Impotent Effusions: The Joint Statement On Gaza
One such statement, released on July 21, proved to be yet another one of those flossy effusions made by, as Macbeth might have said, idiots, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. The idiots numbered many: 28 international partners, including the foreign ministers of 27 states and, obviously not wanting to miss out, the EU Commissioner for Equality, Preparedness and Crisis Management. All, bar Australia, were from Europe. 'We, the signatories listed below, come together with a simple, urgent message: the war in Gaza must end now.'
The statement goes on to mention the drearily obvious. 'The Israeli government's aid delivery model is dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity.' The 'drip feeding of aid and inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of food and water' deserved condemnation. The deaths of over 800 Palestinians (the numbers are most certainly higher) while seeking aid was 'horrifying'. Even here, the language lacked rage. Israel's 'denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable.' The government 'must comply with its obligations under international humanitarian law.'
To that end, Israel was called upon to restore the flow of aid and enable the work of the United Nations and humanitarian NGOs to resume in the Strip. This is obviously something that the Netanyahu government is conscious of avoiding, given the systematic program of controlled starvation and deprivation being inflicted.
To add balance, the statement also notes the plight of the Israeli hostages still held by Hamas, their continued detention also something to be condemned. They were to be immediately and unconditionally released with a negotiated ceasefire being the best way of doing so.
The signatories do go so far as to acknowledge the dangers and intentions of Israel's administrative measures that seek 'territorial or demographic change in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The E1 settlement plan announced by Israel's Civil Administration, if implemented, would divide a Palestinian state in two, marking a flagrant breach of international law and critically undermine the two-state solution.' The West Bank is also recognised in similar light, with the signatories urging a cessation to the violence taking place against Palestinians and a halt to the building of settlements across the territory 'including East Jerusalem'.
These statements are always interesting for what they omit. No toothy measures to address the maltreatment of Palestinian civilians are stipulated, other than an encouragement of 'a common effort to bring this terrible conflict to an end'. A benign, most unthreatening promise is made: the prospect of taking 'further action to support an immediate ceasefire and a political pathway to security and peace for Israelis, Palestinians and the entire region.' This may be code for recognition of a Palestinian state, fanciful given the systematic pulverisation of the people who would inhabit it. The signatory list also omits Germany and, most importantly of all, the United States, Israel's arch guardian and evangelical sponsor.
The US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, gave us a flavour of feelings in Washington about the signatories in a post on X. 'How embarrassing for a nation to side [with] a terror group like Hamas & blame a nation whose civilians were massacred for fighting to get hostages released.' In another post that made a vague shot at justifying the unjustifiable, the ambassador absolved Israel in its conduct; only the militant group Hamas deserved exclusive blame. The nations in question had 'put pressure on @Israel instead of savages of Hamas! Gaza suffers for 1 reason: Hamas rejects EVERY proposal. Blaming Israel is irrational.'
The Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar, ever lurking in the twilight of alternative reality, reasoned the statement away, much as relatives would the views of a demented, unloved aunt. 'If Hamas embraces you – you are in the wrong place.' Praise from the group was itself 'proof of the mistake they [the signatory countries] made – part of them out of good intentions and part of them out of an obsession against Israel.'
While the various foreign ministers were flashing their plumage of principles and international humanitarian law, the Israeli Defense Forces had busily commenced an operation on a part of Gaza they have yet to level: Deir al-Balah. Given its importance as a humanitarian hub that still houses UN staff and guesthouses, more slaughter is imminent.
