
Solar power could soon overtake hydel power in Kerala's renewable energy mix, indicates KSEB
Hydropower continues to dominate the renewable energy mix in the State's power system, at least for the time being.
The picture could change soon if the latest data presented by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB), the State power utility, before the Kerala State Electricity Regulatory Commission (KSERC) are any indication.
The data was presented by the KSEB during a hearing on the draft KSERC (Renewable Energy and Related Matters) Regulations, 2025.
Hydropower accounts for 50% of the renewable energy bouquet, while solar power is now a close second at 47%. The latter includes both rooftop and non-rooftop (ground-mounted) solar power.
While hydel power accounts for 2284.42 megawatts (MW), rooftop solar is second with 1397.12 MW (30%), and solar other than rooftop schemes (such as ground-mounted projects) contribute 787.35 MW (17%). The latter quantum of 787.35 MW also includes around 300 MW sourced from outside Kerala.
Wind power is in fourth position with 146.53 MW (3%), according to the KSEB. In the case of daytime generation, solar power generation has already crossed hydel generation.
The rapid increase in renewable energy injection, mostly solar, into the grid is also presenting tough challenges to the KSEB which says it is struggling to absorb the large volume of RE exports from prosumers.
According to the KSEB, prosumers are exporting to the grid much more than they are using during the daytime. All categories of prosumers export 75.53% of their generation during solar hours to the grid.
In the case of the domestic (low-tension) alone, this is 79.21%. According to the KSEB, in 2022-23 the day-time use and energy export stood at 172 million units (mu) and 309 mu respectively. This has risen to 369 mu and 877 mu respectively in 2024-25.
If one takes into account Kerala's overall power availability from all sources within and outside the State, renewable energy, including hydropower, accounts for about 65%. Coal accounts for 31%.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
a day ago
- Mint
IBBI proposes cap on assignments for insolvency professionals to curb delays
New Delhi, Aug 13 (PTI) The IBBI has proposed imposing a cap on the number of assignments that insolvency professionals (IPs) can handle across key roles, in a bid to improve efficiency and ensure equitable distribution of work. Currently, IPs are restricted to a maximum of 10 assignments as resolution professionals (RPs) in corporate insolvency resolution processes (CIRPs), of which not more than three can involve admitted claims exceeding ₹ 1,000 crore each. The proposed changes will broaden this ceiling to cover IRP and liquidator roles as well, recognising the comparable complexity and time demands of these assignments, the IBBI said in a discussion paper on Tuesday. The move comes amid concerns that a small group of IPs is handling a disproportionately large number of assignments in some instances up to 25 cases while newly registered professionals face entry barriers due to uneven distribution of work. As of March 31, 2025, out of 4,527 registered IPs, 2,198 held valid authorisations for assignment, with many juggling multiple roles alongside their regular practice. Under the proposed framework, the IBBI said IPs already handling 10 or more assignments, whether as RP, IRP or liquidator, when the new rules come into force will not be permitted to take on fresh work until their active caseload falls below the threshold. The changes will be effected through the deletion of Clause 22 of the Code of Conduct under the IBBI's (Insolvency Professionals) regulations, 2016, and the insertion of a new norm specifically capping total assignments. In a separate discussion paper, IBBI has also proposed deleting Clause 6 from the Code of Conduct for Insolvency Professionals (IPs), citing duplication with existing rules that already govern the sale of debtor assets during liquidation and bankruptcy. Under the clause, it prohibits IPs and their relatives from acquiring assets of a debtor during liquidation or bankruptcy process unless it is shown that there was no impairment of objectivity, independence or impartiality, and the board's approval has been obtained in the matter. However, the board noted that similar prohibitions are explicitly laid out in the IBBI's Liquidation Process rules, and the Bankruptcy Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors norms. "It is proposed that to avoid duplication and for promoting harmonisation within the Regulations, Clause 6 be deleted from the Code of Conduct for Insolvency Professionals," the IBBI said. Removing the clause from the Code of Conduct would avoid potential duplication and redundancy, and also ensure that specific prohibitions are primarily housed within the rules that govern the procedural aspects of asset realisation, it added. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has invited public comments on the proposals by September 1.


