Stellantis warns of more tariff impacts as it reports US$2.7B loss
The carmaker, which owns a sprawling portfolio of brands including Jeep, Ram, Peugeot and Fiat, said President Donald Trump's tariffs had cost it 300 million euros so far as the company reduced vehicle shipments and cut some production to adjust manufacturing levels.
But Chief Financial Officer Doug Ostermann told analysts that the 300 million euro impact was not representative of what the group expects for the second half, as tariffs only came into effect part way through the first half.
'We'll see significantly more in the second half unless things change … given the current outlook, I would expect to see that figure probably double in the second half or more,' he said, adding that Stellantis was seeing a total full-year impact of between 1 and 1.5 billion euros.
Story continues below advertisement
2:01
Some small auto businesses suffering under U.S. Tariff threats
Stellantis, which under new CEO Antonio Filosa faces the challenge of revamping its product ranges in Europe and the United States, said it also booked 3.3 billion euros in pre-tax charges for the first half.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
These were due to program cancellations, including a hydrogen fuel cell project and money set aside for fines linked to U.S. pre-Trump carbon emission regulation. It was also investing more in popular hybrid cars in Europe and large gasoline-powered models in the U.S. market.
Last year, more than 40 per cent of the 1.2 million vehicles Stellantis sold in the United States were imports, mostly from Mexico and Canada where Trump has imposed tariffs of 25 per cent. Imports from the EU face levies of 30 per cent, though these have been deferred to Aug. 1.
Earnings miss
In April this year, the company said it had reduced vehicle imports in response to tariffs and would calibrate 'production and employment to reduce impacts on profitability.'
Story continues below advertisement
The automaker's first-half results were below consensus, according to analysts at Jefferies, Bernstein and Citi. But despite the earnings miss, restructuring steps taken by Stellantis 'suggest decisive actions,' Bernstein analysts said.
Milan-listed shares in the automaker closed up 1.5 per cent after falling as much as 3.9 per cent in morning trade. They are down 35 per cent since the start of the year.
In April, Stellantis suspended its profit forecasts for 2025 due to uncertainty about tariffs, but said on Monday it was publishing its unaudited preliminary financial data to align analyst forecasts with the group's actual performance.
Asked whether Stellantis' situation was similar to that of rival Renault's, whose shares fell as much as 18 per cent last week when it issued a profit warning on the back of softening demand for cars and vans in Europe, Ostermann said Europe was a 'very competitive environment.'
8:50
Automotive parts manufacturers association doesn't want countertariffs
'I won't disagree with our counterparts at Renault,' he said.
Story continues below advertisement
Stellantis' first-half loss, versus a 5.6 billion euro net profit a year earlier, underscores the tough challenges for Filosa, who was appointed in May after a disastrous performance in the company's crucial U.S. market in 2024 forced the ousting of former boss Carlos Tavares.
In a letter to employees seen by Reuters the new CEO on Monday promised that 2025 would be 'a year of gradual and sustainable improvement' after a 'tough first half, with increasing external headwinds.'
Stellantis, which will publish its final results for the first half on July 29, said it burnt through 2.3 billion euros of cash in the January-June period.
–Additional reporting by Enrico Sciacovelli; Writing by Giulio Piovaccari and Nick Carey; Editing by Louise Heavens and David Holmes
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
It's Trump's economy now. The latest financial numbers offer some warning signs
WASHINGTON (AP) — For all of President Donald Trump's promises of an economic 'golden age,' a spate of weak indicators this week told a potentially worrisome story as the impacts of his policies are coming into focus. Job gains are dwindling. Inflation is ticking upward. Growth has slowed compared to last year. More than six months into his term, Trump's blitz of tariff hikes and his new tax and spending bill have remodeled America's trading, manufacturing, energy and tax systems to his own liking. He's eager to take credit for any wins that might occur and is hunting for someone else to blame if the financial situation starts to totter. But as of now, this is not the boom the Republican president promised, and his ability to blame his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden, for any economic challenges has faded as the world economy hangs on his every word and social media post. When Friday's jobs report turned out to be decidedly bleak, Trump ignored the warnings in the data and fired the head of the agency that produces the monthly jobs figures. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump said on Truth Social, without offering evidence for his claim. 'The Economy is BOOMING.' It's possible that the disappointing numbers are growing pains from the rapid transformation caused by Trump and that stronger growth will return — or they may be a preview of even more disruption to come. Trump's economic plans are a political gamble Trump's aggressive use of tariffs, executive actions, spending cuts and tax code changes carries significant political risk if he is unable to deliver middle-class prosperity. The effects of his new tariffs are still several months away from rippling through the economy, right as many Trump allies in Congress will be campaigning in the midterm elections. 'Considering how early we are in his term, Trump's had an unusually big impact on the economy already,' said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist at Firehouse Strategies. 'The full inflationary impact of the tariffs won't be felt until 2026. Unfortunately for Republicans, that's also an election year.' The White House portrayed the blitz of trade frameworks leading up to Thursday's tariff announcement as proof of his negotiating prowess. The European Union, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and other nations that the White House declined to name agreed that the U.S. could increase its tariffs on their goods without doing the same to American products. Trump simply set rates on other countries that lacked settlements. The costs of those tariffs — taxes paid on imports to the U.S. — will be most felt by many Americans in the form of higher prices, but to what extent remains uncertain. 