Mchunu vs Mkhwanazi: Police operations continue amid allegations
As the furore surrounding KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi intensifies, National Police Commissioner Fannie Masemola says normal operations continue across the country.
In a briefing on Sunday, Mkhwanazi alleged political interference in police operations, claiming that Mchunu and Deputy National Commissioner for Crime Detection, Shadrack Sibiya, had meddled. These allegedly include issuing letters to disband a task force, halt crime intelligence appointments, and withdraw case dockets to Sibiya's office.
Day-to-day policing
Police spokesperson Brigadier Athlenda Mathe said Masemola has assured the nation that daily crime combatting operations and normal day-to-day policing at stations and other service points continue.
Mathe said Masemola will, at a predetermined time, update the media on ongoing police operations to prevent and combat crime in the country.
'The mandate and work of the police, which is to prevent, combat and investigate crime, to maintain public order, to protect and secure the inhabitants of the Republic and their property, and to uphold and enforce the law, is not affected in any way.
'The men and women in blue remain hard at work at every corner of this country to serve and protect all people living in South Africa,' Mathe said.
ALSO READ: MK party wants Mchunu arrested amid explosive allegations
Crime intelligence
Masemola is also expected to announce the appointment of an acting Divisional Commissioner for Crime Intelligence.
'Other issues that are currently in the public domain will also be discussed.'
Meanwhile, the MK party has demanded the 'immediate arrest' of Mchunu following explosive allegations against the minister and senior officials within the South African Police Service (Saps).
Action
The MK party said Masemola, together with Mkhwanazi, 'must act without delay.'
'Given the weight of the allegations, the arrest must be carried out without any further delay. The integrity of our democratic institutions and the safety of our citizens should always be paramount.
'Any efforts that hint at sabotaging justice and truth, regardless of the source, must be eradicated,' the MK party said.
President Cyril Ramaphosa is expected to address the matter when he returns to the country from Brazil, where a Brics leaders' summit is currently taking place.
ALSO READ: KZN's Mkhwanazi makes damning claims about Mchunu, senior police officials
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
26 minutes ago
- TimesLIVE
Kenyan police fire teargas, water cannons on anniversary of pro-democracy protests
Kenyan police fired teargas and water cannons to disperse protesters in the capital Nairobi on Monday as they marked the 35th anniversary of pro-democracy rallies. Activists rally every year on July 7 to mark the date in 1990 when opponents of then-president Daniel Arap Moi launched a bid to transform the country into a multiparty democracy. The protest is called 'Saba Saba' ('seven seven' in Kiswahili) because of the date. Authorities have ramped up police deployments in Nairobi since youth-led protests in June 2024 that initially focused on tax hikes but expanded to cover issues such as graft, police brutality and unexplained disappearances of government critics. A Reuters witness saw police use teargas and water cannons on Monday to disperse crowds along a key artery in Nairobi as hundreds of demonstrators advanced, with some blowing whistles while they marched. Police had earlier blocked major roads leading into Nairobi and heavily restricted vehicle traffic within the city, leaving streets deserted but for the demonstrators, who turned up on foot. Most schools and at least one shopping mall were shut in anticipation of possible trouble. 'We are not ready to go back (home) because who will fight for our rights? We will be here until evening,' said Francis Waswa, a construction worker. Interior minister Kipchumba Murkomen, who last month described the protests as 'terrorism disguised as dissent', said on his X account on Sunday the government was committed to protecting life and property. 'Our security agencies are on high alert to deal decisively with criminals and other elements of ill intent who may seek to infiltrate peaceful processions to cause havoc, mayhem or destruction of property,' he said. Unidentified people forced their way into the offices of the nonprofit Kenya Human Rights Commission on Sunday to stop a press conference ahead of Monday's protests. At least one person, a board member, was injured, said Ernest Cornel, who works at the commission. Police spokesperson Muchiri Nyaga did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The death of Albert Ojwang, a teacher and blogger, in police custody in June gave fresh impetus to public protests. The government-funded Kenya National Commission on Human Rights reported 19 deaths nationwide during demonstrations on June 25. Prosecutors approved murder charges against six people, including three police officers, over Ojwang's death. All six suspects pleaded not guilty.
