logo
‘He'd get bored at home in his mansion': Storm players back Craig Bellamy to stay on in 2026 as veteran coach weighs up future

‘He'd get bored at home in his mansion': Storm players back Craig Bellamy to stay on in 2026 as veteran coach weighs up future

News.com.au2 days ago

Melbourne halfback Jahrome Hughes says Craig Bellamy would get easily bored if he decides to retire at the end of the season, which is why he expects the veteran coach to stay on for at least another year.
Bellamy has an option to remain in charge of the premiership favourites in 2026 and is likely to make a call on his coaching future in the coming weeks to give the club plenty of time to find a replacement if he does decide to call time on his glittering career.
A decision was made on May 10 last year for him to coach on in 2025, with the early mail that he will make a similar call very soon.
The seven-time Dally M Coach of the Year has helped turn the Storm into one of the biggest sporting franchises in Australia since he arrived in 2003.
It's why they'd love for him to stay as long as he wants, with champion five-eighth Cameron Munster likely to walk into his coach's office and deliver his traditional pitch for him to stay.
'Usually around this time it's all in the papers with what he's going to do, but there hasn't been much talk about what he's going to do,' Hughes said.
'He probably wouldn't want that to distract anyone. He likes to keep that close to his chest with what he's going to do, but I'm sure he'll reach out soon.
'It probably hasn't been spoken about as much as previous years, but I guess it's that time of year when it's probably going to come up now.
'He's probably going to have to make a decision soon, and I'm sure 'Mun' will be back in his office to get him to stay another year.
'He's such a great coach and such a great mentor for all of us players. The longer he stays, the better. But for me, it's whatever's best for him and his family.
'I can't see him hanging it up too soon because he'd get bored at home in his mansion. I'm sure he'll go around again.'
Bellamy could well add another premiership this season with the Storm favourites with the bookies to go all the way, but they'll need to be better than they were in the win over the Titans.
They've been fairly inconsistent in recent weeks but should get skipper Harry Grant back for Friday's home game against the Cowboys after he was rested for the trip north.
'It was a scrappy win, but it was good to get those scrappy wins,' Hughes said.
'It's not always going to be pretty, so it's good to get one of those out of the way and know that we can win that way.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NSW Labor workers comp reform to be referred to inquiry despite pleas for urgency
NSW Labor workers comp reform to be referred to inquiry despite pleas for urgency

News.com.au

time19 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

NSW Labor workers comp reform to be referred to inquiry despite pleas for urgency

