NHS Fife has run up £220,000 legal bill in Peggie tribunal, watchdog reveals
Up to the end of March, a total of £220,465.93 was spent on the case, including counsel fees and services from the NHS Scotland's central legal office.
Ms Peggie brought the case against the health board after her complaint about sharing a changing room with transgender medic Dr Beth Upton led to her being suspended.
The nurse lodged a complaint of sexual harassment or harassment related to a protected belief under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010.
Information Commissioner David Hamilton said NHS Fife should carry out searches for data on the costs of the case, describing the situation as 'frustrating' when freedom of information requests were appealed.
In its response to the requests, the health board said: 'These costs will be reclaimed through the national clinical negligence and other risks indemnity scheme (CNORIS).
'Under CNORIS, NHS Fife's financial liability is limited to £25,000, which ensures that the legal proceedings do not impact frontline clinical or patient services.
'NHS Fife is not in a position to estimate the full cost of proceedings while the tribunal remains ongoing.'
Ms Peggie has publicly welcomed the UK Supreme Court judgment which in April made clear the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the 2010 Equality Act 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'.
She said that she 'expects NHS Fife to immediately stop permitting any man who identifies as a woman access to female-only, single-sex spaces in the workplace'.
Maya Forstater, chief executive of the gender critical campaign group, Sex Matters, which is supporting the nurse, told The Herald newspaper: 'That NHS Fife has already run up £220,000 in legal costs to date is outrageous, but also unsurprising given the determination of so many employers to defend policies that permit trans-identifying men like Dr Upton to use women's facilities, even though the law is clear that female employees have the right to male-free facilities.'
Conservative MSP Tess White said the costs had been released in a 'sleekit' way.
She said: 'They have spent months rejecting legitimate requests to reveal how much taxpayers' money they are squandering on this case, only to try and slip it out in the hope nobody will see it.
'The sum spent so far taking Sandie Peggie to a tribunal could have gone to frontline healthcare services which are overwhelmed due to 18 years of SNP mismanagement.
'Senior figures within the health board must come clean about why this figure was not revealed sooner and how much more money from the public purse they expect to waste when the case resumes.'
A spokesperson for the health board said: 'NHS Fife notes the report from the Scottish Information Commissioner, published on July 9, and will comply fully with the decision notice.
'The costs to date associated with the defence of the employment tribunal, brought against NHS Fife by Sandie Peggie have been made publicly available on the NHS Fife website.'
The spokesperson added: 'NHS Fife sought a Rule 50 order to protect the confidentiality of sensitive personal information of staff involved in the tribunal process.
'As a public sector organisation, NHS Fife has a duty of care to all its staff with consideration given to protecting their privacy, safety, security and wellbeing.
'The decision to apply for the order was made following legal advice and in line with the reasons outlined above.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 days ago
- The National
Trans people face 'total ban from single-sex spaces under EHRC rules'
While services will not be compelled to provide single-sex spaces, The Times reported that trans people could be barred from accessing any that do exist – whether those spaces align with their birth sex or their acquired one. The difficulty stems from the fact that trans people will not be allowed to use facilities that align with their acquired gender – but can also be banned from using facilities that align with their birth sex if they look too much like their acquired gender. READ MORE: Trans toilet rules 'may force Scottish museums to close' Draft EHRC guidance states: 'For example, a trans man [who was born a female] might be excluded from the women-only service if the service provider decides that, because he presents as a man, other service users could reasonably object to his presence, and it is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim to exclude him.' The Times reported that the finalised guidance would have the same effect as this draft guidance. It will apply to organisations that provide public services, including shops, museums, gyms, prisons, and NHS departments, among others. The statutory guidance, which will have to be approved by Labour's Equalities Minister Bridget Phillipson, is further expected to say that trans people can be excluded from single-sex sports, and that people could object to trans people's 'presence' if they feel it is a vulnerable situation, such as changing clothes. Services will be allowed to request to see people's birth certificates to decide whether they are allowed in a single-sex space – but will have to tread carefully as doing so insensitively could be considered discrimination, The Times reported. However, services will also have to provide suitable facilities for trans people to use, meaning a separate space may be the only option many places have. The EHRC is facing a legal challenge over its draft guidance, with a full hearing due in November. Good Law Project, who are bringing the challenge, claim the EHRC guidance goes 'far beyond' the Supreme Court's ruling, which said in April that sex must be considered biological under the 2010 Equality Act. 'It amounts to a bathroom ban for trans people, violating people's right to privacy in their everyday lives,' Good Law Project said. READ MORE: EHRC changes guidance on single-sex toilets after legal challenge People have privacy rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which campaigners argue may be breached by having to reveal biological details to use the toilet. 'We'll be arguing in November that the EHRC was wrong to say employers can only provide gendered toilets based on 'biological sex', and wrong to ignore ways that companies and the public sector can provide trans inclusive men's and women's facilities,' Good Law Project said. The EHRC has also faced criticism for the speed at which it has consulted on its draft guidance, using artificial intelligence to sift through 50,000 representations at a reported rate of 1850 per day. A legal challenge against the short consultation period was thrown out in June. A spokesperson for the EHRC said: 'The code of practice has not yet been finalised. We received an extremely high volume of responses to the consultation and are grateful to everyone who shared their feedback. 'To ensure we give these responses the consideration they merit, we are working at pace to analyse them and are amending the draft code of practice text where necessary to make it as clear and helpful as possible. The news comes after a Scottish Government report found that negative media and political attention around trans people is impacting on gender healthcare, making it harder to recruit and retain staff. 'But our code will remain consistent with the law as set out by the Supreme Court.'
