logo
Israel-Iran War: Targeting & Taming The Octopus

Israel-Iran War: Targeting & Taming The Octopus

News1817-07-2025
Last Updated:
India enjoys good relations with both Iran and Israel and is not in a position to pick sides
Israel and Iran war has moved into the second week with large exchange of aerial and ballistic missiles and with very little respite.
In a much-anticipated preemptive air strike with 200 jet aircraft, Israel struck more than 100 targets in Iran last week targeting nuclear assets and the command structure of Iran. The Mossad had infiltrated and neutralised anti-aircraft assets of Iran by firing huge numbers of drones from within Iran.
It may be recalled that Iran has a minority population of 10,000 Jews down from 1,00,000 before the Iranian revolution.
Four Generals of top military command and ten scientists working on the nuclear installations were eliminated in the first offensive. Ten cities have been targeted and nuclear assets have been degraded up to some extent.
In the second week, the United States of America (USA) has joined Israel in targeting and degrading the underground nuclear assets of Iran where the Israelis did not have the penetrating power. Operation Midnight Hammer was a lightning campaign in which B-2 Stealth Bombers attacked Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan and caused appreciable destruction to the underground assets.
The stated strategic aim of Israel to carry out the preemptive strike was to neutralise the nuclear and ballistic assets and affect a regime change in Iran after a popular uprising among the people against the Mullahs. They also targeted and successfully eliminated the higher civil and military leadership with the aim of creating a psychological paralysis in the nerve centre of the besieged nation.
The US, Israel and Iran may be in for a long haul, taking a cue from the Russian-Ukrainian war and the war in Gaza. In effect, Israel has helped the Iranian regime in rallying masses to show their commitment to their nation and for the timebeing all opposition to the Islamic regime has been put on the back burner.
President Donald Trump has yet again proved to be a transactional leader. He lulled the Iranians into having fifth round of talks on Iranian nuclear programme and was fully in picture when the Israelis attacked just before the talks. While declaring that he will take up to two weeks to decide whether to attack Iran or not, he had already passed orders for deploying the forces.
After the midnight attacks on Iran's underground nuclear assets which US claims to be a great success, he is again talking about peace and exhorting Iran to come to negotiation table!
The peace seeking or the Nobel Prize-seeking President has come out in the open and attacked Iran which no other POTUS dared to do. Is North Korea listening and taking note? This brazen attack on the sovereignty and security of a distant nation by Israel and USA may also act as a carte blanche for China to move into Taiwan or Arunachal Pradesh.
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khameini vowed punishment to the aggressor and launched hundreds of ballistic missiles onto the Israeli cities targeting Israel's cybersecurity centers and nuclear facilities mainly in the southern part of the country. For once, the volume of Iranian attack overwhelmed the Iron Dome and rendered it ineffective to a certain extent. Iran also claims to have eliminated the head of Mossad. While the casualties in Iran at the time of writing have been around 26 dead, the Israelis have lost around six persons.
Israel and Iran have been locked in a proxy war for decades. When we went to Israel for an official visit from the National Defence College (NDC), New Delhi in 2009, we were briefed by their foreign and Defence Ministry senior officials and all were in unison to list their threat perception, their enemy No 1, 2 and 3 as Iran, followed by Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, Fatah in West Bank, the Syrian regime, militias in Iraq and Houthis from Yemen, in that order.
When I later went there as Head of the Mission and Force Commander of United Nations Peacekeeping Force at Golan Heights between Israel and Syria from 2012 to 2015, the threat perception had not changed.
