‘Melanesian Relationship Agreement' Endorsed At Bougainville Independence Talks
The talks concluded with the endorsement of a proposed 'Melanesian relationship agreement' that will be taken to the leaders of PNG and ABG during the last week of June., RNZ Pacific Senior Journalist
Delegates to this week's deliberations at Burnham Army base in New Zealand over Bougainville's quest for independence from Papua New Guinea placed emphasis on shared values and commitments.
Bougainville's Government has stated that it wants to be independent by September 2027.
The critical issue going into these talks centred on the difficulties the autonomous province has faced getting the results of its independence referendum tabled in the PNG parliament.
That referendum vote was overwhelmingly in favour of independence.
The meeting was closed to media.
This week's talks, held at what the PNG Prime Minister James Marape dubbed the 'spiritual home of the Bougainville peace process' led to a recognition of a need for a 'pathway to peace by peaceful means'.
In a statement, the parties reveal they want a solution that is homegrown and maintains a close, peaceful and enduring familial relationship between PNG and Bougainville.
The delegates called this a 'Melanesian Partnership'.
'Parties agreed on core elements of the proposed future political relationship and how to work with parliament for taking their agreement forward, including the integral role to be played by the bipartisan parliamentary committee on Bougainville.'
The talks concluded with the endorsement of a proposed 'Melanesian relationship agreement' that will be taken to the leaders of PNG and ABG during the last week of June.
The parties and the independent moderator, former New Zealand Governor-General Sir Jerry Mateparae, expressed deep appreciation for the support of the government and people of Aotearoa New Zealand and the United Nations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Ban on protesting outside homes rebalances freedom of expression and privacy rights
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has announced protesting outside someone's home will become an offence. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The government's ban on protesting outside someone's home will rebalance the right to freedom of expression and the right to privacy, a law professor says. But another academic has questioned whether a new law is necessary, and says police may struggle to enforce it. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith announced on Friday protesting outside someone's home would become an offence, punishable with a fine or jail time. While it would apply to all residences, Goldsmith said there had been increased reports of demonstrations targeting the homes of public figures like MPs, judges and other officials. Otago University law professor Andrew Geddis said current laws around protests only related to public settings. "Protests that take place outside someone's home really do intrude into a sort of domestic sphere where people usually feel they should be able to exist unperturbed and unthreatened," he said. "So this particular change in the law will help to restrike that balance." Otago University law professor Andrew Geddis. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly Geddis said the change would plug a legal gap highlighted by a Supreme Court ruling nearly two decades ago. The 2007 case, Brooker v Police, involved a man who was convicted of disorderly behaviour for standing outside a police officer's house playing the guitar and singing protest songs against her, he said. But the Supreme Court found his behaviour was not disorderly. "The Supreme Court said that disorderly behaviour only applies to the public consequences of your behaviour, how that affects the public place. "And just because it's intruding into someone's private home, that's not a consideration as to whether the protest is covered by disorderly behaviour," he said. It meant the balance between people's rights within their home and people's rights to protest in public was "out of whack", Geddis said. One of the judges noted the court's finding could lead to more protests outside people's homes, and Parliament would need to consider that at some point, he said. "It turns out he was right." Victoria University law professor Steven Price said police may find it hard to enforce the new law. Goldsmith said it would be tightly targeted and prohibit "unreasonable disruptions", but Price said the independent police watchdog's review of policing protests found officers struggled to make a call on that. "What the IPCA had to say about that ... is that police have trouble on the ground having to make fine distinctions about what's an unreasonable disruption and what's not, and that seems a fair point to make," he said. "But on the face of [Goldsmith's] press release, it doesn't really solve the problem." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
17 hours ago
- RNZ News
Dunedin councillor Jim O'Malley quits as committee chair over hostile work environment
Jim O'Malley. Photo: RNZ / Ian Telfer A Dunedin councillor has resigned from chairing a committee because of what he describes as a hostile work environment. In his resignation letter, councillor Jim O'Malley said he does not feel safe as the chair of the hearings committee as he feels targeted by the chief executive. He said he has doubts about the council's commitment to follow due process and natural justice. He is also calling for an investigation into behaviour of the chief executive and the processes for different hearings including the local alcohol policy. The Dunedin City Council has been contacted for comment. More to come...
RNZ News
17 hours ago
- RNZ News
Protesting at people's private homes to be outlawed
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Protesting outside someone's home is set to be made an offence, with the government introducing new legislation carrying fines or jail sentences if people target private residences. While it will apply to all residences, the justice minister said there had been increased reports of demonstrations targeting the homes of public figures like MPs, judges and other public officials. Paul Goldsmith said the right to protest was valued, and would remain that way. "The public's ability to demonstrate is a cornerstone of our free and democratic society. It is a key way for citizens to express themselves and engage in political activity." However, he said the right to privacy was also valued. "Everyone in New Zealand, and their families, should be able to expect peace and privacy in their own home, no matter what their daytime job is," he said. "Unreasonable intrusions into people's privacy are simply unacceptable." The law will only apply to demonstrations directed at a person in their home, and will consider factors like the time of day, duration, the demonstrators' actions, noise levels and distance to the premises. It will carry a maximum penalty of three months in jail or a fine up to $2000. The ability to protest is protected under the Bill of Rights Act, and would not change. But Goldsmith said all rights were subject to reasonable limitations, and this change was considered reasonable. Earlier this year, The Post reported Goldsmith was in discussions with Parliament's Speaker on legislative changes to protect MPs' safety. Parliamentary Service and Parliament's internal security services have been working with the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet since the end of last year on the issue. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
