logo
Murder or mistake? Trial opens over teen shooting death

Murder or mistake? Trial opens over teen shooting death

Perth Nowa day ago

The fate of two people accused of murdering a teenager during a car chase rests on the reasons for firing a shotgun.
John Paul Evans, 57, and his son Keith Evans, 31, are accused of murdering Jesse Thompson during a pursuit through the streets of Wyong on the NSW Central Coast in 2017.
The pair were in a dual-cab ute with a woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, when a shotgun was discharged in the hands of Keith Evans.
Mr Thompson was sitting in the back seat of a Toyota Kluger, the second car involved in the pursuit, when he was hit by the shot.
The 19-year-old died soon after as a result of his injuries.
Events preceding Mr Thompson's death were revealed as agreed facts during the NSW Supreme Court trial opening on Thursday.
In the days leading up to his death, Keith Evans assaulted one of Mr Thompson's friends, Jayke Rodgers, putting him in hospital.
On the day of the alleged murder, Mr Rodgers and some of his friends retaliated by smashing a glass door at the Evans' family home.
They later met with more friends at a local park and got into the Kluger, with Mr Thompson in the back seat, and became involved in a car pursuit with the Evans' ute.
But the details of the car chase, including who brought the gun, remains in dispute.
One of the key issues in the trial is whether Keith Evans intended to fire the shotgun.
"The heart of this dispute is about the discharge of that firearm and whether it was accidental," his barrister Michelle Fernando said.
Her client did not intend to fire the gun or harm Mr Thompson, Ms Fernando told the jury.
"Keith Evans is here not because he's committed a crime," she said.
"He's here because the Crown alleges he has committed the crime of murder."
John Evans' barrister, John Stratton SC, told the jury his client was not aware of the altercation between his son and Mr Rodger's group of friends.
"It is his belief that the shot which killed the deceased was the result of a terrible accident," he said.
Mr Stratton said John Evans maintained he picked up the gun after one of the men from the Kluger dropped the weapon.
Crown prosecutor Adrian Robertson told the jury John Evans has given evidence he knew about the smashed door at their family home.
Throughout the trial, occupants of the Kluger would tell the jury they saw Keith Evans point the gun at their vehicle, Mr Roberston said.
The jury would hear evidence Keith Evans first pointed the shotgun at the front of the vehicle, before shifting it to fire through the open back window, he said.
Mr Robertson said the Crown must prove he deliberately fired at Mr Thompson.
"An intentional act, rather than an accidental one," he said.
"And of course, that there was no lawful excuse for such a thing."
The trial continues on Friday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Erin Patterson mushroom murder trial: Erin Patterson two faces claim
Erin Patterson mushroom murder trial: Erin Patterson two faces claim