Labor's controversial plan to reform workers compensation in NSW has suffered another blow after being referred to an inquiry, despite a plea by the Treasurer that it be urgently passed. The NSW government is attempting to pass amended plans to reform workers compensation before July 1, having faced significant opposition from the unions and the Opposition. Liberal leader Mark Speakman said the Coalition was in favour of reform to the beleaguered system, but only with key amendments – if not, they will seek to send it to an inquiry. The Opposition, in a bizarre alliance with the Greens and the unions, is seeking to stay plans to lift the threshold for a permanent whole person impairment (WPI) to 31 per cent. Opponents of the planned changes say they would lock most claimants suffering a psychological injury out of support; the government says it offers greater access to lump sum payments. Appearing before the Legislative Council, shadow treasury spokesperson Damien Tudehop moved that the bill be referred to the Public Accountability and Works Committee for inquiry in August. Instead, an amended version of the motion put forward by independent MLC Mark Latham was approved by the Council, which set that the committee would determine its own reporting date. 'It is incumbent upon the Treasurer to at least demonstrate … the manner in which this scheme is currently operating and why the savings, which have been identified for the scheme, are acting or potentially acting to target people who are the most vulnerable in terms of psychological injury which they have suffered,' Mr Tudehop said. Mr Tudehope went on to add: 'There are other areas of the manner in which the scheme is being managed at the moment, which can produce savings. There are significant savings identified in the act, which in fact we will be wholeheartedly endorsing'. During his address, Mr Tudehope said he was 'not here to hold up the process', but that the Opposition had not had enough time to properly assess the plan. In response, Treasurer Daniel Moohley said delaying the bill by referring it to an inquiry would be an 'opportunity that we miss' to begin repairing the 'broken' system. 'The opportunity we will miss is to begin to provide for injured workers,' he said. 'Absent reform, a small business that has no claims rejected is facing the prospect of a 12 per cent increase next year, followed by a further 12 per cent, followed by a further 12 per cent. 'The bigger opportunity that we've been missing is to begin to build a proper culture of prevention when it comes to psychological injury. 'That is crucial to stopping people from getting injured in the first place and at the same time making sure that we have a workers compensation system that complements the task of returning people to their health and returning people to their work.' In four weeks time, Mr Moohkey warned the system would 'fall back even further' and make reform harder, including the private sector which he said was suffering $5m losses per day. He instead urged for the Opposition to 'make this decision today' and put their amendments up for debate, rather than referring the workers compensation bill to an inquiry. Greens MLC Abigail Boyd supported the Opposition's motion, stating that the bill, if passed, 'could cause so much distress to people who are already at their most vulnerable that they may choose to end their lives. 'A bill that is literally about life and death. 'That's why we should never seek to pass a bill like this in these circumstances, with the secrecy, the deception, the blatant mistruths that we've been told over the last three months, and with the government having failed to make out the case for what they have decided to do.' She urged Labor MLCs supporting the bill to consider whether it was 'this reform that has been never recommended in any of the multiple, multiple reports or inquiries into the workers compensation system, that has been sprung on you with very little warning. 'Are you personally satisfied that the only option, the only option is to implement these reforms? The most cruel and dangerous of all of the possibilities.' She went on to add: 'I don't think any Labour member can honestly say that they thought two years ago they would now be sitting here trying to defend a bill that will kill workers.' The proposed workers compensation reform has faced stiff opposition from the state's unions, as well as a parliamentary inquiry, and competing claims about urgency. The state government says the reforms need to be passed before July 1, while the Opposition says premiums for the nominal insurer are already locked for next year. Mr Moohkey previously indicated he would not authorise further payments to the Treasury Managed Fund, the government's self-insurer, following billions in cash injections. The plan also seeks to address the state of the nominal insurer, the health of which has resulted in rising premiums for businesses and charities operating in the state, Mr Moohkey said failure of the bill had already been factored into the state budget,

Two top NRL player agents banned and fined over serious alleged breaches
Two top NRL player agents banned and fined over serious alleged breaches

