logo
Nottinghamshire: How council shake-up became an election battle

Nottinghamshire: How council shake-up became an election battle

BBC News24-04-2025

The upcoming county council election in Nottinghamshire is an unusual one as it looks set to be the council's last - at least in its current form.When the government announced in December it wanted to overhaul how local authorities are organised, you'd have been forgiven for thinking it would be little more than a drab restructuring and would all happen without much attention being paid.But now, what started as a row between those most closely involved in local government appears to have spilled out into the public at large and, therefore, to voters.
Or as one local leader put it recently - "people are stirring."It means an issue which is not, in itself, directly relevant to how Nottinghamshire County Council is run has now become a big talking point in the election campaign.For what is an incredibly finely-poised authority, could it be enough to tip the balance in favour of one party or another?
How close is it to reality?
The plans are still at a very early stage.So-called "interim proposals" with three potential options were submitted to central government last month.Council leaders have emphasised the submission was a progress report rather than tangible plans, and some have expressed frustration at the timeframe in which they've had to come up with suggestions.In other words, what eventually happens could end up being completely different to any of those three options.But regardless of all the uncertainty, the BBC has been told it has been one of the big topics of conversation on the doorstep, and it is perhaps a more divisive issue in Nottinghamshire than other areas for two reasons.The first is council reorganisation has been on the cards in the county in recent memory.Similar plans driven by then-county council leader Kay Cutts back in 2018 were met with criticism and ultimately failed to get off the ground.That was a very different scenario - the Conservative government at the time seemed fairly lukewarm towards the idea, whereas now it's the Labour government pushing the plans centrally.It does mean, however, that some key local voices are already primed to have this argument.The second reason is the well-documented financial problems at Nottingham City Council, which Nottinghamshire County Council envelopes on all sides.The city council doesn't have elections this year and its leaders insist its financial situation is improving, but its not hard to see how its circumstances could have a bearing on the election outcome for its nearest neighbour.Whilst nothing is confirmed, some of the options for reorganisation would see the city combining with surrounding boroughs to create a new, larger council.The suggestion alone has prompted concerns from some who worry they'd end up being "absorbed" by a city with a chequered history - concerns which some politicians have been quick to seize upon.It's a ready-made attack line for parties other than Labour, who whilst campaigning for the county council elections can point across the border into the city and give warnings about what its "expansion" could mean.
What do different parties say?
The current county council leader, Conservative Sam Smith, was among the first to break cover when the plans were unveiled by central government.He favours the so-called "county only" option, which would see the smaller district and borough councils scrapped and Nottinghamshire turned into a unitary authority, but the existing boundary with the city would remain in place."Any city expansion will mean residents of Nottinghamshire will pay more tax because there will be less people paying in so the new authority will charge more, but they'll receive less services," he said."The Conservatives have been absolutely clear that no services