logo
Sanford cops resign, another suspended over botched response to knife attack at gas station

Sanford cops resign, another suspended over botched response to knife attack at gas station

Yahoo22-05-2025

Two Sanford police officers resigned and another was suspended after video surfaced showing officers hesitating to rescue a gas station employee held by a knife-wielding man in a restroom, the police chief announced Thursday.
Body-worn camera videos that captured circumstances of the June 1, 2024, incident at RaceTrac on South Orlando Drive alarmed Chief Cecil Smith, who opened an internal investigation after footage was posted March 2 on YouTube by a vlogger.
The video showed officers Dominick Delorbe and Geovanni Castro waiting several minutes for backup outside a hallway leading to the restroom while a female employee trapped inside begged for her life. Two other officers later joined them and they then moved to rescue the woman. She was found clutching the blade of the box cutter held by Randal Lawton, who surrendered once police entered the restroom with guns drawn.
Lawton, 63, awaits trial on charges of aggravated battery and kidnapping and remains in the John E. Polk Correctional Facility on a $50,500 bond.
Speaking to reporters Thursday during a news conference, Smith said Delorbe, the veteran officer at the scene, issued a letter of resignation before he could be fired for failing to respond to an active assailant. Castro, a probationary employee at the time, was issued a 60-hour unpaid suspension for the same policy violation because the investigation revealed Delorbe 'failed to provide the additional information needed' for him to act, Smith said.
A third officer, Francisco De La Rosa, seen in video footage joking about Lawton's mental state, resigned before the internal investigation. Smith said had De La Rosa gone through the investigative process he likely would have received a written reprimand.
Meanwhile, two supervisors who spoke with the officers after the incident, Miguel Francis and Chafic Nsouli, were disciplined with a 'letter of counseling' for not informing higher-ups, including the chief, of what took place. Smith said the supervisors initially were cleared by department investigators but he overturned that decision because he felt they should be 'held at a higher responsibility than the officers.'
'This was a mistake, and I think one of the most important parts about any leadership is that we accept the fact that there was a problem,' Smith said. 'We've seen that there was an issue and we've effectively put things into place to make sure that those issues don't happen again.'
News outlets were first made aware of the incident by a post from the account of EWU Bodycam, which describes itself as a news agency that publicizes body camera videos from law enforcement nationwide. Smith said at the time he didn't know of the incident until clips were posted.
'You don't want me to tell you what I said,' Smith said of his response to the YouTube video. 'It wasn't very good. It upset me.'
The March post from EWU Bodycam showed the officers hesitating as sounds could be heard of the woman screaming. However on Thursday, Smith clarified that audio of the 911 call had been dubbed over the body camera footage to create that effect. In fact, Smith said the officers did not hear that call at the time.
But the woman — whose name the Orlando Sentinel has not published because she's a victim of a crime — can be heard in the original body cam footage begging Lawton to free her as officers stood by wondering what to do next.
The original affidavit describing Lawton's arrest, filed long before the video surfaced online, never mentioned the lack of response by Delorbe and Castro to the ongoing attack. Instead, it suggested officers went in to rescue the woman when they heard her cry for help.
That's contrary to what was shown on video — with one officer describing the situation as a possible 'setup.'
'I hope he ain't killing her in there,' a customer said as he watched the officers. Rather than go in, one officer shouted: 'Sir, can you come out with your hands up?'
In the aftermath of Lawton's arrest, Delorbe and Castro spoke to other officers at the scene and were told they didn't need to wait for backup to apprehend him. Indeed, department policy requires officers take 'immediate action' based on available information.
Since the video's release, Smith's officers are redoing active assailant training, the second phase of which is set to begin in June.
He added that his department is working to ensure supervisors review body camera videos 'more often, more accurately and more in detail' while requiring similar incidents be reported to internal affairs or himself personally.
'There will be no more hesitations,' Smith said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fake Sassa grants ‘news' is exploding online. Here's how to spot the lies
Fake Sassa grants ‘news' is exploding online. Here's how to spot the lies