I was the sponsor officer of the UAE naval officer doing the NDC and his dissertation was on Nuclear Programme of Iran. This officer along with the Saudi and the Egyptian officers always asked questions to the guest speakers on nuclear assets of Iran. Therefore, as early as the first decade of this millennium, it was not only the Israelis but also all GCC and Arab countries were equally wary of the Iranian nuclear assets and keenly watched their progress as they viewed it as a Shia Bomb. The Sunni world already had a nuclear bomb closer home in Pakistan and Jews had their own; but they have all been always apprehensive of Iran getting the expertise because of the theocratic power structure of Iran.
The Iron Dome was built jointly by US and Israel in 2011 and I was shown its effectiveness during the previous Gaza war of 2014 that lasted 52 days. India rightly acquired the know-how from Israel and coupled it with the S-400 Triumf, surface-to-air anti-aircraft missile system from Russia, in creating Akashteer, a comprehensive air Defence system; its own version of Iron Dome that protected us from the enemy air assets during Operation Sindoor.
Both China and Russia have jointly criticised the brazen Israeli offensive as an attack on Iran's sovereignty, security and territorial integrity. The E3 to include UK, France and Germany invited the Iranian Foreign Minister to Geneva for talks on the nuclear deal but the Iranians have kept the condition of bringing an end to Israeli attacks on their soil and further destruction of the country and causing large-scale death and destruction of their population as a prerequisite for the talks to recommence.
Since October 7, 202 attack by Hamas cadres on Israeli military cadres and civilians, Israel has been systematically eliminating all sub-conventional and conventional threats in the region. For decades, Iran has been fighting a proxy war with Israel through Hizbullah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, Fatah in West Bank, erstwhile Syrian regime of Assad, Shia militias in Iraq and the Houthis from Yemen.
Israel has termed Iran an Octopus and has very diligently crushed its arms of Hamas, Hezbollah, Bashar Al Assad, Shia militia of Iraq and Houthis from Yemen. In doing so, Israel has completely dismantled the so-called Shia Crescent and has now decided to go for the head of the octopus. It has got overwhelming success in the initial attacks but is now finding it hard to reach the head of the octopus. Before reaching the head of the octopus, Israel has to deal with the mantle, siphon and the beak!
The Iran-Israel-USA war is not coming to an early end. Israel will ensure that Iran is weakened substantially and its nuclear-weapon ambition is pushed by five to ten years. However, Iran may walk out of Non-Proliferation Treaty and give impetus to its nuclear dream. A nuclear Iran will also be more secure as nuclear capability brings in a strategic deterrence. The non-contact wars have a limitation and there is very little possibility of Israel and US to commit troops on the ground.
India enjoys good relations with both Iran and Israel and is not in a position to pick sides. India has historical, cultural and traditional relations with Iran spanning centuries, is managing the operations of the Chabahar Port project and has a stake in the International North-South Transport Corridor connecting ship, rail and road trade routes between Azerbaijan, Central Asia, Europe, India, Iran and Russia. It is also ensuring its energy security with help of Iran. With our dependence on Israel for our defence procurement especially in command and control and air defence sectors including the domain of information technology and cybersecurity, we have developed strategic partnership with Israel in the last three decades.
India has to ensure a tightrope walk and in fact may be able to work towards bringing ceasefire and peace between the two varying sides, as it enjoys excellent relations with both the nations.
The author was Head of the Mission and Force Commander of UN Peacekeeping Mission (UNDOF) between Israel and Syria at Golan Heights from 2012 to 2014. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
June 23, 2025, 13:57 IST
News opinion Opinion | Israel-Iran War: Targeting & Taming The Octopus
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alaska summit: Putin wins hands down as Trump gifts him time
Alaska summit: Putin wins hands down as Trump gifts him time

