France defends move to recognise Palestinian state
President Emmanuel Macron said Thursday that his country would formally recognise a Palestinian state during a UN meeting in September, the most powerful European nation to announce such a move.
Macron's announcement drew condemnation from Israel, which said it "rewards terror", while US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called it "reckless" and said it "only serves Hamas propaganda".
Mike Huckabee, US ambassador to Israel, quipped that Macron did not say where a future Palestinian state would be located.
"I can now exclusively disclose that France will offer the French Riviera & the new nation will be called "Franc-en-Stine", he said on X.
Hamas itself - which is designated a terrorist group by the United States and the European Union - praised the French initiative, saying it was "a positive step in the right direction toward doing justice to our oppressed Palestinian people".
But French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot on Friday argued that Macron's initiative went against what the militant group wanted.
"Hamas has always ruled out a two-state solution. By recognising Palestine, France goes against that terrorist organisation," Barrot said on X.
With its decision, France was "backing the side of peace against the side of war", Barrot added.
Domestic reactions ranged from praise on the left, condemnation on the right and awkward silence in the ranks of the government itself.
'COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE', 'POINTLESS'
The leader of the far-right National Rally (RN), Jordan Bardella, said the announcement was "rushed" and afforded Hamas "unexpected institutional and international legitimacy".
On the other side of the political spectrum, Jean-Luc Melenchon, boss of the far-left France Unbowed party, called Macron's announcement "a moral victory", although he deplored that it did not take effect immediately.
Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau, a right-winger whose relationship with Macron is tense, declined on Friday to give his opinion, saying he was currently busy with an unrelated "serious topic" linked to the "security of French people on holiday".
But the vice president of his party, Les Republicains, Xavier Bellamy, blasted the decision as possibly "counter-productive" or, at best, "pointless".
The move risked "endangering Israeli civilians" as well as "Palestinian civilians who are victims of Hamas's barbarism", he said.
Bellamy said that Macron's move was a departure from the president's previously set conditions for recognition of Palestine, which included a Hamas demilitarisation, the movement's exclusion from any future government, the liberation of all Israeli hostages in Gaza and the recognition of Israel by several Arab states.
"None of them have been met," he said.
While France would be the most significant European country to recognise a Palestinian state, others have hinted they could do the same.
Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced he would hold a call on Friday with counterparts in Germany and France on efforts to stop the fighting, adding that a ceasefire would "put us on a path to the recognition of a Palestinian state".
Norway, Spain, Ireland and Slovenia all announced recognition following the outbreak of the Gaza conflict, along with several other non-European countries.
Once France follows through on its announcement, a total of at least 142 countries will have recognised Palestinian statehood.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
How democracy has led to economic stagnation, and what to do about it
The exploitation of South Africa's large mineral endowment explains the relative development of its economy; at the same time, it explains its stagnation. South Africa is an old country with a lot of old problems that are not amenable to many technical solutions. South Africa belongs to a group of countries that were known as the New World. These are countries that were carved out of the Americas by the European powers after Christopher Columbus. New World countries were created by genocide against, among others, Native American populations and replaced with free populations from Europe and enslaved populations from Africa. South Africa and Mauritius are the only New World countries in Africa. The most economically successful New World country is the US. The least successful is probably Haiti. What has all this to do with South Africa today? The answer is plenty. The modern South African economy is as old as the economy of the US. The efforts to develop both countries date back to the 1860s, about 150 years ago. In 1865, the US started on its road to development from an agricultural economy by abolishing slavery. South Africa abolished slavery in 1834. In 1867, South Africa commenced its road to development by starting diamond mining, soon followed by gold mining. Today the US is the largest industrial economy in the world while South Africa is the largest economy in Africa. However, that is where the comparison between the two countries ends. South Africa's level of economic development today is where the US was 115 years ago, in 1910. Today, the per capita gross domestic product (GDP) of the US is $89,000. The per capita GDP of South Africa is $6,000. Why did the economies of the two countries diverge to the extent that an average American today is 15 times more productive than an average South African? The answer is not as complicated as one may imagine. Leaders of the two countries chose