logo
New Illinois bill would require homeschool families to notify state or face truancy

New Illinois bill would require homeschool families to notify state or face truancy

Axios01-04-2025

Illinois lawmakers are considering a new bill that would require parents to tell the state when they choose to home school their children.
Why it matters: Illinois does not require parents and guardians to notify schools when they pull kids from the district, leaving no mechanism to monitor if students are meeting necessary benchmarks.
Supporters of the bill say it will prevent kids from slipping through the cracks.
State of play: Current required subjects for home school students, according to the Illinois State Board of Education (ISBE), are: Language arts, math, biological and physical science, social studies, fine arts and physical development and health.
There are no specific classes or duration of study required in those subjects.
There is no requirement to administer tests, projects or grades or mandate to report any student assessment to the state.
Parents or guardians do not need a high school diploma or GED to homeschool.
Zoom in: The bill would require the ISBE to create a Homeschool Declaration Form that homeschool families submit to the school district where the child would otherwise attend.
If the form's not submitted, the student would be considered truant.
If a child wants to enroll in a public school or school activities, they will need to have required immunizations or a signed Certificate of Religious Exemption.
Context: Rep. Terra Costa Howard (D-Lombard), the bill's sponsor, told WGN she introduced the legislation in February after a ProPublica investigation last year reported on a homeschooled boy in central Illinois who told welfare officials he was beaten, denied food and had no school lessons.
Howard, who is also chair of the Adoption and Child Welfare Committee and an attorney involved in child welfare, said the concern in cases like that is the lack of adults who could spot and report signs of abuse at home.
"For the vast majority of homeschooling families, these changes will have minimal impact," Howard told Axios in a statement.
"The intent of this bill is to help in cases of child abuse, in which adults are claiming to 'homeschool' in an attempt to isolate children, or when families are flagrantly neglecting their legal responsibility to educate their children, in violation of the principles of homeschooling."
The other side: The Illinois Home School Association in a statement calls the bill "a very expensive unfunded mandate," and that many parents have chosen this route because "the public school system is clearly failing many of our students."
"This bill will not save lives. In every single case they have brought to us of an abused child not in school it has become clear that Child Protection Services already knew of the family and was stretched too thin to help," the association added.
Reality check: The bill would ask that parents maintain a simple portfolio providing evidence of education in required subjects, in the case that a truancy investigation is launched.
"Nothing in the bill provides for random investigations or 'checks' by a local school district or Regional Office of Education," Howard said.
Yes, but: ISBE does recommend that home schoolers check what colleges require if students plan on applying.
Zoom out: Homeschooling became more popular during the pandemic and stuck through the 2022-23 school year, a Washington Post analysis found.
The Post estimated there were between 1.9 million and 2.7 million home-schooled children in the United States that year.
Yes, but: Illinois is not included in the analysis since families are not required to notify the state when they decide to homeschool.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brown County and C. Reiss agree to lease Pulliam property, but not for coal
Brown County and C. Reiss agree to lease Pulliam property, but not for coal

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

Brown County and C. Reiss agree to lease Pulliam property, but not for coal

The Brown County Board voted to approve a deal June 5 with Green Bay and C. Reiss Co. to relocate the coal piles to the Fox River Terminal and use the former Pulliam site to store C. Reiss' bulk commodities. Many eyes were on Green Bay and Brown County this week as officials inched closer to a deal that had $15 million at stake. The deal marks a historic milestone to a decades-long effort to relocate the coal piles from its 125-year home at 115 W. Mason St. Under the agreement, C. Reiss will lease the former Pulliam power plant to store salt and other bulk commodities instead of coal. The terms still fulfill decades of community leaders' goal to free up prime riverfront property for industrial, commercial and residential use at the mouth of the Fox River. The Brown County Board unanimously voted to approve the terms of the agreement. Board member Dixon Wolfe was not at the meeting. Former Green Bay mayors Jim Schmitt and Paul Jadin awaited the County Board's momentous vote, along with state Sens. Eric Wimberger, R-Oconto, and Jamie Wall, D-Green Bay; and state Reps. David Steffen, R-Howard; Ben Franklin, R-De Pere; Ryan Spaude, D-Ashwaubenon; and Amaad Rivera-Wagner, D-Green Bay. C. Reiss will lease 16 acres of the Pulliam site to store bulk commodities. The coal piles will be housed at the Fox River Terminal. Lease payments with a rate of $350,000 per year with increases every five years during the first 25 years based on the Consumer Price Index. The length of the lease is 60 years and can be extended. The lease needs to be executed by Sept. 25, according to the agreement. The new plan is a notable shift from previous proposals that had intended to make the Pulliam site the new home of the coal piles. Key parties were sorting out the agreement just a few minutes before starting the County Board meeting June 5, Buckley said ahead of the vote. The board voted on the deal June 5, just hours before the deadline to retain the $15 million state grant. The Wisconsin Department of Administration gave the County Board until June 6 to approve terms of a deal after extending the deadline from the end of May. Brown County agrees to buy the 43.75-acre Pulliam site for $2.7 million in January 2021. Brown County approves the Pulliam site purchase and agrees to sell almost 10 acres of the site to GLC Minerals for an expansion in February 2021. Gov. Tony Evers awards the city and county a $15 million Neighborhood Investment Fund Program grant funded through American Rescue Plan Act dollars in March 2022. Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg presents the county with a federal $10.1 million Port Infrastructure Development grant to support the project in May 2023. Offers, counteroffers and rejections began in mid-December 2024 when the county officials and C. Reiss tentatively agreed to a $26 million plan that would lease 14.5 acres of the Pulliam property to C. Reiss for up to 75 years at a rate of $110,000 per year with an annual 2.5% increase. The County Board on Dec. 18, 2024, approved modified terms that reduced the lease to 40 years, changed the portion of the Pulliam property C. Reiss would use and added air quality compliance measures. C. Reiss considered the changes a rejection of the negotiated deal. The county's Port of Green Bay published a request for companies' general interest in using the new port site envisioned for the Pulliam property in January 2025. C. Reiss was one of eight to respond with a $28.5 million proposal to improve and use the Pulliam site for coal storage. C. Reiss in mid-March formally rejected the County Board's terms and proposed the county and company spend several months negotiating a deal. The County Board on March 19 rejected the company's offer. The county instead sought to shift negotiations to two alternate sites for coal storage, saying the Pulliam property's future use would be determined by the request for interest process. State officials in March gave the county, company and city a May 30 deadline to reach a deal to relocate the coal piles to the Pulliam site or lose the $15 million grant. Two new proposals emerged in late May as the county, company and city jointly met to discuss options and ideas. State Sen. Eric Wimberger, R-Oconto, on May 23 asked the state to extend the May 30 deadline and the Department of Administration did so on May 30, giving the parties until June 3. Brown County and C. Reiss reached a tentative agreement June 3 and announced the parties would put together the terms in writing June 4 and 5. More: Who still uses coal? Answers to questions about Green Bay coal piles and the possible move More: Brown County, C. Reiss strike deal to move coal piles after extensive negotiations Press-Gazette reporter Jeff Bollier contributed to this report. Contact Benita Mathew at bmathew@ This article originally appeared on Green Bay Press-Gazette: Brown County votes on C. Reiss deal for coal piles