First Post

time9 minutes ago

  • First Post

Alaska summit: Putin wins hands down as Trump gifts him time

The Alaska summit proved that neither Trump knows Putin nor can guarantee a ceasefire or peace It was the typical high-voltage Donald Trump pomp and power show at the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday. A B-2 Spirit Bomber escorted by four F-35 Lightnings conducted a flyover as a desperate Trump tried to persuade Vladimir Putin to reciprocate his unrequited love. They shook hands on the red carpet and later posed on a blue stage emblazoned with 'ALASKA 2025' amid parked F-22 Raptors. However, hours before, Putin, in his subtle yet powerful style, had already delivered his message loud and clear: Make USSR Great Again (MUGA). STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Harking back to the Soviet Union's superpower days of global dominance during the Cold War, Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov arrived at a hotel where Trump and Putin later met sporting an unusual dress breaking the diplomatic protocol. A black jacket over a white sweatshirt emblazoned with 'CCCP'—Union of Soviet Socialist Republics—and light blue denims. Lavrov's dress wasn't merely symbolic; it conveyed two messages. First, Putin's longing for the USSR's lost greatness and anger at its disintegration, which the Russian president had termed 'the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century'. Second, Russia's immense confidence in being back in the diplomatic fold after being declared a pariah by the West since Putin invaded Ukraine in February 2022. The stage was set. The performers were ready. Trump was accompanied by Marco Rubio (secretary of state), John Ratcliffe (CIA director), Steve Witkoff (special envoy to Ukraine and the Middle East). Scott Bessent (treasury secretary) and Howard Lutnick (commerce secretary). Putin's entourage comprised Lavrov, Yuri Ushakov (foreign policy adviser), Andrei Belousov (defence minister), Kirill Dmitriev (Russian Direct Investment Fund chief) and Anton Siluanov (finance minister). The audience expected to be spellbound by a scintillating performance by the brilliant cast. However, the most-anticipated drama was a big flop for the American audience and international media. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Neither Trump nor Putin took questions from a quote-famished media as reporters jostled to get even one comment. Both made their statements and left the media disappointed. Antagonist Putin turns protagonist The Russian president came, he saw and he conquered. Putin was brimming with confidence from the moment he agreed to take a ride on The Beast, Trump's armoured limousine, at the latter's request. He was a virtuoso, an artiste who had crafted and polished his skills in dealing with five American presidents—Bill Clinton, George W Bush, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Trump (six times in his first term).After the summit ended, Putin was the first to address the media as Trump stood silent by his side. Putin got what he eagerly sought—that too on American soil. Despite being shunned by the West, especially the Joe Biden administration, and having an ICC arrest warrant for committing war crimes in Ukraine, his performance was excellent. First, Putin, whose troops occupy around 18 per cent of Ukraine, including Crimea, 70 per cent of Donetsk and almost all of Luhansk (Donbas) and two-thirds of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, came out with the biggest gain. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Putin has time till November-end to capture more Ukrainian territory and to negotiate with both Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky from a more powerful position. By December, Ukraine's harsh winter would set in, making fighting extremely difficult. The Russian advance in eastern Ukraine has been incremental but continues. Putin has around three months to turn these slow gains into strategic wins. Moreover, neither Trump nor Putin announced the venue and date of another meeting. Putin wants to freeze the gains and the conquered areas in Russia's fold and Zelensky to drop his goal of joining NATO. The Ukrainian president rejects both demands. Before and after the summit, Trump said that a tri-lateral meeting between Putin, Zelensky and him would be the best option to reach peace. The Alaska summit was held months after Trump showed a willingness to meet Putin. Convincing Putin and Zelensky to meet face-to-face will require intensive diplomatic efforts and hectic parleys between the three countries. That will allow Putin to buy more time to advance further inside Ukraine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Zelensky was quick to highlight how Putin will use the opportunity. '… we anticipate that in the coming days the Russian Army may try to increase pressure and strikes against Ukrainian positions in order to create more favourable political circumstances for talks with global actors', he wrote on Telegram. Second, Putin re-established diplomatic ties with the US amid a grand welcome in a country that led Nato against him without the Russian leader taking one step back. 