
‘Trans toddlers' allowed gender treatment on NHS
The NHS is treating nursery-age children who believe they are transgender after watering down its own guidance, The Telegraph can reveal.
The health service was previously set to introduce a minimum age of seven for children to be seen by its specialist gender clinics, claiming anything less was 'just too young'.
The limit was removed after the proposals were put out to consultation, with new guidance due to be published showing that children of any age are eligible.
However, a source close to the consultation process said NHS England had 'caved to the pressure' of trans activists to remove the limits.
The children are not given powerful drugs such as puberty blockers at the clinics, but are offered counselling and therapy along with their family.
Up to 10 children of nursery age are being treated, according to new data, while as many as 157 children aged nine or younger have been referred to the clinics.
Seven 'just too young'
The NHS previously said that children under seven years old were 'just too young' to be considered to have gender dysphoria, citing an example of a young child taking a liking to toys or clothes typical of the opposite sex as normal.
'We know that showing an interest in clothes or toys of the opposite sex – or displaying behaviours more commonly associated with the opposite sex – is reasonably common behaviour in childhood and is usually not indicative of gender incongruence,' it said.
That draft guidance, published in 2023, added that by seven years old, 'children may have more developed their cognitive, comprehension and communication skills to an extent that they will be able to engage with health professionals'.
The guidance was drawn up after the Cass review into children's transgender services, led by the paediatrician Baroness Cass, found the NHS had been sending children on a one-way path to change gender at the Tavistock clinic.
Doctors routinely prescribed puberty blockers despite a lack of evidence to support their safety and effectiveness, and instead of assessing for other conditions.
The clinic was closed as a result and the NHS began opening more 'holistic' regional gender clinics as part of plans to move away from a 'medical model'.
Last month, The Telegraph revealed that these plans included testing all children for neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism and checking their mental health.
The number of nursery-aged children referred to the new services is said to be 'fewer than 10', according to data released by the NHS under freedom of information laws.
The exact number of under-fives was withheld in order to prevent them from being identified, but with 157 children under 10 waiting to be seen, it raises the prospect that dozens of under-sevens have been referred to the clinics as a result of the about-turn.
NHS insists it is following Cass
The NHS said it was following the Cass review's recommendation not to set an age limit and that any care for children aged under seven would be focused on family support and advice.
The Cass review recommended that children who wanted to socially transition be seen as early as possible by medical professionals in order to identify and address any mental health concerns or neurodevelopmental conditions.
The Government has also thrown its support behind the move, insisting it is following the recommendations of the review.
Labour has been caught in the middle of controversies over transgender ideology.
Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, has indefinitely banned puberty blockers and pledged to ensure women-only spaces in NHS hospitals do not include trans women after the Supreme Court's ruling on biological sex.
However, other Labour MPs have vocally opposed both of these decisions.
The new guidance has raised fears that the new services could repeat mistakes made at the Tavistock, which was seeing three new children under seven each month until it was shut down.
Helen Joyce, director of advocacy for human-rights charity Sex Matters, said: 'Research shows that pre-adolescent children who feel confused or distressed by the fact of their sex will usually grow out of this stage if they're sensitively supported, but not when they're encouraged to believe the unscientific notion that everyone has a 'gender identity' that may differ from their sex.'
She added: 'The question for the new NHS hubs is whether they perpetuate the failed 'affirmation' model of the now-closed GIDS clinic, in which case parents should keep their children well away, or whether they offer genuinely holistic care based on evidence, not ideology. If the treatment does more harm than good, the length of the waiting list is irrelevant.'
However, others said it was better for parents to talk to doctors rather than, for example, have teachers encourage the child to socially transition, such as by changing their name and dressing as the opposite sex for school.
Stephanie Davies-Arai, director of Transgender Trend, said: 'Although it seems unbelievable that children under five are being referred to the new gender hubs, it was a recommendation of the Cass review that children are seen as early as possible.
'This makes sense because parents have been given such bad advice for so long, and may believe their child is 'transgender',' she said.
'Trans lobbyists have told parents that children know their 'gender identity' from age three and there is no harm in 'affirming' a child's identity. It is important that these parents can get proper information and sensible advice from the gender hubs rather than listening to activists.'
The current child gender services are operated by London's Great Ormond Street Hospital, Alder Hey Children's Hospital in Liverpool, and University Hospitals Bristol, with another service planned for the East of England later this year.
So far, about 250 children have been seen by the new services, which are designed to see 25 patients a month each.
The NHS plans to have seven or eight services operating across the country, which will allow it to see up to 200 new children per month, it is understood.
