
QUENTIN LETTS: The Lib Dems are no longer against nukes - as long as they're fuelled by lentil gas, perhaps!
When North Korea tried to launch a warship the other day, things did not go entirely to plan and the vessel capsized.
Labour 's announcement of its defence plans nearly went the same way. What a foul-up they made of it.
MPs were cross that they were not allowed to read the defence review until the Secretary of State, John Healey, was at the despatch box. The Speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, went on the war path, voicing backbenchers' fury and ensuring that Mr Healey's announcement was delayed by other squabbles.
Commons leader Lucy Powell took several direct hits from Sir Lindsay. She curled a lip at him but that only encouraged him to unleash more verbal torpedoes.
Ms Powell was soon listing, holed below decks and with much of her superstructure gone. After further sorties from her Tory counterpart, Jesse Norman, she may be beyond salvage. While a 'glug glug glug' came from HMS Powell, Mr Healey glided to the despatch box to agree that MPs should, yes, be allowed to read the document before asking him about it.
By this stage, many of its contents had already been reported by newspapers – a proud day for journalists, egad – and Sir Keir Starmer had held a wonderfully wooden event in front of two half-built frigates at Govan. The nasal knight was surrounded by shipyard workers. He gulped, blinked, said 'er' and 'um', and managed to create further confusion as to when, if ever, defence spending would reach 3 per cent of gross domestic product.
Back at Westminster a junior defence minister, Luke Pollard, had a sticky time explaining what the Government's policy on nuclear weapons would now be. Mr Pollard, hesitating, explained: 'I don't want to eat the Secretary of State's sandwiches.' Speaker Hoyle, roaring in broad Lancastrian: 'Don't you wurry, the Sunday papers did it already!'
Mr Healey was by now in the chamber, going through the text of his speech but perhaps silently thinking 'cripes, what a shambles'. Beside him sat another defence minister, Maria Eagle, dabbing at her runny nose with a sopping Kleenex. The chemical warfare laboratory at Aldermaston would not have handled that hankie without a hazmat suit.
Just when things could hardly deteriorate further, Tory frontbencher Mark Francois came scampering into the chamber like a plump old spaniel with a string of butcher's sausages. He whispered something urgent to the shadow secretary of state, James Cartlidge, who promptly stood up to announce that the review
document had been given to leading defence firms at 8am. Two and a half hours before even the journalists? Disgrace! Speaker Hoyle whooshed back to his feet and said he hoped there had been no insider-dealing on the stock market as a result.
Up in the gallery beside us blunt nibs, meanwhile, sat Lord Robertson, the Labour grandee and former Nato boss who led the defence review. Tories suggested he must be appalled by the goings-on. Lord Robertson looked to me as if he was enjoying the chaos enormously.
Finally we reached real points of debate. Jeremy Corbyn and a few Lefties complained about a breaking of nuclear non-proliferation treaty agreements. The Greens – Ellie Chowns from the SAS lands of Herefordshire, indeed – wailed that 'warheads don't buy a safer world'. Tory heckler: 'I think you'll find they do.' Debbie Abrahams (Lab, Oldham E) fretted about mental health. The Labour MP for Aldershot wanted a new bank. And the Lib Dems are no longer opposed to nukes. Provided they are fuelled by lentil gas, perhaps.
Mr Healey ground his jaw. He spoke of 'our island home' and said 'we must now move to war-fighting readiness'. His macho routine did not work as well as it usually does. When he claimed that Rachel Reeves had 'fixed the economic foundations', I regret to say that the House just laughed.
Not that Mr Healey will mind that the Treasury, which may be his more immediate foe than even the Kremlin, has now become a national joke.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Leader Live
36 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Parliament moves closer to setting up Iraq war-style inquiry into Gaza conflict
Parliament moved a step closer to setting up a probe after MPs agreed that the Gaza (Independent Public Inquiry) Bill should be listed for a debate later this year. The draft new law would 'require the inquiry to consider any UK military, economic or political co-operation with Israel since October 2023', the month when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel and killed around 1,200 people and kidnapped more than 250 others. Israel's retaliatory offensive has seen more than 54,000 people in Gaza killed, according to the territory's health ministry. 'Our future history books will report with shame those that had the opportunity to stop this carnage but failed to act to achieve it, and so we will continue our campaigns in this House and outside because we're appalled at what is happening,' the former Labour Party leader told the Commons. Mr Corbyn, the Independent MP for Islington North, had earlier said: 'In the aftermath of the Iraq war, several attempts were made to establish an inquiry surrounding the conduct of the British military operations. 'The government of the day spent many years resisting those attempts and those demands for an inquiry, however, they could not prevent the inevitable and in 2016 we had the publication of the Chilcot Inquiry, which Sir John Chilcot had undertaken over several years.' Mr Corbyn added that when he was the Labour leader, when the 12-volume report came out, he 'apologised on behalf of the Labour Party for the catastrophic decision to go to war in Iraq' and added: 'History is now repeating itself.' He warned that 'human beings have endured a level of horror and inhumanity that should haunt us all forever – entire families wiped out, limbs strewn across the street, mothers screaming for their children buried under the rubble, human beings torn to pieces, doctors performing amputations without anaesthetic, children picking grass and dirt from the ground thinking they might find something edible to eat'. Mr Corbyn alleged that the UK had a 'highly influential role in Israel's military operations', including by supplying weapons, and also said a future inquiry should seek the 'truth regarding the role of British military bases in Cyprus' and Government 'legal advice over an assessment of genocide'. He said the inquiry would uncover the 'murky history of what's gone on, the murky arms sales and the complicity in appalling acts of genocide'. Deputy Speaker Nus Ghani called 'order' when several MPs applauded, as Mr Corbyn presented his Bill. The Bill will be listed for its next debate on July 4.