Herald Sun

time6 hours ago

  • Herald Sun

Erin Patterson mushroom murder trial: Erin Patterson two faces claim

Mushroom cook Erin Patterson had 'two faces' and was pretending to love her in-laws before she allegedly murdered them with a deadly beef wellington meal, a prosecutor has claimed. The mother of two has spent every day this week testifying in her own triple-murder trial and on Friday faced another grilling by Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC. Ms Patterson is standing trial in Morwell, accused of murdering her estranged husband's parents Don and Gail Patterson, both 70, along with Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66. The prosecution alleges she served them individual beef wellingtons she had deliberately laced with lethal death cap mushrooms at her Leongatha home on July 29, 2023. Heather's husband, pastor Ian Wilkinson, 71, was the only guest to survive. Ms Patterson, 50, has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one of attempted murder, claiming she may have accidentally added foraged mushrooms into the meal along with dried mushrooms she purchased from an Asian grocer. Under cross-examination, Dr Rogers suggested Ms Patterson did not love Don and Gail, pointing to expletive-laden messages to her Facebook friends where she described them as a 'lost cause' and 'wanted nothing to do with them'. Dr Rogers asked: 'In fact, you had two faces: a public face of appearing to have a good relationship with Don and Gail … agree or disagree?' Ms Patterson replied: 'Are you asking me to agree if I had two faces?' When pressed again, she said: 'I had a good relationship with Don and Gail.' Dr Rogers asked: 'I suggest that your private face was the one you showed in your Facebook Messenger use, correct or incorrect?' She replied: 'Incorrect.' Ms Patterson also disagreed that she was angry they took their son Simon's side amid a child support dispute in December 2022. 'They did love me and I did love them. I do love them,' she told the Supreme Court. Dr Rogers put to Ms Patterson that if she 'had loved them' she would have immediately notified the authorities when she realised on August 1 there was 'possibility' foraged mushrooms were in a container with the dried mushrooms from the Asian grocer. 'Well I didn't … I had been told that people were getting treatment for possible death cap mushroom poisoning, so that was already happening,' she said. She confirmed she 'did not tell anybody' about that possibility. The court heard Ms Patterson invited the guests and Simon to lunch after a church service on July 16, with Simon testifying that she said to him she had some 'important medical news' to share and had invited everyone 'to discuss that topic'. 'No, that's not what I said to him,' Ms Patterson replied. 'That wasn't the purpose of the lunch or the purpose of the invitations.' Dr Rogers took her to the text she sent Simon after he pulled out of the lunch on July 28. 'That's really disappointing. I've spent many hours this week preparing lunch for tomorrow which has been exhausting in light of the issues I'm facing … I may not be able to host a lunch like this again for some time,' she wrote. After a series of rapid-fire questions, Ms Patterson said she did tell Simon she wanted to discuss some 'medical stuff', but she denied that she wanted advice and that it was the purpose of the lunch. The jury has previously heard she misled her guests when she told them she may need treatment for cancer, but she testified on Friday she was 'confronting' medical issues, since she was planning to have gastric bypass surgery. Ms Patterson denied she prepared a poisoned beef wellington for Simon 'just in case' he turned up at the lunch. 'And when he didn't show up for lunch … you threw it in your rubbish bin,' Dr Rogers said. 'I did put the pastry and mushrooms in the rubbish bin,' she replied. Dr Rogers also asked Ms Patterson why she invited the Wilkinsons to lunch. 'I really liked them and I wanted to have a stronger relationship with them,' she said. Dr Rogers suggested she invited them because she thought it would make it more likely that Don, Gail and Simon would come, but she denied that was the reason. Later, Ms Patterson was asked about records that showed a map about death caps – on citizen science website iNaturalist – was accessed on May 28, 2022, on a computer in her house. 'I don't have a specific memory of this day or this internet search, but my evidence is it's possible, because I remember at some point wanting to find out if death cap mushrooms grow in South Gippsland and finding out that they do not,' she said. Ms Patterson told the jury on Wednesday she found out mushrooms growing on her property were 'probably toxic to dogs' and she wanted to see if death caps grew in the area. The trial, before Justice Christopher Beale, continues.

Patterson reveals mushroom lies she cooked up after lunch
Patterson reveals mushroom lies she cooked up after lunch

Perth Now

time17 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Patterson reveals mushroom lies she cooked up after lunch

Ms Patterson says she was 'disappointed' that her ex said he wouldn't come to lunch. 'You wanted him to come to lunch so you could feed him part of a poisoned beef Wellington lunch,' the Crown prosecution said. 'No,' Ms Patterson replied. Ms Patterson then agreed she scraped the mushrooms and pastry off the sixth beef Wellington later into her rubbish bin. Erin Patterson has now agreed that she told her ex-partner on June 16 that she had 'medical issues' she wanted to discuss, but is still disputing that she said she wanted 'advice', including how to break it to the kids. When Mr Patterson told Ms Patterson he was 'too uncomfortable' to attend lunch, he said he was 'happy to talk about health' issues at another time. 'That's really disappointing. I have spent many hours preparing lunch,' Ms Patterson replied to Mr Patterson. 'I wanted it to be a special meal because I might not be able to host a lunch like this again. 'I hope to see you there.' Ms Patterson said the 'medical issues' were not 'why' she invited people. 'My memory is that I said to him something like, 'there's some medical stuff that I'll talk to you about then'.' She says, 'that wasn't a lie' as she had an appointment booked for a 'pre-surgery appointment' for a gastric bypass. Simon Patterson previously gave evidence claiming that the accused invited Don and Gail Patterson and Heather and Ian Wilkinson to lunch to discuss 'important medical news' and that she wanted advice on how to break it to the children. He has also given evidence claiming the accused wanted the children not to attend the lunch. Ms Patterson disputed that evidence, claiming she just invited everyone to lunch and has not asked guests to come to discuss 'medical news'. She accepted that she had invited Don, Gail, Heather and Ian before Simon. Ms Patterson 'disagreed' that she told the wider family before her ex-partner so that he would feel more inclined to come. Erin Patterson took to Facebook to 'vent' to her friends about her 'frustration' over Don and Gail Patterson. Her messages were read to the court, where she said she wanted 'nothing to do with' the Patterson family due to their lack of involvement in mediation. 'Nobody listens to me. At least I know they're a lost cause,' Ms Patterson wrote. 'So, f..k em',' the message continued. 'I wrote that. I was venting. I was frustrated,' Ms Patterson said, explaining her comments. Ms Patterson denied that she was telling her friends about her true feelings, claiming she was not angry, just 'frustrated'. Ms Patterson accepted that she also wrote a message ahead of lunch, where she called Simon Patterson a 'deadbeat'. 'Her (Gail) son is such a deadbeat.' Ms Patterson admitted to sending a message to her Facebook friends, where she vented about a 'dispute' over child support and school fees. 'Simon wants to walk away from his responsibilities,' she said. She went on to say that it might be a good thing as Ms Patterson could now put her children in whatever school she wanted. She added that if her ex-partner wanted the kids to attend a Christian school, he could pay half. 'A blessing in disguise,' she told her friends. Ms Patterson says she told her partner about changing which school her child attended, something the Crown disputes. Erin Patterson was asked to read a message she sent in a group chat that Don and Gail Patterson were in. In her message, she said: 'Simon needs accountability for the difficulty he is causing me.' The message continued, with Ms Patterson mentioning school fees and how much her ex-partner was paying. Ms Patterson denied she was trying to get Don and Gail to influence Simon's contribution to school fees but accepted that Don made clear he wasn't going to get involved. 'I wasn't angry,' Ms Patterson said. Erin Patterson, 50, stands accused of murdering her in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, as well as the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson by serving them beef Wellington containing poisonous mushrooms at a lunch at her Leongatha home on July 29, 2023. Alleged mushroom killer Erin Patterson is under intense cross examination at her triple murder trial, spilling confessions on the lies she told police and health authorities about mushrooms. She is returning to the witness box now.

