What are Scotland's abortion laws as MPs vote to decriminalise procedure in England
MPs voted for an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill in the House of Commons on Tuesday
Abortion remains a contentious issue in Scotland and around the world. The majority of people have an opinion on the matter, whether it's buffer zones or a women's right to choose.
After MPs voted in favour of decriminalising abortion in England and Wales at Westminster yesterday, June 17, Labour MPs called for Scotland to follow suit. Tuesday's vote on an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill put forward by Labour's Tonia Antoniazz passed by a majority of 242 votes.
Now, women who terminate their pregnancy outside the current legal framework - after 24 weeks, for example - will no longer be at risk of police investigation. But anyone assisting a woman doing so outwith the rules can still be penalised.
Following the vote, Lillian Jones and Joani Reid have urged the Scottish Government to make sure no woman is prosecuted for terminating a pregnancy.
The Crime and Policing Bill amendment only affects England and Wales, as abortion was devolved to Holyrood in 2016. We are taking a look at the current legislation in Scotland on a topic that is fiercely debated.
Abortion is permitted up to the 24th week of a pregnancy in the UK. However, there are concerns that women in Scotland can only have a termination here after 20 weeks in cases where there is either a foetal abnormality or the woman's life is at risk.
The law says you can have an abortion if two doctors approve the procedure. Often, the medics will both have to agree that having a termination would cause less damage to your physical or mental health (or that of existing children) than continuing with the pregnancy.
"Most doctors will view the distress of continuing with an unwanted pregnancy as likely to be harmful," states the Sandyford Clinic in Glasgow.
"However, some doctors may choose not to be involved in abortion services and referrals, in which case they must refer you to another doctor or service, who will be able to help you."
Abortions after 24 weeks are available in exceptional circumstances, such as to save the life of the pregnant person, or if there has been a diagnosis of a serious or fatal foetal anomaly.
You will not have to pay for either the abortion assessment clinic or the abortion procedure, provided you are entitled to receive NHS care in Scotland.
But in Scotland, abortion isn't actually legal and it is not technically in the hands of the women involved, as the two doctors have to approve the procedure.
The healthcare procedure is still criminalised under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, and only allowed in certain circumstances under the Abortion Act 1967.
On the House of Commons amendment, East Kilbride and Strathaven MP Reid said: "[Abortion] is an offence created by the courts alone north of the border, but it's one that the Scottish parliament can legislate to abolish...
"There is a balance of risks, and I think that the greater injustice is the thought of our police, our prosecution services, and our courts relentlessly pursuing women who have had an abortion and women who, through error, misunderstanding, or sheer desperation, find themselves accused of a crime they scarcely knew existed."
The Scottish Government has set up an expert group to review the law on abortion and advise on whether it should be changed. The group will report next year.
The Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Scotland) Bill came into effect in September, creating 'buffer zones' around medical facilities where terminations are performed, to stop anti-abortion protesters gathering.
The legislation was introduced by Green MSP Gillian Mackay and is aimed at protecting women from harassment when they attend these facilities.
US Vice President JD Vance claimed that the Scottish Governemnt were sending letters to residents in the buffer zones 'warning them that even private prayer within their own homes may amount to breaking the law'. His comments were branded 'ludicrous' and 'wrong' by Health Secretary Neil Gray.
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Austria plans stricter gun laws following deadly school shooting
The conservative-led administration confirmed the measures on Wednesday after a cabinet meeting. The gunman, a former pupil at the school in the southern city of Graz, legally owned the two firearms used in the attack: a shotgun and a Glock pistol. Under existing laws, a shotgun can be purchased by any adult not prohibited from owning weapons, following a three-working-day waiting period. The Glock pistol, however, requires a gun permit, for which individuals must be 21 or older and pass a psychological test. In response to the tragedy, the government intends to raise the minimum age for obtaining a gun permit from 21 to 25. Furthermore, the psychological test required for permits will be made more stringent, and the "cooling-off phase" for all weapon purchases will be extended to four weeks. "We ... promised that we would not go back to business as usual and that we would draw the right conclusions from this crime to live up to the responsibility we have," Chancellor Christian Stocker told a joint press conference with the leaders of the two other parties in the ruling coalition. "Today's cabinet decision shows that we are fulfilling that responsibility," he said. The school shooter, identified by Austrian media as Arthur A., failed the psychological test that is part of the screening for military service, but the armed forces are not currently allowed to share that information. The government plans to ensure such information is shared and taken into account in applications for gun permits, it said in a statement issued after the press conference. Newly issued gun permits will also expire after eight years, it added. The government said it planned to introduce a separate gun permit for those under 25 that would apply to the category of weapons that includes the shotgun the shooter used, but a spokesman said details were still being ironed out. Beyond gun ownership rules, the government plans to increase psychological counselling and monitoring at schools as well as ensure a greater police presence in front of schools until the end of the school year, Stocker said.
