EU to stockpile critical minerals amid geopolitical risks, FT says
"The EU faces an increasingly complex and deteriorating risk landscape marked by rising geopolitical tensions, including conflict, the mounting impacts of climate change, environmental degradation, and hybrid and cyber threats," the newspaper quoted the draft as saying.
The document warns that the higher-risk environment was driven by "increased activity from hacktivists, cybercriminals and state-sponsored groups", the FT said.
The European Commission did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
The draft document, due to be published next week and still subject to change, says there is "limited common understanding of which essential goods are needed for crisis preparedness against the backdrop of a rapidly evolving risk landscape", the newspaper reported.
In March, the European Commission unveiled its EU Preparedness Union Strategy, urging member states to strengthen stockpiles of critical equipment and encouraging citizens to keep at least 72 hours' worth of essential supplies in case of emergencies.
The strategy was designed to prepare the bloc for risks such as natural disasters, cyberattacks and geopolitical crises, including the possibility of armed aggression against EU countries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
US immediately pausing issuance of worker visas for commercial truck drivers, Rubio says
WASHINGTON, Aug 21 (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Thursday that the United States was immediately pausing the issuance of all worker visas for commercial truck drivers. "The increasing number of foreign drivers operating large tractor-trailer trucks on U.S. roads is endangering American lives and undercutting the livelihoods of American truckers," Rubio said in a post on X.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Can investors buy in to Big Law? Burford Capital bets on it
Aug 21 (Reuters) - (Billable Hours is Reuters' weekly report on lawyers and money. Please send tips or suggestions to opens new tab.) What would it take for outside investors to own a stake in a major U.S. law firm's business? It's a question that's gaining new urgency, after litigation finance giant Burford Capital (BURF.L), opens new tab revealed it is in talks to take such a step. Publicly traded Burford is already among the largest third-party backers of individual lawsuits or litigation portfolios, which it funds in return for a share of potential settlements or judgments. Now, according to Burford chief development officer Travis Lenkner, it is in "meaningful discussions" with U.S. firms to partner with them more directly. Burford is exploring two paths, Lenkner said: Investing in firms through Arizona's alternative business structure (ABS) program and backing firms via managed service organizations (MSOs), a model that legal ethics experts and deal advisors said has been gaining traction. "This is law firms seeing what's happening in other jurisdictions, in other professions, and responding to the competitive challenges in their own market, and looking for a solution to the otherwise inefficiency of the partnership structure," Lenkner said. He said Burford has fielded interest from firms of different sizes and expects to deploy capital "relatively soon," though he did not name specific firms or provide a timeline for its U.S. plans. Outside the United States, Burford in 2020 acquired a 32% stake in a U.K.-based litigation firm. Ethical rules in nearly every U.S. state prohibit non-lawyers from owning U.S. law firms or receiving a percentage of their fees. Arizona in 2020 became the first U.S. state to implement a workaround, creating an ABS program to allow co-ownership with court approval. Earlier this year, KPMG became the first of the Big Four accounting firms to win approval from Arizona's Supreme Court to launch a law firm in the state. Under a managed service organization model, a law firm's back-office operations—billing, IT, marketing—are spun off into a separate MSO entity. That entity, funded by outside investors, provides services to the law firm for a fee. The MSO doesn't share in the firm's profits, sidestepping the provisions against non-lawyers owning law firms or receiving a cut of legal fees. "It has the promise of modernizing the practice of law in a really material way,' said Trisha Rich, a partner at Holland & Knight who is advising both law firms and investors on MSOs. Rich said such arrangements can help lawyers shift time from administrative tasks to their practices. She said she's currently working on 10 such transactions and has closed others, though she declined to name clients. Lucian Pera, a partner at Adams & Reese and legal ethics expert who has advised on both MSOs and ABS arrangements, said interest in MSOs is 'exploding.' While most deals involve a single MSO serving a single firm, there's room for other structures, he added. Despite the appeal, MSOs face constraints. Existing ethics rules mean an MSO could not charge law firms a percentage of their revenue or profits as a fee, said Paul Haskel, a Crowell & Moring partner. Lawyers also can't sign non-compete agreements, Rich said, meaning investors must accept that key talent can walk away at any time. While not specific to MSOs, some attorneys have balked at efforts to expand the financial stakes of non-lawyers in the legal profession. Programs like Arizona's have stalled or been rejected in California and other states after critics warned that client interests could be harmed by the influence of investors or corporations that are not bound by attorney ethics rules. Ethics aside, some experts said law firm partners might resist an arrangement like an MSO for business reasons. Bruce MacEwen and Janet Stanton of law firm consultancy Adam Smith Esq predicted "the great majority will reject the notion of an MSO for their firm for (misplaced) fear of its diluting their control of the law firm as a business." "We see no reason an MSO interest would taint or dilute zealous client representation," they said in an email, since the MSO would not dictate management of the firm. These structures have been used in other professions, such as healthcare and public accounting, Burford's Lenkner said. He said law practice traditionally didn't require significant upfront investment, but that has changed with the pace of technological change and heightened competition for talent. 