Arrests made at protest in support of banned Palestine Action
Palestine Action lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday which sought to stop the protest group being banned, less than two hours before the new legislation came into force at midnight.
Officers are responding to a protest in support of Palestine Action in Parliament Square.
The group is now proscribed and expressing support for them is a criminal offence.
Arrests are being made.
Further updates will be shared here.
— Metropolitan Police (@metpoliceuk) July 5, 2025
The designation as a terror group means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
The move to ban the organisation was announced after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action, which police said caused around £7 million of damage.
The force posted on X saying: 'Officers are responding to a protest in support of Palestine Action in Parliament Square.
'The group is now proscribed and expressing support for them is a criminal offence.
'Arrests are being made.
'Further updates will be shared here.'
A group had earlier said it was set to gather in Parliament Square on Saturday holding signs supporting Palestine Action, according to campaign group Defend Our Juries.
In a letter to the Home Secretary, protesters said: 'We do not wish to go to prison or to be branded with a terrorism conviction. But we refuse to be cowed into silence by your order.'
Leslie Tate, 76, a Green councillor from Hertfordshire, said: 'Palestine Action are not a violent organisation, and the proscription is wrong.
'You do know, of course, that they were proscribed by Parliament with two other groups involved – all three at once – so that was a trick to make sure the Bill went through.
'The evidence from their actions that they've taken from the start of Palestine Action is that they all have been non-violent.
'This protest is necessary to defend our democracy, and this is the creeping edge of totalitarianism, frankly.
'We thought they (the police) would probably take pictures of people.
'It's the obvious thing to do, to photograph them, then they have their identity, rather than make arrests.'
Metropolitan Police circled around dozens of protesters standing quietly beneath the statue of Mahatma Gandhi, with placards that said: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action'.
Occasional chants of 'free Palestine' broke out from the surrounding onlookers, and some criticised the police attending.
The protest started at about 1.10pm and officers were seen taking people away shortly after 1.30pm.
An elderly woman in a clerical collar, who was sat in a camp chair with one of the placards at her feet, appeared to be taken away by officers.
Another person was seen lying on the floor in handcuffs as police gathered over her.
A woman seen lying on the floor in handcuffs was carried away in the air by officers and put in a police van.
While suspended and flanked by a large group of police, she said calmly: 'Free Palestine, stop the genocide, I oppose genocide, I support the rights of the Palestinian people, I support freedom of speech, I support freedom of assembly.'
A mass of people crowded around to film the scene.
Officers placed her in the vehicle parked on the road behind the square before returning to the Mahatma Gandhi statue, where almost no protesters remained.
Chants of 'shame' broke out, directed at the police, and officers moved behind the Gandhi statue.
Most of the police dispersed at around 2.10pm.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'.
MPs in the Commons voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday, before the House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday.
Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident at Brize Norton.
They appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday after being charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
36 minutes ago
- Times
Palestine Action is malign, but terror status goes too far
At midnight on Saturday, Palestine Action became officially proscribed under the Terrorism Act. In that ignoble status, it joins al-Qaeda, Hamas and Isis. Voicing support for, or being a member of, Palestine Action is now punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Predictably enough, a number of adherents of the anti-Israeli direct action group do not seem to have been chastened. Following a failed last-minute High Court effort to block the group's proscription, dozens of protestors were arrested over the weekend on suspicion of supporting the organisation. They included an 83-year-old priest, as well as others thought to be 'wearing clothing or displaying articles' indicating membership of a terrorist organisation. That Palestine Action is a malign force is beyond doubt. Its members include sinister ideologues, deeply confused in their geopolitical outlooks and their assessment of the best way to secure their objectives. The group's 'disruptive tactics' involve calculated acts of criminal damage, illegal occupation of premises, and intimidating acts of vandalism. Since its founding in 2020, the group has had a hand in around 500 distinct instances of 'direct action', often targeting firms and property suspected of having links to Israel. The most serious act for which the group claimed credit was when four people were arrested on suspicion of causing £7 million of damage to two military transporter aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. It was this that prompted Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, to judge that the group had 'crossed the threshold established in the Terrorism Act'. • Police defend arrest of 83-year-old Palestine Action activist Yet, however wanton its criminality, it remains a stretch to brand Palestine Action a terror group. Its members are qualitatively different from those of al-Qaeda, and pose a substantially different kind of threat to public order and national security. Their tactics more closely resemble those of extremist environmentalist groups like Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion than those of Islamist terrorists. In recent months, a combination of public ill will, effective prosecution and proportionate sentencing have made it unviable for climate activists to persist with their criminal antics. In March this year, Just Stop Oil announced an end to its practices of criminal vandalism, claiming implausibly to have achieved its objectives. In reality, they were prosecuted into submission by legitimate use of the criminal law. The heavy-handed branding of Palestine Action as terrorists risks seeming absurd when bona fide hostile military groupings like the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps remain unproscribed. The destruction of property that Palestine Action has made its calling card can already be prosecuted. There are legitimate concerns that such measures risk suppressing dissent on the part of those politically opposed to the government's support of Israeli defence policy. Palestine Action's members may be misguided, but Britain must remain a country in which the right to express unpopular and dissenting political views is not subject to outright prohibition. The emergence in recent years of activist groups that make criminal forms of destruction and public nuisance their modus operandi does raise challenges for law enforcement. Lord Walney, the government's former independent adviser on extremism, has recently mooted an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill which would give police greater power to curb the illegal antics of extremist groups that fall shy of terrorist organisations. These might include powers to block their ability to fundraise, organise on social media, or live-stream acts of criminality. These lighter-touch measures would be an obviously apt response to the level of threat posed. Palestine Action are an antisocial menace to public order; but politicians should not do them the service of taking them as seriously as they take themselves.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Inside the 7/7 response: 'You just kept going'
In the days after the London bombings, urgent efforts were made to identify the 52 victims. Twenty years later, the BBC hears what life was like for one of those tasked with helping. Whendie Backwell was vacuuming her lounge when London's transport network was was the morning of 7 July 2005, and the Hampshire crime scene investigator had planned to tackle some household chores on her day the phone rang.A voice said: "Can you get to London?"As she threw clothes into a suitcase, the TV was blaring in the said: "There was something on the news and that's when I thought 'this is a bad one'."I knew then that I probably wasn't coming home for a while." Her day job was with Hampshire Constabulary, but Ms Backwell was also part of an anti-terror unit - a team of experts from across the country poised to help in an had received similar calls before, but this one had a more urgent tone to she arrived, the Metropolitan Police had already launched its mass disaster 24 hours, a temporary mortuary was constructed in the grounds of the Honourable Artillery Company in central London."It looked like something out of Star Wars," Ms Backwell said."It was like a temporary town full of white tents."She was asked to oversee the work to identify the victims in the the expanse of tents were four separate pods - one for each bombing. Terrorists had targeted tube trains at Edgware Road, Aldgate and Russell Square, along with a double-decker bus at Tavistock Square."You had to be careful that there was no cross-contamination," Ms Backwell achieve this, the bodies from each incident were kept apart until every forensic examination had been clothing, gender and rough age was recorded. A note was made of any tattoos. Jewellery and watches were post-mortem examinations were carried out. Teeth were matched against dental records and fingerprints were then could each victim be moved to a central tent."Every body part had to have an identification, so that as much as possible could go back to families for closure," she about 4,000 names had been reported missing to the Metropolitan Police's Casualty Bureau."People are ringing in frightened because they've not heard from their loved ones," Ms Backwell said. The team was frantically feeding the information back to the bureau, working relentlessly long days, powered by coffee and energy drinks."Everyone really worked their socks off. There were days when I'd be thinking 'I don't think I can do another day of this'."But you get onto the site and something kicks in. You just keep going."Ms Backwell's team were not always notified when they had helped match a body to a missing person because the results would be sent elsewhere. 