two different roads to economic development. American leaders chose an innovation-driven industrialisation model to development. South African leaders, on the other hand, chose a minerals-export-driven development model that was combined with import-substitution industrialisation. The American road to development prioritised investment in the skills and health of its population. The South African road to development prioritised exploitation of natural resources through the use of cheap, unskilled labour. This is what accounts for the massive differential between the productive power of an average American compared with an average South African. Natural resource curse The World Bank regularly publishes a Global Human Capital Index, which measures which countries are best at mobilising their human capital – the economic and professional potential of their citizens. It thus measures how much capital a country loses through lack of education and health. The top 10 in a survey of 169 countries in the 2020 Human Capital Index were Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Canada, Finland, Macao, Sweden, Ireland and the Netherlands. South Africa was number 132. Among African countries, Mauritius was number 58, Kenya was number 91. The bottom 10 countries were all African: the Democratic Republic of Congo, Sierra Leone, Angola, Mozambique, Nigeria, Liberia, Mali, Niger, Chad and the Central African Republic. Why does South Africa's economy, the most diversified on the African continent, have one of the lowest human capital indexes, both in Africa and in the world? This is explained in part – ironically – by South Africa's vast mineral resource endowment. Large mineral endowment is both a blessing and a curse. South Africa is a classic illustration of this duality. The exploitation of South Africa's large mineral endowment explains the relative development of its economy; at the same time, it explains its stagnation. The South African economy, as we know it today, dates from 170 years ago with the discovery of copper deposits in Namaqualand in 1854. These discoveries were soon followed by the discovery of diamonds, gold, coal and platinum deposits, to mention only a few minerals in South Africa's treasure trove. To extract these minerals South Africa had to import everything except black labourers. It imported capital, machinery, skilled miners, railways, food and other supplies. The exploitation of minerals thus created what came to be known as an enclave capitalist economy. This type of economy employs a relatively small number of workers, most of them unskilled, but produces minerals of very high value in the world market. Such an economy can thus sustain a small enclave population with a fabulous standard of living in a sea of poor, low-skilled population. This was what South Africa became during the past 170 years. Compared with the US, which has a developed capitalist society, South Africa's middle and upper class/elite is only 12% of the economically active population, whereas a similar population group in the US – proprietors, managers and professionals – are 37.6% of the economically active population. Most striking is South Africa's size of the category 'underclass and unemployed'. They comprise nearly half of the economically active population. This category does not exist in the US. An enclave capitalist economy in South Africa developed through imports substitution industrialisation. This is in contrast to how the economies in East and South East Asia are developing. They are developing through export promotion industrialisation. This explains why the South African economy is less sophisticated than most Asian economies. An important attribute of a natural resource enclave capitalist economy is its dependence on imported skills and technology. Such an economy is dominated by foreign companies in most sectors, especially in manufacturing. This explains its relatively low investment in research and development. Foreign firms carry out their research and development in their home countries. It also explains the dominance of oligopolies in many sectors of the economy. This therefore accounts for low levels of entrepreneurship in such an economy as South Africa's. The foreign firms carve up the limited, protected domestic market in an enclave capitalist economy and so keep out new entrants into the economy. A mineral-dependent enclave economy lives with enormous risks. Top of the list is what happens when mineral resources become depleted and/or are substituted due to technological changes. We are seeing this in South Africa today in connection with its four top primary export minerals – gold, diamonds, coal and platinum group metals: Gold deposits have become more uneconomical to mine due to the depth of the deposits; Diamonds are being replaced with cheaper synthetic diamonds; Coal is being phased out due to climate change considerations; and Platinum is being made superfluous by the phasing out of the internal combustion engine which used platinum to scrub exhaust fumes. Mineral assets' depletion or their substitution is one cause of South Africa's economic stagnation. The second source of its stagnation is democracy. Democracy, deindustrialisation and economic stagnation One of the most important outcomes of democracy in South Africa was that it transferred political power from property owners, farmers, miners, factory owners, bank owners and shop owners to non-property owners – the African middle-class professionals and organised labour. This is one of the major drivers