
Father accused of shaking his infant daughter walks free from court as jury acquits him of all charges
A 31-year-old man has walked free from court after a jury found him not guilty of a series of charges where it was alleged that he had shaken his five-month-old daughter and caused her harm and unnecessary suffering.
The man, who cannot be named to protect the identity of his daughter, denied all three charges, which the State alleged occurred while the infant was in his care at their family home in
Cork
over a six-week period between November 25th, 2020, and January 4th, 2021.
He was charged with causing serious harm to the child on January 4th, 2021, and with assault causing harm to the child between November 25th and December 15th, 2020.
The man was also charged with wilfully assaulting or ill-treating the child in a manner likely to cause unnecessary suffering to the child's health or seriously affect the child's wellbeing.
READ MORE
A jury of five men and seven women at Cork
Circuit Criminal Court
on Friday unanimously found the man not guilty of the assault causing harm charge. They returned majority verdicts acquitting him of the charges of causing serious harm and ill-treatment.
Judge Dermot Sheehan thanked the jury for their diligence and deliberation before informing the accused that he was free to go. The man was immediately embraced by his mother, who had sat through the nine-day trial at Anglesea Street courthouse in Cork.
Prosecution counsel Jane Hyland SC had called evidence from consultant paediatrician Dr Rosina McGovern, who said the accused and his partner brought the child to
Cork University Hospital
on January 4th, 2021, and offered no explanation for the many injuries the child had.
These included bruises on her face, cheek, stomach, abdomen and buttock and abrasions on her forehead, cheek and nose, and a fractured collarbone. A CT scan showed bleeding on the brain and behind the eyes – injuries the court heard are usually associated with a high-impact collision such as a car crash.
Dr McGovern said the brain injuries, which were caused by a back-and-forth acceleration and deceleration movement, were consistent with abusive head trauma or
shaken baby syndrome
. She said she believed the injuries constituted serious harm as defined in Irish law.
However, the accused testified that he had never shaken the baby. He said he told social workers he had done so in an attempt to ensure his partner would keep the child, who they feared they might never get to see again if one of them did not say he had shaken the girl.
He also said that earlier admissions about twice dropping the child accidentally were similarly made in order to provide an explanation to the hospital authorities for the child's injuries. He said they were told they would not be allowed to take the child home until the injuries were explained.
The accused spent almost three hours in the witness box and his mother and his partner's mother also gave evidence, as did hospital consultants, social workers and investigating gardaí. The infant's mother did not attend the hearing or give evidence.
Defence counsel Ray Boland SC made reference to the fact that the infant's mother was not called by the prosecution. He said the jury needed to pay particular heed to her absence, given how central she was to the narrative proposed by the prosecution.
'It is a huge [mother's name]-shaped hole in the case. Does [mother's name] look like a person who would shake a baby? We don't know. And we don't know why the DPP did not bring her,' he said to the jury.
Mr Boland also suggested to the jury that only 'an eejit' would make admissions that he did something such as shake the baby if they had not done it. However, he said his client had done that was because he was young and out of his depth among professionals such as doctors and social workers.
The jury heard memos of interviews from when gardaí questioned the accused.
'I didn't shake her, I swear to God I didn't do it,' he said. 'I know somebody did shake her, but I don't know who. I will maintain my innocence until the day I die. I did not shake my baby.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Garda inquiry into Evan Fitzgerald followed tip-off Irish person trying to buy guns on darknet
The Garda investigation into 22-year-old Evan Fitzgerald over his alleged efforts to buy guns on the darknet started after an international law enforcement agency provided information to the force , it is understood. That intelligence, which appears to have come through Interpol , suggested an unknown person in the Republic was on the darknet trying to buy guns. Acting on the information, the Garda Drugs and Organised Crime Bureau established contact with the Irish suspect. It is understood that undercover gardaí made contact with the person, on the darknet, while posing as a criminal with guns for sale. The Irish Times understands agreement was reached that weapons would be sold, with cash paid and the guns delivered by undercover officers in an investigative process known as 'controlled delivery'. READ MORE However, after delivery of the firearms – a machine gun and pistol, with ammunition – a Garda interception was made. The guns and bullets were seized and Fitzgerald was charged with four offences following the sting operation early last year. A search of a property linked to him yielded an assortment of ammunition, as well as powders that can be used to make explosive devices. That discovery resulted in Fitzgerald being charged with nine further offences. Fitzgerald, of Portrushen, Kiltegan, Co Wicklow, was facing 13 charges and was at liberty on bail when he went to the Fairgreen Shopping Centre in Carlow town last Sunday week, firing several shots and taking his own life. The gun he used, a stolen shotgun legally held by another