AC helmets to help Vizag traffic police personnel beat the heat
The traffic police personnel in the city have received air-conditioned helmets to beat the summer heat while on duty. The helmets were provided by a Noida-based company as part of its CSR initiative.
'For the first time, the traffic police in Andhra Pradesh got AC helmets,' said Police Commissioner Shankabratha Bagchi after distributing them at a programme at the Police Conference Hall on Saturday.
Mr. Bagchi said that 30 AC helmets had been distributed among the traffic police personnel so far.
The helmets were manufactured by Poly Propylene Co-polymer material and work with Active Cooling technology, he said, adding that the helmets, weighing 740 grams each, will work for about eight hours if kept charged for four hours.
The Police Commissioner also reminded that 220 cool jackets had also been distributed among the traffic police personnel to beat the summer heat.
In the coming days, 40 more jackets will be distributed, he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Red Bull's Lindblad granted F1 licence ahead of 18th birthday
Formula One's governing body has granted Red Bull junior driver Arvid Lindblad a super licence ahead of his 18th birthday in August after the team requested a dispensation. Formula One rules say drivers must be over 18, a measure introduced after Red Bull's now four-time world champion Max Verstappen was signed by Toro Rosso at 16 and made his race debut at 17 in 2015. Lindblad, born in Britain to a Swedish father and mother of Indian heritage, is seen as a hot prospect and the exemption will allow him to take part in F1 practice ahead of the August break. He has been tipped for an eventual seat at Racing Bulls, Red Bull's Italy-based sister team which currently has Frenchman Isack Hadjar and New Zealand's Liam Lawson. READ: F1 announces 2026 calendar: Madrid to make Formula One debut; Imola scrapped Hadjar has impressed in his rookie season, with speculation he could be next to move up to the senior team alongside Verstappen if Yuki Tsunoda is not retained. Verstappen is also only a penalty point away from a one-race ban, meaning Red Bull needs to be prepared to shuffle around drivers. Lindblad, third overall in the Formula Two championship, already has enough points for a super licence with age his only barrier. The governing FIA's World Motor Sport Council, granting the request at a meeting in Macau, said Lindblad had 'recently and consistently demonstrated outstanding ability and maturity in single-seater formula car competition'. Mercedes was in a similar position with Kimi Antonelli last year but waited until he was 18, also in August, before giving him a practice debut. The Italian this season took the seat vacated by seven-time world champion Lewis Hamilton.
NDTV
7 hours ago
- NDTV
Tesla Faces Stiff Competition By The Rise Of Chinese Auto, Tech Giants
Austin: Chinese electric-vehicle makers led by BYD beat Tesla in the competition to produce affordable electric vehicles. Now, many of those same fierce competitors are pulling into the passing lane in the global race to produce self-driving cars. BYD shook up China's smart-EV industry earlier this year by offering its "God's Eye" driver-assistance package for free, undercutting the technology Tesla sells for nearly $9,000 in China. "With God's Eye, Tesla's strategy starts to fall apart," said Shenzhen-based BYD investor Taylor Ogan, an American who has owned several Teslas and driven BYD cars with God's Eye, which he called more capable than Tesla's "Full Self-Driving" (FSD). It's not just BYD. Other Chinese auto and tech companies are offering affordable EVs with FSD-like technology for a relative pittance. China's Leapmotor and Xpeng, for instance, offer systems capable of highway and urban driving in $20,000 vehicles. A slew of Chinese firms are chasing the same technology, an industry push backed by China's government. BYD's assisted-driving hardware costs are far lower than Tesla's, according to analyses performed for Reuters by companies that dismantle and analyze vehicles for automakers. The comparisons, which have not been previously reported, show that BYD's costs to procure components and build a system with radar and lidar are about the same as Tesla's FSD, which doesn't have such sensors. That undercuts Tesla's unusual technological approach, which aims to save costs by nixing such sensors and relying solely on cameras and artificial intelligence. The rising competition from Chinese smart-EV players is among the chief problems confronting Tesla CEO Elon Musk after his rocky tenure as a Trump administration advisor as he refocuses on his business empire - as Tesla vehicle sales are tanking globally. The stakes are made higher by a moment-of-truth challenge this month in Tesla's home base of Austin, Texas, where it plans to launch a robotaxi trial with 10 or 20 vehicles after a decade of Musk's unfulfilled promises to deliver self-driving Teslas. Tesla did not respond when reached for comment about its Chinese competitors. Previously, Musk has described Chinese car companies as the most competitive in the world. Chinese competition was one factor driving Tesla's strategic pivot away from mass-market EVs last year, when Reuters reported it had killed plans to build an all-new EV expected to cost $25,000. Musk has since staked Tesla's future instead on self-driving robotaxis, the hopes for which now underpin the vast majority of the automaker's stock-market value of roughly $1 trillion. Now Tesla faces the same stiff competition on vehicle autonomy from many of the same Chinese automakers who undercut its affordable-EV plans. Adding to the challenge are tech firms including Chinese smartphone giant Huawei, which supplies autonomous-driving technology to major Chinese automakers. Short of full autonomy, today's driver-assistance systems offer a critical competitive edge in China, the world's largest car market, where Tesla sales are falling amid a protracted price war among scores of homegrown EV brands. Tesla is further handicapped by China's regulations preventing