Europeans open to buying US arms for Ukraine under Trump plan but need details
Trump said on Monday that Washington will supply Patriot air defence systems, missiles and other weaponry to Ukraine for its war against Russia's invasion and that the arms would be paid for by other NATO countries.
But much remains undisclosed, including the amounts and precise types of weapons to be provided, how quickly they would be supplied and how they would be paid for.
U.S. officials have suggested that European countries will be willing to give up some of their own stocks of weapons for Ukraine and then buy replacements from the United States. But some of the countries involved say they still don't even know what is being asked of them.
Such a move would get weapons to Ukraine more quickly but would leave donor countries' defences more exposed until new systems are ready.
"We are ready to participate. Of course we can't do it on our own, we need others to partner up – but we have a readiness,' Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen told reporters in Brussels on Tuesday ahead of a meeting of European Union ministers.
Speaking alongside Trump at the White House on Monday, NATO chief Mark Rutte said that Germany, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Canada want to be part of the new initiative.
Many of those countries have been among the biggest military aid donors to Ukraine, either overall or per capita.
Asked whether Denmark could give U.S. arms from its own stocks as part of the scheme, Rasmussen said: 'We don't have these kind of systems – the Patriot systems – so if we should lean in, and we are absolutely ready to do so, it will be (with) money and we have to work out the details.'
European ministers said they would now need to examine how new purchases of U.S. weapons could be paid for. In many cases, that seems likely to involve countries teaming up to buy U.S. weapons systems.
"Now we need to see how together we can go in and finance, among other things, Patriots, which they plan to send to Ukraine," Sweden's Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard told Swedish radio.
In Brussels, Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp said his country is looking into the plan 'with a positive inclination'.
Asked about the scheme, Norwegian Defence Minister Tore Sandvik told Reuters that Oslo was 'in close dialogue with Ukraine' on military aid and 'air defence remains a high priority for Ukraine and for the Norwegian military support'.
'Norway has contributed to significant amounts of air defence for Ukraine, including co-financing the donation of a Patriot system and missiles,' he said.
The Finnish Defence Ministry said Helsinki 'will continue to provide material support to Ukraine'.
"The details of the U.S. initiative ... are not yet known and we are interested to hear more about them before we can take more concrete lines on this issue,' it said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Tax on AI and crypto could fund climate action, says former Paris accords envoy
Governments should consider taxing artificial intelligence and cryptocurrencies to generate funds to deal with the climate crisis, one of the architects of the Paris agreement has said. Laurence Tubiana, the chief executive of the European Climate Foundation and a former French diplomat, is co-lead of the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force, an international initiative to find new sources of funds for climate action by taxing highly polluting activities including aviation and fossil fuel extraction. She said cryptocurrency should certainly be taxed, and levies on AI should be considered. 'That could be a first step – again, it's the same rationale [for AI as taxing cryptocurrency], because they use a lot of energy,' she said. 'Crypto seems to be something which is not regulated at all, and of course it's a concern, from the financial stability element.' The equivalent of Poland's annual energy consumption is expended each year just on generating bitcoin, one of the leading cryptocurrencies. AI also consumes vast resources, resulting in IT companies scrabbling to secure electricity supplies in locations around the world. Taxing AI could prove tricky, Tubiana conceded, as companies might try to shift the location of their datacentres. Although there was likely to be 'pushback' against taxing cryptocurrencies, particularly from the US, where Donald Trump is an enthusiastic supporter of the technology, she said central bankers had expressed an interest. 'Because we need to regulate it – it's organised crime sometimes, so you should look at where the money's coming from, and who is the user,' Tubiana said. The taskforce has assigned a group of experts to examine how this could be achieved. The taskforce has scored an early success in the form of an agreement among some countries to put new charges on business-class and first-class airline tickets, and private jets. France, Spain, Kenya, Barbados, Somalia, Benin, Sierra Leone, and Antigua and Barbuda were the first countries to sign up to the accord announced at the end of June. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, said: 'We have to mobilise more and more countries in order for these critical sectors which are benefiting from globalisation to contribute to the financing of this common effort [to combat the climate crisis]. I want to urge all possible countries to join this international framework because it's absolutely key, and it's part of our agenda.' Such taxes could raise €147bn (£127bn) a year, if the big economies joined in. The use of private jets increased by almost 50% between 2019 and 2023, and first- and business-class flying recovered more speedily than economy class after the Covid lockdowns. Polls suggest that charging premier-class passengers more would be a popular move. Tubiana said: 'When you have your car, you pay tax, and when you fly you don't pay tax, so there is an element of justice there that resonates.' Countries could impose such taxes without a global agreement, she added. 'The aviation tax is not that complicated, because it's really a sovereign decision.' A potential carbon tax on shipping is also still under discussion, after the International Maritime Organization agreed steps towards such a deal in April. A further meeting will take place in October, and Tubiana said she was 'reasonably optimistic' a new levy would be decided. The taskforce is also examining options such as a tax on buying shares in the stock market, which could raise as much as €105bn a year without distorting the market, according to research. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion Rebecca Newsom, the global political lead of Greenpeace International's Stop Drilling Start Paying campaign, urged the taskforce to go further and push for taxes on fossil fuel production. 'The obvious next step is to hold oil and gas corporations to account,' she said. 'As fossil fuel barons rake in obscene profits, and people are battered with increasingly violent floods, storms and wildfires, it's no surprise that eight out of 10 people support making them pay. Members of the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force and rich countries around the world should act upon this enormous public mandate.' Tubiana, who guided the Cop21 conference in 2015 at which the Paris agreement was signed, also expressed concern about the direction France was taking in international climate negotiations. Macron has mooted a delay to the European Commission's proposal of a 90% cut to greenhouse gas emissions by 2040, a target that is supposed to be confirmed by the EU parliament and member states in September before the Cop30 climate summit in Brazil in November. Tubiana said Macron's new-found hesitation over climate policy was 'a very sad story'. She warned that it would backfire and would reduce the chances of a strong outcome for Cop30, at which countries must set new emissions goals under the Paris agreement. 'How can we ask anybody to do something if we're not doing it, if we're not proving that we believe we can decarbonise the economy?' she said. 'I hope they will wake up to the bad signals they are giving. It's really not reasonable to think that delaying action will benefit the economy of France. We need innovation, we don't need to delay.'
Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump's tariff war demands countervailing force: podcast
Follow on Apple or Spotify. Listen on the Reuters app. Europe is still reeling after the US president announced 30% levies on all exports. In this Viewsroom podcast, Breakingviews columnists debate how Brussels and others can react, and why, given the thus far measured response, Trump has reason to push even harder. Follow Aimee Donnellan on LinkedIn. Follow Jonathan Guilford on X and Linkedin. (The hosts are Reuters Breakingviews columnists. The opinions expressed are their own.) Further Reading How global tensions are unsettling markets: podcast Time for EU to remind Trump of its trade war cards Trump TACO trade contains seeds of own unravelling EU's China-US trade weakness only goes so far Visit the Thomson Reuters Privacy Statement for information on our privacy and data protection practices. You may also visit to opt-out of targeted advertising.
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump is doing a better job of acting in our nation's interest than Labour
It's often said the UK and the US are two countries divided by a common language. In another instance of life imitating art, Donald Trump, ahead of his visit to Aberdeen in two weeks, called on Keir Starmer to abandon the windmills blighting so much of rural Scotland. Trump is absolutely correct to call out Labour's deranged energy policy – concreting over the countryside and installing unsightly pylons, annihilating arable agricultural land and carpeting the countryside with solar panels in pursuit of their mad dash to net zero. Anyone who has ever left London and seen the impact of these damaging policies on rural Britain would agree with Trump on this. But that can't be said of our London-centric Prime Minister. It should not take a foreign leader coming over here to spell out common sense to him. But we are where we are with our mediocre middle manager-in-chief. Part of what makes Britain great is our green and pleasant land. I get it. Telegraph readers get it. Apparently even Donald Trump gets it. So why does Starmer and his cabal of lefties in Cabinet, including Red Ed, seem so determined to take a wrecking ball to it every chance they get? Having been elected on a promise to reduce bills by £300, they are now radically pushing forward an agenda that is going to throw taxpayers' money down the drain and jeopardise our energy security to boot. It makes absolutely no sense. It is yet another case of this ideological Labour Government pursuing what works in socialist screeds, rather than what actually works in real life and for real people. The cost of sacrificing rural Britain at the altar of net zero nonsense is set to cost the taxpayer an eye-watering £800 billion by 2050. Just like the Chagos surrender, or the looming employment Bill which gives the unions the whip hand, it is a lose-lose situation for Britain. It is becoming so bad that Keir Starmer now seems to need Donald Trump to point out the glaringly obvious fact that this won't work, and no one wants it. But still, he seems determined to plough on. Kemi Badenoch has thrown down the gauntlet. Enough is enough of this eco zealotry that flies in the face of facts and common sense. Net zero by 2050 will not work. Whilst of course we must stop climate change, we are responsible for 1 per cent of global emissions. So why would we blow up our economy, hike everyone's bills and jeopardise our energy security on this madness? To anyone with two brain cells to rub together, it is glaringly obvious: even businesses and industry experts are crying out for Labour to stop. But, judging by the disastrous first year of this Government, brains are in short supply around the current Cabinet table. Take Ed Miliband, for example. He spent billions on an energy company that doesn't create any energy. Far from reducing everyone's energy bills, as they promised they would do, they are getter higher than when they took office. Meanwhile, they are set to hike everyone's taxes at the same time as they are forgoing £20 billion in tax receipts by shutting off the North Sea. It will not be lost on anyone that the president, whose Drill Baby Drill policies on oil and gas couldn't be more at odds with the Dole Baby Dole madness of Ed Milliband, will be in Aberdeen where job losses are predicted to be up to 400 every two weeks. And, unlike the New Labour anthem, things can only get worse. They have just adopted an 81 per cent emission reduction target without a plan how to get there. All that means is more harebrained policies that cost the earth but won't save it. We need the Government to have a radical rethink of net zero. Hopefully, Trump will get our embattled Prime Minister to change his tune once again. Otherwise, the only thing their energy policy will generate is resentment.