7NEWS

time20 minutes ago

  • 7NEWS

Two top NRL player agents banned and fined over serious alleged breaches

Two NRL player agents have received bans totalling 18 months and a collective $35,000 in fines for separate breaches of their accreditation, with one accused of failing to disclose police charges to the league. Mario Tartak, who represents such players as Josh Addo-Carr, Damien Cook and Haumole Olakau'atu, is alleged to have communicated with an underage player without a parent or guardian present. The NRL also claims he 'entered into a commercial arrangement with two NRL clubs', which is a breach of the league's accredited agent scheme rules. Tartak has been offered a 12-month suspension and $25,000 fine, with the NRL factoring in previous breach proceedings when considering his punishment. The agent received a breach notice from the NRL in 2019 for failing to disclose bankruptcy proceedings. A second agent Matthew Desira has been offered a six-month ban and $10,000 fine. The NRL claims the agent of Wests Tigers coach Benji Marshall did not disclose 'police charges and court proceedings' brought against him. The pair's suspensions have the potential to cause headaches for players off contract this year, as well as those who will become free agents on November 1 ahead of their deals ending next season. Tartak's clients Addo-Carr, Cook, Nathan Brown and Luciano Leilua are among those off contract in 2026, while Danny Levi and Josh Schuster headline his list of players with deals expiring this year. Players can still be managed by other agents that operate out of the same company as Tartak and Desira. Elsewhere, the NRL has issued Des Hasler with his final warning for criticising the match officials after the Gold Coast coach singled out a bunker referee in round 13. Hasler has become the second coach this season to receive an official final warning from the league after North Queensland boss Todd Payten last month. 'Mr Hasler has been reminded of his obligations under the NRL Rules and Code of Conduct as well as his general responsibility as a sporting leader,' read a statement from the NRL. 'Negative public remarks about match officials significantly hinder the recruitment and retention of match officials at the community and pathways tiers of the game. 'All rugby league participants are reminded to respect match officials who perform a vital role within the game.' Asked about his comments ahead of Saturday's clash with Brisbane, Hasler said: 'I was just pointing out a few things.' Hasler was frustrated with a pivotal decision in the second half of his side's 28-16 loss to Melbourne last week and promised then to seek clarification from the NRL. Titans hooker Sam Verrills was denied a try on the grounds he had made contact with teammate Tino Fa'asuamaleaui as he attempted to burrow past Melbourne defenders lying in the ruck. Bunker official Kasey Badger ruled Storm fullback Ryan Papenhuyzen had been denied the chance to tackle Verrills because of this contact, with the Storm scoring their match-sealing try minutes later. 'Kasey got it wrong, again,' Hasler said then of the call. 'There's an email from the NRL about players lying in the ruck; that's fine, let them lie in the ruck, but you shouldn't lose the advantage. 'They were lying all over the ground and six again, penalty, I don't know whether it was called, and young Vez (Verrills) picks up the ball and dives through, doesn't touch anyone, (Storm fullback Ryan) Papenhuyzen wasn't obstructed. 'That was the word-for-word what the NRL sent out so I'll be interested to see what their explanation was.'

Liberals hose down Alan Stockdale's women comment while parliament achieves parity
Liberals hose down Alan Stockdale's women comment while parliament achieves parity

ABC News

time25 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Liberals hose down Alan Stockdale's women comment while parliament achieves parity

