Israel has agreed to a 60-day Gaza ceasefire, Trump announces
He claimed that Israel had 'agreed to the necessary conditions' to finalise a ceasefire in Gaza, though it was not immediately clear whether Hamas would accept the terms. ' Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War,' he wrote in the post. 'The Qataris and Egyptians, who have worked very hard to help bring Peace, will deliver this final proposal. 'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE. 'Thank you for your attention to this matter!'
Trump also said on Tuesday he will discuss the situations in Gaza and Iran when he meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House next week, adding that he hopes to achieve the much-anticipated ceasefire in Gaza soon. Trump plans to meet Netanyahu on Monday and told reporters during a visit to Florida that he would be 'very firm' with him on the need for a speedy Gaza ceasefire while noting that Netanyahu wants one as well.
The US President said he is hopeful that a ceasefire-for-hostages agreement can be achieved next week between Israel and Iran-backed Hamas militants in Gaza. 'We hope it's going to happen. And we're looking forward to it happening sometime next week,' he told reporters as he departed the White House for a day trip to Florida. 'We want to get the hostages out.' Hamas has said it is willing to free remaining hostages, opens new tab in Gaza under any deal to end the war, while Israel says it can only end if Hamas is disarmed and dismantled. Hamas refuses to lay down its arms.
It comes after White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Monday that Trump is seeking to resolve the conflict between both Israel and Gaza and secure the release of the remaining American hostages in the war-torn city. 'It's heartbreaking to see the images that have come out from both Israel and Gaza throughout this war,' Leavitt said. 'And the president wants to see it end. He wants to save lives and, however, the main priority for the president also remains to bring all of the hostages home out of Gaza. 'As you know, his tireless effort has brought home many of the hostages, including all of the American hostages who were held there.'
A senior Israeli official, Ron Dermer, has been in Washington this week holding talks ahead of the meeting between the Israeli and American presidents. He was due to meet on Tuesday with US special envoy Steve Witkoff, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance, an Israeli official said.
Trump and Netanyahu worked together on a military operation against Iran's nuclear sites in June that culminated with American B-2 bombing raids. Trump said the strikes 'obliterated' Tehran's nuclear capability, although there remains a debate about the degree of damage done to the Iranian nuclear program. But the US president recently expressed his disapproval with Israel, after the president announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran on June 24.
However, both sides quickly launched accusations that the other had violated the agreement, prompting Trump to tell reporters that both had failed to uphold the terms of the deal. 'I'm not happy with them,' Trump said at the White House last week. 'I'm not happy with Iran either, but I'm really unhappy with Israel going out this morning.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
Hamas warns Palestinians against cooperating with U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation
CAIRO, July 3 (Reuters) - The Hamas-run interior ministry in Gaza on Thursday warned residents of the coastal enclave not to assist the U.S.-and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, saying deadly incidents near its food distribution sites endangered hungry Gazans. "It is strictly forbidden to deal with, work for, or provide any form of assistance or cover to the American organization (GHF) or its local or foreign agents," an interior ministry statement said. "Legal action will be taken against anyone proven to be involved in cooperation with this organization, including the imposition of the maximum penalties stipulated in the applicable national laws," it added, without giving further details. The GHF said in a statement in response that it had delivered million of meals "safely and without interference." "This statement from the Hamas-controlled Interior Ministry confirms what we've known all along: Hamas is losing control," the GHF said. The GHF began distributing food packages in Gaza at the end of May, overseeing a new model of deliveries which the United Nations says is neither impartial nor neutral. Since Israel lifted an 11-week aid blockade on Gaza on May 19, the United Nations says more than 400 Palestinians have been killed while seeking handouts of aid. A senior U.N. official said on Sunday that the majority of people killed were trying to reach aid distribution sites of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Israel's military acknowledged on Monday that Palestinian civilians had been harmed near the distribution centres and that its forces had been issued with new instructions following what it called "lessons learned." Israel has said its forces operate near the centres in order to prevent the aid from falling into the hands of militants, which Hamas denies. More than 170 international humanitarian groups signed a letter this week calling on governments to press Israel to end use of the GHF to deliver aid and return to letting in aid mainly through U.N.-run channels. The GHF has said it has delivered more than 52 million meals to hungry Palestinians in five weeks, while other humanitarian groups had "nearly all of their aid looted."