'For the White House and their allies, a key part of managing the expectations and politics of the Trump economy is maintaining vigilance when it comes to public perceptions,' said Kevin Madden, a Republican strategist. Just 38% of adults approve of Trump's handling of the economy, according to a July poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs. That's down from the end of Trump's first term when half of adults approved of his economic leadership. The White House paints a rosier image, seeing the economy emerging from a period of uncertainty after Trump's restructuring and repeating the economic gains seen in his first term before the pandemic struck. 'President Trump is implementing the very same policy mix of deregulation, fairer trade, and pro-growth tax cuts at an even bigger scale – as these policies take effect, the best is yet to come,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said. Recent economic reports suggest trouble ahead The economic numbers over the past week show the difficulties that Trump might face if the numbers continue on their current path: — Friday's jobs report showed that U.S. employers have shed 37,000 manufacturing jobs since Trump's tariff launch in April, undermining prior White House claims of a factory revival. — Net hiring has plummeted over the past three months with job gains of just 73,000 in July, 14,000 in June and 19,000 in May — a combined 258,000 jobs lower than previously indicated. On average last year, the economy added 168,000 jobs a month. — A Thursday inflation report showed that prices have risen 2.6% over the year that ended in June, an increase in the personal consumption expenditures price index from 2.2% in April. Prices of heavily imported items, such as appliances, furniture, and toys and games, jumped from May to June. — On Wednesday, a report on gross domestic product — the broadest measure of the U.S. economy — showed that it grew at an annual rate of less than 1.3% during the first half of the year, down sharply from 2.8% growth last year. 'The economy's just kind of slogging forward,' said Guy Berger, senior fellow at the Burning Glass Institute, which studies employment trends. 'Yes, the unemployment rate's not going up, but we're adding very few jobs. The economy's been growing very slowly. It just looks like a 'meh' economy is continuing.' Trump's Fed attacks could unleash more inflation Trump has sought to pin the blame for any economic troubles on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, saying the Fed should cut its benchmark interest rates even though doing so could generate more inflation. Trump has publicly backed two Fed governors, Christoper Waller and Michelle Bowman, for voting for rate cuts at Wednesday's meeting. But their logic is not what the president wants to hear: They were worried, in part, about a slowing job market. But this is a major economic gamble being undertaken by Trump and those pushing for lower rates under the belief that mortgages will also become more affordable as a result and boost homebuying activity. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. His tariff policy has changed repeatedly over the last six months, with the latest import tax numbers serving as a substitute for what the president announced in April, which provoked a stock market sell-off. It might not be a simple one-time adjustment as some Fed board members and Trump administration officials argue. Trump didn't listen to the warnings on 'universal' tariffs Of course, Trump can't say no one warned him about the possible consequences of his economic policies. Biden, then the outgoing president, did just that in a speech last December at the Brookings Institution, saying the cost of the tariffs would eventually hit American workers and businesses. 'He seems determined to impose steep, universal tariffs on all imported goods brought into this country on the mistaken belief that foreign countries will bear the cost of those tariffs rather than the American consumer,' Biden said. 'I believe this approach is a major mistake.'
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
CTV National News: Trump fires senior official over jobs numbers
CTV National News: Trump fires senior official over jobs numbers U.S. President Donald Trump has ordered the firing of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after job numbers were lower than expected in July.
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
B.C. braces for impact of Trump's 35 per cent tariffs
U.S. President Donald Trump has hiked Canada's tariffs to 35 per cent - here's what that means for B.C. For Michael Devereux, an economics professor at the University of British Columbia, the new tariffs imposed on Canada Friday morning are 'confusing.' Devereux told CTV News the 35 per cent levies – which U.S. President Donald Trump blamed, in part, on fentanyl going over the border – will hurt Americans. '(They're) much more important for the U.S. consumer because they actually pay the tariffs,' said Devereux. Approximately 90 per cent of Canadian exports, which are covered under the Canada United States Mexico Agreement, or CUSMA, are still tariff-free. But Devereux explained the remainder that are could have a significant impact on the economy, if U.S. consumers choose to stop purchasing those Canadian goods. B.C. Forestry Minister Ravi Parmar said, 'No sector has felt the weight of that more than our forestry sector here in British Columbia.' Parmar said his ministry is currently focusing on creating robust trade relationships with other nations. 'I'm going to be ensuring that my team has boots on the ground in those places supporting small and medium-sized companies to be able to explore finding new customers,' he said. While those negotiations are ongoing, Parmar said the B.C. government is still hopeful their federal counterparts can secure a long-term deal with the U.S. Federal ministers including Vancouver MP Gregor Robertson were tight-lipped on Friday, but did say Prime Minister Mark Carney was attempting to forge the best deal possible for Canadians Carney put out a statement in the morning that read, in part: 'The Canadian government is disappointed by this action and will act to protect Canadian jobs,' adding that he will continue to negotiate with the Americans. Devereux said British Columbians are in a difficult situation, and with CUSMA renegotiations on the table next year unless what he called a rational deal is made, things could get worse. By CTV News Vancouver's Demetra Maragos