Waiting list up 12pc in a year
The waiting list stands at 6,225 as of the end of March, up by 12 per cent from 5,560 a year earlier, as demand has continued to rise. The average waiting time to be seen has also risen to more than two years, from 100 weeks to 116.
Professor James Palmer, NHS medical director for specialised services, said children and their families 'can access mental health support if they need it' while on the waiting list.
'The NHS is now almost halfway through its planned expansion of regional services, and we are seeing significantly fewer referrals as children are first assessed by paediatric or mental health experts and provided with care in NHS services that are more appropriate to their needs,' he added.
A Department of Health spokesman said: 'We are working with NHS England to reform children's gender services in line with the recommendations from the Cass review, to provide children with timely, holistic support.
'We've opened three new children and young people's gender services with a fourth anticipated to open later this spring. These new services will increase clinical capacity and reduce waiting times, so patients can be seen sooner and closer to home.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The £12 at-home prostate cancer test that could save you weeks of waiting for a GP
It's a slightly odd moment when I fire the little spring-loaded lancet into my own hand and, despite my attempts to bleed neatly, the kitchen table takes on a crime-scene feel. I've waited until family members are out and I'm able to process results alone, decide on next steps, and set my face if needed. I'm taking a prostate health blood test that I bought in Sainsbury's. It uses the little white plastic result tray familiar from Covid, capturing a drop of blood. The makers of the test I'm using say take up has increased 69 per cent since launch, two years ago. More and more of us are checking ourselves in this way, but what does it entail and what do you need to know? There is something satisfying about taking some control of your own health, and that's how it feels to take a prostate health test in your kitchen. It requires some self-education and a little caution, but I'm a fan. There are two kinds currently available – the pin-prick quick response that I am trying, and those that require a larger sample to be sent to a lab. Other commercial screenings exist, but have not been rolled out for home use yet. The commercial laboratory tests are much the same as an NHS blood test, only without the doctor to interpret results and place them in context (many provide this as an optional extra). Both measure PSA, a naturally occurring protein that can be an indicator of cancer. Testing at home for medical conditions is a booming business, with the global at-home medical testing market estimated at $7.4 million (£5.5m) in 2024. I have to confess, the idea of peering into my health in the privacy of my own home is very appealing – especially while there is no national screening programme. The faff of arranging appointments, the vulnerable feeling that overtakes you as you walk through the door of the surgery, and the worry about managing feelings: all of this makes lightly stabbing myself at the kitchen table feel more than worth it. Pros of self-test kits They are (reasonably) accurate Nick James, professor of prostate and bladder cancer research at the Institute of Cancer Research, and the Royal Marsden Hospital in London says, 'We did a bit of research on tests of this type and they weren't bad, to be honest. We dual-tested 50-100 [patients], comparing our lab results with their results – there was some inaccuracy at the borderline between normal and abnormal, but did that matter? Probably not. Once you have a properly abnormal PSA they will be accurate'. They are quick Prof James says: 'It is quite a good way of circumventing the initial chat with the GP. Most things in life you have control of, you want a pizza you pick up the phone and it arrives. It's only in medicine where you have to be grateful for what the NHS gives you, which might be great or it might be rubbish.' They are a useful start 'There's not much you can do wrong with them really,' says Prof James. 'If you have the test and it's normal, probably the NHS test would be normal too, if it's abnormal that should allow you to drive a referral. I tried to get an NHS PSA just to see the process, and it took me weeks and weeks.' They are cheap and easy Frederick Manduca is a director of Newfoundland Diagnostics, which makes the lateral flow PSA test I used. He says: 'There's a convenience factor, you can buy the test in Sainsbury's with your shopping and the result is there within ten minutes. It retails at £12, so you can screen regularly. It's easy to use. You only need a few droplets of blood and you can put it through the lateral flow test.' They are set up for the most at-risk group Newfoundland tests record any PSA score up to four as normal. 'We chose four as the dividing line,' says Manduca. 