'The past period was very difficult for bilateral relations. And, let's be honest. They have slid to the lowest point since the Cold War. … Obviously, sooner or later, it was necessary to correct the situation—to move from confrontation to dialogue. And in this regard, a personal meeting of the heads of the two states was really overdue,' he said with Trump by his side. Third, the much-touted summit hinged on a territorial swap between Russia and Ukraine—rejected by Zelensky—to reach a peace deal and end Europe's bloodiest war since WWII. That's what Trump had been chiming before the summit to the shock of European allies. However, during a virtual call with European leaders later, he said that any territorial concession should be decided by Ukraine. There was no discussion about a territorial swap at the meeting. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Fourth, Putin didn't even agree to a ceasefire—forget a peace deal. Earlier too, he never agreed to a ceasefire and continued with the onslaught despite several attempts by Trump and Witkoff, who had met Putin four times in over two months. Despite praising Trump and his administration for facilitating 'the resolution of the Ukrainian conflict', Putin didn't indicate ending the conflict. Fifth, he again blamed Ukraine, as did Trump during Zelensky's White House visit in February, for starting the war and repeated how Russia's security is under threat. 'I have said more than once that for Russia, the events in Ukraine are associated with fundamental threats to our national security.' On the other hand, Putin, using his trademark tactics, terming Ukrainians 'brotherly no matter how strange that may sound in today's conditions'. 'We have the same roots and everything that is happening for us is a tragedy and a great pain.' Putin put the ball in Trump's court while conflating Russia's 'legitimate concerns' and the 'root causes of the crisis' with a ceasefire and Ukraine's security. 'Therefore, our country is sincerely interested in putting an end to this. But at the same time, we are convinced that for the Ukrainian settlement to be sustainable and long-term, all the root causes of the crisis must be eliminated.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Putin was referring to Nato's eastward expansion and Ukraine's ambition to be part of the military bloc. Though Ukraine's security 'must, without a doubt, be ensured' and 'I would like to hope that the understanding we have reached will allow us to get closer to that goal and open the way to peace in Ukraine', Russia's 'legitimate concerns must be taken into account, and a fair balance in the security sphere in Europe and the world as a whole must be restored'. Putin said. Sixth, he massaged Trump's ego without conceding anything. 'Overall, we have established a very good business-like and trusting contact with President Trump,' he said knowing well how Trump gloats in self-praise and all the more when patted on the back by an adversary like him. 'And I have every reason to believe that by moving along this path, we can—the quicker the better—reach an end to the conflict in Ukraine,' Putin said without mentioning a timeline to end the war or even a ceasefire. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Putin's best shot was slamming Joe Biden and praising Trump for saying that the war would have never happened if he were the US president. 'And in the end, I would like to add one more thing. I'd like to remind you that in 2022, during the last contact with the previous administration, I tried to convince my previous American colleague that the situation should not be brought to the point of no return when it would come to hostilities and accept it quite directly back then—that is a big mistake,' he said of Biden without naming him. In the biggest boost to the US president's ego, he said that if Trump were the president in 2022, the war wouldn't have started, as claimed by him during the 2024 US election campaign. 