Council applies for £16m emergency government loan
A council has asked the government for a £16m emergency loan to cope with "tremendous financial demands".
West Berkshire Council said £13m would bolster dwindling reserves while the remaining £3m would fill a gap in next year's budget.
Iain Cottingham, cabinet member in charge of finance, said the authority would sell off assets to repay the loan as soon as possible.
On Monday, the government said a record number of councils had applied for financial help for 2025/26.
Some authorities have requested loans, while six councils, including Windsor and Maidenhead, have been allowed to raise their council tax by more than the government limit of 5%.
Mr Cottingham said: "This budget reflects the harsh reality of the current financial climate that faces all councils across the country.
"It has been a significant challenge to set a balanced budget."
The council said its reserves stood at £4m and were forecast to fall to "unsustainable" levels.
Growing pressures for the Liberal Democrat-run council included the cost of caring for children and adults in need, it added.
Council leader Jeff Brooks said: "There are tremendous financial demands across the country within local councils and we are not immune.
"We are spending much more on children and adult care – investing over £8m extra in this area in the next year as demand continues to grow."
The council said some proposed cutbacks had been rejected following public feedback.
The discounted plans included removing support for Downland Sports Centre, switching off streetlights at night and ending the Adult Respite in the Community service.
You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Millions face council tax rise of more than 5%
Authority's 25% council tax hike plan blocked
Council may switch off street lights to save cash
West Berkshire Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
38 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Massport pushing to make the state a hub for sustainable aviation fuels
Among the suggestions: Pass legislation to create tax credits that would encourage sustainable aviation fuel blends, storage, and production infrastructure, and new kinds of fuel technologies. While Massport has already asked the US Department of Energy to study the region's current sustainable aviation fuel assets, the task force also wants to identify existing state programs that could be used to support and grow the industry. Davey said he hopes Massachusetts can become a big player in this emerging industry, by fostering startups that can engineer more environmentally friendly alternatives to traditional petroleum-based jet fuel, and by prompting the airlines that use Massport-run Logan Airport to increasingly blend sustainable aviation fuels, primarily biofuels, with their conventional fuel. Advertisement Current technology and regulations allow for up to 50 percent biofuel in jet engine tanks. While its use is rapidly rising, biofuels still represent less than 2 percent of all jet fuel in the US market. Advertisement 'We're not going to stop flying,' Davey said. 'On the flip side, we have a [climate] crisis we need to address.' Davey pitched the idea of creating a sustainable aviation fuel hub to Healey soon after he started as Massport chief executive last year. 'What we found in this journey is that this is not only about improving or reducing gas emissions in Massachusetts,' Davey said. 'It's also an economic development play.' Toward that end, the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center has access to newly created tax credits and capital grants tailored specifically for climate-tech businesses, funded by a $4 billion economic development bond bill that the Legislature passed last year. The working group would like to augment those subsidies with tax credits that could be applied against the state's jet fuel tax to encourage the big airlines to add more biofuels to their tanks. (Airlines paid around $50 million in jet fuel taxes in Massachusetts last year.) Davey said the legislation could include a cap on how much is spent each year, like what has been done in several other states that already offer these incentives. 'I'm cognizant that while we want to solve this problem, the state budget right now is a bit murky,' Davey said. 'We need to balance that uncertainty and all the services we provide [from state government] with this potential incentive.' Some research and development in sustainable aviation fuels is already happening here. Chief growth officer Ben Downing pointed to two startups affiliated with the nonprofit incubator and accelerator where he works, The Engine in Cambridge: Lydian Labs, which is creating carbon-neutral aviation fuels, and Sora Fuel, which aims to make fuel out of carbon removed from the air. Advertisement Downing said Massport's leadership should help spur similar startups, in part because of the opportunities that the port authority could provide to commercialize sustainable fuel technologies by working with suppliers and airlines. 'We've seen Rich and his team lead [on this issue],' Downing said. 'There's a proactive nature to their approach that puts Massachusetts in a really interesting position to be not just a place where these things get invented but potentially where these companies grow. ... That's a model for other key anchor institutions and it's really hopeful and promising for this sector.' Jon Chesto can be reached at
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
MP: Grenfell-style mistakes could be repeated over battery storage regulation
The Government risks repeating the mistakes of Grenfell unless safety regulations on battery storage units are brought forward, an MP has warned. Liberal Democrat John Milne said there were 'alarming parallels' with the systemic failure which led to the west London tower block fire. Currently there are no laws which specifically govern the safety of battery energy storage systems (Bess), according to the House of Commons library. However, individual batteries could be subject to product safety regulations. Speaking in the Commons, Mr Milne accused the Government of being 'too complacent' as he called for enforceable regulations for the design and construction of the storage systems. The MP for Horsham said: 'The Grenfell disaster was the end result of many failings by both individuals and companies, but at its heart it was a failure of regulation. 'The rules left things wide open for exploitation by cost-cutting developers, and that is exactly what happened. 