person, was unrelated to the undercover operation that resulted in his arrest early last year. The guns used by the undercover gardaí in the 2024 sting operation were taken from Garda stores. They had been decommissioned and the ammunition was non-functioning. When arrested in early 2024, Mr Fitzgerald made admissions. His first court appearance was told that there was no suspicion he wanted the guns to further any involvement in organised crime. Instead, he had acted in a 'naive' way in trying to buy guns for recreational shooting. Concerns have been raised by Labour TD Alan Kelly and Senator Michael McDowell, the former minister for justice, about the manner of Fitzgerald's arrest and the charges against him. Both have questioned why an alternative, unspecified, legal option was not used to deal with him, rather than his being charged with possession of the guns and ammunition. In reply to queries, Garda headquarters said it could not comment on a specific case. However, commenting in general terms, it said gardaí use 'a range of internationally recognised investigative techniques when tackling serious crimes such as drug dealing and procuring of firearms, either of which could then be used to cause significant harm to the public. 'One of these is controlled deliveries. In controlled deliveries any material used is made safe by the law enforcement agency before being used, [for example], firearms are deactivated.' On Wednesday, Mr Kelly and Mr McDowell raised the case in the Dáil and Seanad, asking about court reports that suggested gardaí had told the judge in the case that they were 'investigating' how Fitzgerald and others acquired the guns. 'The guns were actually given to him by An Garda Síochána ... how could they say in court that they didn't know where the guns came from?' asked Mr Kelly. In the Seanad, Mr McDowell said: 'I am also very deeply concerned that by informing the court that the gardaí were still investigating by whom the weapons in question were sold; the court was actively misled.'


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Dublin firefighter accused of raping woman in Boston hotel says he ‘didn't touch' her, US court hears
The Dublin firefighter arrested on rape charges over St Patrick's Day weekend last year told Boston detectives he 'didn't touch' the female complainant in an audio played in a US court on Wednesday. The complainant, a 29-year-old attorney, claims she was raped by Terence Crosbie (39) while his Dublin Fire Brigade colleague Liam O'Brien slept in a separate bed in a shared hotel room. She said she had consensual relations with Mr O'Brien after meeting him at The Black Rose bar in Boston. She subsequently fell asleep and, she says, later woke up to a man raping her. The man was later identified as Mr Crosbie. He denies the charges and has pleaded not guilty. READ MORE On Wednesday, the third day of the trial in Boston, jurors heard an audio recording of Mr Crosbie denying having sex with the woman, touching her or finding her in his bed when he returned to his room at the Omni Parker House hotel in Boston in the early hours of March 15th, 2024. 'There's nothing missing there, there's nothing I'm skipping, there's nothing I'm leaving out,' Mr Crosbie said, after repeated questioning by the detectives. Boston Police detective Joseph McDonough testified that the woman did not recall Mr O'Brien's name and did not recall meeting Mr Crosbie before the alleged assault. The court was told that the detective tracked down Mr Crosbie with the help of hotel security footage as well as images of Mr O'Brien and Mr Crosbie provided to him by a federal agent. He said that on March 16th, 2024 – a day after the complainant reported the rape – he approached Mr Crosbie by the lift of the hotel. Detectives initially asked Mr Crosbie of his whereabouts on March 14th and March 15th. Mr Crosbie said he was one of 10 members of Dublin Fire Brigade who travelled to Boston to march in the city's St Patrick's Day parade. He said that he interacted with the woman, later identified as the complainant, on Thursday night at The Black Rose bar and again briefly, when the woman went up to the hotel room with Mr O'Brien. The Black Rose Irish pub in Boston Mr Crosbie said he waited in a chair in the corridor outside of room 610 while the complainant and Mr O'Brien were inside. He told detectives that when he returned to the room, he knocked on the door, used his phone as a torch and 'didn't see anybody in the bed'. Mr Crosbie said he removed his pants and shirt, pulled the bed covers off while still wearing his boxer shorts and got into the bed. A minute and a half after he laid down, he said he 'heard a girl moving' and saw her collect her belongings in the dark and leave. He told detectives he did not have any interactions with the complainant before she left. 'Didn't say hello, didn't say goodbye, didn't say anything,' Mr Crosbie said. When detectives asked whether Mr Crosbie had sex with the woman, he replied: 'No, I didn't touch her.' The detectives also asked Mr Crosbie if the woman was crying as she left. 