News18
a day ago
- News18
HC rejects petitions against Karnatakas smart meter mandate
Agency: PTI Bengaluru, Aug 13 (PTI) The Karnataka High Court on Wednesday dismissed two petitions challenging the state government's decision to mandate the installation of smart pre-paid electricity meters for new consumers, despite concerns over their high cost compared to neighbouring states. Justice M Nagaprasanna, who reserved orders on July 22, noted that a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) raising similar issues is already pending before a division bench. 'Judicial discipline demands hierarchy, and propriety requires this court to show judicial hands off to the present petitions. Therefore, the subject petitions are not entertainable," the judge said. The court also recorded an earlier submission from Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty that the state would not compel the petitioners to install smart meters in their residences since these were not new connections. During earlier hearings, the bench had remarked on the stark price difference between Karnataka and other states, observing, 'Everywhere else it is Rs 900 for the same smart meter, here you are charging Rs 8,900 — where will poor people go? You have outsourced the work; this is dangerous. You are squeezing the poor." An interim order had been issued then, preventing the state from making smart meters compulsory in situations not covered by the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (Pre-paid Smart Metering) Regulations, 2024. Representing one of the petitioners, Senior Advocate Lakshmy Iyengar argued that the policy would eventually affect all consumers, questioning the tender process and highlighting the financial burden when other states offer the same meters at a fraction of the cost. Advocate General Shetty, however, maintained that the requirement applies only to new households, not to existing electricity consumers. PTI JR ROH view comments First Published: August 13, 2025, 20:00 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
a day ago
- Business Standard
IBBI proposes assignment cap for insolvency professionals to cut delays
The IBBI has proposed imposing a cap on the number of assignments that insolvency professionals (IPs) can handle across key roles, in a bid to improve efficiency and ensure equitable distribution of work. Currently, IPs are restricted to a maximum of 10 assignments as resolution professionals (RPs) in corporate insolvency resolution processes (CIRPs), of which not more than three can involve admitted claims exceeding ₹ 1,000 crore each. The proposed changes will broaden this ceiling to cover IRP and liquidator roles as well, recognising the comparable complexity and time demands of these assignments, the IBBI said in a discussion paper on Tuesday. The move comes amid concerns that a small group of IPs is handling a disproportionately large number of assignments in some instances up to 25 cases while newly registered professionals face entry barriers due to uneven distribution of work. As of March 31, 2025, out of 4,527 registered IPs, 2,198 held valid authorisations for assignment, with many juggling multiple roles alongside their regular practice. Under the proposed framework, the IBBI said IPs already handling 10 or more assignments, whether as RP, IRP or liquidator, when the new rules come into force will not be permitted to take on fresh work until their active caseload falls below the threshold. The changes will be effected through the deletion of Clause 22 of the Code of Conduct under the IBBI's (Insolvency Professionals) regulations, 2016, and the insertion of a new norm specifically capping total assignments. In a separate discussion paper, IBBI has also proposed deleting Clause 6 from the Code of Conduct for Insolvency Professionals (IPs), citing duplication with existing rules that already govern the sale of debtor assets during liquidation and bankruptcy. Under the clause, it prohibits IPs and their relatives from acquiring assets of a debtor during liquidation or bankruptcy process unless it is shown that there was no impairment of objectivity, independence or impartiality, and the board's approval has been obtained in the matter. However, the board noted that similar prohibitions are explicitly laid out in the IBBI's Liquidation Process rules, and the Bankruptcy Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors norms. "It is proposed that to avoid duplication and for promoting harmonisation within the Regulations, Clause 6 be deleted from the Code of Conduct for Insolvency Professionals," the IBBI said. Removing the clause from the Code of Conduct would avoid potential duplication and redundancy, and also ensure that specific prohibitions are primarily housed within the rules that govern the procedural aspects of asset realisation, it added. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has invited public comments on the proposals by September 1. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)