'Today, when President Trump is saying that if he were the president back then, there would be no war, and I'm quite sure that it would indeed be so. I can confirm that,' Putin said. He even invited Trump to Moscow for another meeting—if it is held at all—in a rare public use of English. 'Next time in Moscow?' he said as the joint presser ended triggering an expected reaction from Trump, who said, 'Ooh! That's an interesting one. I don't know. I'll get a little heat on that one, but I could see it possibly happening. Thank you very much, Vladimir.' Trump was never in control of the plot Trump looked visibly exhausted. The American president expected to mesmerise the audience—but his performance was below average. There was no ceasefire or peace deal, contrary to his boastful claims of one in the offing, as Russia continued to attack Ukraine during the around-three-hour meeting. Inviting Putin to the US was Trump's first mistake. The cringeworthy display of military power play and posing with Putin, flanked by Raptors, was the second mistake. The big, hollow claims and threats made by Trump in the months and days leading up to the summit were his third and biggest blundTrump is all bluster and no bite whenever he confronts an equally dominating and powerful adversary like Putin or Chinese President Xi Jinping. Trump wrote the Alaska summit script, but Putin controlled the plot. The Russian leader pulled the strings and his American counterpart danced all along—even in the months before the summit. Trump, like his predecessors, has failed miserably to read the former KGB agent, despite meeting him five times and talking to him over the phone nine times in his first presidency, seven calls after office and another six calls in his second term. Russian leaders have always outsmarted their American counterparts. Two months after America's failed Bay of Pigs invasion in Cuba, John F Kennedy met Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev at a summit in Vienna in 1961. In 1962, Khrushchev deployed nuclear missiles in Cuba, jolting Kennedy and bringing the world to the precipice of Armageddon. 'Kennedy allowed himself to be bullied by Khrushchev [in Vienna] and he regretted it,' according to award-winning journalist Evan Thomas, who authored the book Being Nixon: A Man Divided. 'Some scholars think that Khrushchev felt like he could push Kennedy around. And that made him, perhaps, more likely to put the missiles into Cuba.' Trump failed like Kennedy. From his campaign trail's hollow claim to end the war in 24 hours if he returned to power to cajoling and coercing Putin, Trump's blustering narrative of how he could influence the Russian leader to sign a peace deal fell flat and exposed his flaws. When Putin rejected his ceasefire offers, Trump threatened sanctions. The Russian president was unrelenting. Soon, Trump's frustration with him was public. He was visibly 'very angry' and 'pissed off' at the 'bullshit' thrown by 'crazy' Putin. Finally, he gave Putin a 50-day deadline to end the war or face more sanctions and secondary sanctions on top buyers of Russian crude oil (China and India). He failed. Then Trump reduced the deadline to 10-12 days. He failed again. Trump had also boasted that he would know exactly in 'the first two minutes' of the meeting whether a deal could be made', and also vowed to 'walk' away from the table if the talks remained inconclusive. In the end, it boiled down to a no-show with Trump's blow-hot-and-cold attitude resulting in a mockery. Trump's 'two-minute' boast fizzled out as the meeting lasted for more than two-and-a-half hours—neither did he walk away from the unproductive talks as pledged earlier. In his statement, shorter than that of Putin's, Trump's usual strategy of fake claims regarding the war and his one-sided bromance with Putin were on display. '…I believe we had a very productive meeting. There were many, many points that we agreed on, most of them, I would say,' he said despite Putin not agreeing to even a ceasefire. 'There are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there. We didn't get there, but we have a very good chance of getting there,' he added. Aware that he had achieved nothing but zilch, Trump admitted that there were 'a couple of big ones [points] that we haven't quite gotten there, but we've made some headway. So, there's no deal until there's a deal'. Sensing that he would be pilloried by the media for failing to squeeze even one ounce of concession from Putin, Trump conveniently put the onus on NATO and Zelensky. 'It's ultimately up to them. They're going to have to agree with what Marco and Steve.' Finally, he was back to his admiration for Putin, who has always manipulated him. Claiming that Putin and he 'really made some great progress today', Trump said, 'I've always had a fantastic relationship with President Putin—with Vladimir. We had many, many tough meetings, good meetings.'To please Putin further, Trump reiterated that the Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election was a 'hoax'. 