of the country's economic stagnation. Non-property owners – African middle-class professionals – who control the state use their political power to transfer the economic surplus from potential investment in the production sector to consumption by the ruling political elite using the tax system, and awarding themselves inflated public sector salaries. This contributes to fuelling economic stagnation. Democracy is a last-resort form of appeasing or accommodating the demands of aggrieved social groups through the creation of a more inclusive system of governance. Democracy comes about when the use of force has failed to suppress or overcome threats from below to an existing socioeconomic order. Democracy is a mode of preserving, as much as possible, the existing socioeconomic order through compromise and accommodation where use of force by protagonists has failed to prevail. I once asked Pik Botha why the National Party (NP) decided to negotiate when it did, from a position of strength. Botha said the NP estimated it could hold back the threat from the blacks by force for another 10 years. He said a more immediate threat to the regime were the whites. The whites were not prepared to sacrifice their standards of living in order to preserve apartheid. The main threat to the white standard of living came from international sanctions, especially American sanctions. The British government was also aware of the threat of the collapsing South African economy posed by the American sanctions. By their own calculations, the British concluded a collapsing South African economy would dislocate 800,000 people of British descent from South Africa and another 200,000 citizens in the UK who would lose their jobs derived from trade with South Africa. Given the threat to South Africa's socioeconomic order, the NP therefore had to find a formula that preserved as much of the existing socioeconomic system as possible by accommodating its adversaries who by the mid-1980s included: big business, whites, blacks, the American government, the UK government, African governments, the United Nations and the Commonwealth. South Africa's industries had grown behind high tariff walls. When the walls were lowered with the advent of democracy after 1994, the economy proved uncompetitive and thus started to deindustrialise rapidly. Democracy has therefore proved to be a double-edged sword. On the one hand it brought about many social, economic and political benefits. On the other it contributed to economic stagnation. Conclusion: How to overcome economic stagnation The conclusion is that political power in South Africa after the May 2024 elections is in the hands of the combined black and white middle-class. Left out of political power are the working class, the poor and the capitalists. As the middle class in South Africa is consumption-driven, this is a risky outcome for the country economically. It means economic stagnation is going to continue indefinitely unless a coalition of the marginalised groups intervenes politically and forms a new coalition to contest for political power on a production-driven agenda. Desirable way forward for South Africa: Promote conversation between the groups politically marginalised by democracy, especially the poor and business, about a better and inclusive future for South Africa; Promote industrial modernisation policies to reduce dependence on mineral resources; Creation and promotion of a new entrepreneurial class linked to digital and 4IR technologies; Overhaul of the education system to improve South Africa's Human Capital Index position from 132 out of 169 globally; Repeal black economic empowerment (BEE) legislation; Professionalise public service and halve its cost as a percentage of GDP; Draw up an urbanisation plan for South Africa and a development strategy for rural areas in former homelands; and Overhaul the education system and health provision for the population. DM This is an edited version of a paper delivered at the recent FW de Klerk Foundation Conference on 'Achieving an Inclusive Economy'. Moeletsi Mbeki is chairperson of the South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA), an independent think-tank based in Johannesburg.
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Netanyahu meets security officials as Israel considers full Gaza takeover
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivers a speech during a meeting in Jerusalem, July 27, 2025. Image: VCG Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with senior security officials to finalize a new strategy for the nearly two-year conflict in the Gaza Strip, his office said on Tuesday. Media reports indicated he favored a complete military takeover of the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territory. Despite intense international pressure for a ceasefire to ease hunger and dire conditions in the besieged enclave, efforts to mediate a truce between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas, which governs Gaza, have collapsed. Local health authorities reported that at least 20 people were killed by Israeli gunfire while they waited for United Nations aid trucks in the northern Gaza Strip. In southern Gaza, 20 people were wounded by Israeli gunfire as they waited for aid from UN trucks near Morag Square near Rafah, medics said. Eight more people died of starvation or malnutrition in the past day, Gaza's Health Ministry said, while at least 80 people were killed in the latest Israeli shelling. Netanyahu's office stated that the prime minister held a "limited