Non-profit fears for future of blindness research if Donald Trump's budget passes
Non-profit fears for future of blindness research if Donald Trump's budget passes

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

Non-profit fears for future of blindness research if Donald Trump's budget passes

LAKE COUNTY, Ill. (WGN) — Proposed federal funding cuts are hitting home in Lake County, especially when it comes to the blind. The Foundation Fighting Blindness, a Maryland-based non-profit organization who organizes the Chicago Vision Walk, fears clinical trials and promising new treatments for blindness and retinal disease will be frozen or canceled if President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' passes into law. 'Six years old was when I got the diagnosis,' Rich Idstein said. 'It's tough.' Idstein is a legally blind man who works at Ace Hardware in Libertyville. He suffers from Retinitis Pigmentosa, a blinding retinal disease with no cure. Idstein and his two brothers all suffer from the same disease, which gets progressively worse with age. At the age of 52, Idstein figures he has five-to-ten years left before he's completely blind, but he's hoping clinical trials through the National Institutes of Health will lead to new treatments. 'We are driving research for therapies. They're called gene therapies that can replace or fix that code,' said Ben Shaberman, Vice President of Communications for the Foundation Fighting Blindness (FFB). 'So, the cells in the retina work correctly, and vision can be saved or restored.' The problem is, under Trump's proposed budget, the NIH is facing a potential 40% funding cut to medical research, which would directly impact the dollars going toward the clinical trials that Idstein hopes can help cure the disease that's plagued he and his brothers. The FFB has raised nearly $1 billion over the past five decades for eye and vision research, but its mission could be severely impacted if Congress doesn't act. For more info on the FFB, visit their website: Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Another $1.6M SNAP benefits stolen as ‘big beautiful bill' looks to save
Another $1.6M SNAP benefits stolen as ‘big beautiful bill' looks to save

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

Another $1.6M SNAP benefits stolen as ‘big beautiful bill' looks to save

(WGN) — Food benefits are on the chopping block as part of a bill dubbed by President Trump as 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' It passed the House and is now in the hands of the Senate. Critics argue it doesn't address a problem with the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP that could save millions of dollars. WGN Investigates: Investigating public corruption, crime & fraud In Illinois, about 15% of the population relies on food benefits. The proposed legislation would, among other things, shift some of the cost to states and expand work requirements for recipients. One SNAP recipient who was featured in a recent WGN Investigates story about stolen benefits says she wants to see the bill address the millions of dollars stolen using skimming devices instead of looking for ways to make cuts. Previous Coverage: Stolen SNAP dollars will no longer be replaced WGN Investigates search of state and federal data portals reveal another $1.6 million in stolen benefits were reported to the IL. Department of Human Services in the first three months of this year. In all – Illinois has reported $24 million in stolen benefits over the last few years. Nationwide – the federal government has replaced $322 million in stolen benefits. Brandon Duke with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities says, 'I don't see much here on enhancing the technology behind the SNAP program and those sorts of things. But instead cutting benefits in one way or another for families trying to get by.' It's possible that other bills could tackle ways to protect the food benefit cards by implementing better technology. Later this year Illinois is expected to be part of a pilot program that would equip cards with chips, making them harder to tap into. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store