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Russia says low global oil stockpiles prompted OPEC+ to hike output
July 5 (Reuters) - Low global oil stockpiles were a major motivating factor in prompting OPEC+ members to raise production by 548,000 barrels per day in August at the group's meeting on Saturday, the Russian government said in a statement. The group, which pumps about half of the world's oil, has been curtailing production since 2022 to support the market. But it has reversed course this year to regain market share and as U.S. President Donald Trump demanded the group pumped more to help keep gasoline prices lower. "Taking into account the robust global economic outlook and current market conditions reflected in low oil inventories, they (eight OPEC+ members) agreed to make a production adjustment of 548,000 barrels per day in August 2025," the Russian government said. OPEC+, which groups the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies led by Russia, wants to expand market share amid growing supplies from rival producers like the United States, sources have said. The group will next meet on August 3.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Music industry torn in two by Israel as radicals take centre stage
Bob Vylan's incendiary performance at Glastonbury may have caught the BBC off-guard, but for those working in the music industry it was less of a shock. It was just one glimpse of the simmering tensions between artists and the industry caused by escalating activism about Israel and the conflict in Gaza. Music and politics have always been intertwined but what is different today is the hard edge to the views. Bob Vylan led chants of 'death, death to the IDF', eclipsing contentious Irish hip-hop trio Kneecap as the focal point for scandal. As artists use headline slots to spout hate speech, political pressure is mounting behind the scenes to curb the radicalism on stage. Music bosses are scrambling to cool friction within their own ranks but tensions are boiling over. This weekend Massive Attack, who have used their tours to campaign against the 'horror of Gaza', told The Telegraph they had stopped working with their agent of three decades after he called for Kneecap to be dropped from Glastonbury. While the pro-Palestinian views espoused by artists may be popular with young, Left-wing audiences, it does not go down well with the executives and investors who back both record labels and festivals. 'These investments are made because [live events] became a very stable, predictable place ... but it is now on the verge of becoming unstable and unpredictable,' says one senior industry executive. 'The reality is that the arts and culture have relied on external funding for a long, long time and that's the same with us. We need sponsors, we need investors. Scare them away and there's no industry left.' Bob Vylan are not the first group to mount a vocal campaign against Israel's actions in Gaza. Massive Attack, the Bristol-based trip-hop group, have put the conflict at the heart of their act in recent months. Their show at the Co-op Live arena in Manchester last month only went ahead after the group demanded the removal of all branding from sponsor Barclays, which they described as a 'profoundly unethical corporate identity' because of its dealings with arms companies and fossil-fuel businesses. Shortly after, their performance at London's Lido festival screened an anti-war video that featured footage of the late Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar. Massive Attack have also taken aim at private equity firms and the broader corporate finance underpinning the music industry, though observers wryly point out that this anti-capitalist sentiment did not extend to the group's lucrative sale of its back catalogue to music rights firm Round Hill. Behind the scenes, campaigners have been targeting music festivals and their organisers over perceived links to Israel's war in Gaza. The pro-Palestinian BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) movement has been mounting a campaign against Superstruct, the entertainment giant behind events including Field Day, Mighty Hoopla, Kendal Calling and Boiler Room. In a statement, Massive Attack said it was 'misleading' to suggest BDS was targeting music festivals, adding: 'Artists have made political expressions in support of the Palestinian cause from festival stages for decades, this isn't new. 'What is new is the fact that various private equity or banking giants that hold major investments that profit from the occupation, apartheid and genocide identified by dozens of international agencies as occurring in Gaza and the West Bank have targeted music festivals for sponsorship or even part ownership. It is this targeting that has made music festivals contested spaces.' The backlash began after Superstruct's acquisition last year by KKR, the New York-based private equity firm that BDS accuses of being 'complicit in Israel's genocide and apartheid'. The campaign group has led calls for boycotts of Superstruct events, which led to a number of artists including DJ Midland pulling out of Field Day in Brockwell Park, south London, in May. All this is likely to cause a headache for Alex Mahon, the outgoing Channel 4 boss who will take up the top job at Superstruct in the autumn. Meanwhile Live Nation, the world's largest live events company, was last year forced to drop Barclays as sponsor for a number of festivals, including Download, Latitude and Isle of Wight, following a backlash from artists and fans. Yielding to this pressure raises awkward questions for Live Nation itself. The company is controlled