Till Israel assumes the status of a pariah state it seemingly craves to become, its rogue army confined and depleted, its economy humbled and isolated, the industrial appetite for slaughter and dispossession will only continue. The Palestinians will be left to be relics of moral anguish, banished to the footnotes of bloodied history along with many more statements of concern and sheer impotence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
NZ Hit With 15% Trump Trade Tariff, Trade Minister Says He Will Push Back
New Zealand exports to the US will face a 15 percent tariff rate, it has been announced. The White House has revised its list of tariffs for particular countries and New Zealand has been put on a 15 percent base rate, up from the original 10 percent announced earlier. Trade Minister Todd McClay told Midday Report 's Charlotte Cook that New Zealand was being unfairly penalised for what is a small trade deficit with the United States. "It appears it has been done based upon countries that have a trade deficit with the US, who sell them more than they buy. "In New Zealand's case, that's about half a billion US dollars and in a scheme the size of the US economy it's really not significant or meaningful." McClay told Midday Report he had asked Treasury for urgent advice about Friday's development. "Many of the exporters are saying they have been able to absorb the 10 percent, or in many cases pass it on, but at 15 percent it is going to start having a greater effect on our exporters. "We sell about $9 billion worth of goods into the US every year and so a 15 percent tariff rate is meaningful, but again the difference in trade is not significant in the scheme of things." He maintained New Zealand had good relations with the US. "The first step will be to talk to them directly and we've been engaging a lot. In fact, it's been very good engagement, both at official level, [Foreign Minister] Winston Peters has been to Washington and I've met with my counterpart a number of times now." McClay said he had put in a request for a call with Ambassador Jamieson Greer and would expect that to happen over the weekend so he could "start making the case" for a lower tariff rate. US President Donald Trump announced the tariffs back in April and said he they would be imposed on more than 125 countries. Tariffs are paid by importers of products from other countries to their own governments, like taxes, effectively making imported goods more expensive for local consumers. Advocates say they protect local economies, while detractors say they reduce trade and push up prices. In announcing the initial range of tariffs in April, Trump caused confusion when he held up a chart saying New Zealand charged US goods a 20 percent tariff, which the New Zealand government denied. It ended up being 10 percent, which Finance Minister Nicola Willis at the time called "extraordinary". Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said New Zealand would not respond in kind. Two-thirds of Kiwi businesses in a survey earlier this year thought the tariffs would have a more severe global impact than Covid-19 and the global financial crisis over the next 12 months. Trump has repeatedly threatened a range of different tariffs on various nations since returning to the White House - most recently India, citing its own trade barriers and purchasing of energy and arms from Russia, and Canada, over its newfound support for Palestinian statehood.
Scoop
15 hours ago
- Scoop
Higher Tariffs, Higher Cost Of Living For Kiwis
Confirmation today that New Zealand exports to the US will be subject to a 15 percent tariff is a slap in the face for our exporters and could mean higher prices here at home. 'This is a major fail for the Government and for our relationship with the US. Christopher Luxon has failed to secure a low tariff rate for our exports, while others around the world such as the EU and UK have managed to make deals. Unbelievably, the tariff has actually gone up from 10 to 15 percent on his watch,' Labour trade spokesperson Damien O'Connor said. 'Under Luxon, the cost of living is already increasing, making life harder. He promised his business background would help fix things, but it's getting worse. Under this government, this economic uncertainty will only cause more instability and further stifle our economic growth. 'Businesses will have to decide whether to pass the costs on to American customers, or weather those themselves. They may have to explore new markets. None of these options are good for business confidence here at home. 'This is our second-largest market and exporters such as the meat sector will be grappling with the implications of this. This is an additional barrier to competitive access to a hugely valuable market. 'The ripple effects of tariffs imposed by the US on our trading partners will also hit us. 'Christopher Luxon needs to work harder for New Zealand's interests overseas and remind the US that we have low tariffs on their goods and services being imported here,' Damien O'Connor said.
Otago Daily Times
18 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Trump slaps 15% trade tariff on NZ goods
US President Donald Trump announced the tariffs in April. New Zealand exports to the US will face a 15% tariff rate, it has been announced. The White House has revised its list of tariffs for particular countries and New Zealand has been put on a 15% base rate, up from the original 10% announced earlier. US President Donald Trump announced the tariffs in April and said they would be imposed on more than 125 countries. Tariffs are paid by importers of products from other countries to their own governments, like taxes, effectively making imported goods more expensive for local consumers. Advocates say they protect local economies, while detractors say they reduce trade and push up prices. In announcing the initial range of tariffs in April, Trump caused confusion when he held up a chart, saying New Zealand charged US goods a 20% tariff, which the New Zealand Government denied. It ended up being 10%, which Finance Minister Nicola Willis at the time called "extraordinary". Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said New Zealand would not respond in kind. Two-thirds of Kiwi businesses in a survey earlier this year thought the tariffs would have a more severe global impact than Covid-19 and the global financial crisis over the next 12 months. Trump has repeatedly threatened a range of different tariffs on various nations since returning to the White House. Most recently, he targeted India, citing its own trade barriers and purchasing of energy and arms from Russia, and Canada, over its newfound support for Palestinian statehood.