'We were interfered with by the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax. It made it a little bit tougher to deal with, but he [Putin] understood it. I think he's probably seen things like that during the course of his career. He's seen—he's seen it all. But we had to put up with the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax. He knew it was a hoax, and I knew it was a hoax.' Trump's statement was a redux of his meeting with Putin in Helsinki in July 2108 when he sided with Russia against US intelligence agencies and denied any election interference. In another feat of imagination, Trump concluded by saying that both were on the same page about stopping the killing of Ukrainians. 'We had some good meetings over the years, right? … Let's do the most productive one right now. We're going to stop, really, 5, 6, 7 thousand, 1000s of people a week from being killed, and President Putin wants to see that as much as I do.' Post-summit comments show who's winner A few days before the summit, the White House was careful not to portray it as a Trump show that could guarantee a ceasefire or a peace deal. However, Trump was back to his boisterous ways claiming that Putin wants a peace deal, not to occupy the whole of Ukraine, because of their rapport. 'I think he [Putin] has wanted the whole thing,' he told Fox News host Brian Kilmeade's radio show. 'But because of a certain relationship that he has with me running this country, I believe now he's convinced that he's going to make a deal. He's going to make a deal. I think he's going to.' Later, he doubled down on his claim at the White House. 'I think President Putin will make peace.' Trump's claim sounded very stale. In February, he made the same claim. 'I mean, I know him very well. Yeah, I think he wants peace. I think he would tell me if he didn't.' The Alaska summit proved that neither Trump knows Putin nor can guarantee a ceasefire or peace. Putin didn't concede anything while Trump gave away everything. The post-summit comments proved how Putin had outmanoeuvred Trump. In his first comments after the summit, all Putin had to say was a few words of praise for Trump and how they 'talked about a possible resolution of the Ukrainian crisis on a fair basis'. 'The visit was timely and very useful. We discussed practically all areas of our cooperation,' he said without providing any details about the points of cooperation, a ceasefire or peace. 'We naturally respect the position of the US administration, which sees the need for an immediate end to hostilities, and we would also like to see this happen. We would like to move towards resolving all issues by peaceful means. No indication of a ceasefire, an end to the conflict or even a trilateral meeting with Trump and Zelensky. On the other hand, Trump granted Putin's wish. 'I wouldn't be thrilled if I didn't get it [a deal],' he told Fox News on the way to Alaska. 'Everyone says, 'You're not going to get a ceasefire. It'll take place in the second meeting.' But I'm not going to be happy with that.' Several hours later, Trump made a predictable U-turn realising that he had returned empty-handed—no ceasefire but only a peace deal. In the event, there was no agreement on a ceasefire, and Trump downplayed its importance in a post on Truth Social as he returned to Washington. 'It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often do not hold up,' he posted on Truth Social after returning to Washington. It's obvious that Putin didn't agree to a ceasefire and called for a peace deal so that he could buy more time to continue his assault and seize more Ukrainian territory. That's the reason both presidents refused to interact with the media at Anchorage. If Trump had revealed what transpired at the meeting and how he agreed to Putin's insistence on a peace deal, not a ceasefire, he would have faced a barrage of questions. Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of the Security Council of Russia and a former president, summed it up precisely how Putin got what he wished for without preconditions. 'Important fact. The meeting has demonstrated that negotiations are possible without preconditions while the Special Military Operation continues,' he wrote. The writer is a freelance journalist with more than two decades of experience and comments primarily on foreign affairs. He tweets as @FightTheBigots. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

