Meet the face of France's anger against cancer and pesticides
"With my cancer face, I was the only one who could speak up in the chamber," said Breteau. The Parisian founded the Cancer Colère group ("Cancer Anger") the day after the Duplomb Law was first passed by senators, on January 27. Her goal: "To politicize cancer by making it visible." She has succeeded. Her act contributed to the success of the citizens' petition calling for the law's repeal, which passed the million-signature mark shortly before 6 pm on Sunday, July 20. "This is what civil society is giving back to a contemptuous government and the 316 lawmakers who supported Duplomb over public health, science and the future of farmers," responded the newly minted activist. "They thought they could censor the democratic process. They wanted to destroy us, but they are bringing us together."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
'To feed, not to poison': French chefs push back against pesticide law
"We restaurateurs are in this business to feed, not to poison." A wave of discontent is spreading through France's culinary world as chefs publicly denounce a new law reauthorising a controversial pesticide. The so-called " Duplomb law" has sparked an outcry among food professionals, with a petition demanding its repeal surpassing 2 million signatures on Monday. In a joint opinion piece published last Thursday in Le Monde, hundreds of chefs voiced alarm over the declining quality of ingredients and joined calls for the law's withdrawal. 'If we're speaking out today, it's because we're stunned by the blindness of our politicians and their increasingly obvious ties with agribusiness,' they wrote, following the highly publicised intervention of three-starred chef Jacques Marcon, who rarely speaks out publicly. Marcon took to Instagram to criticise Senator Laurent Duplomb, the law's author, who represents Haute-Loire, where Marcon's restaurant is located. "'Proud to be Altiligerian' [Proud to be someone from the Haute-Loire] is our department's motto, but today I'm ashamed to live in Haute-Loire, the department you represent!" he wrote, addressing the senator directly. The Duplomb law reintroduces, by way of derogation, the use of acetamiprid, a pesticide from the neonicotinoid family long criticised for its environmental impact. Banned in France since 2018, the chemical remains legal in the European Union and proponents say French farmers need it to help them compete. 07:11 Marcon accused the senator of acting as "a spokesperson for the agro-industry, which favours intensive agriculture harmful to future generations". His message, accompanied by a photo of a wild herb field in Haute-Loire, was widely shared and drew strong support from fellow chefs defending local terroirs and food quality. "Thank you, we feel the same here about our Brière landscapes, in Loire-Atlantique, which collect all the water from the surrounding runoff," said Éric Guérin, chef at the Michelin-starred La Mare aux Oiseaux. "Thank you for saying it loud and clear, I'm happy to relay your message." A groundbreaking stand Marcon's intervention – a first of its kind in the fine dining world – carried particular weight due to his standing in French gastronomy. It broke a long-standing silence within the industry on political and environmental issues and sparked an unprecedented mobilisation: nearly 400 chefs and food professionals have since signed a shared statement. "The so-called 'Duplomb law' is an insult to scientists, to farmers who work without pesticides every day, to public health and to our profession," the open letter reads. Signatories include three-starred chefs Mauro Colagreco and Glenn Viel, former three-star chef Olivier Roellinger, and Top Chef alumna Chloé Charles. "I don't understand this law," Viel told AFP, denouncing "pesticides that pollute our soil" and linking food consumption to cancer rates. "We're capable of spending billions to defend our country and rightly so. But can't we find a billion or two to help farmers make this ecological transition?" Speaking to Nice Matin, Colagreco – who heads the restaurant Mirazur, in southern France – slammed the law as 'catastrophic', describing it as a step backward that goes against scientific consensus and 'shows outright contempt for health and environmental standards'. He urged a full repeal of the legislation, calling for agriculture that 'respects nature and our health'. Others were more blunt. 'This law is a hammer blow,' said chef and food columnist Marie-Victorine Manoa, calling for a 'general rebellion'. Thibaut Spiwack, Michelin-starred chef at ANONA, told RTL that the law widens the gap between those with access to healthy food and those without. He warned it will result in "vegetables loaded with chemical, toxic products and very low nutritional value" – a purely commercial logic, he said, 'normalised simply because other European countries do it too". "We are worried. Worried about the future of our food, battered by the climate crisis and biodiversity loss. Worried about the terrifying rise in cancer. Worried about the deteriorating quality of the products we serve, increasingly laced with pesticide residue. Even the water we bring to the table, bottled or tap, is affected." – Excerpt from the column published in Le Monde A rare show of unity The initiative was launched by Ecotable, a company that helps restaurants adopt sustainable practices. The movement has united Michelin-starred chefs, school canteen cooks, bistro owners and farmer-restaurateur collectives. "These are people who rarely speak publicly, but food is their everyday reality," said Ecotable founder Fanny