'I don't know – it didn't sound like she was crying,' he replied. Mr Crosbie was arrested later that evening after booking an early flight back to Ireland and boarding a plane. The detective seized Mr Crosbie's luggage and took photos of his clothing, including a series of specialised T-shirts and jumpers with emblems featuring American flags in the shape of shamrocks and embroidered lettering saying: 'Dublin Fire Brigade Boston 2024.' Mr Crosbie was identified as wearing similar clothing in surveillance video taken of The Black Rose and the Omni Parker House hotel shown to the court. The Omni Parker House hotel in Boston where the woman alleges she was raped. The woman previously testified that she and Mr O'Brien had consensual sex and then she fell asleep in a separate bed. She told the court in tears that she 'woke up to somebody on top of me' and they were raping her. She said the man, alleged to be Mr Crosbie, disparaged Mr O'Brien while assaulting her. She claimed that while Mr Crosbie was having sex with her, he said: 'I know you want this; [Mr O'Brien] can't even do this for you – what a loser.' She testified that she told him to 'stop' and that she eventually managed to manoeuvre her legs off the side of the bed and break free. According to the complainant, Mr Crosbie continued to follow her around the hotel room. When she collected her clothes and went to the bathroom, she said Mr Crosbie tried to get in and 'was jiggling the handle' after she locked the door. Under cross examination on Wednesday, Mr Crosbie's defence attorney Daniel C Reilly asked Mr McDonough about discrepancies in the complainant's earlier interviews. Mr Reilly asserted that the woman did not provide detectives with details of Mr Crosbie attempting to push his way into the bathroom until April 8th – weeks after the alleged assault – in an email. 'In her prior interviews she did not mention being in a separate bed [from Mr O'Brien] when Mr Crosbie arrived,' Mr Reilly said. Mr McDonough confirmed that was correct. Jurors previously heard that Mr O'Brien was listed as a potential witness as part of the jury selection process. On Wednesday Mr Reilly said 'Mr O'Brien declined to participate in this trial'. Mr McDonough said that was correct. On Wednesday, jurors also heard from Lindsey Walsh, a physician at Massachusetts General Hospital, and the second medical professional to testify that the woman was found to be suffering from a vaginal tear hours after the alleged assault.


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Attorney general scandal adds to Spanish government woes
The unprecedented legal action being taken against Spain 's attorney general which could see him go on trial and has fuelled calls for his resignation is just the latest in a litany of scandals which have left the Socialist-led government of Pedro Sánchez struggling for stability. This week, a supreme court investigating judge recommended that the attorney general, Álvaro García Ortiz, should face trial for his alleged role in leaking secret information to the media about a tax fraudster. In March 2024, Spanish media reported details of a plea deal which Alberto González Amador, boyfriend of the conservative president of the Madrid regional government Isabel Díaz Ayuso, had proposed to the general attorney's office. The tax office had found that González Amador had avoided paying about €350,000 from earnings made from importing healthcare material during the Covid-19 pandemic. READ MORE The media reports corrected a false claim made by Díaz Ayuso's team that the attorney general's office had been the one to offer a deal. The investigating judge, Ángel Luis Hurtado, has now accused the attorney general himself of being the source of the reports. According to the judge, the leak aimed 'to make clear that, according to [García Ortiz], the attorney general had not offered any deal of this kind'. Díaz Ayuso, a prominent figure on the right, has been a fierce critic of the government. If he does go on trial, which now looks likely, and were to be found guilty, García Ortiz could receive a jail sentence of up to four years. However, the most damaging allegation, as far as the government is concerned, was that the attorney general, who it proposed for the post, was acting on the orders of the prime minister's office. The left-wing coalition government has staunchly defended the attorney general and justice minister Félix Bolanos flatly denied the claim the government was involved in the leak. [ Catalan amnesty expected to get court blessing amid political turmoil Opens in new window ] 'I regret very much that the supreme court should make such a serious assertion without any evidence, because that never happened,' he said. However, the opposition says García Ortiz cannot remain in his post. 'The situation regarding the attorney general is unprecedented in our democracy, you must demand his resignation,' Alberto Núñez Feijóo, the leader of the conservative Popular Party (PP), told Sánchez in Congress on Wednesday. The opposition leader has cast this as the latest in a series of scandals to affect the government. Sánchez's wife, Begona Gómez, has been investigated for possible business irregularities and his musician brother, David, is due to go on trial for alleged influence peddling in being appointed to a public post. A former Socialist minister, José Luis Ábalos, is being investigated on suspicion of profiting from a kickback scheme when he was in government. Meanwhile, a former Socialist party official, Leire Díez, has been caught on tape offering favourable treatment to a businessman in exchange for incriminating information on the police unit carrying out investigations into several cases affecting the government. Many judicial experts have said the attorney general's position is untenable. However, a large number have also expressed concerns about the judge's investigation, pointing to an apparent lack of evidence against García Ortiz. Tensions between the government and the judiciary have been escalating since Sánchez's administration introduced an amnesty law for Catalan nationalists last year. Many on the left see the ongoing investigations as part of a campaign by magistrates with right-wing allegiances. Government spokeswoman Pilar Alegría said that 'at this point certain judges are doing things which are difficult to understand'. A recent poll by the national statistics institute found that 78 per cent of Spaniards do not trust the impartiality of their justice system in cases involving political parties.