Here are this past week's main stories in charts
Here are this past week's main stories in charts

The Hindu

time9 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Here are this past week's main stories in charts

(1) Plea for SC/ST 'creamy layer' in Supreme Court The Supreme Court sent a notice to the Centre after it received a plea calling for the establishment of a creamy layer system in SC/ST reservations, similar to that seen within the OBC. Currently, a creamy layer is recognised for SCs and STs only in promotions within government jobs. This comes from a 2006 verdict that said the creamy layer will be taken into account for such promotions. Here is a brief timeline of key judgments regarding the issue, noting the considerations before the Court. These key judgments have shown that a majority of judges in Supreme Court Benches have supported the creation of a 'creamy layer' of SCs and STs based on individual conditions, while recognising the inherent backwardness of these communities as a whole. When it comes to reservation at other levels, what is to be decided by States is the criteria to decide what constitutes the creamy layer - whether it is economic conditions, vocations or something else. (2) Trump-Putin Alaska summit yields no deal on war U.S. President Donald Trump said on Saturday (August 16. 2025) that Ukraine should make a deal to end the war with Russia because 'Russia is a very big power, and they're not', after a summit where Vladimir Putin was reported to have demanded more Ukrainian land. After the two leaders met in Alaska on Friday, Trump told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy that Putin had offered to freeze most front lines if Kyiv ceded all of Donetsk, the industrial region that is one of Moscow's main targets, a source familiar with the matter said. Zelenskiy rejected the demand, the source said. Russia already controls a fifth of Ukraine, including about three-quarters of Donetsk province, which it first entered in 2014. The meeting between US and Russian presidents, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, was billed as a vital step towards peace in Ukraine. But with no ceasefire and an invitation to Moscow, the meeting has yielded more questions than answers. Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and has been gradually advancing for months. The war - the deadliest in Europe for 80 years - has killed or wounded well over a million people from both sides, including thousands of mostly Ukrainian civilians, according to analysts. (3) Retail inflation eases to 8-year low of 1.55% in July Retail inflation in India slipped to 1.55% in July 2025, the lowest since June 2017, and below the Reserve Bank of India's comfort band of 2-6%, primarily led by a contraction in food prices. The Consumer Price Index (CPI), released by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation on Tuesday (August 12, 2025), showed inflation in India has been easing for nine consecutive months. The rate of inflation in the food and beverages category came in at -0.8% in July 2025, lower than -0.2% in June and 5.1% in July 2024. Vegetable and pulses prices contracted 21% and 14% respectively, driven by a high base and falling prices. Core inflation, which excludes the impact of food and fuel prices, also eased to 4.1% in July 2025 from 4.4% in the previous month, nearly at the RBI's target of 4%. The other broad categories in the CPI saw inflation remaining nearly the same in July as in June. The pan, tobacco and intoxicants category saw inflation remain flat at 2.4% in July. Similarly, the clothing and footwear category saw inflation ease marginally to 2.5% in July from 2.5% in June. Inflation in the housing segment remained at 3.2% in July, while that in the fuel and light category quickened to 2.7% in July from 2.5% in June. (4) Three-member panel to probe Justice Yashwant Varma case Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Tuesday (August 12, 2025) set in motion the process of removing Justice Yashwant Varma of Allahabad High Court by admitting a motion, signed by 146 members, and constituting a three member inquiry committee to probe the charges against Justice Varma. The inquiry committee comprises Supreme Court judge Justice Aravind Kumar, Madras High Court Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and senior Karnataka High Court advocate B.V. Acharya. Justice Varma was repatriated from the Delhi High Court to the Allahabad High Court after burnt wads of currency notes were found at his official residence on March 14. Subsequently, an in-house inquiry of the Supreme Court had indicted Justice Varma. Earlier, then Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna had initiated an in-house probe into the allegations and set up the three-member committee in March to conduct the inquiry. After receiving the report, the CJI asked Justice Varma to resign or face impeachment proceedings. However, since Justice Varma declined to quit, CJI Khanna then forwarded the report and the Judge's response on it to the President of India and the Prime Minister for removal of the judge. Though Justice Varma had moved the Supreme Court against CJI Khanna's recommendation for his removal, the top court rejected his plea. (5) Afghanistan begins its fifth year of Taliban rule On August 15, 2021, the Taliban marched into Kabul, returning to power after two decades, as internationally backed President Ashraf Ghani fled the country. Since then, the former insurgents have consolidated their grip on power, excluded women and girls from public life, stamped out internal dissent and external challengers, and gained debut recognition as the country's official government from Russia, a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council. The Taliban govern through decrees, but Afghans have aspirations and needs that cannot be fulfilled through edicts and ideology. Here is a look at key dates since the Taliban returned to power four years ago:

Russia-Ukraine war: What US security guarantees for Ukraine could look like
Russia-Ukraine war: What US security guarantees for Ukraine could look like

