfriend, John O'Keefe. The 12-person panel began deliberating Friday, June 13 on the three charges against Read: second-degree murder, vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, and leaving the scene of a collision resulting in death. Their verdict is expected to come nearly a year after Read's first trial ended, when, after five days of discussions, jurors were unable to come to a unanimous decision. This time around, Shira Diner, a professor at the Boston University School of Law, said it's impossible to gauge how long the jury could take. Through almost two months of testimony, prosecutors have painted a picture of a winter night in the suburbs of Boston gone horribly wrong. A relationship on the rocks. A historic snowstorm barreling down. Friends and coworkers drinking together at a local bar to start the weekend. An after-party at a cop's home. A body found under a pile of snow the next morning. Fueled by jealousy, anger and alcohol, prosecutors allege Read backed into O'Keefe with her Lexus SUV while dropping him off at the house party, then left him to die in the snow and cold. Her defense team maintains investigators were biased against Read and overlooked evidence pointing to another cause for O'Keefe's death: law enforcement officers inside the home at 34 Fairview Road may have beaten O'Keefe, let a violent dog attack him, and discarded his body, they suggested. The 45-year-old woman has never taken the stand. Yet, even more than in Read's first trial, the commonwealth's case against her hinges on what they describe as her own 'admissions.' Prosecutors peppered multiple clips from Read's media appearances throughout their case to reinforce witness testimony and crime scene evidence, adding a new twist to the years-long legal saga that has captivated true-crime fans, sparked conspiracy theories and splintered communities. The commonwealth is hoping the tactic will tip the trial in their favor. But legal experts say Read's fate more likely hangs on jurors' predispositions, the battle between expert witnesses and the definition of reasonable doubt. The prosecution and defense have largely followed the same blueprint for Read's second trial – with a few potentially critical changes. For one thing, they've each added more muscle to their bench; the commonwealth hired Hank Brennan, one of famed mobster James 'Whitey' Bulger's lawyers, and Read's defense brought on attorney Victoria George, an alternate juror from her first trial. Brennan focused more on analyzing evidence than on showing the chronology of events when questioning witnesses, as did the lead prosecutor in Read's first trial. He called only 38 people to the stand compared to the more than 60 prosecution witnesses who testified last time. Misty Marris, a New York-based legal expert who has been following the case, said Brennan's approach appeared aimed at putting 'pieces of the puzzle' together for jurors. He brought Jennifer McCabe, the sister-in-law of Brian Albert, whose home whose it was where O'Keefe was found, to the stand earlier in this trial to deliver bombshell testimony alleging Read said, 'I hit him, I hit him, I hit him,' when they discovered his unresponsive body in the snow around 6 a.m. Digital analysts spent hours presenting vehicle and phone data that mapped out Read and O'Keefe's actions in the hours before he died. Forensic scientists testified about small pieces of red plastic found near O'Keefe's body, the nature of his injuries and Read's fractured taillight. Notably missing: Michael Proctor, a former Massachusetts State Trooper and the lead investigator in O'Keefe's case. He testified for the prosecution in Read's first trial and was seen as a potential liability to their case, Marris said. Proctor sent crude text messages about Read during the investigation and was fired before the second trial began. The defense highlighted the texts as evidence that police were biased against Read from the beginning. Kensley Barrett, a Rhode Island defense attorney, said Brennan also presented several new pieces of evidence, including clips of interviews Read conducted and a crash reconstruction report showing Read's SUV moving 87 feet in reverse at about the time O'Keefe's car locked for the last time. The interview clips of Read appeared aimed at bolstering witness testimony about her intoxication and claims she 'hit him.' But Jeffrey Abramson, a former assistant district attorney in Massachusetts who has written daily about the trial in a Substack, told USA TODAY the video clips could play against the prosecution. 'It could humanize Karen Read in the eyes of the jury,' he suggested. 