News24

time4 hours ago

  • News24

Fake Sassa grants ‘news' is exploding online. Here's how to spot the lies

YouTube channels and fake news websites are pumping out dozens of false stories about Sassa grants and jobs every month. These hoaxes prey on vulnerable recipients, spreading confusion, false hope or panic. Many are clearly fake, Andrew Thompson writes, but they have still managed to infiltrate public discourse and be widely shared. South Africa's social grant system is under digital siege. A flood of fake news targeting the South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) has spread across Facebook, YouTube and a network of low-quality, foreign-run websites. These stories are designed to mislead, confuse or panic grant recipients, often with the aim of generating clicks and ad revenue by preying on vulnerable beneficiaries. YouTube channels with tens of thousands of subscribers and some videos with hundreds of thousands of views have together uploaded hundreds of fake videos this year alone. They claim imminent changes to payouts, onerous new rules, or exciting bonuses. Dozens of websites posing as job boards or news sites have also published false notices about new jobs, grant amounts, pension cuts, and backlogged payments. Screengrab None of these channels have any connection to South African state institutions, yet they continue to reach large audiences and prompt real-world concern, forcing Sassa to issue repeated denials. In May, Sassa issued a media statement highlighting the extent of the problem and warning that it is 'concerned about the mushrooming and the rapid spread of fake news and disinformation targeting the Agency and its services almost daily'. It stressed that it has made no announcements about 'double grants', changes to pension rules, or automatic top-ups, which are among the most popular fake news stories that tend to gain traction. 'Furthermore, reports have been spreading like wildfire that Sassa has announced 'New Rules Could Affect Your Pension' from 10 June. The report has even gone further and announced various dates for different provinces. This is not an official announcement from Sassa,' the cautionary statement reads. How fake Sassa grant news spreads: volume, panic, and false hope The wave of Sassa disinformation in 2025 has followed two broad patterns, regardless of the medium or the outlet disseminating it, and the content is broadly split into two themes: fake job adverts and fake grant updates. The job advertisements regularly go viral. They claim that well-paid government positions requiring no experience are available and often direct users to deceptive forms or clickbait sites that mine data. These regularly appear as images on fake government letterheads that circulate widely on platforms like Facebook, WhatsApp and X. SASSA The fake grant updates employ a more familiar disinformation approach with a different motive. These mostly AI-generated false news articles report on increased or double payments, pension rule changes, or Sassa 'deadlines' that risk non-payment of grants. All are presented without basis, and often spill over from clearly fake websites into public discourse. Fake news websites and YouTube accounts repeatedly publish variations of similar videos and articles, many of which use text-to-speech tools and AI-generated thumbnails to appear convincing. The tone ranges from panic ('rules changing next week!') to false reassurance ('you can still claim your R7 000 today'). Most rely on sheer volume, hoping that one story or job advert will catch on and spread - as many already have. News24's Disinformation Desk has counted hundreds of fake news articles about Sassa currently online, and although many fade into obscurity, an increasing number are breaking through requiring official responses. Screengrab For now, the motive of these platforms appears to be financial gain. Most of the videos are hosted on monetised channels, and the websites link to Google Adwords accounts. If these get enough traction from panicked recipients, they will generate some revenue for the owners. Yet ironically, much of the vitality of this material reveals itself on platforms like WhatsApp without direct links to the source, which do not generate the website owners income but have the same impact on grant recipients. The majority of the Sassa disinformation that gains mainstream traction appears not to have an overt political motive or agenda, yet. Instead, it is riding on the wave of attention afforded by this vulnerable target market, many of whom are understandably deceived by the deluge. Rapid-fire Sassa debunks from the last few months alone News24's Disinformation Desk has identified hundreds of fake news stories and videos targeting Sassa recipients published in the last few months alone. Here are the most prominent examples, with their themes often emulated across other fake news sites: A viral post linking to a website called All Provinces Jobs claimed that 'South African government jobs 2025' were open for applications. The link leads to a fraudulent website not affiliated with any government department. Similar posts appeared on Facebook pages falsely advertising hiring opportunities through Sassa, often featuring job titles and closing dates to lend false credibility and create a sense of urgency. YouTube channels 'SASSA Benefits Updates' and 'Stimulus Sam' have released several dozen videos each about grant payments in South Africa, including that increased Sassa payments would be made in June 2025. The videos utilise text-to-speech narration featuring a vaguely South African accent and footage that is clearly created with generative AI. Both channels are entirely fake. A report hosted on the fake news website Debtcol Council claimed that 'new rules could affect your pension' from 10 June. Sassa has confirmed that this is also false. Another story on that website claimed application backlogs had been cleared, while yet another suggested a new top-up payment was in progress. All are fabricated. A website called Prabh Honda published a story about Sassa grant suspensions, which is entirely baseless and without truth. A piece on Rise Up WV, a website responsible for several prominent fake news items, stated that grant beneficiaries needed to reapply for doubled payments due to 'SASSA system updates'. There is no basis for this in any of Sassa's official communications. Why it matters - and how to protect yourself or family members Many of the intended recipients of these grants are older, economically vulnerable, and may not be experienced with digital literacy or fact-checking online. The combination of desperation and trust in anything that looks official makes this a fertile ground for exploitation via disinformation. These false reports don't just casually mislead - comments beneath even palpably false news items and videos indicate the confusion and desperation many experience about this topic. This fake news also distracts Sassa, which is already stretched in the payment grants, by forcing them to correct disinformation. To stay safe, advise family members of the following: Check only official Sassa channels: Information is reliably published on and Sassa's verified X and Facebook pages. Do not trust any information sent via WhatsApp or Facebook Messenger. Sassa does not communicate important information via forwarded messages. Never enter personal information into a form on a website claiming to offer Sassa job opportunities. Ignore YouTube channels with videos claiming to be the Department of Social Development or Sassa. Sassa's official YouTube page is not used to share news about grants. When in doubt, don't share: spreading false information, even with good intentions, can cause unnecessary panic.