The South African
32 minutes ago
- The South African
O'Sullivan: Mkhwanazi overstepped his authority, must fall
Forensic investigator Paul O'Sullivan has condemned KwaZulu-Natal provincial police commissioner Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi for making serious allegations against Police Minister Senzo Mchunu and deputy national police commissioner Lieutenant General Shadrack Sibiya. O'Sullivan told Newzroom Afrika that Mkhwanazi had no authority to accuse government officials of criminal conduct publicly. He claimed the commissioner crossed a line by attacking the Police Ministry, the judiciary, and the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). 'The reality is that he overstepped his mark,' O'Sullivan said. 'It's not the job of a provincial commissioner to accuse the government or judiciary of criminality. That is exactly what he did today, and I want to see him fall, the sooner the better.' According to IOL , O'Sullivan revealed that he had written to the Police Minister calling for an urgent judicial commission of inquiry into Mkhwanazi's conduct. He also called for the suspension of both Mkhwanazi and national commissioner General Fannie Masemola, saying: 'If Masemola authorised what Mkhwanazi did, they can both go down together.' O'Sullivan also criticised Mkhwanazi for wearing a Special Task Force uniform during Sunday's press briefing and appearing flanked by heavily armed masked officers. 'He is not a task force member. Why was he wearing their uniform? Why was he surrounded by task force members carrying R5 rifles and wearing masks? Who is he trying to intimidate the government, the police?' O'Sullivan asked. He warned that the scene looked 'dangerously suspicious' and resembled the actions of someone threatening a coup. During Sunday's briefing, Mkhwanazi said he was ready to die for the police badge. He accused Minister Mchunu of interfering in policing matters, including disbanding the political killings task team without consulting national police leadership. Mkhwanazi also claimed cellphone analysis linked a ministerial associate to the criminal underworld. He announced plans to open a criminal case against Mchunu. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Mail & Guardian
42 minutes ago
- Mail & Guardian
The President and the Pulpit: What does a social compact even mean?
Last month, President Cyril Ramaphosa, took the pulpit and displayed qualities befitting a leader of the African National Congress — the broadest of all churches.(@PresidencyZA/X) In his seminal essay , 'Brother Baldwin' on the streets of Harlem as a teenager, outstripping even his father — he slowly lost his faith. Though the horrors of life in the ghetto that had driven him to seek refuge in the church-house grew no less fierce; ' In spite of everything, there was in the life I fled a zest and a joy and a capacity for facing and surviving disaster that are very moving and very rare. Perhaps we were, all of us — pimps, whores, racketeers, church members and children — bound together by the nature of our oppression, the specific and peculiar complex of risks we had to run; if so, within these limits we sometimes achieved with each other a freedom that was close to love. ' Whereas ' There was no love in the church. It was a mask for hatred and self-hatred and despair. The transfiguring power of the Holy Ghost ended when the service ended and salvation stopped at the church door. When we were told to love everybody, I had thought that meant everybody . But no .' Ultimately, he could no longer evade the moment when: ' I was able to see that the principles governing the rites and customs of the churches in which I grew up did not differ from the principles governing the rites and customs of other churches, white. 'The principles were Blindness, Loneliness and Terror, the first principle necessarily and actively cultivated in order to deny the two others .' Last month, President Cyril Ramaphosa, took the A communion and fellowship that might just save us all: A Can you imagine? Imagine a Nation From Hobbes to Locke to Rousseau and later Adam Smith and others, Western philosophy developed this theory — not just to describe power, but to justify it. To argue we are taxed, ruled by laws and policed because a rational person would prefer this arrangement to any alternative. That life is better when we come together — voluntarily. A hypothetical abstraction to ground state legitimacy. A tidy explanation for the existence of power and the limitations on freedom. In the world of rhetoric — which is much of politics and, according to some linguists, all of reality — 'the social contract' became a kind of blank cheque. Not so much an empty phrase — but one so loaded with rich theoretical associations and credibility … i.e. moral authority, that it could be deployed to assert any set of rights or responsibilities were not only desirable arrangements conducive to a good life, but real and binding. But as critics of this theory have always pointed out, a hypothetical contract is not a contract at all. And even the greatest constitutional congress of all time can only produce an imagined agreement. Transformative constitutionalists go further and say that such an agreement must continuously be reimagined. That doesn't mean such a nation itself isn't real. But neither does embracing the group identity and nomenclatures of liberal democratic civic nationalism make a society free. Take, for example, Israel, a brazen apartheid state, whose national ethos has for decades described itself as the Only Democracy in the Middle East. Just like the church Baldwin could no longer live with and apartheid South Africa could not have lived without. But we live in a complicated world (of ideas). Even among progressive intellectual leaders — fully invested in the resistance of oppression and injustice — there is not much unanimity about what nations are. UN international law expert Francesca Albanese rejects, with contempt, the much-beloved question whether Israel has the right to exist. In a popular But Albanese seems to suggest that this is a morally insignificant thing when she quips: 'Tomorrow, Italy and France could decide to come together and be 'Ita-France'' — and shrugs to suggest that would be meaningless. But as a lawyer, she must appeal to authority — emphasising that international law does not guarantee any state's right to exist but enshrines the rights of 'a people' to exist. But this still calls into question what constitutes a people. Not just as a matter of international law, itself a