by Liberty Media, a US conglomerate that operates a dedicated venture fund investing in Israeli companies. There are other examples: SXSW, the film and media festival that held its inaugural London event earlier this year, has also been targeted by boycotts due to its military and defence links to Israel. From Rage Against the Machine burning an American flag onstage at Woodstock '99 to Jeremy Corbyn's Pyramid Stage speech at Glastonbury in 2017, music and politics have often gone hand in hand. But many critics fear recent anti-Israeli actions have gone beyond mere activism. Police have launched a criminal investigation into the Glastonbury performances by Bob Vylan and Kneecap, one member of whom is already facing terror charges after allegedly displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah at a London gig. More broadly, the BDS movement has been accused of bullying and intimidating anyone who fails to publicly – and vocally – endorse its own radical viewpoint. As well as threatening a boycott against anyone who does not adhere to its set of 'guidelines', industry sources say the group has also coordinated social media pile-ons and even put up posters outside the offices of companies it deems to be non-compliant. As a result, organisers have begun crisis planning. 'We haven't been directly called out or anything like that, but we have given serious thought to that eventuality,' says one festival industry source. Insiders say the campaigns have also had a devastating effect on both artists and staff within the music business. The sensitivity around the topic is so acute that very few are willing to speak at all, let alone on the record. 'Rock and roll has always had a political angle and if you want to stand on a stage as an artist and take a position, that's fine, that's voluntary,' says one industry executive. 'Forcing people to do this, hounding people, outing people, cancelling people ... that's what's happening today.' The political hijacking of music events follows similar moves in other parts of the creative industries. A number of institutions including the Tate, the Royal Shakespeare Company and the National Portrait Gallery have been forced to cut ties with fossil-fuel sponsors, while the the Hay literary festival was last year embroiled in a row over sponsor Baillie Gifford's links to Israel and climate change. Arts and culture is often viewed as an easy target, particularly given the sectors are frequently staffed by liberal, Left-leaning people. But critics say even those who support the principles of the BDS movement are feeling intimidated, and divisions are starting to show across the industry. Nick Cave and Radiohead frontman Thom Yorke are among the artists to face a backlash over their perceived silence on the issue, as well as their decision to perform in Israel. Meanwhile, as Massive Attack launched its public salvos against Israel, the band's agent, David Levy, was reportedly one of the signatories of a letter from music industry executives to Glastonbury organiser Emily Eavis calling for Kneecap's appearance to be scrapped. The band said in a statement: 'On learning of the actions of our agent, we now feel more secure representing ourselves and our political and ethical positions than we do being represented by others, whose views and methods we fundamentally disagree with. So, after 30 years of live touring across five continents, we decided to part company with our live agent.' Pro-Israel lobby groups are now understood to be putting pressure on festival organisers to cut ties with Kneecap and Bob Vylan ahead of future events. The rap duo has already been dropped from upcoming festival appearances in Manchester and France. Massive Attack said musicians who spoke out in support of Palestine faced 'industrial or commercial censorship, or increasingly, highly organised, vexatious legal approaches, designed to intimidate artists into silence via the threat of litigation'. They added: 'We are talking to other artists now about a collective response to these campaigns of intimidation and censorship.' Record label sources say they faced criticism from both sides for their response to Hamas's Oct 7 2023 attacks on Israel, with a particular divide in how the issue was viewed in the US and Europe. Divisions are being fuelled by online conspiracy theorists who claim that the upper echelons of the music industry are stacked with secret supporters of Israel, claims often pervaded by anti-Semitism. In the miasma of outrage, only one thing is clear – there is no consensus on how to respond to such controversy. 'We all see what happened at Glastonbury over the weekend but behind the scenes there's also a lot of tension and disagreement,' says the music industry executive. 'Generally people are very afraid to make the wrong step.' For many in the industry, the actions of activists such as BDS go against the artistic and cultural principles of freedom that should underpin music. For those in the driving seat, however, there is a more pressing issue: money. Figures released this week showed the UK welcomed a record 23.5m music tourists to concerts and festivals in 2024, driving £10bn in spending. Music rights, meanwhile, has become a booming market in recent years, with investors splashing at least $20bn (£14.6bn) on back catalogues since 2019. Yet this boom has been reliant on significant investment, and as festivals are increasingly taken over by political activism, some fear this gold rush could now be at risk. 'The threat to business is that, in theory, if they [activists] are successful they become the most powerful voice in entertainment,' says the executive.