US Supreme Court to review death row inmate's intellectual disability ruling
US Supreme Court to review death row inmate's intellectual disability ruling

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

US Supreme Court to review death row inmate's intellectual disability ruling

By John Kruzel WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Friday to hear an appeal by Alabama officials of a judicial decision that a man convicted of a 1997 murder is intellectually disabled - a finding that spared him from the death penalty - as they press ahead with the Republican-governed state's bid to execute him. A lower court ruled that Joseph Clifton Smith is intellectually disabled based on its analysis of his IQ test scores and expert testimony. Under a 2002 Supreme Court precedent, executing an intellectually disabled person violates the U.S. Constitution's Eighth Amendment bar on cruel and unusual punishment. The justices are due to hear the case in their next term, which starts in October. Smith, now 54, was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1997 murder of a man named Durk Van Dam in Alabama's Mobile County. Smith fatally beat the man with a hammer and saw in order to steal his boots, some tools and $140, according to evidence in the case. The victim's body was found in his mud-bound Ford Ranger truck in an isolated, wooded area. The Supreme Court's 2002 precedent in a case called Atkins v. Virginia barred executing intellectually disabled people. President Donald Trump's administration backed Alabama's appeal in the case. At issue in Smith's case is whether and how courts may consider the cumulative effect of multiple intelligence quotient (IQ) scores in assessing a death row inmate's intellectual disability. Like many states, conservative-leaning Alabama considers evidence of IQ test scores of 70 or below as part of the standard for determining intellectual disability. Supreme Court rulings in 2014 and 2017 allowed courts to consider IQ score ranges that are close to 70 along with other evidence of intellectual disability, such as testimony of "adaptive deficits." Smith had five IQ test scores, the lowest of which was 72. A federal judge noted that Smith's score could be as low as 69, given the standard of error of plus or minus three points. The judge then found that Smith had significant deficits from an early age in social and interpersonal skills, independent living and academics. The Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the judge's conclusions in 2023, setting aside Smith's death sentence. This prompted Alabama officials to file their first of two appeals to the Supreme Court in the case. In November, the justices threw out the 11th Circuit's decision, saying that the lower court's evaluation of Smith's IQ scores can be read two ways, and requires clarification. Ten days later, the 11th Circuit issued an opinion clarifying that its evaluation was based on "a holistic approach to multiple IQ scores" that also considered additional relevant evidence, including expert testimony. This prompted a second appeal by Alabama officials to the Supreme Court. Alabama in its filing to the Supreme Court argued that the lower courts in the case applied the wrong legal standard in establishing Smith's intellectual disability and urged the justices to take up the appeal to provide clarity on the issue. Friday's action by the court was unexpected. The court had planned to release it on Monday along with its other regularly scheduled orders, but a software glitch on Friday prematurely sent email notifications concerning the court's decision in the case. "As a result, the court is issuing that order list now," said court spokesperson Patricia McCabe. It is not the first time the court has inadvertently disclosed action in sensitive cases. Last year, an apparent draft of a ruling in a case involving emergency abortion access in Idaho was briefly uploaded to the court's website before being taken down. That disclosure represented an embarrassment for the top U.S. judicial body, coming two years after the draft of a blockbuster ruling rolling back abortion rights was leaked.