Giansetto. "We restaurateurs are hard workers. We usually keep our heads down and keep going," said Viel. "But at some point, you have to bang your fist on the table." Even Marcon, who proudly claims his farming roots, expressed self-criticism. "I also consider myself responsible for this backward-looking law," he said, vowing to become "a real activist for agriculture and the environment". He also called on the industry to take stock and "help" farmers. "We're fully aware of the daily challenges French producers face," the chefs wrote, "caught between the financial pressures of their profession and growing public demands to move away from industrial agriculture. But the Duplomb law, passed on July 8, addresses none of these issues. On the contrary, it turns a blind eye to the real problems: farmer incomes, deregulated trade and food competition." One Instagram user, identifying as an organic winemaker, responded under Marcon's post: "Your words are welcome, thank you. This law supposedly 'requested' BY farmers is far from unanimous among us!" Senator Duplomb responded on Facebook, accusing Marcon of "lecturing others" and inviting him to "step out from behind his Michelin stars". But in a sector long reluctant to engage in public debate – as seen during the farmers' protests of early 2024 – Marcon's outcry appears to have sparked a shift. More chefs are speaking out, increasingly aligned around the future of food, public health and the responsibility they bear. Watch more One year after protests, French farming still in crisis Among the most visible supporters is Stéphane Manigold, restaurateur and head of the Eclore group. In an Instagram post titled "Truth of the facts according to the text", he challenged Duplomb's claims "point by point", describing the bill as "a limited social measure, which you are attempting to wrap in an opportunistic ideological narrative". "People on the ground are neither blind nor naive," he wrote. According to a poll published Sunday in La Tribune Dimanche, 64% of French respondents said they hoped French President Emmanuel Macron would refuse to sign the bill and instead call for a new parliamentary debate. Macron has said he is awaiting the Constitutional Council's ruling on the law's legality, expected on August 7, before making his decision. In the meantime, the Duplomb bill appears to have triggered a wake-up call, galvanising a cross-cutting wave of anger – from local bistros to Michelin-starred kitchens.
LeMonde
7 hours ago
- LeMonde
French petition against pesticide reaches two million signatories
A student-led petition against a chemical deadly to bees reached more than two million signatures in France on Monday, July 28, increasing pressure on the president not to sign a bill allowing its use into law. The legislation was adopted on July 8, but without a proper debate to bypass gridlock in a bitterly divided parliament. On July 10, a 23-year-old master's student launched a petition urging the French government to drop the law allowing the reintroduction of acetamiprid, a pesticide that is harmful to ecosystems but popular with many farmers in Europe. Banned in France since 2018, the chemical remains legal in the European Union. The insecticide is particularly sought after by beet and hazelnut growers, who say they have no alternative against pests and face unfair competition. The petition on France's lower-house Assemblée Nationale's website had garnered more than 2,015,000 signatures on Monday morning. Backers at the height of summer include 400 people from the culinary world, including Michelin-starred chefs, who have criticized the "blindness of our politicians." According to a poll published in La Tribune Dimanche on Sunday, 64% of people surveyed hope Macron will not sign the bill into law but will instead submit it to a new debate in parliament. Macron has said he is waiting to hear the verdict of the Constitutional Council, which is expected to rule on the constitutionality of the law on August 7. The contested legislation is dubbed the Duplomb law, after its author, Laurent Duplomb, a senator for the right-wing Republicans party. The petition reached 500,000 signatures last weekend, a threshold after which the lower house may choose to hold a public debate, but that would be limited to the content of the petition – not the law itself.
LeMonde
2 days ago
- LeMonde
Bashar al-Assad: France's highest court upholds personal immunity for sitting heads of state
On Friday, July 25, the Cour de Cassation, France's highest court of appeals, decided that the personal immunity granted to sitting heads of state allows for no exceptions. The ruling is a major disappointment for human rights defenders and international law experts fighting against impunity. And as a result, the arrest warrant issued in November 2023 by Parisian investigating judges against former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, who was accused of ordering chemical attacks in the suburbs of Damascus in 2013, has been annulled. This decision was made just days before the 12 th anniversary of the sarin gas attack on Ghouta, which killed around 1,000 to 1,500 people, including several French-Syrians. This decision effectively prevents French courts from prosecuting sitting heads of state, who, like prime ministers and foreign affairs ministers, enjoy personal immunity. The court did not uphold Prosecutor General Rémy Heitz's suggestion that the arrest warrant for al-Assad be maintained by setting aside his personal immunity, since France had not recognized him as the "legitimate sitting head of state" since 2012, given the "mass crimes committed by the Syrian regime."