it from using data collected by Tesla cars in China to train the artificial intelligence underpinning FSD. Tesla has been negotiating with Chinese officials, so far without success, to get permission to transfer such data back to the United States for analysis. Tesla's competitors in China do benefit from subsidies and other forms of policy support from Beijing for advanced assisted driving technology. Their advantages also stem from another consequential factor: cut-throat smart-EV competition that has characterized their industry over the past decade. The resulting EV boom created economies of scale and the industry's tendency to forgo some profit margins to expand new technologies' market penetration quickly, leading to lower manufacturing costs. STREETS OF SHENZHEN BYD investor Ogan, of Shenzhen-based Snow Bull Capital, has a front-row seat to China's autonomous-tech battleground. He recently drove several BYD models equipped with God's Eye, he said, and didn't have to take over driving in any of them while traveling the congested streets of Shenzhen, a bustling southern China megalopolis of 18 million people. Another notable smart-EV player in China is Huawei, experts say. Huawei lends its technology and branding to a half dozen automakers including heavyweights Chery, SAIC and Changan, and has lower-profile partnerships with more than a dozen other carmakers, Huawei representatives said. Reuters journalists rode in an Aito M9 - a luxury electric SUV from Seres with Huawei driver-assistance technology - as it navigated Shenzhen roadways in April. With a driver's hands off the wheel, the vehicle exited a highway seamlessly into a congested urban zone, where the M9 proceeded cautiously and slowed to a crawl as a construction worker appeared like he might walk into the roadway. At one point the vehicle turned right and slowly drifted left to avoid two men unloading boxes from a parked truck. The vehicle then parallel parked itself at Huawei's Shenzhen headquarters. Huawei was among several Chinese companies, including automakers Zeekr, Changan and Xpeng, that touted progress towards fully-autonomous cars at April's Shanghai auto show, even as Beijing announced a new marketing crackdown on terms such as "smart" and "intelligent" driving in the wake of a deadly crash in a Xiaomi vehicle involving driver-assistance technology. Huawei said it's ready to undergo a new validation regime being developed by Chinese regulators to certify so-called Level 3 driving systems, meaning they are capable enough to allow drivers to look away unless notified by the system to take over. Zeekr, a luxury brand of China auto giant Geely, also plans to soon sell cars with Level 3 systems. Tesla has yet to release such an "unsupervised" version of FSD because its technology needs more training to operate without a driver's hands on the wheel and eyes on the road. Tesla plans to launch self-driving robotaxis in Austin this month. Little is known about its plans. The company has said it aims to initially deploy between 10 and 20 fare-collecting driverless robotaxis in restricted geographic areas of the city, which Tesla has not publicly identified. 'GOD'S EYE' ON THE CHEAP Chinese EV makers are moving quickly to develop driver-assistance systems in a market where car-buyers are demanding them at a faster pace than in other regions, analysts say. Their ability to do so at lower costs poses the biggest threat to Tesla's new autonomy-based business model. BYD buyers can get an FSD-comparable version of God's Eye as a standard feature in cars priced at about $30,000. The cheapest FSD-equipped Tesla in China is a Model 3 selling for about $41,500. According to an analysis by A2MAC1, a Paris-based tear-down firm that benchmarks components, the mid-level God's Eye version most comparable to Tesla's FSD runs on an Nvidia computing chip with data collected through 12 cameras, five radars, 12 ultrasonic sensors, and one lidar sensor, at a cost of $2,105. That compares to $2,360 for Tesla's FSD, which uses cameras without sensors and two AI chips, the firm estimates. Cameras, radar and ultrasonic sensors are 40% cheaper in China than comparable devices in Europe and the United States, A2MAC1 estimates. Lidar sensors cost about 20% less, the firm says. Sensor costs have fallen because China's EV boom created economies of scale, said A2MAC1 engineer Elena Zhelondz. The fierce competition also pushed carmakers and suppliers to accept lower profits on driver-assistance equipment, she said. BYD's 22% gross margin will likely fall as it gives away God's Eye but it will benefit from a vehicle-sales boost, said Chris McNally, head of global automotive and mobility research for advisory firm Evercore. MORE CARS, MORE MILES, BETTER AI Falling behind the Chinese brands on driver-assistance technology would compound Tesla's challenges in China, where it's already losing market share to rivals including BYD, which sells an entry-level EV for less than $10,000. The growing scale of BYD and others could also provide a technological advantage: Racking up more miles on China roads helps train the AI technology needed to perfect automated-driving systems. BYD has a "clear and ongoing market-share driving advantage" over Tesla in gathering such on-road data to refine God's Eye, Evercore's McNally said, adding that advantage might only increase as offering God's Eye for free helps sell more BYD vehicles. BYD's scale also helps lower costs by providing uncommon leverage over suppliers. In November, a BYD executive in charge of passenger-vehicle operations wrote to suppliers telling them that the automaker sold 4.2 million vehicles last year (more than double the number of Teslas sold) because of "technical innovation, economies of scale, and a low-cost supply chain." The executive noted the new year would likely bring more growth, but also fiercer competition. Without specifically mentioning God's Eye, he ended the letter by asking the suppliers for an across-the-board 10% price cut on all parts and systems starting on January 1, calling the new year a final "knockout round."