should be cut as a result of local government reorganisation and nobody should pay more."He has been joined in his calls by the county's only remaining Conservative MP, Robert Jenrick.The position of local Labour politicians is more nuanced. While the city council's leader has backed a "Nottingham + 2" model, the Labour group leader at the county council, Kate Foale, adopted a more cautious tone."There are all kinds of models being suggested, but the Labour government has only asked for a progress report, we don't have to decide until November," she said."Until we've seen the evidence of what will have the best impact for our residents throughout the county, then we cannot make a decision."Labour leader of Gedling Borough Council John Clarke, meanwhile, has been quite open in saying he doesn't want the area to join the city.All Labour voices, however, have rejected the Conservatives' characterisation of the plans as a "takeover" by the city council - arguing that all councils in the area would actually be scrapped and new authorities established in their place.
Leader of the Ashfield Independents, Jason Zadrozny, is a long-time critic of local government reorganisation, but now seems resigned to some sort of change."The government are forcing this to happen, it's going to happen come what may. There is the big elephant in the room that people are very nervous of being associated with the city," he said.He said he prefers options where the county is divided into two or three councils, but is completely opposed to a Nottinghamshire-wide unitary authority, encompassing both the current city and county."It's too big. People need to know they can liaise with their council and their councillors," he said.At a national level, Reform UK has been critical of the government's plans, particularly in areas where it has meant elections have been delayed.Locally, they are calling for a full public consultation before any decisions are made.The party's only current county councillor, John Doddy, said: "Nobody has gone out to Nottinghamshire and said - do you want a unitary council?""My position on this quite simply is that if the people want it, as a representative of the people I will happily give it to them."For the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party, their positions are fairly similar and unambiguous - both think the whole thing is a waste of time.Lib Dem candidate David Watts said: "We are opposed to the government's plans. They want to do away with a vast amount of local democracy and people really value their local areas.""If there is an issue somebody has, they can pick up the phone and talk to somebody they know will deal with it. That's the sort of representation we want, and that's what you won't get if all the borough councillors are done away with."The Green Party's Ben Gray called the plans "uncosted, undemocratic and unnecessary"."There's no real promise that we're going to see greater efficiency. It's hinted at but there's no evidence to back that up," he said."It is evidence to reduce democracy though, taking decisions away from the grassroots up into larger and larger councils just isn't going to deliver the democracy we deserve."Arguments over local government reorganisation will doubtless continue until well after polling day.It seems strangely apt, however, that the campaign for the upcoming election has become so entwined with the debate which, ultimately, looks set to end with the authority being abolished entirely.Polling day for the Nottinghamshire County Council election is 1 May.More information and a full list of candidates is available on the council website.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hamilton by-election: How Labour 'defied the odds' and Reform ripped up the rulebook
Hamilton by-election: How Labour 'defied the odds' and Reform ripped up the rulebook