body of dubious existence. What is the standard form of a social compact? If agreements of different peoples to organise and come together are morally arbitrary — say, Ita-France — maybe they are undergirded by the moral force and value of social contracts. Contrast this with another similarly semi-viral exchange. Ta-Nehisi Coates, in a The Message , in which he is very critical of apartheid, is badgered by an irate interviewer. The accusation is that his extremist latest book seems to deny Israel's right to exist. The first important point Coates makes is to explain that the substance of our systems of morality and the foundations of how power is organised, and identity is assumed and ascribed, are at base simply stories. Good stories, bad stories, true stories — and more creative imaginings. He encourages young writers to participate in giving meaning, meaning that is constructed through language. And so, the tool is to sprint to the writer's room — and be heard when stories are being recorded. This opinion is But when Coates is continuously badgered by the interviewer, he offers a very different answer on the state's right to exist. He says: 'No country in the world establishes its existence through rights. Countries establish their existence through force. That's what America did.' He refers to the centuries-long human history where many nation-states and ethnic nationalisms were formed through histories of conquest. But in saying so, he seems to imply that it's impossible — or pointless — to even engage in the ulterior question of the justification of a state. Is it even possible — or necessary — to crown moral authority on a self-organised sovereign state or nation? Is the right to exist on moral terms a priori? Albanese and Coates agree the existence of states — and presumably peoples and '-isms' — are matters of fact. But Coates focuses on whether those groups exist in the right way. His criticism of Israel is not about the material fact of its existence but its character — that of an apartheid regime which visits death and indignity upon other peoples on grounds of discrimination. So, perhaps states are not made up of subjective group stories or even the (abstractly contractual) deliberative decision to collectivise. In judging state legitimacy — insofar as civic nationalisms are not just social constructs and narratives in isolation — they are competing imaginations. Competing recordings and retellings. And, often, tools that further active hostilities against all those outside the church. As we try to not only propagate, but to create, peoplehood and deepen humanity by promoting, celebrating and enumerating the substance of our shared bonds — processes commonly grouped under the umbrella term 'nation-building' … At the same time, we are witnessing a singular and unprecedented attack on, not just one people's existence, but humanity itself, in the unfolding of an unrelenting ethnic cleansing. South Africa's unequivocal solidarity with Palestinian lives, and recognition of mass death, is woven into the fabric of our nation state. It reflects our historic development, our understanding of exclusion and national civic identity. And yet our own nation-building and democratic project still trends towards exclusion and decline. The South African compact Yes, South African democracy is special. We have pulled off democratic miracles that should have been impossible. Etymologically, the terms social contract and social compact might seem similar. But it would be a mistake not to recognise that these phrases mean very different things in the abstract tradition of European philosophy, versus what they've come to mean in South Africa. Here, the compact has meant democratisation without war. At least as close as any nation could hope to get. This is part of why some are capable of asserting unity and inspiring faith. Even if you did not grow up in the Congress, when a young nation hears 'social compact', it is compelling. Because we've seen what it can mean. The homepage of the Constitutional Court THE HISTORY OF THE IDEA The notion of a bill of rights for South Africa can be traced back to an ANC document in the early 1920s. The Freedom Charter of 1955 carried the idea forward. The Freedom Charter, whose I recall the first written Economic Freedom Fighters manifesto contesting the ANC. The breakaway group's core claim was not to deny the Freedom Charter's legacy — but to claim that they and not the ANC, were its true successors in custody. Because the Charter is so deeply embedded in our national tradition that even the ANC's fiercest critics cannot denounce it. A later and more ultimate compact is of course the Constitution. The nation was created on the basis of that compact. The idea that the Constitution and the broader democratic compact emerged solely from the ANC is not quite right. Some might suggest a broader coalition, a united democratic front that opposed apartheid, also played a role. And while the Congress tradition informed the values and vision that shaped negotiations, the Constitution as a social compact was forged through compromises with the National Party, with capital — local and international — and under the watchful eyes of global institutions. The settlement was not only democratic, but pragmatic. It secured formal equality. It promised representation. It promised inclusion. It gave birth to institutions which have occasionally made participatory democracy look good. It was preceded by fora like the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, whose attempts at deepening the compact of reconciliation were jettisoned by the very same politicians who devised this process. (See Andre du And it was succeeded by multiple subsidiary compacts, such as the National Development Plan, or 'Vision 2030', which for some reason the president now believes requires a new nation-building national dialogue before we can implement its vision or revise it. Where early European philosophers used the social contract to explain why anyone should ever accept government by force, our social compacts have meant the rejection of apartheid, a broadening of political inclusion and the deliberate creation of coalitions. So yes, it's a romantic and transformative notion. It's hard not to be moved — every single time it is invoked. But that is exactly why we should be cautious. When the ANC calls for a new dialogue to form a new 'social compact', we must ask: 'What nation? What dialogue? What compact?' Elisha Kunene is a recovering lawyer and the project lead for participatory democracy at