Mint
8 hours ago
- Mint
Incentives for JLR's senior executives are now linked to Tata Motors's market performance
The annual bonuses of Jaguar Land Rover Ltd's senior executives now partly depend on the performance of parent Tata Motors Ltd's shares, with so-called 'phantom stocks' substituting in for regular stock options or bonuses. The decision comes at a time when JLR, Tata Motors's UK-based subsidiary, faces growth challenges amid a slowdown in the Chinese automobile market and the US's reciprocal tariffs, which could make premium cars such as Jaguar and Land Rover more expensive. JLR said in its annual report for 2024-25 that it introduced a cash-settled long-term incentive plan last year for certain employees. The incentive plan, which replaces JLR's annual strategic bonus programme, is a phantom share scheme to reward the company's senior executives based on business results and valuation. These are not real stocks and do not give equity ownership in the company but mirror the value of Tata Motors's shares. JLR accounted for 71% of Tata Motors's revenue in FY25. Tata Motors's share price has declined by more than 2% so far this year as against a nearly 3% rise in the Nifty Auto index. On Tuesday, Tata Motors gained about 2% to end at ₹732.70 on NSE. Employees eligible for the scheme will be rewarded a cash payment based on two things: the performance of Tata Motors' shares over a period of three years and achievement of long-term business metrics. 'The scheme will provide a cash payment to certain employees based on the Group's performance against long-term business metrics related to performance and strategic priorities and the share price of Tata Motors Limited over a period of three years," Tata Motors said in its FY25 annual report. In a statement to Mint, a company spokesperson said the decision to change the bonus pay structure was in line with industry standards. The long-term incentive plan accrues over a three-year period and 'is in line with other industry long-term incentive plans and the interests of shareholders", the spokesperson said, without elaborating on the details of the scheme and how the payouts will be made to senior management. JLR's annual report suggests the performance metrics are based on four indicators: retail sales, customer satisfaction, cash flow, and earnings before interest and tax margin. Also read | Jaguar Land Rover tariff hit compounds Tata Motors' domestic woes JLR's employee retention strategy Industry experts said incentive plans such as JLR's phantom stock scheme allow companies to incentivise retaining employees for a longer period and also manage cash flows in the short term. 'From a stability perspective, considering that phantom option schemes are typically vested across a longer period, companies are able to retain employees for a longer period and manage their short-term cash flows, as opposed to bonuses, which may be required to be paid out more regularly to employees," Ifrazunnisa Khan, counsel at Initium Legal Services, said. Neha Sinha, founder and partner, Corporate Law and Policy Advisors, noted that JLR's phantom stocks scheme allowed it to link incentives to its listed parent without having to dilute any shareholding. 'This route allows secondary businesses to bank on their more successful parent and group companies for incentivising their employees and advisors," Sinha said. JLR stated in its FY25 annual report that as its long-term incentive plan is cash-settled and based on phantom shares, it would not dilute the holdings of existing shareholders. Although JLR recorded £5 million as 'employee costs" for FY25 in relation to its long-term incentive plan, no phantom shares were exercisable at 31 March 2025, the company added. Also read | Tata Motors, JLR flag EV supply chain as a separate business risk Global headwinds for JLR Tata Motors, India's third-largest carmaker by revenue, is looking to stabilise JLR's business as the UK-based subsidiary faces multiple headwinds that forced its management to hold back announcing growth projections for 2025-26. In FY25, Jaguar Land Rover's revenue fell 0.1% to £28.9 billion while profit before tax declined 30% to £1.8 billion. Retail sales declined 0.6% to 428,854 units. JLR's largest markets include North America, China and Europe. In the US and China, the company is currently facing headwinds due to multiple factors including the threat of reciprocal tariffs by US President Donald Trump's administration and the company's slowing sales in China. Also read | Who says Jaguar's new ad campaign is 'too woke to work'? JLR halted exports to the US in April to assess the situation before resuming in May. Also, JLR decided last year to discontinue all Jaguar models including XE, XF, XF Sportwagon, and F-Type, barring one. It plans to make Jaguar an all-electric brand by 2026. 'In JLR, discontinuance of 'Jaguar' models, loss of market share in the China region, and imposition of tariffs in the US region, shall lead to a volume contraction ahead," analysts at Nuvama Institutional Equities said Analysts at Motilal Oswal Financial Services said, 'JLR continues to face multiple headwinds due to the tariff-led uncertainty in its key markets. As a result, management has refrained from giving any guidance for FY26 and beyond." Also read | How Tata Motors plans to win back the market with its hatchbacks
