Parker says city has offered District Council 33 'largest one-term pay increase' in over 30 years
PHILADELPHIA - As negotiations between District Council 33 and the City of Philadelphia near a Tuesday deadline, Mayor Cherelle Parker says her administration has offered the largest wage increase of any mayor in their first term over the last 30 years.
"Municipal workers who are part of Council 33 are among our most valued assets as a city," Parker said in a video posted to Facebook on Saturday morning.
District Council 33 represents 9,000 city employees, including the sanitation workers, members of the water department, and 911 dispatch. They have demanded higher wages and pension improvements.
The backstory
The City of Philadelphia and District Council 33 have until midnight Tuesday to avert a strike after 95% of its members voted in favor of walking off the job until a new contract is reached.
The strike would mean services across all corners of the city will be impacted. The work stoppage would affect rec centers, pools, libraries, the water department, 911 dispatch, airport workers and sanitation.
A work stoppage could begin at the height of the summer heat and during the Welcome America Festival.
What they're saying
As high-stakes negotiations dragged into the weekend, Mayor Cherelle Parker said the city's current offer includes the highest pay increase for District Council 33 members in a mayor's first term in more than 30 years.
"I am unapologetically a pro-union, pro-labor, and pro-worker mayor," Parker said. "I will always support the men and women in our city who pick up our trash, clean our streets, care for our most vulnerable citizens, provide healthcare to residents, run into burning buildings to save people, and put their lives on the line every day to protect and serve the people of our great city," she said.
Parker outlined wage increases for District Council 33 members in a mayor's first term over the last 30 years, and claimed her 12% pay bump is the highest such raise.
Ed Rendell increased District Council 33 wages by 5% in his first term as mayor. John Street dolled out a 9% increase during his first four years in office. Michael Nutter didn't raise wages at all in his first term. And former mayor Jim Kenney gave out a 11.5% raise to District Council 33 members in his first term.
"That increase of more than 12%, it will represent the largest one-term pay increase for District Council 33 from any mayor in more than 3 decades," Parker said.
In her first year alone, Parker said the city and the union agreed to a 5% pay increase – the largest one-year wage bump that the union has seen in three decades.
"For an average District Council 33 worker, that meant an average annual pay increase of $2,383," Parker said. "If the workforce of District Council 33 accepts the proposal that we have already put on the table for them, their pay increase will total over 12%."
The other side
Mayor Parker hopes to avert a strike by making good on one of District Council 33's largest sticking points of wage increases.
Union boss Greg Boulware on Thursday said they made "minimal progress on certain topics, but not enough to avoid a strike at this time."
In addition to wage increases, District Council 33 has demanded improvements to pensions.
What's next
As the possibility of a strike that would grind crucial city services to a halt looms, sources tell FOX 29 News that department heads are preparing contingency plans.
"Even if a deal does not take place, we will talk about plan B. I want to be optimistic that they will stay at the table because the City of Philadelphia does not want a strike," said City Council President Kenyatta Johnson.
The 9,000 District Council 33 members could also be joined on the picket lines by members of the city's white-collar employees.
AFSCME District Council 47 and its 3,000 workers are also in contract negotiations with the city.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
19 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Appeals Ruling Blocking Executive Order Against Perkins Coie
The Trump administration filed an appeal on Monday challenging its loss in federal court to Perkins Coie, in a signal that it intends to prolong its fight in trying to force some of the nation's top law firms to capitulate. Earlier this year, fearing President Trump, a number of prominent firms shocked some of their peers and clients by agreeing to take on hundreds of millions of dollars of free legal work on causes of shared concern with the White House in exchange for the right to continue operating as usual. But a handful of firms declined to strike a deal and were singled out by Mr. Trump for punishment through executive orders that exiled them from work with the federal government. Those firms, including Perkins Coie, sued in March. The courts have found Mr. Trump's actions unambiguously illegal, and have blocked the government from following the orders. The filing on Monday was the first indication so far that Mr. Trump has not been deterred. The appeal follows the fourth straight ruling against the Trump administration on Friday, when a judge struck down an order targeting the firm Susman Godfrey. The decision in that case struck many of the same notes that Judge Beryl Howell of the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia did when she declared the order targeting Perkins Coie illegal on May 2. 'The courts have permanently blocked all four unlawful executive orders targeting law firms because those orders violate core constitutional freedoms,' a spokesman for Perkins Coie said in a statement about the Trump administration's appeal. 'We look forward to presenting our case to the D.C. Circuit and remain committed to ensuring that the unconstitutional executive order targeting our firm is never enforced.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


CNN
20 minutes ago
- CNN
Elon Musk just made his starkest political threat since the election
After declaring he was stepping away from the political spotlight, Elon Musk got right back in it. As the Senate debated President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' on Monday before a final vote, Musk issued a stark warning via his social media platform X. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' he wrote. For weeks, Musk has railed against Trump's policy bill, leading to a very public and ugly fight with Trump earlier this month. In the flurry of X posts several weeks ago, Musk had proposed starting a new political party. That proposal resurfaced on Monday, when Musk said, 'It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!! Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people.' Musk's resolution to support candidates who plan to launch primary campaigns against members of Congress is one of Musk's most concrete political threats since leaving his post as a White House adviser. Musk spent more than $275 million to support Trump and other Republican candidates in the 2024 election. In late May he said in an interview he was planning to cut back on political spending, saying he has 'done enough.' According to Federal Election Committee filings, Musk's political action committee America PAC last gave money in March to support two Republican candidates running in special elections in Florida – Randy Fine and Jimmy Patronis.

Wall Street Journal
22 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Grocery Runs With Mamdani
Zohran Mamdani may be the next mayor of New York by doubling down on the socialist promises of free stuff and taxing the rich, none of which has ever worked ('The People's Republic of New York City,' Review & Outlook, June 26). Yet one proposal—making shopping cheaper with government-run grocery stores—may succeed. I have been in Cuban-government grocery stores, and you do save money. Unfortunately it's because the shelves are empty. David Arnold