New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
Labour MPs are revolting on Gaza
Photo by House of Commons It has been 606 days since the start of the war in Gaza and according to Gaza's health ministry, as of 5 May, 52,615 people have died. The conflict has reached a turning point; a 'dark new phase' as the Foreign Secretary David Lammy recently described it. Today, the US-backed organisation operating aid distribution centres in Gaza announced they would be closed all day. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) told people in Gaza this morning, that 'travel is prohibited…via the roads leading to the distribution centres, which are considered combat zones'. Entry into the areas around the distribution centres is 'strictly prohibited'. This follows an 11-week blockade of aid, food and water into Gaza, and attacks by Israeli forces on Palestinians near aid distribution centres, the last of which left at least 27 Palestinians dead (Israel's military has denied firing 'near or within' the site). On 19 May Keir Starmer signed a joint statement with the leaders of France and Canada strongly opposing Israel's military operations. But has the Prime Minister's position shifted tangibly yet? The UK has not recognised Palestine as an official nation and has not withdrawn from the F-35 jet fighter programme (the government's riposte for not withdrawing is that remaining in the programme is important for Nato's peace and security). These were two issues which Hamish Falconer, the minister for the Middle East, was quizzed on for more than an hour in the House of Commons today. Falconer was called in front of MPs to answer an Urgent Question (UQ) from the Labour MP for Liverpool Wavertree, Paula Barker. In his statement to the House, Falconer said Israel's block on aid into Gaza was 'unjustified' and 'inhumane'. The Israeli government's decision to 'expand its military operations in Gaza and severely restrict aid undermine' the push for peace and release of the remaining hostages. But he stopped short of telling MPs that any further action would be taken by the government. Unusually, all MPs who spoke in the session were united in the belief that the violence in Gaza must end. A row of back-bench Labour MPs, all of whom had attended the Red Line for Palestine protest which congregated in Parliament Square earlier that day, and many of whom were wearing red, loomed at the back of the chamber. They were joined by the independent MP Zarah Sultana, who used her question to criticise Lammy ('It is a disgrace that the Foreign Secretary isn't here. But it isn't surprising.') The group could be seen shaking their heads and rolling their eyes each time Falconer gave an unsatisfactory answer. As the MP who brought the UQ, Barker kicked off proceedings, asking the minister, 'what more evidence do we need to call this exactly what it is – a policy of annexation and genocide'. She added: 'History will not look kindly on this government.' Richard Burgon asked why, if the government had sanctioned Vladimir Putin after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, would it not sanction Israeli politicians. 'This reek of double standards,' he said, 'Netanyahu will see the government as weak, weak, a pushover and a joke.' Falconer responded: 'Let us not pretend this government has done nothing. We have taken measures, and we will continue to do so.' Meanwhile, various Conservative MPs also used this session to criticise the government. Kit Malthouse, the Tory MP for North West Hampshire pointed out that in the three weeks since Falconer last gave a commons statement on Gaza, Israel said it will establish 22 new settlements in the occupied West Bank. 'It feels like the whole House has been played,' said Malthouse. 'He shows up, he mouths the words and very occasionally the government leaks out just enough sanctions to keep the Labour benches from open revolt.' As Falconer responded ('I'm under no illusion of the severity of the situation we currently face'), Malthouse shouted back, incensed, 'they're killing dozens of people, every day'. The 90-minute session ended flatly. In the minutes afterwards, Jeremy Corbyn took his moment to present his Ten-Minute Rule Bill, which he had hoped might force the government's hand on Gaza, if sent to a vote of all MPs. (Falconer had already rejected Corbyn's request during the UQ, 'I do not see… what an independent inquiry would achieve'). Instead, it was waved through by the Deputy Speaker, who urged the independent MPs who had shouted 'no' in order to force a vote, to retract their objection unless they actually meant it. They all did so. It is now up to the government to decide whether to progress the bill. Corbyn pointed out that today's events in the Commons reveal that 'some politicians have finally started to backtrack'. He added: 'Perhaps they are frightened by the consequences of their inhumanity.' Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe It is clear now that the government can no longer rely on speeches and statements to convince MPs they are sufficiently committed to action on Gaza. Falconer's defence that the government is waiting for 'something to change' before its next move repeatedly fell flat. Because something has changed: Israel's actions in Palestine are clearly no longer simply an act of self-defence – but of systematic aggression. The government has run out of time for equivocation on Gaza – it is already starting to look weak. [See more: Inside No 10's new dysfunction] Related


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
New French patrol boats to address migrant crossings across English Channel
France has agreed to develop a plan to stop small boats at sea by the summer, following criticism of French authorities for allegedly allowing people smugglers to operate like a 'taxi' service. The French government is reportedly expanding its Navy with new patrol boats to intercept migrant boats before they reach the UK, aiming to have the strategy ready before President Macron's visit to London on July 8. The decision follows a surge in crossings, with over 1,000 people crossing the English Channel on Saturday, and reports of French police observing migrants boarding boats. Defence Secretary John Healey criticised France's inaction, stating Britain has 'lost control of its borders,' while Home Secretary Yvette Cooper urged France to intercept migrant boats at sea immediately. A French interior ministry source indicated a desire to change intervention protocols to allow operations in shallow waters, up to 300 metres from the coast, to intercept 'taxi boats,' with the goal of having 'shared guidelines' ready for the July summit; the UK has a £480m deal with France to prevent Channel crossings.