Welcome back to your weekly federal politics update, where Brett Worthington gets you up to speed on the happenings from Parliament House. Senior blokes in the Liberal Party have long had an issue reading the room. Just look to the last two federal elections to see the extent of the damage wreaked on the party. Enter Alan Stockdale, whose biggest party sin until recently was that he's a Victorian. A former state government treasurer, he was brought in as an external administrator to run the far from thriving NSW division of the Liberal Party despite coming from south of the Murray River. You'll remember just how high performing the NSW division is. It's the one that failed to nominate candidates for council elections (talk about literally only having one job to do). Addressing the NSW Liberal Women's Council on Tuesday he said that women were "sufficiently assertive" and the party might need to "protect men's involvement". Even if he thought it was a hilarious joke, no one was laughing. The comments were made during a discussion about female representation and gender quotas. It's worth remembering that the once mighty Liberal Party managed to just get just six MPs elected to NSW's 46 federal seats last month. NSW voters also elected six crossbenchers, five of whom are women, including the newly victorious independent Nicolette Boele who joins Sophie Scamps, Allegra Spender and Zali Stegall in once-safe Liberal seats in Sydney. Writing in the Sydney Morning Herald just days after the Liberals were repudiated at the ballot box, Charlotte Mortlock (a former adviser and founder of a group tasked with bolstering female representation in the party) wrote that without reform the party would remain "beholden to a smaller and smaller cohort of angry men, blinded by their own ideology, so detached from reality that we will never be in power again". She argued that the Liberal Party had its highest calibre of female candidates at the last election but the issue was they were "forced to sell a shit sandwich". In a sign that at least some leaders in the Liberal Party are reading the room, federal Opposition Leader Sussan Ley (one of just two Liberal women elected in NSW) was quick to condemn Stockdale's comments, arguing she wanted more assertive women in her ranks. State Opposition Leader Mark Speakman offered a similar sentiment on ABC Radio Sydney on Thursday morning. "Honestly, Alan, read the room," Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie told the Today Show. "It was a shocking comment. I think it's time for Alan to head back to the Melbourne Club, have a stiff whiskey and chat with the old boys about what went wrong." Just when Liberals thought things couldn't get much worse, their only glimmer of hope from the May 3 election was snuffed out. Liberal Gisele Kapterian initially won Bradfield by eight votes after the full distribution of preferences. But given it was under 100 votes, a full recount was required. More than a month on from polling day, the recount ended with Boele winning by 26 votes. It's certainly not without precedent that the victor would change after a recount. In 2007, Labor candidate Rob McEwen beat incumbent Liberal Fran Bailey by a handful of votes in the Victorian seat of McEwen. After a recount, Bailey was ahead by 12. Labor and McEwen took the case to the Court of Disputed Returns, challenging the validity of some of the 643 invalid votes. Sadly, the judgement from the case, in which all 643 votes were re-scrutinised, is far less dramatic than the scenes that played out in Selina Meyer's recount in HBO's Veep. In the end, Bailey's lead grew and she won the seat by 31 votes (Mitchell would comfortably win the seat three years later when Bailey retired). In 2016, the LNP considered challenging Labor's 37 vote victory in the Queensland seat of Herbert, but the party ultimately decided against it. Kapterian and the Liberals say they're considering a challenge in Bradfield but it's too early to know what their decision will be. There are no shortage of people who see Kapterian as the future of the party. She's modern, the daughter of migrants and has worked at senior levels of politics and tech. It's for the same reason that Ley rewarded Kapterian with a junior portfolio in the outer frontbench, a move the leader said was to reward once safe Liberal seats for sticking with the party. Like Mitchell before her, if she is to be the future of the party, she'll likely have to wait three more years to have another crack. There's always an old quote that comes back to haunt politicians. A week ago, then Greens senator Dorinda Cox insisted Labor's contentious extension of the north west shelf gas project was a climate bomb that "must not go ahead". A week later, the now Labor Senator Cox insisted "it wouldn't be suitable for me to have public commentary during that stage". When Fatima Payman quit Labor, no shortage of party leaders insisted she should quit parliament (which of course they would because they would pick her replacement). There were no such calls coming from Labor when its ranks were bolstered by Cox's defection. Beyond all the noise that has surrounded the defection (not to mention no shortage of internal matter bubbling over publicly), it highlights the growing pains the Greens have experienced in recent years. After the 2022 election, the party reached a high-water mark of four MPs and 12 senators. Today, it has just one MP and 10 senators. The Cox defection also brings with it risks for Labor, even if the PM insists all internal matters in the senator's office have been dealt with. Any issues now will be for him and Labor to explain. But in not going to the crossbench, Cox's move keeps the Senate maths simple. Labor only needs the Coalition or the Greens to pass legislation. If Cox had become and independent, Albanese would have needed the Greens and one crossbencher to pass legislation. Cox's defection takes the Labor caucus to 123 politicians, comfortably more than double the Liberal partyroom of 51. Add in the 19 Nats and the official opposition will have 70 members. The new-look parliament will have 40 new politicians and will have gender parity for the first time, with 113 women and 113 men across the House of Representatives and Senate. It will also be the most culturally diverse parliament. Queensland is the only state where the Coalition has more MPs than Labor — 16 to 12. Labor will hold four of the six seats where the winner had a two-candidate preferred margin above 70 per cent. Of the six seats with a winner on 69 per cent, Labor holds four of them. At the other end of the spectrum, seven seats have a winner on a margin between 50 and 50.7 per cent. Teal independents hold three of them, Labor holds three and the LNP one. Go out a little further and Labor holds six of the seven seats with a winner on 51 per cent. Within the parties, Labor is 57 per cent female, the Liberals 33 per cent, the Nationals 26 per cent and the Greens 63 per cent. Both Coalition parties fare better with gender parity in the Senate (a chamber that is almost 57 per cent women) with the Nationals 50 per cent women and the Liberals at 48 per cent. Labor's ranks are almost two-thirds women in the Senate and the Greens on 60 per cent. The prime minister has taken to taunting the Liberal Party over female representation, noting he has more women with a name starting with A in the House of Representatives (10) than the Coalition does women MPs (9). And yet for all the talented women in Labor, the party can't find any to promote to its House of Representatives leadership. Talk about blokes being unable to read the room.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store