'It's all based on what we see as the most helpful cut-off for age. If we were screening 20-40 year olds the cut off would be much lower, but because that group is at such low risk, we weren't focused on them. At 70-plus, an abnormal result comes in between 4 and 5 PSA, between 50 and 70, anything from 4.00 upwards is definitely raised. It's the mid-point for that age range.' Cons of self-test kits Interpreting the results It's about self-education. PSA is not a cancer indicator in itself. Manduca says: 'The key is people understanding when they should test and what the results mean – this is a test for a protein the body produces, it's not a test for prostate cancer.' The Newfoundland tests come with a leaflet produced in conjunction with a cancer charity. How do the self-test kits compare to a clinical screening? There has been some controversy about this. A BBC report into the rapid response tests (no brands were specified) said: 'Of the five kits analysed by the BBC, one did not produce a readable result; three came back all clear; but one did show a solid dark line, indicating a PSA level above 4.0 ug/l. A private blood test taken the same day and sent to a laboratory, showed a much lower reading of 0.27 ug/l.' Manduca says the Newfoundland kits are tested against approved independent lab results: '92 per cent of the time the lab tests and the rapid tests were agreeing. There are slight deviations and cut-offs, if you were right on a boundary number, say 3.9.' He warns, however, that there are less reliable tests sold online and consumers need to check for official approvals before buying. The Prostate Cancer UK site says: 'We recommend that if you're worried about prostate cancer and want a PSA blood test, you should speak to your GP. It's crucial that, before you have a PSA blood test, you get balanced information or counselling from a healthcare professional, and that you get professional follow-up about your result and what to do next.' How to read your self-test kit results Any PSA is far from conclusive. Using a cheap and reasonably accurate home test can allow you to track your number and spot any changes. An NHS PSA test is also not definitive, and a high number should mark the start of an investigation. Figures for 'normal' PSA scores by age are available online, but any worries need full investigation with MRI scans via the doctor. Fredrick Manduca says: 'It's a tool in an overall toolkit. A lot of men don't know that if do they have a raised PSA only one-in-four of them will have prostate cancer. The general concept is for someone to test every year or every two years depending on how at risk they are, and see if there's a change.' My test, by the way, was normal, matching my most recent PSA which came in under 4.00. But I shall continue to monitor myself, looking for tell-tale changes.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
The five superfoods which can help you live a DECADE longer, according to a top nutritionist
The new buzzword in health writing is 'longevity'. Maybe it's because weight-loss drugs have made slimness less elusive; or maybe it's because we're living longer, and are now focused on how we can make those extra years as healthy and enjoyable as possible. Whatever is responsible, a recent survey found Brits are paying for as many as 18 supplements a day to try and boost their mental and physical wellbeing.


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
UK households told to close windows and doors from 10am until 3pm
Hay fever season is currently in full swing and sufferers are being urged to take preventative measures to try and minimise their symptoms - including keeping windows and doors shut Brits with hay fever are being told to keep their windows and doors firmly shut, especially between 10am and 3pm, as hay fever season wreaks havoc across the country, lasting from late March to September. From the first release of tree pollen in late March to the prevalence of grass and weed pollens throughout the summer, sufferers have been fighting symptoms. Particularly prevalent in the South are higher pollen counts compared to the North, with grass pollen proving the most troublesome during two peaks in early June and July – which may explain any recent spike in your sniffling. The UK's warmest meteorological spring and May on record since 1884, followed by balmy temperatures in late June, has led to what experts dub "ideal" conditions for pollen blights. Those afflicted by hay fever can attest that symptoms such as sneezing, congestion, and itchy eyes tend to hit hardest from late March through to September, with weather conditions playing a pivotal role. Britain is bracing for a sizzle as the Met Office forecasts a scorcher next week, predicting temps will soar from Wednesday, June 11, sending the mercury into the high 20Cs. This heatwave comes hand in hand with sky-high pollen counts, spelling trouble for hay fever sufferers in North West England, the West Midlands, and London and South East England, where "very high" levels are expected. The rest of the UK isn't off the hook with "high" levels predicted too, reports the Express. There's no magic pill for hay fever, but experts stress the importance of pre-emptive actions to keep those pesky symptoms at bay. They advise against flinging your windows and doors open willy-nilly when pollen's playing up, as it invites those sneeze-inducing particles in to settle on your soft furnishings – not what you want! NHS guidance sides with the cautious, suggesting keeping windows and doors shut "as much as possible", but if you're craving a breath of fresh air during the balmy weather, aim to crack them open outside peak pollen times. Saxton Blades' very own DIY expert, Glen Peskett, chimes in with some sound advice for sniffle-stricken Brits: allergy-proofing is key and that means windows and doors should stay firmly shut between the hours of 10am and 3pm, especially on blustery days. That's when pollen counts peak and flinging things wide open is just asking for trouble. Glen added: "It's important to get fresh air, and when the weather begins to improve, it's even more tempting to open your home up to the warmer elements. "However, during peak pollen times - usually between 10 am and 3 pm, and on windy days - it's extremely beneficial to keep your windows and doors shut. This is especially important in bedrooms, where you want to breathe easy at night."