South Wales Argus
27 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
First Windrush Commissioner vows cultural change, accountability, and action
Reverend Clive Foster is the first person to take up the role, fulfilling a promise by Labour in its manifesto to appoint a Windrush Commissioner. The post was advertised earlier this year as a three-day week role with an annual salary of £130,000 and for a three-year term. Mr Foster is a senior pastor at the Pilgrim Church in Nottingham and is the son of parents who migrated to the UK from Jamaica in 1959. A founder of the Nottingham Windrush Support Forum and vice-chair of the Windrush National Organisation, the Home Office said he brings both lived experience and professional expertise to the role. He vowed to work constructively with Government but to maintain independence in a role he hopes can bring 'change that the Windrush generations can see and feel in their everyday lives'. Mr Foster said: 'I'm honoured to take on the role of Windrush Commissioner. I'm committed to ensuring justice is delivered for the Windrush generations – people who have given so much to this country and deserve better than the treatment they have received. 'The injustices they faced must never be repeated, and that requires more than words; it requires cultural change, accountability, and action. 'My aim is to deliver change that the Windrush generations can see and feel in their everyday lives, particularly in how the Windrush Status and Compensation Schemes operate. 'I will carry out this role independently, without fear or favour, while creating a constructive relationship with Government where challenge is welcomed and scrutiny leads to specific, transparent improvements.' The Windrush scandal – which campaigners have since said should be known as the Home Office scandal – erupted in 2018 when British citizens were wrongly detained, deported or threatened with deportation despite having the right to live in Britain. Many lost homes and jobs and were denied access to healthcare and benefits. The compensation scheme set up for victims of the scandal has faced criticism from campaigners and those within the community as complicated and too slow. Earlier this week Home Office minister Seema Malhotra said around 64 Windrush compensation claimants had died after applying for payouts, as she set out the Government's wish to speed up 'justice'. She told the House of Commons on Monday that the new commissioner would look at ways to change the compensation scheme. Ms Malhotra told MPs: 'In opposition, we frequently heard that the application process was too complicated with insufficient support for those wishing to make a claim. 'The Government is determined to ensure that the victims of the Home Office Windrush scandal are heard, that justice is sped up, that the compensation scheme is run efficiently and effectively.' The Windrush scandal has become known as the Home Office scandal (Kendall Brown/PA) Mr Foster has been appointed with immediate effect but will begin his formal duties shortly after Windrush Day celebrations on Sunday, the Home Office said. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has repeated her insistence that Labour is 'absolutely determined to right the wrongs they suffered at the hands of the Home Office'. She added: 'This is why I am delighted to welcome Reverend Clive Foster as our new Windrush Commissioner. 'His deep understanding through his own connections and dedicated community work makes him the perfect champion for those affected by this historic injustice. 'I look forward to working closely with Reverend Foster as we continue our vital work to rebuild trust and deliver the justice that the Windrush generations so rightfully deserve.'