'It's not clear why law has been left for last, but it is clear why firms are now realizing the need for these structures,' Lenkner said. – The Justice Department's bankruptcy watchdog has asked a federal judge to set a trial date in its case challenging legal fees awarded to law firm Jackson Walker by a former bankruptcy judge David Jones, whose undisclosed romantic relationship with one of the firm's partners sparked an ethics scandal and cast uncertainty over the firm's fees in dozens of cases. The Office of the U.S. Trustee's request was included in a Friday filing in opposition to an individual settlement reached by Jackson Walker with a bankruptcy client whose case was overseen by Jones. The U.S. Trustee said the proposed settlement with Seadrill Partners would "prematurely and improperly short circuit" its effort to hold the firm accountable. Five similar proposed settlements totaling more than $2.3 million are now pending before U.S. District Judge Alia Moses, who is overseeing a legal effort by the U.S. Trustee to force Jackson Walker to disgorge all of the fees it was awarded by Jones. Instead of weighing those individual deals and others that are in the works, Moses should schedule the matter for trial, the Trustee said. "A full trial is necessary to ensure the Court can consider all evidence and remedies within a single proceeding," the U.S. Trustee said. – A U.S. judge in Alabama this week approved more than $759 million in legal fees and expenses for lawyers at 38 firms who secured a $2.8 billion antitrust settlement with Blue Cross Blue Shield on behalf of a class of health care providers. Chief U.S. District Judge R. David Proctor on Tuesday granted the request for $657.1 million in fees and at least $102 million in expenses as part of the settlement, which resolved claims that hospitals, physicians and other health professionals were underpaid for reimbursements. Read more: US legal jobs are rising again, but gains are mixed Optum picks new fight to kick law firm Motley Rice off opioids case Lawyers face objections to multimillion-dollar fees after no-cash settlement with Schwab
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Chelsea boss Enzo Maresca confirms Nicolas Jackson is free to leave and also wants Christopher Nkunku out the door
CHELSEA manager Enzo Maresca would rather risk a striker crisis than keep unhappy pair Nicolas Jackson and Christopher Nkunku. Wantaway forwards Jackson and Nkunku will be left out of the Blues squad for Friday's Prem trip to West Ham, despite BOTH being fit. 4 4 4 Arsenal were forced back into the transfer market when Kai Havertz suffered a knee injury that left Viktor Gyokeres as their only available centre-forward. When asked if it might be better to keep Jackson as back-up to new signings Joao Pedro and Liam Delap, Maresca said: 'It's better for Nico if what he desires is going to happen. 'He is available, but he's not going to be part of the squad because we have two players in that position — and we know that something can happen before the transfer window closes. 'The player is open to leave. If he finds a good solution, he's going to leave. 'Christo is with us like Nico, but it's the same answer as Nico. We'll see if they're going to be here. 'It's always better if they find a solution, as they are going to be more happy — and the club the same. "But you need someone that is going to buy you. It's not so easy.' Newcastle, Aston Villa, Napoli and others have all shown interest in Jackson — without indicating they will meet Chelsea's £60m-plus valuation. Chelsea's transfer deals IN Joao Pedro - from Brighton - £60m Jamie Gittens - from Dortmund - £52m Jorell Hato - from Ajax - £37m Liam Delap - from Ipswich - £30m Estevao - from Palmeiras - £29m Dario Essugo - from Sporting Lisbon - £18.5m Kendry Paez - from Independiente - £17.5m Mamadou Sarr - from Strasbourg - £12.5m TOTAL - £256.5m OUT Noni Madueke - to Arsenal - £52m Joao Felix - to Al-Nassr - £44m Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall - to Everton - £28m Djordje Petrovic - to Bournemouth - £25m Lesley Ugochukwu - to Burnley - £25m Armando Broja - to Burnley - £20m Bashir Humphreys - to Burnley - £15m Mathis Amougou - to Strasbourg - £12.5m Kepa Arrizabalaga - to Arsenal - £5m Marcus Bettinelli - to Man City - £5m TOTAL - £203.5m The Blues are not prepared to send the strikers out on loan, the option Bayern Munich and RB Leipzig would prefer for Nkunku. If both end up leaving, Maresca will be happy with the options Pedro and Delap offer. SunSport discusses the key takeaways from Enzo Maresca' pre-West Ham press conference including Jackson update He said: 'Pedro probably gives us more than Liam in small spaces. "Liam probably gives us a little bit more in terms of physicality, in terms of runs in behind. 'So it depends a little bit on the game plan.' 4 But neither Pedro nor sub Delap came close to breaking the deadlock in last Sunday's 0-0 home draw with Crystal Palace. So while the futures of Nkunku and Jackson remain uncertain, there is no doubt Maresca will already be under pressure if the Blues fail to beat the Hammers without them. But the Italian is boosted by the return of defender Tosin Adarabioyo ahead of Friday's clash.
