How to be a great thinker
MOST people are getting dumber. Largely because of the smartphone, we're in an era of declining attention spans, reading skills, numeracy and verbal reasoning. How to buck the trend? I've charted seven intellectual habits of the best thinkers.
True, these people exist in a different league from the rest of us. To use an analogy from computing, their high processing power allows them to crunch vast amounts of data from multiple domains. In other words, they have intellectual overcapacity. Still, we can learn from their methods. These can sound obvious, but few people live by them.
Read books. A book is still the best technology to convey the nuanced complexity of the world. That complexity is a check on pure ideology. People who want to simplify the world will prefer online conspiracy theories.
Don't use screens much. That frees time for books and creates more interstitial moments when the mind is left unoccupied, has freedom to roam and makes new connections. Charles Darwin, Friedrich Nietzsche and Immanuel Kant experienced these moments on walks. The biochemist Jennifer Doudna says she gets insights when 'out weeding my tomato plants' or while asleep.
Do your own work, not the world's. The best thinkers don't waste much time maximising their income or climbing hierarchies. Doudna left the University of California, Berkeley to lead discovery research at biotech company Genentech. She lasted two months there. Needing full scientific freedom, she returned to Berkeley, where she ended up winning the chemistry Nobel Prize for co-inventing the gene-editing tool Crispr.
Be multidisciplinary. Pre-war Vienna produced thinkers including Sigmund Freud, Friedrich Hayek, Kurt Godel and the irreducible polymath John von Neumann. The structure of the city's university helped. Most subjects were taught within the faculties of either law or philosophy. That blurred boundaries between disciplines, writes Richard Cockett in Vienna: How the City of Ideas Created the Modern World. 'There were no arbitrary divisions between 'science' and 'humanities' – all was 'philosophy', in its purest sense, the study of fundamental questions.'
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Hayek, for instance, 'trained at home as a botanist to a quasi-professional level; he then graduated in law, received a doctorate in political science from the university, but... spent most of his time there studying psychology, all before becoming a revered economist.'
Breaking through silos goes against the set-up of modern academia. It also requires unprecedented processing power, given how much knowledge has accumulated in each field. But insights from one discipline can still revolutionise another. The psychologist Daniel Kahneman won the Nobel Prize for economics for his findings on human irrationality.
Be an empiricist who values ideas. During World War II, Isaiah Berlin was first secretary at the British embassy in Washington. His weekly reports on the American political situation were brilliant empirical accounts of the world as it was. They mesmerised Winston Churchill, who was desperate to meet Berlin. (Due to a mix-up, Churchill invited Irving Berlin for lunch instead. The composer was baffled to be asked by Churchill himself: 'When do you think the European war will end?')
In March 1944, Isaiah Berlin returned from Washington to London on a bomber plane. He had to wear an oxygen mask all flight, wasn't allowed to sleep for fear he would suffocate, and couldn't read as there was no light. 'One was therefore reduced to a most terrible thing,' he recalled, 'to having to think – and I had to think for about seven or eight hours in this bomber.' During this long interstitial moment, Berlin decided to become an historian of ideas. He ended up writing the classic essays The Hedgehog and the Fox and Two Concepts of Liberty.
Always assume you might be wrong. Mediocre thinkers prefer to confirm their initial assumptions. This 'confirmation bias' stops them reaching new or deeper insights. By contrast, Darwin was always composing arguments against his own theories.