Scotsman

time36 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Hamilton by-election: How Labour 'defied the odds' and Reform ripped up the rulebook

Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Anas Sarwar was buzzing. The triumphant Scottish Labour leader told journalists his party had defied the bookies, the pollsters and the pundits by winning the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, and it was now 'game on'. He had a point. Almost everyone thought the SNP would keep hold of the seat, albeit with a much reduced majority. In the end, Labour's candidate, Davy Russell, beat his Nationalist rival by 602 votes. It was a narrow victory, but a win is a win. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad On Friday, as Labour held a victory rally in Hamilton, one party spinner purchased a "humble pie" - technically, an apple flan - from the Bayne's bakery next to their campaign HQ and used it to tease journalists who had written off Labour's chances. A Reform UK election billboard poster in Larkhall | PA Alas, it wasn't long before Professor Sir John Curtice, the polling guru, rained on their parade with some cold, hard numbers. The result, he said, was actually 'way below' what Labour needs if it wants to win next year's Holyrood election. "I think the honest truth is that neither Labour nor the SNP can be really particularly happy with this result,' he told The Scotsman. Professor Sir John Curtice has an important message about how to restore the public's trust in politics and democracy (Picture: Leon Neal) | Getty Images Instead, the most important development in terms of its wider implications lies elsewhere. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Hamilton by-election was a tight three-horse race between Labour, the SNP and Nigel Farage's Reform UK. The latter came in third, but still secured a remarkable 26 per cent of the vote, outperforming its national polling. In light of this, Sir John said, the possibility that Reform might come second next year, ahead of Labour, 'is not an outcome that we can presume is out of the bounds of possibility'. Like it or not, Reform is now a force to be reckoned with in Scottish politics, and all without having a separate leadership team in place north of the Border. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The spectre of Mr Farage dominated the by-election campaign, and his visit to the constituency on Monday received huge amounts of coverage. His rivals also spent a great deal of time talking about him. The First Minister repeatedly portrayed the by-election as a two-horse race between the SNP and Reform - an analysis that turned out to be somewhat flawed, to put it mildly. "Reform's performance, 26 per cent, is more than you would expect in Hamilton, if the result there were simply reflecting what the opinion polls have been telling us,' Sir John said. "Now there are [a few] possibilities. One is that the Reform campaign in the constituency might have been particularly effective. I certainly think that Mr [Ross] Lambie was a relatively strong candidate. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "And it may well be that Labour and the SNP made the cardinal, classic mistake of giving lots of lovely publicity to your opponent's election campaign. "Or it may be that the polls are indeed underestimating Reform somewhat. We did see Reform doing better than expected in the English local elections, and then the polls caught up with what the local elections were saying." The polling expert added: "For those of us who weren't consumed by the day to day events in Hamilton, we were going 'hang on, the only thing that anybody is hearing about this by-election campaign is what Nigel Farage is saying, as advertised by Anas Sarwar and John Swinney'." Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse was prime territory for Labour, and exactly the sort of seat it should be winning. Nevertheless, a narrative developed during the campaign the party was in trouble, and there was speculation it could even come third. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad That did not happen, and Mr Sarwar is quite right to celebrate a hard-earned victory. Anas Sarwar, leader of the Scottish Labour party, celebrates with deputy leader Jackie Baillie. | Lisa Ferguson Mark Diffley, the pollster, said it was a 'big win' for Labour. However, he said it was 'not right' to say the party had hugely outperformed its polling. 'National polling puts Labour at 20 per cent, down two points from 2021 Holyrood election,' he wrote on social media. 'In this by-election, Labour's vote share fell by two points from the Hamilton result in 2021.' Labour bosses credited their victory to activists rolling up their sleeves and hitting the doors. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "For a long time, people looked at the SNP and thought they had the strongest communications strategy, the strongest digital outlook and they had the strongest field operation,' Mr Sarwar said. 'I genuinely believe we beat them in all three of those areas. We ran the most significant and best ground operation in any constituency in the history of the Scottish Labour party in this by-election." Meanwhile, John Swinney, the First Minister and SNP leader, told journalists he would 'consider the implications' of the result. 'There's nothing quite like being on the doorsteps for several weeks to hear what people are thinking and feeling, and you hear it very directly,' he said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Asked about a potential Cabinet reshuffle, he said: 'Obviously I've got to consider all the issues about the ministerial team. [Energy Secretary] Màiri McAllan will be concluding her maternity leave soon, so these issues will be considered.' While his rival celebrated in Hamilton, Mr Swinney took questions at the SNP's HQ near the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh. It was, understandably, a muted affair. But spare a thought for the Scottish Tories, who secured just 6 per cent of the vote. The party will meet for its annual conference in Edinburgh next weekend, where leader Russell Findlay will have the unenviable task of trying to build some momentum.

Cardiff Council leader confirms he will seek to run in the 2026 Senedd elections
Cardiff Council leader confirms he will seek to run in the 2026 Senedd elections

