Telangana High Court Orders Local Body Elections Within Three Months
In a significant ruling on Wednesday, the High Court of Telangana mandated the state government and the State Election Commission to conduct Gram Panchayat elections within the next three months.
The verdict was delivered by Justice T. Madhavi Devi, following the conclusion of arguments on six petitions concerning the local body elections, which were reserved for judgement on Monday.
The court's decision underscores the urgency of facilitating democratic processes at the grassroots level. This ruling prompts the state authorities to prepare for the upcoming elections, aiming to enhance local governance and representation in the region.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
HC declares demolition of community centre in Cuttack dist ‘illegal'
Cuttack: Terming the act as an instance of 'bulldozer justice', Orissa high court has declared the demolition of a community centre in Balipur village under Athagarh tehsil in Cuttack district illegal and ordered to provide a compensation of Rs 10 lakh to the youth association which was managing the facility. The structure stood on 0.05 acres of gochar (grazing) land and had served vital public functions, including holding health camps, awareness drives and govt outreach programmes. The demolition, carried out in an encroachment case by revenue authorities on Dec 14 last year was allegedly executed without giving the villagers or the youth association adequate time to seek legal redress. The community had even offered to exchange homestead land for the portion used, but their pleas were apparently not heard. The association filed a petition in HC seeking a direction to declare the demolition of the structure as illegal, order its reconstruction at govt expense, award compensation for loss and initiate proceedings against officials responsible for it. Justice S K Panigrahi, in his June 20 judgment, observed that it is not the bulldozer per se that offends constitutional sensibilities, but the ease with which it is deployed before the law has spoken its final word. The judgment criticised the haste shown by the tehsildar, who acted in violation of Supreme Court guidelines and subsisting judicial orders. Of the Rs 10 lakh compensation awarded, Rs 2 lakh will be recovered in instalments from the salary of the tehsildar, citing his direct role in the demolition. The remaining Rs 8 lakh is to be paid by the state govt within eight weeks, Justice Panigrahi specified in his order. He also directed the initiation of departmental proceedings against the tehsildar and mandated the chief secretary and revenue secretary to ensure compliance. Further, the chief secretary has been instructed to issue comprehensive guidelines for all revenue and municipal officials, aligning with the SC's directives to prevent future violations of this nature.
India Gazette
5 hours ago
- India Gazette
"Wasted time of this court": Bombay HC rejects plea claiming discrepancies in 2024 Maharashtra assembly polls
Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], June 25 (ANI): The Bombay High Court on Wednesday dismissed a petition seeking to set aside the results of the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly elections and said it had 'wasted time of court'. A Division Bench comprising Justice GS Kulkarni and Justice Arif S Doctor rejected the petition filed by Mumbai resident Chetan Ahire, who had challenged the validity of the election results based on votes allegedly polled after the stipulated 6 pm deadline. Pronouncing its order after reserving it earlier this week, the court said, 'This petition needs to be rejected, and that is why it is being rejected accordingly. It has wasted the time of this court, but we refrain from imposing any cost on the petitioner.' The petition, argued by Senior Advocate and political leader Prakash Ambedkar--grandson of Dr B.R. Ambedkar and president of the Maha Vikas Aghadi--alleged that a total of 76 lakh votes were polled after 6 pm on November 20, 2024, the day of polling in Maharashtra. It further claimed that this unusually high number of late votes had a decisive impact on as many as 90 assembly constituencies. However, during the hearing on Monday, the bench posed critical questions to the petitioner's counsel, asking, 'Is this the first time votes were polled after 6 pm in any election?' The court also questioned why no challenge had been brought in relation to the Lok Sabha elections, where similar voting patterns reportedly occurred. Responding to the bench's queries, counsel for the Election Commission of India and the Union Government, clarified that polling beyond 6 pm is not an irregularity but a routine feature of Indian elections. Voters who are present in the queue by the scheduled closing time are legally permitted to cast their vote, which often leads to extended polling hours, the counsel said. The court found no grounds to intervene to annul the results of an entire state election. (ANI)
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Don't want to stall panchayat polls', HC gives U'khand govt a day to clarify quota roster
Dehradun: The Uttarakhand high court (HC) on Wednesday refused to lift the stay on the panchayat elections and sought clarification on Thursday from the state govt on the repetition of reservation rosters and its compliance with the Panchayati Raj Act and Article 243T of the Constitution which mandate seat reservations for SC-ST candidates in proportion to their population. The HC was hearing a batch of petitions challenging the reservation roster for the upcoming three-tier panchayat elections across 12 districts (excluding Haridwar), and posted the matter for next hearing on Thursday. The division bench of Chief Justice G Narendar and Justice Alok Mahra held a lengthy afternoon session but adjourned the proceedings due to time constraints, making it clear that it supports conducting the election within the regulatory framework. "It is not a herculean task to correct the reservation roster if any discrepancy exists. We will not stall the elections and will take it up on priority," said the bench. On Monday, the HC had stayed the ongoing panchayat election process, citing irregularities in the state govt's revised reservation roster and noting that the new system appeared to violate established norms. The court asked the state to submit a detailed explanation. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Representing the state, advocate general S N Babulkar and chief standing counsel Chandrashekhar Rawat on Wednesday argued that the cancellation of the earlier reservation roster was necessitated by the recommendations of the Commission for Backward Classes. They asserted that the election process should not be suspended solely based on a few petitions alleging procedural lapses and that it was largely in order. Emphasising that resources were mobilised and expenditures were incurred, the state govt sought the removal of the HC's stay on the panchayat elections, but the court insisted on a comprehensive factual submission of the reservation rster. Petitioner Ganesh Khandpal from Bageshwar and others contested the state's June 9 and June 11 directives, arguing that these rules eliminated the existing reservation roster and introduced a new one, treating it as the initial implementation — in contravention of previous court orders and section 126 of the Panchayati Raj Act, 2016, which requires official gazette publication for such rules to take effect. The court thoroughly examined submissions from the advocate general and the petitioners, and called for panchayat reservation maps while expressing concern about amendments to the reservation rules every five years. HC observed that deficiencies in one area's roster could have wider implications, potentially halting the entire electoral process. As per the original schedule, the panchayat polls were to be conducted in two phases — on July 10 and July 15 — with results announced on July 19. The elections were set to be held across 12 of the state's 13 districts, excluding Haridwar, with roughly 47.7 lakh registered voters expected to participate.