'Just as with lithium-ion batteries, a new technology, in this case cladding, was being used at scale for the first time without proper understanding of the risks. The time to act is now.' He continued: 'The Government itself has responded to all questions from myself and others to say that it considers the present regulatory regime to be robust. I am tempted to say pride comes before a fall. 'In the last few weeks a Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokesman has stated that battery fires at storage sites are rare in the UK, we already have high standards in place that require manufacturers and industry to ensure batteries are safe throughout their lifespan. 'This is just too complacent. 'Fires as a result of cladding were also incredibly rare, but that did not save 72 lives at Grenfell.' Mr Milne said the industry would benefit from clear guidance, before adding: 'Any guidance needs to cover-off a number of areas, including transport of batteries to the site, design and construction, fire-fighting, ongoing inspection and decommissioning. 'In the short term, if the Government is for any reason still reluctant to regulate, perhaps it could issue clear national guidelines which are capable of being updated annually. 'Enforcement might then take place through the insurance industry, who would be likely to insist that any new applications followed such guidelines, as no project can go ahead without insurance, it is enforcement by the back door. 'Grenfell was a wholly predictable tragedy. A similar fire at Lakanal House in Camberwell, which killed six people, should have made us understand the risk, but the warning wasn't heeded and history took its course. 'We can't go back in time to stop Grenfell, but we can act now to avoid making the same mistake again with battery energy storage systems.' Elsewhere in the debate, Conservative MP for Mid Buckinghamshire Greg Smith said there should be minimum distances between battery storage sites and housing. Mr Smith said: 'This is not a debate about the principle of energy storage, although I am in principle opposed to such schemes taking agricultural land and challenging our food security, but today's debate, which is deeply concerning, and what this House must urgently address, are the real, growing, and too often overlooked safety implications of these installations, particularly when placed in close proximity to villages, and rural road networks ill-equipped to support them.' He added: 'At the very least the Government should introduce clear national guidelines on the siting of Bess installations, including minimum separation distances from residential properties, fire resilience standards, mandatory site-specific risk assessments and restrictions on placing these facilities on, or near, rural roads.' SNP MP for Aberdeen North, Kirsty Blackman, said developers should pay towards fire mitigation measures. She said: 'If we're saying to those organisations that are creating the battery storage sites, you will need to pay for the fire safety assessment, you will need to consult the local fire and you will need to pay for the training of those local fire teams in tackling fires at battery energy storage sites, I think that would be the most reasonable way forward. 'Ask them to pay for that training, because it's them that are going to be making a huge profit off it.' Energy minister Miatta Fahnbulleh said: 'It is often claimed that there is no regulation in this sector because there is no specific law addressing battery safety. This is simply untrue. 'The safety and standards of batteries are assured throughout their life cycle. The Government is therefore confident that the safety risks posed by grid-scale batteries are relatively small and well managed.' She added there is 'scope to strengthen' the planning process.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Drastic' action needed to save £1 bus fares
A mayor who pledged to retain a discounted bus scheme warned it was in danger of being lost unless "something drastic" was done. The Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority's (CPCA) Tiger bus pass allows people under 25 to travel for £1 and has been used on more than a million journeys. It was introduced by former Labour mayor Nik Johnson, with his Conservative successor Paul Bristow promising it would stay in a BBC interview last month. A recommendation on how to continue funding it beyond the end of the year was not agreed by the CPCA board and will be discussed again at a transport meeting on 25 June. Chris Boden, leader of the Conservative-led Fenland District Council, had argued the council should not continue its local bus fare cap beyond December, when it is currently due to end, and instead fund the Tiger pass. Maintaining the Tiger pass once the national £3 bus fare cap had also ceased in December could mean the CPCA would have to reimburse bus operators to the tune of £473,000 a month, and £6.2m a year, a report to the board stated. "If we don't take some quite drastic action, which involves a large amount of money being shifted around in the budget, then the Tiger pass will stop," he warned. He argued the Tiger pass must be continued to build up passenger numbers but would otherwise run out of funding in the autumn. The measure could run until March, he said, when a new budget and proposal would be put forward. "We have an opportunity here with £1.8m in the budget for the fare cap coming on December 31," he said. "If that money were utilised towards the continuation of the existing Tiger pass to March 31, that would be a very significant part of the funding needed for that." Speaking in support of the proposal, Bristow said: "We are in danger of losing the Tiger pass if we don't do something drastic. "What people want is continuity and security." Lucy Nethsingha, leader of the Liberal Democrat-controlled Cambridgeshire County Council, said she thought the Tiger pass was a "priority" but would rather everyone had the correct figures before making a decision. Anna Bailey, leader of East Cambridgeshire District Council - led by the Tories - supported the recommendation and said the bus fare cap was the "wrong choice" when the Tiger pass was unfunded. Cambridge City Labour councillor Anna Smith, who was deputy mayor when the Tiger pass was introduced, suggested looking beyond the transport budget to find money for the bus pass. The Tiger bus pass and bus fare cap are due to be discussed at a transport meeting on 25 June before being brought back to the board in July. Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. Mayor fights to keep Fenland town's bus route £1 Tiger bus pass staying, says new mayor CPCA