Erin Patterson live trial updates: Alleged mushroom killer denies picking death cap mushrooms for fatal lunch
Erin Patterson live trial updates: Alleged mushroom killer denies picking death cap mushrooms for fatal lunch

West Australian

time17 hours ago

  • West Australian

Erin Patterson live trial updates: Alleged mushroom killer denies picking death cap mushrooms for fatal lunch

Scroll down for the latest updates from Erin Patterson's triple murder trial. Simon Patterson previously gave evidence claiming that the accused invited Don and Gail Patterson and Heather and Ian Wilkinson to lunch to discuss 'important medical news' and that she wanted advice on how to break it to the children. He has also given evidence claiming the accused wanted the children not to attend the lunch. Ms Patterson disputed that evidence, claiming she just invited everyone to lunch and has not asked guests to come to discuss 'medical news'. She accepted that she had invited Don, Gail, Heather and Ian before Simon. Ms Patterson 'disagreed' that she told the wider family before her ex-partner so that he would feel more inclined to come. Erin Patterson took to Facebook to 'vent' to her friends about her 'frustration' over Don and Gail Patterson. Her messages were read to the court, where she said she wanted 'nothing to do with' the Patterson family due to their lack of involvement in mediation. 'Nobody listens to me. At least I know they're a lost cause,' Ms Patterson wrote. 'So, f..k em',' the message continued. 'I wrote that. I was venting. I was frustrated,' Ms Patterson said, explaining her comments. Ms Patterson denied that she was telling her friends about her true feelings, claiming she was not angry, just 'frustrated'. Ms Patterson accepted that she also wrote a message ahead of lunch, where she called Simon Patterson a 'deadbeat'. 'Her (Gail) son is such a deadbeat.' Ms Patterson admitted to sending a message to her Facebook friends, where she vented about a 'dispute' over child support and school fees. 'Simon wants to walk away from his responsibilities,' she said. She went on to say that it might be a good thing as Ms Patterson could now put her children in whatever school she wanted. She added that if her ex-partner wanted the kids to attend a Christian school, he could pay half. 'A blessing in disguise,' she told her friends. Ms Patterson says she told her partner about changing which school her child attended, something the Crown disputes. Erin Patterson was asked to read a message she sent in a group chat that Don and Gail Patterson were in. In her message, she said: 'Simon needs accountability for the difficulty he is causing me.' The message continued, with Ms Patterson mentioning school fees and how much her ex-partner was paying. Ms Patterson denied she was trying to get Don and Gail to influence Simon's contribution to school fees but accepted that Don made clear he wasn't going to get involved. 'I wasn't angry,' Ms Patterson said. Erin Patterson, 50, stands accused of murdering her in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, as well as the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson by serving them beef Wellington containing poisonous mushrooms at a lunch at her Leongatha home on July 29, 2023. Alleged mushroom killer Erin Patterson is under intense cross examination at her triple murder trial, spilling confessions on the lies she told police and health authorities about mushrooms. She is returning to the witness box now.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store