Supreme Court to consider use of multiple IQ tests in determining death penalty
Supreme Court to consider use of multiple IQ tests in determining death penalty

USA Today

time8 hours ago

  • USA Today

Supreme Court to consider use of multiple IQ tests in determining death penalty

Supreme Court to consider use of multiple IQ tests in determining death penalty The Justice Department said lower courts are confused about how to evaluate multiple IQ tests when determining if a criminal can be executed. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump calls for death penalty for migrants who kill Americans Donald Trump vows to invoke the Alien Enemies Act while calling for the death penalty for migrants who kill Americans. WASHINGTON −More than two decades after the Supreme Court said inmates who are intellectually disabled can't be executed, the court will consider how to deal with multiple intelligence tests in evaluating close calls. The court on June 6 said it would take up the case of Alabama death row inmate Joseph Smith, who was convicted and sentenced to death for a brutal murder in 1997. Smith's IQ scores have ranged from 72 to 78. Because IQ tests have an error range, lower courts said Smith's IQ could be below 70, one of the factors for defining intellectual disability. But the state argues that when five test scores are all above 70, it's unlikely that Smith's IQ is 70 or below. The Justice Department similarly told the Supreme Court that some lower courts are confused about how to evaluate multiple IQ tests under Supreme Court rules for what counts as cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. "That confusion prevents states from implementing lawful capital punishment," lawyers for the Justice Department wrote in a brief urging the court to get involved. Lawyers for Smith countered that the Supreme Court has previously said there's no precise math equation for determining an intellectual disability. Previously: Supreme Court orders new trial for Oklahoma death row inmate in closely watched case Supreme Court previously considered Smith's case This isn't the first time the high court has considered a request from Alabama to take up Smith's case. After sitting on the case for more than a year, the court in November ordered the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to clarify why it backed the trial judge's determination that Smith is intellectually disabled and can't be executed. Cruel and unusual? Supreme Court wants new ruling in case involving convicted murderer with low IQ In a brief opinion, the court said it couldn't tell if the appeals court used a holistic approach to weighing the evidence about Smith's disability or relied primarily on his lowest-possible IQ score. The justices noted that the Supreme Court hadn't previously said how courts should evaluate multiple IQ scores. In response, the appeals court said it considered the entire record. Other factors considered besides IQ tests In addition to IQ, other factors that define intellectual disability are 'significant or substantial deficits in adaptive behavior' and the onset of those qualities before age 18. 'Clinicians who attempt to diagnose whether an individual has significantly subaverage intellectual functioning do not limit themselves to IQ tests,' the appeals court wrote. Multiple IQ tests with similar results are not sufficient, the court said, because the test itself may be consistently flawed or improperly given. On death row for brutal 1997 murder Smith was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1997 murder of Durk Van Dam, who received 35 blunt force injuries and wounds from a saw on his neck, shoulder and back. U.S. District Judge Callie V. S. Granade called the evaluation of Smith's mental functioning a 'close case' but wrote 'the evidence indicates that Smith's intelligence and adaptive functioning has been deficient throughout his life.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store