New Statesman
27 minutes ago
- New Statesman
PMQs review: The grooming gangs scandal continues to shake Parliament
Photo by House of Commons Kemi Badenoch must be fuming that Keir Starmer is flying back from the G7 in Canada right now, with Angela Rayner standing in for him at PMQs and convention dictating that the Leader of the Opposition also offers up a deputy. So it was that in a week where the headline topic remains the grooming gang scandal that Badenoch has decided is one of her key passion projects, it was one of her shadow ministers asking the questions. Badenoch has chosen not to have a regular deputy for these occasions, offering the job to a revolving cast of Tory frontbenchers. Unsurprisingly given what was obviously going to be the main issue, today it was the shadow home secretary. No, not Robert Jenrick (though you'd be forgiven for the mistake), but Chris Philp. That's the same Chris Philp who appeared with Badenoch on a panel of grooming gang survivors, parents and activists yesterday morning, during which they were urged that 'all the political stuff needs to be put aside' by survivor Fiona Goddard. And it's also the same Chris Philp who seemed to show very little interest in the scandal until Elon Musk brought it back to Westminster's attention in January, including for the almost two years in which he was policing minister in the Home Office. All of this meant that, when Philp began his questioning by noting he had met with survivors on Tuesday, he was greeted to heckles that he'd never met with any of them while in office. He brushed this off, adopting a dignified tone as he asked about survivors' justifiable insistence that the national inquiry announced on Monday will be fully independent, have statutory powers, cover all affected towns and put the affected individuals at its centre. It was an attitude that won him appreciation from Rayner, who struck a stateswomanlike poise as she thanked him for 'his tone and for putting the survivors central', adding wryly that she hoped members of his party would follow his lead. Badenoch's own tactic of ferociously hammering the government over Louise Casey's report, most notably in the Chamber on Monday afternoon, has drawn criticism – including from victims, and from Casey herself. The air of cross-party respect didn't last. Before long Philp was channelling his inner Badenoch, calling on Rayner to apologise for Starmer's claim in January (which the Prime Minister surely now regrets) that those calling for an inquiry were 'jumping on a bandwagon' and 'amplifying what the far right is saying'. Rayner responded with the universal Labour defence of pointing out what the Tories had done in office: 'precisely nothing'. It was notable that, while Philp raged, Rayner was flanked on both sides by female colleagues (Lucy Powell and Yvette Cooper to one side, Rachel Reeves and Bridge Phillipson on the other). It was a powerful image. From there, we got an unedifying spat over illegal migrant numbers, the failure of the Rwanda scheme, asylum accommodation and – a nice new addition, presumably due to Rayner's brief – house building. Philp walked into a number of traps Badenoch could have told him were coming. Bringing up immigration at PMQs enables whoever is representing the government to return to their comfort ground of the Conservatives' own record. Philp's retort that the Rwanda scheme 'never started' isn't quite the win he thinks it is, given one of the key reasons voters abandoned the Tories was a feeling the party was so incompetent it couldn't even do what it was said it wanted to. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe As for his line wondering aloud how Rayner 'has the brass neck to claim she's got it under control, when the numbers crossing the Channel this year are the highest in history', Philp should have guessed his adversary would be prepared. And she was, punching the Boriswave bruise (nearly a million arrivals in 2022-3 alone), reeling off stats, and condemning Philp for the 'one million pounds a day 'spiffed' up the wall' (an allusion, perhaps, to Boris Johnson's similar turn-of-phrase discussing money spent on historic child abuse investigations – at any rate, a new one for Hansard). It wasn't the finest audition piece from Philp. One wonders why Robert Jenrick wasn't chosen to stand in (although the answer to that may be apparent). Rayner brought less of her characteristic fire to today's proceedings, and all in all it was a somewhat anticlimactic session, with the mood around the House gradually souring. We had Lib Dem and SNP MPs ask about cuts to disability benefits, designed to rile up Labour backbenchers who are queasy about what Liz Kendall will be announcing later today. And instead of an explosive intervention from Reform's MPs, we got two planted questions: one about a Reform council cutting a fire engine in Nuneaton, and another about the dodgy arithmetic behind Nigel Farage's claim he could save £7bn of government spending by cutting DEI programmes. We did hear Rayner signalling that the UK would not join the US were Donald Trump to choose to attack Iran, and stressing the need for a diplomatic approach. But given Keir Starmer insisted the US had no intentions of bombing Iran just before Trump implied it was a live consideration, who can say. (This week's New Statesman magazine is a War Special, covering everything going on in the Middle East, including an insight into Benjamin Netanyahu's mind from his former head of personal security and a deep dive into what Iran will do next by Lawrence Freedman, for once you're done digesting PMQs.) Question of the day probably goes to Nick Timothy, who noted that channel crossings are up this year, and asked whether, if they fail to go down, the Home Secretary's job could be at risk. Yvette Cooper has so far not been a major target of the Tory frontbench, with the force of their efforts aimed more at Rachel Reeves, Ed Miliband and Bridget Phillipson. Is Timothy testing out a new attack line for the Conservatives? Or is he simply reminding his colleagues of his presence should a shadow ministerial vacancy come up? [See also: Keir Starmer's grooming gang cowardice] Related