Daily Record
3 days ago
- Daily Record
Scottish Government 'concerned' over NHS Dumfries and Galloway financial picture
Health chiefs are forecasting an overspend of £28 million in the current financial year. The Scottish Government has expressed 'concerns' at the financial situation at NHS Dumfries and Galloway. Health chiefs are forecasting an overspend of £28 million in the current financial year. And that has led to officials in Edinburgh moving the health board to the third stage of the NHS Scotland Support and Intervention Framework. It had been on level two of the five step model since November 2023. In a letter from NHS Scotland chief executive Caroline Lamb to NHS Dumfries and Galloway boss Julie White – which will be presented to Monday's health board meeting – it is explained the move is being taken due to 'concerns about the financial sustainability of the board'. Over the past three years, the health board has received £58 million from the Scottish Government in brokerage, which will be repaid once the health board breaks even. Ms Lamb's letter states that the £26.2 million provided last year was 'the highest brokerage requirement as a proportion of total budget across NHS Scotland'. And the £28 million overspend predicted in 2025/26 is 'the highest of any NHS board as a proportion of total budget'. Ms Lamb notes that the support provided following the move to stage two has been 'beneficial' but 'there has been insufficient improvement in financial sustainability'. Moving to stage three means 'enhanced monitoring and support', including 'increased oversight from Scottish Government together with increased engagement with the NHS Scotland finance delivery unit'. Last October, the then finance director Katy Kerr predicted escalation to stage three was 'inevitable'. Interim finance director Susan Thompson's report for Monday's meeting says a £28 million overspend is expected in 2025/26 against a Scottish Government cap of £25 million. The financial plan has been accepted by Holyrood on the basis 'that any unexpected in year benefits are used to bridge the £3 million gap with any in year pressures being managed within existing budgets'. The approved financial plan contains a savings target of £21.6 million – more than the record £20.1 million the health board saved last year.
Telegraph
3 days ago
- Telegraph
Trans women to be banned from public female-only spaces
Public bodies will be told to ban transgender women from female-only spaces such as lavatories and changing rooms under new guidance to be published by the human rights watchdog, according to reports. The new guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) will apply to any organisation that provides a service to the public, including schools, hospitals, prisons, gyms and shops. They will also be allowed to check birth certificates to ensure the new rules are followed. Private companies and charities will also be covered if they are providing a public service, such as caring for the elderly on behalf of a council. The new rules will also allow bodies to prevent transgender women from taking part in women's sports, and state that women have a right to feel uncomfortable if a biological man undresses in front of them. The watchdog promised to issue new guidance in light of the Supreme Court's ruling earlier this year the definition of women under the Equality Act lies in biological sex, not preferred gender identity. Draft guidance published after the ruling stated that the words women and sex must mean biological sex for the purposes of the Equality Act. 'The law is the law' Many public bodies, including the NHS and civil service, have so far refrained from banning transgender women from female-only spaces until the guidance is issued. The EHRC will submit the new guidance to Bridget Phillipson, the women and equalities minister, before the end of the month, The Times reported. She will then approve it if it is in line with the law. A source familiar with the consultation told The Times: 'The law is the law, and the law's not going to change. 'The EHRC does know what the law is and can't publish final guidance that is in complete contravention of the Supreme Court verdict, however much some might like them to.' The guidance will not decree that organisations have to provide single-sex spaces, but will say that transgender women must be excluded if they do, The Times has reported. Ignoring the guidance will amount to discrimination. The final wording of the EHRC's recommendations has not been agreed but sources told the newspaper it was unlikely to radically differ from the draft. Pro-trans campaigners accused the EHRC of ignoring their views because it had used artificial intelligence to categorise responses to the consultation. An EHRC spokesman said: 'The code of practice has not yet been finalised. We received an extremely high volume of responses to the consultation and are grateful to everyone who shared their feedback. 'To ensure we give these responses the consideration they merit, we are working at pace to analyse them and are amending the draft code of practice text where necessary to make it as clear and helpful as possible. But our code will remain consistent with the law as set out by the Supreme Court. The human rights watchdog said it is using 'a combination of approaches' to analyse the responses to the consultation. The EHRC added: 'With more than 50,000 responses received, we have commissioned an external supplier to support us in analysing them. 'Our approach will involve supervised use of AI alongside our expert legal assessment to ensure a balance of robustness, accuracy and speed, including promoting consistency and helping to avoid bias in managing this scale of responses.'