Keep learning from everyone. Only mediocrities boast as adults about where they went to university aged 18. They imagine that intelligence is innate and static. In fact, people become more or less intelligent through life, depending on how hard they think. The best thinkers are always learning from others, no matter how young or low-status. I remember being at a dinner table where the two people who talked least and listened hardest were the two Nobel laureates. FINANCIAL TIMES
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
2 days ago
- CNA
Can you reverse tooth decay? Here's what dental experts say
Most of us know that the best defence against tooth decay – or damage to the surface, or enamel, of your teeth – is to limit sugary foods and to brush and floss regularly. But once that damage has begun, or even progressed into a cavity, can you reverse it? Online advertisements for products like cavity-undoing chewing gums and enamel-rebuilding toothpastes and tooth powders suggest that you can. We asked experts if they work, and if it's possible to backtrack on tooth decay in the first place. HOW DOES TOOTH DECAY HAPPEN? Your mouth is home to both good and bad bacteria, which adhere to your teeth in a sticky layer called plaque. The bad bacteria love to snack on sugary, starchy foods – like sweetened sodas, gummy candies, pastries and fruit juices – and then turn them into acids that, over time, may pull important minerals from your teeth. The more these bad bacteria eat, the more acids they produce that dissolve essential minerals like calcium and phosphate, said John Featherstone, a professor emeritus of preventive and restorative dental sciences at the University of California, San Francisco, School of Dentistry. This dissolution is called demineralisation, Dr Featherstone said, and it can weaken your enamel over months to years until it eventually caves in and forms a cavity. How quickly this damage, or tooth decay, develops depends mostly on how much of these starchy, sugary foods you consume and how well you clean your teeth, he said. CAN YOU REVERSE TOOTH DECAY? Tooth decay is technically reversible, but only if it is caught early, said Dr Margherita Fontana, a researcher and professor of cariology at the University of Michigan School of Dentistry. During the earliest stage of tooth decay, when some minerals have been lost just below the tooth's surface but a cavity has not yet formed, you (or more likely, your dentist) might notice a white – or sometimes brown or black – spot on your tooth, Dr Fontana said. At this point, you can reverse tooth decay by adding those important minerals back into your teeth – a process called remineralisation, said Dr Yasmi O Crystal, an adjunct clinical professor of paediatric dentistry at the NYU College of Dentistry. Your saliva, which contains calcium and phosphate, naturally remineralises your teeth all the time, such as after eating a sugary snack, Dr Crystal said. But because most of us eat many foods that bad bacteria like, we can't depend on saliva alone to prevent or reverse decay, Dr Featherstone said. The easiest, cheapest and most effective way to support remineralisation is to brush your teeth with toothpaste that contains fluoride, Dr Crystal said. Fluoride not only reduces the amount of acid that bad bacteria produce, but it also helps saliva to more effectively replenish your teeth with lost minerals by attracting calcium and phosphate to them, Dr Crystal said. The fluoride found in most drinking water also bolsters this process, Dr Fontana said, especially when paired with fluoride toothpaste. This cavity-fighting duo is enough to reverse early tooth decay in most people, the experts said. But some, like those more prone to decay because they produce less saliva (such as smokers, older adults, postmenopausal women and people taking certain medications), may benefit from more concentrated fluoride products. These include prescription-strength fluoride toothpastes, as well as mouth rinses, varnishes and gels that dentists may apply during a visit or prescribe to use at home. Chewing sugar-free gum, in addition to your regular oral hygiene routine, may also help reverse early tooth decay, Dr Featherstone said. Chewing produces saliva that, according to the American Dental Association, contains even more enamel-building minerals than the saliva your mouth makes without stimulation from food. Gum may also prevent tooth decay by removing food particles from your teeth, Dr Fontana said. Once tooth decay has caused a cavity, however, you can't reverse it and the cavity should be filled, Dr Crystal said. But you can stop a cavity from getting worse, said Dr Domenick T Zero, a professor at the Indiana University School of Dentistry. Regular dental cleanings and proper oral hygiene – brushing for at least two minutes twice a day and flossing once a day – will keep cavity-causing bacteria out of the hole and prevent it from building up on your teeth, he said. DO THOSE SPECIAL PRODUCTS WORK? Some limited research has suggested that some ingredients like xylitol and hydroxyapatite in products like remineralising tooth powders, toothpastes and chewing gums may help reverse tooth decay by adding minerals back to your teeth. However, all of the experts we spoke with said there wasn't enough evidence to show that they're more effective at reversing decay than fluoride, or that they work at all. Among the handful of small clinical trials that have looked into hydroxyapatite toothpastes, for instance, at least two were funded by the product manufacturers. Dr Fontana also said that these products had been tested mostly on people who are not prone to cavities, so it's challenging to know how effective they may be for people who actually develop tooth decay. 'No one has shown that any of these products come even close to what fluoride toothpaste does,' she said. As with many products you see advertised on social media, if they seem too good to be true, they probably are, Dr Crystal said – 'there are no shortcuts.'