First Post

time22 minutes ago

  • First Post

Russia-Ukraine war: What US security guarantees for Ukraine could look like

While many are classifying the meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska as a complete failure, some within the US administration are claiming otherwise. Trump envoy Steve Witkoff has said that the Russian president has agreed to let the US offer a 'Nato'-like security guarantee to Ukraine. But what does this mean? To many, it looks like the meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska bore no results. Not only was there no ceasefire or peace agreement, Putin and Trump didn't even stick around for the planned lunch. However, some in the Trump administration are claiming they got a big concession from Putin. Trump envoy Steve Witkoff, for example, has claimed that the Russian president has agreed to let the US offer a 'Nato'-like security guarantee to Ukraine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article Five-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO', Witkoff said. It was 'the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that,' Witkoff added. The development comes as a head of a meeting at the White House between Zelenskyy, Trump and European leaders. But what would such a security guarantee for Ukraine look like? Let's take a closer look: A brief look at Nato and Article 5 First let's take a brief look at Nato and its security guarantee. North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato) is the world's largest military alliance. It was established in 1949 after World War II with the aim of countering the threat of the Soviet armies in Europe. It initially comprised a dozen countries – Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States. However, today it has 32 members including Finland, which joined in 2023, and Sweden, which joined in 2024. At the heart of Nato lies Article 5, which essentially says that an attack on one is an attack on all. It states, 'The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Article 5 has only been invoked once in Nato's history, in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks on America. This resulted in US forces and Nato invading Afghanistan. US President Donald Trump has previously threatened to withdraw from Nato. Trump in the past has threatened to withdraw America from Nato particularly during his first term. He has often complained about America footing the bill for the allies. Nato members have responded by vowing to raise their own spending on defence to 5 per cent of their GDP. What would a security guarantee for Ukraine look like? A source has said that the United States has proposed offering Ukraine a Nato-style security guarantee. However, Kyiv would not be allowed to formally join the alliance. The development came to light after a series of calls between Trump, Zelenskyy and other European leaders. This way, Ukraine would get the promise of Nato-style collective defence without the underlying legal obligation. This would also not result in a protest from Russia, which has long considered Nato a thorn in its side. Moscow had stated that Kyiv's long-standing demand to join Nato was one of the reasons it invaded Ukraine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Putin is said to have agreed to this demand, according to the source. If true, this would be a major change of heart from the Kremlin. Russia previously said any solution to the war would need to address the 'root causes of the conflict,' most significantly Ukraine demilitarising and abandoning its aspirations of joining NATO. The Kremlin has also said any peace agreement needs to recognise its sovereignty over Crimea, which it annexed in 2014, and parts of Eastern Ukraine. US President Donald Trump looks on next to Russian President Vladimir Putin during a press conference following their meeting to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, in Anchorage, Alaska, on August 15. Putin is said to have agreed to this demand, according to the source. Reuters Trump after his meeting with Putin said a peace deal could be done if Zelenskyy agreed to give up the entire Donbas region. However, Zelenskyy has been insisting that Ukraine will never hand over its territory over a foreign occupier. Zelenskyy has cited the Ukrainian Constitution as the reason for doing so. The Constitution of Ukraine requires a nationwide referendum to be held to determine such questions. 'Everyone agrees that borders must not be changed by force,' Zelenskyy wrote on X. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Everyone supports that key issues must be resolved with Ukraine's participation in a trilateral format – Ukraine, the US, and the Russian chief.' European leaders, some of them who share a border with Russia, have also push back on such a peace deal. Regardless, Witkoff is already touting the development as a major breakthrough. 'We didn't think that we were anywhere close to agreeing to Article Five protection from the United States in legislative enshrinement within the Russian Federation, not to go after any other territory when the peace deal is codified,' Witkoff said. 'We got to an agreement that the United States and other European nations could effectively offer Article 5-like language to cover a security guarantee.' 'We're on the path for the first time,' he said. 'We are seeing accommodation more than we've seen in the past, certainly more than we saw in the last administration. And that's encouraging. Now we have to build on that.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy wrote on X that it is 'a historic decision that the United States is ready to take part in security guarantees for Ukraine'. 'Security guarantees, as a result of our joint work, must really be very practical, delivering protection on land, in the air, and at sea, and must be developed with Europe's participation', he added. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday said that she welcomed the security guarantees for Ukraine, and that the 'European Union … is ready to do its share'. With inputs from agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store