Boar's Head plans to reopen troubled deli meat plant, but reports of sanitation problems persist
But recent inspections at Boar's Head sites in three states documented sanitation problems similar to those that led to the listeria contamination that killed 10 people and sickened dozens.
The Jarratt, Virginia, plant was shut down in September when U.S. Agriculture Department officials suspended operations and withdrew the federal marks of inspection required to operate, saying the company 'failed to maintain sanitary conditions.' Boar's Head permanently stopped making liverwurst and recalled more than 7 million pounds of deli products.
USDA officials this week said they had 'thoroughly reviewed' the plant and lifted the forced suspension on July 18.
'The facility is in full compliance of the guidelines and protocols set for the safe handling and production of food and the serious issues that led to suspension have been fully rectified,' officials with the USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service said in an email Wednesday.
And yet, documents obtained by The Associated Press through a freedom of information request show that Boar's Head plants in Arkansas, Indiana and elsewhere in Virginia were flagged for the same kinds of sanitation problems that led to the outbreak, with the most recent report in June.
In the past seven months, government inspectors reported problems that include instances of meat and fat residue left on equipment and walls, drains blocked with meat products, beaded condensation on ceilings and floors, overflowing trash cans, and staff who didn't wear protective hairnets and plastic aprons — or wash their hands.
The records, which included USDA noncompliance reports logged by inspectors from Jan. 1 through July 23, raise new questions about the company's promises to address systemic problems and about federal oversight of listeria contamination in plants that make ready-to-eat foods.
'If there is evidence that food safety problems are continuing, the government needs to make sure the company fixes them,' said Sandra Eskin, a former USDA official who now heads STOP Foodborne Illness, a consumer group focused on food safety.
Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins last month announced plans to bolster efforts that combat foodborne germs, including listeria.
Jobs posted in Virginia
Officials at Boar's Head, the 120-year-old company based in Sarasota, Florida, have posted job openings for two dozen positions, including a food safety quality analyst, at the Jarratt site.
The company convened a panel of expert advisers last fall and hired a chief food safety officer in May. The advisers include Frank Yiannas, a former U.S. Food and Drug Administration official, and Mindy Brashears, President Donald Trump's nominee for USDA's undersecretary for food safety.
Boar's Head last year said they 'regret and deeply apologize' for the contamination and that 'comprehensive measures are being implemented to prevent such an incident from ever happening again.'
But company officials refused to discuss the problems found this year. They canceled a scheduled AP interview with Natalie Dyenson, the new food safety officer. And they declined to allow Yiannas to detail the investigation he led into the contamination's cause.
Brashears, who now directs a food safety center at Texas Tech University, did not respond to requests for comment about the Boar's Head problems. An automatic email reply said the USDA nominee was traveling out of the country until Aug. 25. She remains on the company's food safety board.
'Boar's Head has an unwavering commitment to food safety and quality. That commitment is reflected in recent enhancements to our practices and protocols' described on the company's website, Boar's Head said in an emailed statement.
'We have also been working with the USDA in developing a plan to reopen our Jarratt facility in a measured, deliberate way in the coming months,' the statement said.
Inadequate sanitation practices
The 35 pages of new inspection findings cover Boar's Head sites in Forrest City, Arkansas; New Castle, Indiana; and Petersburg, Virginia.
They surprised outside food safety advocates, who said that factory conditions should have improved in the year since the outbreak was first identified.
'You would have expected after all they went through that they would put themselves in a place where you could essentially eat deli meat off the factory floor,' said Brian Ronholm, director of food policy for Consumer Reports, an advocacy group.
Rep. Rosa DeLauro called the findings 'appalling.'
'This is a pattern of negligence — cutting corners to protect the company's bottom line at the expense of consumers and these conditions show a complete disregard for food safety and for the public health of the American people,' the Connecticut Democrat said in a statement.
The findings echo the 'inadequate sanitation practices' that USDA officials said contributed to the outbreak. Key factors included product residue, condensation and structural problems in the buildings, a January report concluded.
At the Jarratt plant, state inspectors working in partnership with USDA had documented mold, insects, liquid dripping from ceilings, and meat and fat residue on walls, floors and equipment, the AP previously reported.
While no instances of insects were documented in this year's inspection reports, there were repeated reports of 'dried fat and protein from the previous day's production' on equipment, stairs and walls. In April, an inspector at the Petersburg plant reported finding discarded meat underneath equipment, including '5-6 hams, 4 large pieces of meat and a large quantity of pooling meat juice.'
Other reports detailed beaded condensation 'directly over the food contact surfaces of tables and conveyor belts.' Additional reports documented rusting meat racks, doors that failed to close completely and staff who ignored required handwashing stations.