security discussion" lasting about three hours, during which military Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir "presented the options for continuing the campaign in Gaza." An Israeli official earlier told Reuters that Defense Minister Israel Katz and Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, a Netanyahu confidant, would also attend the meeting to decide on a strategy to present to the cabinet this week. Israeli media reported on Tuesday that the cabinet is scheduled to meet on Thursday at 6 pm. Palestinians, suffering from extreme hunger under Israel's intense attacks and blockade, gather at an aid distribution centre near the Zikim border crossing in Gaza to try and get food, August 5, 2025. Image: VCG Pressure tactic? Israel's Channel 12, citing an official from Netanyahu's office, stated that the prime minister was leaning toward taking control of the entire territory. This would reverse the 2005 decision to withdraw Israeli citizens and soldiers from Gaza, while keeping control over its borders, airspace, and utilities—a move right-wing parties blame for Hamas gaining power there in the 2006 election. It was unclear, however, whether Netanyahu envisioned a prolonged takeover or a short-term operation aimed at dismantling Hamas and freeing Israeli hostages. The prime minister's office declined to comment on the Channel 12 report. "It is still necessary to complete the defeat of the enemy in Gaza, release our hostages and ensure that Gaza never again constitutes a threat to Israel," Netanyahu told new recruits at a military base. "We are not giving up on any of these missions." The statement from Netanyahu's office said the Israeli Defense Forces were "prepared to implement any decision that will be made by the Political-Security Cabinet." A Palestinian official said the suggestion of a full Israeli military takeover of Gaza may be a tactic to pressure Hamas into concessions, while the Palestinian Foreign Ministry urged foreign nations to heed the reports. "The ministry urges countries and the international community to treat these leaks with utmost seriousness and to intervene urgently to prevent their implementation, whether these leaks are meant to exert pressure, test international reactions, or are genuine and serious," it said. The UN called reports about a possible decision to expand Israel's military operations throughout the Gaza Strip "deeply alarming" if true. US President Donald Trump declined to say whether the US, Israel's closest military ally, supported Netanyahu's plans. "I know that we are there now trying to get people fed," Trump told reporters. "As far as the rest of it, I really can't say. That's going to be pretty much up to Israel." Palestinian students walk past the rubble of their school, which was demolished by Israeli forces in the village of Aqaba in the northern Jordan Valley in the occupied West Bank, Palestine, August 5, 2025. Image: VCG Devastating situation in Gaza This round of the Gaza conflict started when Hamas-led militants attacked Israeli communities and military bases near Gaza on October 7, 2023. About 1,200 people, including more than 700 civilians, were killed, and 251 hostages were taken to Gaza. Israel's military response has devastated the small, crowded enclave, killing more than 61,000 people, mostly civilians, according to Palestinian health authorities. Israel's campaign has forced nearly all of Gaza's over 2 million residents from their homes and caused what a global hunger monitor called last week an unfolding famine. Approximately 188 Palestinians, including 94 children, have died from hunger since this round of the conflict began, according to Gaza authorities. On Tuesday, Israeli tanks moved into central Gaza, but it was unclear if this was part of a larger ground offensive. Palestinians living in the last quarter of the territory where Israel has not yet gained military control, either through ground incursions or demands for civilians to leave, said any new push would be disastrous. "If the tanks pushed through, where would we go, into the sea?" said Abu Jehad, a Gaza wood merchant. "This will be like a death sentence to the entire population." CGTN
TimesLIVE
6 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Israel approves plan to take control of Gaza City
Israel's political-security cabinet approved a plan to take control of Gaza City early on Friday, hours after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel intended to take military control of the entire strip despite intensifying criticism at home and abroad over the devastating almost two-year-old war. 'The IDF will prepare to take control of Gaza City while providing humanitarian aid to the civilian population outside the combat zones,' Netanyahu's office said in a statement, referring to the Israeli Defence Forces. Gaza City, in the north of the strip, is the largest city in the enclave. Axios reporter Barak Ravid, citing an Israeli official, said on X the plan involved evacuating Palestinian civilians from Gaza City and launching a ground offensive there. Netanyahu on Thursday told Fox News Channel's Bill Hemmer in an interview 'we intend to' when asked if Israel would take over the entire coastal territory. 'We don't want to keep it. We want to have a security perimeter. We don't want to govern it. We don't want to be there as a governing body.' He said Israel wanted to hand over the territory to Arab forces that would govern it. He did not elaborate on the governance arrangements or which Arab countries could be involved.