CNA
4 days ago
- CNA
Nvidia, Dell to supply next US Department of Energy supercomputer
BERKELEY, California - :The U.S. Department of Energy on Thursday said its "Doudna" due in 2026 will use technology from Nvidia and Dell. The computer, named for Nobel Prize-winning scientist Jennifer Doudna who made key CRISPR gene-editing discoveries, will be housed at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, California. At an event at the lab attended by Secretary of Energy Chris Wright, officials said that the system will use Nvidia's latest "Vera Rubin" chips built into liquid-cooled servers by Dell and will be used by 11,000 researchers.
Straits Times
5 days ago
- Straits Times
Safety measures can spur AI's growth, not stifle it: Panellists
Professor Dawn Song (right) from the University of California, Berkeley at a fireside chat with Professor Simon Chesterman, senior director of AI governance at AI Singapore, at the Asia Tech x Singapore conference on May 28. PHOTO: IMDA SINGAPORE - Safety measures can foster artificial intelligence (AI) innovations by avoiding unintended harm and building public trust, said Professor Dawn Song from the University of California, Berkeley. Likening AI safety measures to seat belts in the early days of driving, she said that these guardrails will not stifle AI innovation in the same way that seat belts do not slow down the development of the automotive industry. Rather, seat belts have fostered more confident driving, contributing to advancements in overall automotive safety and development, she said. Prof Song was speaking at a fireside chat about securing AI's future with science-based safety on May 28 at the Asia Tech x Singapore conference held at Capella Singapore. 'AI safety... can help you to innovate faster... (and also) in a safer way... It is not there to slow things down,' says Prof Song. AI safety was a common theme at the conference, where many speakers acknowledged that its harms have to be minimised either through regulation or some form of global consensus. Past cases of AI biases that caused massive embarrassments and harmed minority groups offered some lessons. A 2016 investigation led by US publication ProPublica found that a criminal justice algorithm used by the US courts wrongly flagged black defendants as high risk for reoffending, nearly twice the rate of white defendants. In 2018, e-commerce giant Amazon scrapped an internal hiring tool after discovering it was biased against women. The system, trained on resumes submitted over a decade - many of which came from men - systematically downgraded applications that included the word 'women's,' such as 'women's chess club.' The tool was never deployed beyond testing. Calling for responsible innovation, Prof Song said: 'We want to innovate. We want to actually make the world a better place. But we can only do that if we can ensure the safety and security of the AI systems we are building and deploying.' Dr Samir Menon, CEO of Dexterity AI, which builds dexterous robot solutions, pointed out that the safety risks with physical AI can be significantly higher compared with AI chatbots. Physical AI refers to hardware that interacts with the real world through sensors and actuators, and includes autonomous vehicles and surgical robots. While software can cause online harms, hardware failures can be disastrous, he said speaking at a panel titled I, Robot - Future of Embodied AI at the same event on May 28. 'Once a robot moves in the real world, it can bump into people, or knock things over or worse,' he said. In 2023, a robot taxi operated by US self-driving company Cruise ran over a pedestrian who had already been hit by another vehicle, dragging her for several metres and causing serious injuries. A year later in South Korea, a delivery robot made by robot delivery service Neubility collided with a moving car at a pedestrian crossing, damaging the vehicle and sparking debate over who should be held accountable when such machines go rogue. Speaking at the same panel, Stanford University's assistant professor of computer science Jiajun Wu noted that there are inconsistencies in the performance of robots in different research settings . Besides, most robots are trained in controlled environments and applying to real-world settings can be challenging, Dr Samir said. 'If you deploy 10 robots and need to cordon off five meters around each of them, your whole building ends up looking like a robot zoo. That's just not viable,' Dr Samir added. True progress, he said, lies in shared spaces. For instance, robots must be taught how to handle tools safely or carry drinks without spilling to safely co-exist with humans. Their training must be done in a real-world setting. 'If we can pull that off in the next four to five years, that's going to be a fantastic step up,' said Dr Samir. To scale AI deployments safely, clear standards are needed. 'If I train an AI on a robot with one type of hand, and then change the hand or switch to two arms, will it still work? Right now, we just don't know,' he said. Prof Song echoed this, noting that AI systems often lack transparency and systematic evaluation. She added that the broader AI policy landscape remains fragmented, with limited consensus on best practices. Most AI firms still prioritise performance over safety, investing relatively little in risk mitigation. Prof Song said that the AI industry can draw lessons from the cybersecurity sector, which is shifting away from treating safety as an afterthought. Now, many systems are built with security measures already built in. Similarly, AI can be designed to be safe at the onset, she said. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
