Demolition of Broken Hill's Willyama High School begins after mould outbreak
More than 600 Willyama High School students had to be relocated to alternate schools in January last year after the start of term one.
The public high school in Far West New South Wales was earmarked for demolition last March after an independent hygienist report found the mould infestation was so extreme the building would have to be stripped down to its bricks to be safe again.
The rebuild, which local MP Roy Butler believes will cost between $90–100 million, is expected to start early next year, with students returning from 2027.
In the past, locals living near the site voiced concerns about potentially coming into contact with hazardous material, including mould or asbestos, during the demolition.
In a statement, a NSW Department of Education spokesperson said surrounding residents should not worry.
"Before heavy demolition began in the area, all associated hazardous materials were safely removed, and the area inspected to confirm remediation was safely completed," they said.
"The safety and wellbeing of our students, workers and the community is our highest priority, and we will keep the community updated as work progresses."
The spokesperson said the process had been carefully staged to "prioritise safety and minimise disruption to the local community".
"All demolition activities are being undertaken in alignment with the Remediation Action Plan developed by an independent hygienist for the site," they said.
The NSW government announced last month it had allocated more than $50 million in the state budget to start the Willyama High School rebuild.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
4 hours ago
- SBS Australia
One in seven Australians are on this medication and some have 'strange' symptoms coming off
Antidepressants are some of the most commonly prescribed medications globally and in Australia, but knowledge of how they work and how hard it is to come off them remains highly contested. Data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare shows nearly four million Australians — roughly one in seven — take antidepressants. A large systematic review of research into the process of withdrawing from the drugs was published this week, but it quickly faced backlash from some psychiatrists and experts. The authors found coming off antidepressants after short-term use was not associated with a "clinically significant" risk of withdrawal symptoms. However, long-term antidepressant use — that is longer than 12 months — is increasingly common and comes with a greater risk of harm. The review found withdrawal symptoms — such as dizziness, nausea, vertigo — occur in a minority of cases, but they are on average manageable and not severe, especially with proper clinical support. The authors suggest that depression after stopping antidepressants is probably a relapse of the original mental health condition, as the results were similar among placebo groups. The meta-analysis examined the findings of 50 randomised controlled trials, involving 17,828 participants. The review published in JAMA Psychiatry included 38 studies with an observation period longer than two weeks, the critical time frame during which withdrawal symptoms are expected to occur. The average age of the participants was 44, and 70 per cent were female. In Australia, women are prescribed antidepressants at 1.5 times the rate of men — a trend that's seen in other parts of the world. Some health professionals say the review provides useful insights, despite its limitations, while others have been highly critical. UK antidepressant researchers Mark Horowitz and Julie Moncrieff said the review "risks underestimating the potential harms to long-term antidepressant users by focusing on short-term, industry-funded studies." Several of the JAMA Psychiatry article's senior authors declared receiving payments from drug companies. Horowitz and Moncrieff argue that the article's "main analysis" is based on eleven trials, six of which looked at people who had taken antidepressants for eight weeks and four for 12 weeks. "There is growing recognition that stopping antidepressants — especially after long-term use — can cause severe and sometimes debilitating withdrawal symptoms, and it is now acknowledged by the UK government as a public health issue," they wrote in The Conversation. New resources have been developed to support people safely stopping the use of antidepressants over time usually months, through what's called a tapering plan. The Maudsley Deprescribing Guidelines, published last year and co-authored by Horowitz, has been accepted by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners as an Accepted Clinical Resource. On again, off again antidepressant prescriptions Allied health professional Kizzy said she never wanted to be reliant on anti-depressants and has stopped taking them twice in the past. "I was initially quite resistant to any kind of medication, but I got to a point a couple of years ago ... where I was really struggling with suicidal thoughts and just being able to function and do things because of my mood, and all of these horrible feelings and thoughts I was having, and finally got convinced to try sertraline". She said she noticed the drug — a commonly prescribed antidepressant sometimes sold under the name Zoloft — was making her feel "numb". "My hope is that I can one day be not require antidepressants and still maintain this level of functioning and mental health," she said adding that her current medication "potentially affects" her liver. The United States National Library of Medicine says liver abnormalities reportedly occur in around 1 per cent of people who take sertraline, "but elevations are usually modest and infrequently require dose modification or discontinuation". Professor Paul Fitzgerald is the director of the School of Medicine and Psychology at Australian National University and a member of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists. He was not involved in the review. He said it's important to be aware of the more severe cases of side effects. "There are some unusual symptoms that patients experience. The most dramatic one the patients find quite disturbing is the phenomena that patients often talk about as brain zaps." "They get this very strange sensation of electrical zaps in their head or down their spinal cord, and if they haven't been warned about it, it can be quite distressing. It just seems strange." He said it's unclear from this latest review whether the symptoms recorded by researchers are a relapse of a previous mental health condition or withdrawal effects from discontinuing antidepressants. "What happens when somebody's stopping a medication and their underlying symptoms of their condition get worse? "In other words, start to experience more depression or more anxiety, and it can be really difficult to know under those circumstances. "Are those symptoms that they're experiencing some sort of discontinuation or is it really just the symptoms of the illness coming back because the treatment's been withdrawn?" Sonya Morrissey is the national GP adviser at Headspace, a platform supporting the mental health and wellbeing of younger people. She said that, in the