Wales Online

time43 minutes ago

  • Wales Online

Cardiff Council leader confirms he will seek to run in the 2026 Senedd elections

Cardiff Council leader confirms he will seek to run in the 2026 Senedd elections The leader of Cardiff Council, Cllr Huw Thomas, has previously refused to say whether or not he will run in the 2026 Senedd elections Huw Thomas has confirmed his plans (Image: Cardiff Council ) The leader of Cardiff Council has confirmed that he will be putting his name forward for consideration as a Labour candidate in the next Senedd election. Cllr Huw Thomas refused to say whether or not he would stand in the 2026 Senedd election when asked in September 2024. All four Labour constituency members of the Senedd in Cardiff have ruled themselves out of the running. The Local Democracy Reporting Service asked Cllr Thomas what his plans were for next year's elections ‌ Cllr Thomas, who was attending a topping out ceremony for a new block of council flats in Grangetown, said: "I will be putting my name forward for consideration, yes." For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here . ‌ Cllr Thomas became the youngest leader of Cardiff Council in May 2017 at the age of 31. Originally from Aberystwyth, the ward councillor for Splott was first elected to the local authority in 2012. The current constituency member of the Senedd for Cardiff West, Mark Drakeford, is best known for leading Wales as the First Minister during the Covid-19 pandemic. Article continues below Mr Drakeford, who currently serves as the Welsh Government's cabinet secretary for finance and Welsh language, has said he will not be running for re-election. Vaughan Gething's time as First Minister was short lived. The current constituency member of the Senedd for Cardiff South and Penarth quit four months into the job following pressure over donations he received in the Welsh Labour leadership contest. ‌ Mr Gething then announced in September 2024 that he will not seek re-election in 2026. The other two constituency members of the Senedd in Cardiff, Jenny Rathbone for Cardiff Central and Julie Morgan for Cardiff North have also announced that they won't seek re-election. Ms Rathbone, who has served as an MS since 2011, sits on the climate change, environment and rural affairs committee and the public accounts committee. ‌ Ms Morgan has also been an MS since 2011. Over the years, she has been on a number of committees and served as the deputy health minister at one point. Before her time in Cardiff Bay, she also served as a politician in Westminster for 13 years after being elected as the MP for Cardiff North in 1997. The Senedd will undergo a number of major changes next year. Article continues below When people go to the polls in May 2026, they will be using a new voting system and there will be 16 new constituencies. On top of this, the Senedd will be expanded to 96 members instead of the 60 that currently sit and anyone standing for election must live in Wales.

BBC art dealer from Bargain Hunt jailed for terror offence
BBC art dealer from Bargain Hunt jailed for terror offence

South Wales Argus

time43 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

BBC art dealer from Bargain Hunt jailed for terror offence

The 53-year-old admitted to eight counts of failing to disclose during business under the Terrorism Act 2000. Judge Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb said Ojiri was aware that he had sold art to Nazem Ahmad, who had been sanctioned in 2019 by the US authorities. Bargain Hunts star Oghenochuko Ojiri jailed for selling art to suspected Hezbollah financier Hezbollah is considered a terrorist organisation in the UK (Image: Ben Whitley/PA) She stated: "These offences are so severe that only a custodial sentence can be justified." According to the BBC, the judge added: "You knew about Ahmad's suspected involvement in financing terrorism and the way the art market can be exploited by people like him. "Your hard work, talent and charisma has brought you a great deal of success... You knew you should not have been dealing with that man." She added that there was no evidence that Ojiri supported any form of extremism but that his conduct undermined he detection of terrorist financing. Representing the BBC Bargain Hunt star, Gavin Irwin said that the art expert's "humiliation is complete," adding that the star has lost "his good name" and the "work he loves." Mr Irwin added: "He'd like to apologise for undermining trust" in the art market. Discussing the case, Cdr Dominic Murphy, head of the Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command, said: "Raising money for terrorism is a core part of how terrorist groups are then able to cause harm around the world." Bethan David, head of the CPS Counter Terrorism Division, said Ojiri's motivation appeared "to be financial, along with a broader desire to boost his gallery's reputation within the art market by dealing with such a well-known collector." He added: "This prosecution is believed to be the first of its kind, and the CPS will not hesitate to bring criminal charges against individuals who flout the law in this way." What is Hezbollah and why is it considered a terrorist group? According to the House of Lords Library, Hezbollah is an armed Shiite militia group that is backed by Iran, which largely operates in Lebanon. Giving the UK Government's reasoning for classifying it as a terrorist group in 2024, it added: "It has been proscribed in its entirety by the UK as a terrorist organisation since 2019. "The current conflict between Hezbollah and Israel continues. Hezbollah has fired rockets at Israeli territory whilst Israel has launched retaliatory airstrikes—including that which saw the death of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah." It concluded by saying: "The UK has called for an immediate ceasefire to provide space for a diplomatic settlement."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store