The reports point to a 'food safety culture problem,' said Barbara Kowalcyk, who directs a food safety and nutrition security center at George Washington University.
'What jumped out to me is there is an organizational culture issue that needs to be changed,' she said. 'Usually that culture has to start at the top.'
In the meantime, she advised consumers to think carefully about deli meat consumption. Older people and those who are pregnant or have weakened immune systems are especially vulnerable to serious illness from listeria infections.
'I think they need to be aware that there are issues at this organization that still are not completely under control, apparently,' Kowalcyk said.
Boar's Head faced multiple lawsuits from people who fell ill or from the families of those who died. Several survivors declined to comment publicly on the new problems, citing financial settlements with the company that included nondisclosure agreements.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Schools brace for MAHA changes to lunches
The Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement is taking aim at school lunches in a move advocates say is unrealistic without devoting more federal resources to K-12 students. While some schools can only afford to buy frozen meals that are heated up and served, the Trump administration is looking for freshly cooked meals that will take more employees and ingredients to put together. The MAHA Commission was required to send over recommendations to the White House by Tuesday to combat childhood chronic diseases, a document experts and advocates are eagerly awaiting. But three people familiar with the matter told CNN the report will not be released immediately to the public, keeping schools on their toes as it is expected to impact their food. 'We're guessing at this point what we think that the report is going to say around school nutrition, but we have a few hints. RFK Jr. has said that school lunch programs have deteriorated. He's mentioned how many ultraprocessed foods are in school meals. He's suggested that school meals are poisoning children. … I think we're all pretty much anticipating something around that,' said Meghan Maroney, campaign manager for federal child nutrition programs at the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has railed against school lunches before, saying the ultraprocessed food and food dyes are hurting student health. He has moved to ban artificial food dyes from the nation's supply chain and has pushed fast food chains to cook their food in beef tallow over seed oils. 'We need to stop poisoning our kids and make sure that Americans are once again the healthiest kids on the planet,' Kennedy said in April. He has celebrated states such as Utah, West Virginia and Arizona, where certain dyes and processed food were banned from school lunches. But other moves by the Trump administration, advocates argue, have been counterintuitive to helping schools produce fresh meals. The U.S. Agriculture Department (USDA) in the spring ended two programs, totaling $1 billion, that helped schools buy food from local farmers and producers. USDA is in charge of the nutrition standards for the National School Lunch Program. 'They are being asked to create healthy and appealing meals on very slim budgets, and there have been things that have been happening recently that have taken away even more of their resources,' said Alexis Bylander, director of child nutrition programs and policy at the Food Research & Action Center. 'I think what this really comes down to is, are the recommendations going to provide enough resources so that schools really can enhance the quality and appeal of the meals that they are serving?' she added. In Oklahoma, Ryan Walters, the state superintendent of public instruction, has already been working on implementing the MAHA agenda in school food, saying schools can no longer serve food that is ultraprocessed or grown with pesticides and processed snacks in vending machines. The districts are expected to overhaul the foods without additional room in the budget. 'What we're seeing with the MAHA movement as it's applied in our state is lots of talk about restriction and what people can have and what choices they can make, but not a lot of talk about making sure people have access to the healthy things they need or the resources they need to not be food insecure … because, ultimately, if you don't have access to enough food, nutritious or not, your health outcomes are worse than if you do,' said Chris Bernard, CEO and president of Hunger Free Oklahoma. Along with changes to food costs, schools would have to pay for more employees to make the food and, in some cases, would need to acquire equipment to be able to handle making fresh food for hundreds of students every day. The Hill has reached out to HHS for comment. Some are hoping for a definitive set of markers to build upon for what types of food should be served and what the cost will be. 'When we establish that baseline, then we can move from it, then we actually have something that we can achieve goals and we can achieve targets with,' said Gregory Bundschoks, founder for the Foundation of Healthy Schools. He added that there needs to be 'consistency' for businesses trying to make a profit while also remaining within the new mandates. Advocates note school food is the healthiest many students eat and, for some, it might be the only full meal they get in a day. While schools have partnered with some nonprofits to help bring fresher meals to their students, not every district is able to afford it. According to USDA, in 2023, 1 in 5 children were unsure where their next meal would come from. Black, Latino and single-family households were more likely to be food insecure. 'I do think school meals are one of the last remaining universal public school services that are reaching every child, nearly in America … so making school the ideal environment to shape their wellness behavior, and a lot of that starts with food,' said Alexina Cather, director of policy and special projects for Wellness in the Schools. 'As we see increasing rates of food insecurity, food again at school becomes one of the places that kids can be guaranteed a nutritious meal if we put that energy and effort into making sure that's a nutritious meal,' she added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lilly's Mounjaro Exhibits Heart Benefits In Type 2 Diabetes Landmark Trial
Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) is among the 11 Best GLP-1 and Weight Loss Stocks to Invest in. Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) revealed the topline results of the SURPASS-CVOT Phase 3 trial, which showed that Mounjaro (tirzepatide) was non-inferior to Trulicity (dulaglutide) in reducing significant cardiovascular events (MACE-3) among more than 13,000 adults with cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Mounjaro reported higher decreases in body weight (−11.43 kg vs. −4.65 kg), A1C (1.73% vs. 0.90%), and a slowed decline in kidney function by 3.54 mL/min/1.73 m² at 36 months, along with a drop in all-cause mortality by 16%. Mounjaro, a GIP/GLP-1 dual receptor agonist, performed better than Trulicity, a GLP-1 agonist, in several important endpoints in the longest and most extensive tirzepatide trial to date. The 4.5-year research, which covered 30 countries, reaffirmed Mounjaro's tolerability and safety. According to a predetermined indirect analysis, Mounjaro decreased all-cause mortality by 39% and MACE-3 by 28% when compared to a placebo. Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) will discuss all of the findings at the 2025 EASD meeting and aims to submit regulatory applications by year's end. While we acknowledge the potential of LLY as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 High-Growth EV Stocks to Invest In and 13 Best Car Stocks to Buy in 2025. Disclosure. None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Washington Post
17 hours ago
- Washington Post
Appeals court upholds Arkansas ban on gender-affirming care for minors
A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld a 2021 Arkansas law banning gender-affirming care for minors, ruling that parents 'do not have unlimited authority to make medical decisions for their children.' The St. Louis-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit ruled 8-2 that the Save Adolescents From Experimentation Act does not discriminate against transgender people or violate the rights of medical professionals — rejecting a closely watched challenge to the nation's first-of-its-kind ban on gender transition treatment for transgender youth. The SAFE Act also prohibits doctors from referring trans youth to other providers for gender-affirming care, which can include puberty blockers and hormone therapy, among other treatments. Tuesday's ruling follows the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in June, upholding Tennessee's similar ban on gender-affirming care for minors. In the court's majority opinion, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote that Tennessee's ban does not discriminate on the basis of sex and that courts must give elected officials wide latitude to pass legislation when there is scientific and policy debate about the safety of such medical treatments. The 8th Circuit cited the Supreme Court's ruling in U.S. v. Skrmetti throughout its majority opinion. Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin (R) praised the 8th Circuit's decision Tuesday. 'I applaud the court's decision recognizing that Arkansas has a compelling interest in protecting the physical and psychological health of children and am pleased that children in Arkansas will be protected from risky, experimental procedures with lifelong consequences,' Griffin said in a statement. The American Civil Liberties Association — which brought the original challenge to the 2021 law alongside a doctor who provided gender-affirming care in the state and four transgender youths and their families — slammed the ruling. 'This is a tragically unjust result for transgender Arkansans, their doctors, and their families,' Holly Dickson, executive director of the ACLU of Arkansas, said in a statement Tuesday. 'The state had every opportunity and failed at every turn to prove that this law helps children; in fact, this is a dangerous law that harms children. The law has already had a profound impact on families across Arkansas who all deserve a fundamental right to do what is best for their children.' Griffin and the state's medical board filed the appeal with the 8th Circuit in July 2023, after U.S. District Judge James Moody of the Eastern District of Arkansas blocked them from enforcing the state's ban on medical treatment for transitioning young people. Moody had said the ban violated the rights of transgender people and endangered their health: 'Rather than protecting children or safeguarding medical ethics, the evidence showed that the prohibited medical care improves the mental health and well-being of patients and that, by prohibiting it, the state undermined the interests it claims to be advancing.' The 8th Circuit, sitting en banc, reversed Moody's ruling. 'The minors argue that the Act classifies based on sex in violation of the Equal Protection Clause. They argue that a minor's sex determines whether he or she can receive certain medical treatments,' Judge Duane Benton wrote in the 8th Circuit's majority opinion. 'To the contrary, as the Supreme Court explained about a similar Tennessee law, the Act classifies based only on age and medical procedure.' 'The minors alternatively assert that the Act discriminates based on transgender status,' Benton wrote. 'To the contrary, the Act does not classify based on transgender status. Like the Tennessee law upheld by the Supreme Court, the Act effectively divides minors into two groups. In one group are minors seeking drugs or surgeries for the purposes that the Act prohibits. In the other group are minors seeking drugs or surgeries for purposes the Act does not prohibit.'