'She might come across as not a monster, and that could help (the defense).' Read's defense team slightly altered its strategy, too. In Read's first trial, her defense directly accused Albert, a police officer, and his friend Brian Higgins, of killing O'Keefe. This time, the defense does not have enough evidence for that approach, Judge Beverly Cannone ruled. Instead, they used a "Bowden defense," arguing that police failed to properly investigate Albert, Higgins and other potential suspects. 'While the judge's ruling sounded like a blow to the defense it isn't really,' Marris said, adding the defense can still raise reasonable doubt. Many of the most important elements from Read's first trial are still at play, however. To convict Read on charges of second-degree murder, vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and leaving the scene of a collision resulting in death, the jury must find that prosecutors proved their case beyond a reasonable doubt. 'That's a really high standard,' said Diner, the Boston University School of Law professor who is also a defense attorney. Massachusetts' instructions on reasonable doubt tell jurors they need to be convinced to a 'moral certainty,' said Abramson, who also teaches at the University of Texas at Austin. The word 'reasonable,' he said, doesn't mean 'beyond all doubts, because everything human is subject to some doubt.' Read's lawyers have built their case by sowing doubt into the reliability of evidence and the trustworthiness of the prosecution's witnesses. The success of her team's central argument that investigators bungled O'Keefe's case may depend on whether 'jurors were predisposed before this trial began to trust law enforcement, and which jurors were predisposed to have some doubts about law enforcement,' Abramson said. But Christopher Dearborn, a law professor at Suffolk University in Boston, said the jury doesn't have to believe the defense's theory, or even a piece of it, to acquit Read. They merely have to think there's enough uncertainty in the facts prosecutors presented. Dearborn suggested one of the biggest challenges facing the jury could be deciding which experts to believe. The defense and prosecution have called witnesses who have presented competing testimony about what caused O'Keefe's injuries and Read's broken taillight and the reliability of evidence collected by police. 'A lot of this case is going to come down to which experts the jury found more credible,' Dearborn said. 'Was it a dog fight, or was it broken glass? Was the taillight completely broken before or not? Is there a possibility the officers messed with (Read's SUV) in the sally port?' The jury continues deliberating June 16. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Karen Read trial in hands of jury: Which evidence could tilt decision?
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Karen Read awaits fate as jury begins second full day of deliberations
A Massachusetts jury has begun its second full day of deliberations in the second murder trial of Karen Read, the woman accused of hitting her police officer boyfriend with her SUV and leaving him for dead in 2022. The 12-person panel has deliberated for more than nine hours and has not yet reached a decision on Read's fate. They are scheduled to be back in court at 9 a.m. local time. Read, 45, has pleaded not guilty to three charges: second-degree murder, vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and leaving the scene of a collision resulting in death. Prosecutors accuse Read of backing into Boston police officer John O'Keefe with her Lexus SUV and leaving him to die in the snow after a night out drinking. O'Keefe's body was found outside the house of another law enforcement officer. Read's defense claims police officers in the house beat O'Keefe, threw his body out in the snow and purposely bungled the investigation as part of a cover-up. The deliberations come nearly a year after the prosecution's first case against Read ended in a mistrial, when a jury could not come to a unanimous verdict on the charges against her. Catch up with our coverage and analysis from the most pivotal moments of the retrial. Why Karen Read is a true-crime obsession Karen Read screams: Jennifer McCabe, prosecution's star witness, testifies Scratches, taillight shards, hair: Jurors get a look at Karen Read's SUV The dog did it? What to know about the German Shepherd tied to the Karen Read trial Karen Read claims police bungled the investigation. What did they supposedly do wrong? Was John O'Keefe struck by a baseball bat? Doctor testifies about cops injuries Karen Read Trial in hands of jury: Which evidence could tilt the case? The high-profile whodunnit has sparked massive intrigue from true crime fans across the country, spurring an array of podcasts, movies and television shows. On Monday, crowds of people gathered outside the courthouse and cheered in support of Read as they awaited a verdict. Contributing: Karissa Waddick This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Jury in Karen Read trial begins second full day of deliberations