past, patients weren't sufficiently warned about discontinuation symptoms of antidepressants. "It is something that we are, I think, recognising more and there's lots more research being done now, which is great, although there's not a significant amount of research yet in the cohort that we see, which is the 12 to 25 year olds," she said. She said antidepressants are not their first line of treatment at Headspace, but will be used occasionally if needed. LISTEN TO SBS News 11/07/2025 08:17 English The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners' Western Australia vice-president, Dr Ramya Raman, said the recently published meta-analysis still provides useful insight for GPs but said more research on withdrawing from long-term anti-depressant use was needed. She also highlighted the importance of a good doctor-patient relationship when withdrawing from psychiatric medication. "When weaning off of the medication and there is a trusted relationship with the GP, and a regular follow-up with that doctor, the risk of having the discontinuation symptoms are less of a concern compared to when patients actually abruptly stop it. Kizzy also said finding a GP with an interest in mental health can make a big difference when navigating the use of antidepressants and the withdrawal process. "I think it's important to find a GP who has a genuine interest in that area rather than just going to your generic GP, finding a regular one who you know can rely on, who can really support you and speak to you in a way that you're going to feel respected and really understood. "And I think that's a really important kind of foundation support to have because once you have that, then you will feel safe enough to be checking in with them, sharing all your concerns, talking about coming off or going on or switching medications and still be okay through all of that." Readers seeking crisis support can ring Lifeline on 13 11 14 or text 0477 13 11 14, the Suicide Call Back Service on 1300 659 467 and Kids Helpline on 1800 55 1800 (for young people aged up to 25). More information and support with mental health is available at and on 1300 22 4636.
SBS Australia
4 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Gas plant critics warn 'world is now watching' after Murujuga gets World Heritage listing
Environmentalists fear the extension of a gas project could jeopardise the future of an ancient Indigenous rock art collection after it was listed as a World Heritage site. The Murujuga rock art landscape in Western Australia was listed by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) as a heritage site on Friday after intense lobbying by the federal government. "For more than 50,000 years, the Ngarda-Ngarli people have protected and managed this significant land and seascape — and today, I am proud to announce that Murujuga will receive another level of protection via the World Heritage system," Environment Minister Murray Watt said while visiting the organisation's headquarters in Paris. "Achieving World Heritage status ensures stronger protections under Australian legislation and will allow the world to celebrate this unique cultural landscape," Watt added. Murujuga contains the world's largest, densest and most diverse collection of rock art engravings — known as petroglyphs — and some are estimated to be more than 50,000 years old. They depict animals, plants and human figures, and are visible due to the colour and contrast between the removed varnish layer and the underlying brighter weathered rind of the host rocks. The site was previously put forward to UNESCO in 2023 but Australia's application was referred back in May. UNESCO recommended state and federal governments address concerns that nearby acid emissions, including those from Woodside's Burrup gas hub, were degrading the art. The North West Shelf gas project is seen with a petroglyph of a turtle at Murujuga Cultural Landscape in Burrup Peninsula, Western Australia. Source: Supplied / Save Our Songlines / Conservation Council of Western Australia The peninsula in northwest WA near Karratha is home to two gas plants, a fertiliser plant and iron ore and salt export facilities. While environmentalists welcomed the heritage listing, they warned that the Woodside project extension could cause further damage. "The world is now watching," Australian Conservation Foundation chief executive Kelly O'Shanassy said. "The onus is on the Australian government to make sure the values recognised by UNESCO are not jeopardised by ongoing industrial pollution. If the federal government is serious about protecting Murujuga and making sure it is not moved to an "in danger" list, Senator Watt should reject the gas hub's proposed expansion," O'Shanassy added. Mardathoonera woman and Murujuga traditional custodian Raelene Cooper, who was at the UNESCO meeting, said she welcomed the global recognition of Murujuga but cautioned that industry could still harm the rock art site . "This is a momentous day for our old people and our future generations, to have Murujuga's outstanding universal heritage values recognised by the world," she said. "Meanwhile, fertiliser plants are still being built around our sacred sites and polluting gas plants will emit toxic acid on our rock art for another 50 years. "We will continue to fight for protection for this very special place, and the world is now aware of what we are up against." Watt said World Heritage nomination "had the free, prior and informed consent of the five language groups who all come together to care for Murujuga today". Woodside said the listing was "well-deserved global recognition of the petroglyphs and the unique living cultural values of Murujuga" to Australia and the world. "Woodside has been a proud supporter of the World Heritage nomination and assessment process. We look forward to continuing to work closely with the Murujuga Aboriginal Corporation and Traditional Custodians on the continued protection and management of this globally significant area," the company said in a statement sent to SBS News. Greens Leader Larissa Waters joined the chorus of advocate voices in urging Senator Watt to cancel the approval for the North West Shelf project. "UNESCO had warned that Woodside's gas plant threatened the longevity of the rock art prior to the listing, but Minister Watt successfully lobbied other nations when he should have simply rejected Woodside's climate bomb extension in the first place," she said. Woodside has estimated that keeping the North-West Shelf operating until 2070 could lead to emissions of up to 4.3 billion tons tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO 2 -e), the majority of which will come from exported fossil fuel products. That's over nine times Australia's total annual emissions, which currently sit around 440.2 million tonnes CO 2 -e. Senator Waters added that world heritage laws should be bolstered to better protect listed sites. Australia has 21 properties on the World Heritage list, which includes the Budj Bim Cultural Landscape, Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park and the Great Barrier Reef. UNESCO added several other sites to its list, including the Xixia Imperial Tombs in China and the Faya Palaeolandscape in the United Arab Emirates.