'Never forget' "Those people did not deserve to die. They were just ordinary people doing ordinary things," she said."And that's what kept you going, rather than results."Eventually, each victim was identified, and Ms Backwell was sent home. The Met Police later awarded her a commendation for her work. "It was weird afterwards going back to normal work for a while," she with what she had experienced, she found it difficult to travel by train in the years that would leave an extra hour for each journey in case she panicked and needed to get off."You saw and experienced things that no human should," she recalled."You never forget it." If you have been affected by any of the details in this article, help and support is available at BBC Action Line. You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Leader Live
3 hours ago
- Leader Live
First responders share horror over July 7 atrocities
Superintendent Anna Bearman was a 23-year-old police constable on the Metropolitan Police response team when the suicide bombing attacks took place on three London Underground trains and bus. At first, she and her three colleagues were told that there was an incident at King's Cross, possibly related to a fire. But Ms Bearman said she remembers the feeling of a 'pinch' in her stomach when she realised the situation was much more sinister. She said: 'On July 7, it was a nice summer's morning and everyone was elated because we had just won the bid for the London Olympics the day before. 'We were on duty and heard that there was confusion at King's Cross and that perhaps there'd been a fire, so we made our way down to the train station. 'As we were by Euston station, we were asked to divert to Russell Square, and we were told that there were injured people fleeing both stations. 'I remember that being the moment when I thought that it wasn't a fire and it was something more sinister. It was a pinch in the stomach moment.' Ms Bearman described how the four constables in the vehicle fell silent, as it dawned on them that it was a major incident. Upon arrival, they saw dozens of people running out of Russell Square station, with many suffering from injuries. She said: 'There were walking wounded and a sense of hysteria and panic, but we couldn't stop and speak to them because we had to get into the tunnel to help those who couldn't walk out. 'We walked about a mile on the tracks and then we carried one person out who had lost a lower limb, as there were no stretchers, and we took them out a mile back to Russell Square.' After carrying a second injured person out and returning to the train for a third time, they were told there were no more people who needed to be rescued, and they turned to finding oxygen tanks for the injured in the makeshift triage area. Ms Bearman recalls: 'After that, the main task was directing and reassuring members of the public, trying to keep them calm in the moment. 'Later on, I saw that my trousers and my legs were absolutely blood-stained, and that was when the shock of the whole day set in. 'The 20-year anniversary is really important to remember the people who have been affected, the lives lost but also their families and loved ones.' Dr Peter Holden, a GP from Derbyshire, was 50 when the bombings took place. He was not supposed to be in London on July 7, but, in his role as deputy chairman of the BMA GP committee, he was called to a meeting with a government minister at BMA House in Tavistock Square. That was where a fourth device exploded on a bus that had been diverted after the attacks on Aldgate, Edgware Road and Russell Square Tube stations. Dr Holden, who had received major incident training and helped dozens of people on the day, recalls: 'I realised it was really serious when the Royal London helicopter was hovering overhead for a considerable length of time. 'And then I just turned around to my colleague Mary Church, who's the chair of the committee, we heard a bang and then everything just went salmon pink. 'It was something that shook the ground. We were three floors above where the bomb on the bus went off and we looked out of the window and there was a white plume of smoke and the tree canopy had gone. 'When I got downstairs, there were people being brought in on collapsible table tops used for conferences as makeshift stretchers.' As someone with emergency care training, Dr Holden recalls directing 15 doctors and setting up a makeshift triage area . He remains proud of the effort his team made in the crisis, despite having to make difficult decisions surrounding who to prioritise in the moment. Dr Holden said: 'There was a complete range of people – there were Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, those of no particular faith. 'I think there were eight different nationalities from all over the world – medicine is really an international practice. 'But we had to leave two people who we describe as P1 expectants, those who are deeply unconscious and for whom medical care is extremely unlikely to help, and you just have to leave them with another human being so they are not on their own. 'It was the most difficult decision of my life and it still haunts me, because there's a humanity in delivering care. 'It was a terrible day, but I was thankful that I was there and could help people.'