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Murujuga gets World Heritage listing after 30-year campaign, but has it come too late?
Another Australian site has been added to the UNESCO World Heritage List, but among the celebrations are fears that the decision has come too late. The traditional custodians of Murujuga, in Western Australia's Pilbara region, have fought to have their country's physical and spiritual significance recognised and protected for decades. "Nearly 30 years of education of this culture on this country has come to fruition," Murujuga Aboriginal Corporation director Vince Adams said. Belinda Churnside, also a director of the corporation, said the listing was a "testament to the true dedication" and resilience of Aboriginal people. But scientist and rock art researcher John Black fears the damage to the site has already been done. "An enormous amount has been lost," he said. "When you drive into Murujuga now … it looks like an industrial complex, not a sacred, World Heritage-listed gallery." Dr Black hoped the islands off Murujuga, which have been included in the World Heritage area, would now be protected. "There is so much on the outer islands that have lovely petroglyphs that need to be protected, and that will happen [now]." Mr Adams acknowledged much had already been lost to industrial development at Murujuga. He said elders in the early-2000s were unhappy about an expanding industry presence and decided a World Heritage bid was the best way to safeguard the rock art's future. In the years since approvals have been granted for two more liquid natural gas trains, two fertiliser plants, and a provisional approval to extend the North West Shelf gas project to 2070. "We can't stop them — we've tried. We've had people protest … still it carries on," Mr Adams said. He saw the listing as a bargaining chip that Murujuga custodians could use. "This is the tip of the iceberg for us," the Yindjibarndi man said. Michelle Adams, who was a cultural advisor to the World Heritage application, said the listing provided more security than what the government could offer. "We know that Murujuga World Heritage is a threat to industry, and so it should be," she said. "It's deep and it's beautiful and it has to be respected to the highest degree." Ahead of the Paris committee meeting this week the nomination was in serious doubt. The International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), which advises the committee, had recommended knocking back the bid due to concerns about the impact of industry emissions. It was only at the eleventh hour that federal Environment Minister Murray Watt secured an amendment that saw the bid succeed. "In the end, what persuaded the committee was both the scientific evidence that was put forward, which disputed some of the claims that were being made, but also the genuine passion from the traditional owners to see this World Heritage listing be secured," Mr Watt said in Paris. The amendment included softened language regarding the prevention of further industrial development. Wording was changed from "recommends" to "encourages" in relation to a variety of protections and studies at the area. Raelene Cooper, advocate for Save our Songlines, described the amendments as "ludicrous" and said Australia should have accepted the ICOMOS recommendations. "At the end of the day, we're looking for the most protections out there," she said. WA Greens MLC Sophie McNeill said the amendment "watered down" the legitimate concerns of the ICOMOS. "We are deeply concerned the rock art now doesn't have as many protections as the experts think it should have," she said. "That's why we're calling on the Cook and Albanese governments to roll back that approval of the North West Shelf extension." Mr Watt said the federal government would ensure Murujuga was protected now and for future generations. The government agreed to update UNESCO with a report on the implementation of the amendment's recommendations by the end of 2027. WA Environment Minister Matthew Swinbourne said the state government would do its part. "[The WA government] will now implement the strategic management framework and establish the World Heritage property, ensuring the ongoing protection of this significant landscape which has been recognised today," he said. Woodside congratulated the traditional custodians of Murujuga on the listing and said it had been a proud supporter of the nomination and assessment process.
