The UK's own health security depends on continued investment in global disease research
Behind each one of the numbers is a person, a family, a community whose lives have been saved or changed for the better. We believe that as one of the richest nations in the world, the UK has an ethical responsibility to take a lead on breakthroughs in neglected diseases.
But the case for continued support and investment is much stronger than just ethical responsibility; there are widespread and measurable economic and social benefits not only in the countries where these diseases occur but in the UK itself.
On world Malaria day, a new report, by Impact Global Health in collaboration with Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, found that the UK directly benefits from R&D investment into diseases like malaria, HIV and tuberculosis.
It shows that the UK economy would gain an additional boost of £7.7 billion and 4,000 additional jobs by 2040 from public funding of neglected disease R&D. Some £6 billion has already been gained but around £1.5 billion, equivalent to an average of £100 million a year, is yet to be felt and is contingent on funding being sustained.
And the benefits to the UK of investment in global health do not stop there.
Covid-19, and the West African Ebola epidemic demonstrated that infections don't recognise geographic borders. Nobody is safe from future pandemics until everybody has access to effective diagnostics, drugs and treatments and robust health systems.
Put simply: the UK's own global health security depends on continued investment in this early pipeline of global health R&D.
Yet 2025 has been a challenging year for global health – with significant cuts announced to critical funding internationally and continued uncertainty about future investment. Already, many projects have been forced to pause or stop, causing a direct negative impact on the people and communities which are most in need.
In an age where there are multiple calls on government and other budgets, global health R&D could be seen, mistakenly, as an easy target. But the impact of R&D funding in the UK and across the globe should not be underestimated.
This latest research clearly shows how this funding has already significantly improved health outcomes and positively impacted individual lives and wider society. We must keep this momentum to realise these benefits into the future.
There is a very real risk that funding cuts now or in the future will reduce the impact of what has already been achieved and will lose the opportunity to develop new products, save even more lives and create even more sustained economic benefit. Any reduction in investment could rapidly unravel the substantial progress made to date, leaving future advances in life-saving interventions in jeopardy.
Now is the time for bold action to protect critical investment in this area. Every pound of funding lost will negatively impact the UK economy, make the UK more vulnerable to future pandemics, and most importantly, expose the most vulnerable communities around the world to greater health threats.
The UK has been a leader in funding and conducting research and development targeted at neglected diseases over the last two decades. Along with saving countless lives within some of the world's poorest communities, that investment has had real health and economic benefits in the UK.
Professor David Lalloo is Vice Chancellor of the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine. Professor Liam Smeeth is Director of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Protect yourself and your family by learning more about Global Health Security
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Tom's Guide
4 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
My dad is 72, and these are the 3 strengthening exercises I use to build his strong core and improve balance
I've been training my dad ever since COVID-19 hit, and I've seen significant improvements in his strength and mobility, including a notable boost to his balance and core strength. It's one of my proudest achievements. There are many compound exercises I've taught him, but some strengthening exercises I've implemented more recently have been focused on building a strong core (not just the abs) and improving overall balance and stability. My primary goal is for him to avoid injury as he gets older. We've had some fun — and wobbles — along the way, but as a personal trainer, nothing gives me more joy than seeing those gains show up in everyday life, making his day-to-day more enjoyable, too. He tells me that putting his shorts on is now much less of a task. Want to sculpt a stronger core, increase balance and reduce your likelihood of injury? Here are three moves I swear by. Give these a try. Try standing on one leg and performing a deadlift while also standing on a Bosu or balance trainer. It tests your balance, yes, but also coordination and mind-muscle connection, which can help you activate the working muscles better. I think balance training is underrated, and it becomes more and more important as you age. Good balance helps prevent falls and improves the stability of your muscles and joints, which will protect you from injuries. Besides, it's an indirect way to build core strength without relying on abs workouts. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. To keep the strength element of this exercise, hold a set of dumbbells. Stand on the balance trainer with your feet hip-width apart, then hinge forward at the hips and begin lowering your chest toward the floor, while raising one leg into the air straight behind you. If you're holding weights, try tapping them down in front of you, pause when your chest is roughly parallel to the floor, then drive up through your standing leg to stand. Complete 8 reps, then switch sides. Aim for 3-4 sets. Unfamiliar with the deadlift variation? Learn how to do single-leg Bosu ball deadlifts. The key is to avoid twisting your hips and stay controlled throughout. Double up for just $44 and access the Bosu app for inspiration on the best Bosu exercises to try. This is probably the core exercise I've seen my dad improve most on, and it's fun to do. I like to use a light dumbbell, but you can use anything that you can hold between both hands and feet for the given number of reps below. The V-sit is a true core exercise, but it also tests balance and coordination. Add weight, and you'll move your core muscles through more resistance, making the exercise harder. Most people will feel the V-sit target their abs, waist muscles (the obliques), hips and quads. If you feel pain in your lower back, try bending your knees or stop and check out these core exercises for back pain as a safer alternative. Start on your back and extend your arms and legs onto the exercise mat. Hold a weight or similar with both hands. Brace your stomach, slightly lift your shoulders away from the mat, then lift your upper body and legs into the air together, reaching your fingers and toes to meet overhead. Place the weight between your feet and grip it, then lower back to the starting position. On the next rep, exchange the weight from feet to hands. Complete 8-10 reps and 3-4 sets. Here's how to do V-sit-ups step-by-step. Single-sided movements require core stability, balance and coordination to control the load on one side of your body and prevent you from falling. My dad has a habit of trying to (sneakily) use his legs during shoulder presses, even when I scold him that it's a strict press, not a push press. To combat this, I now ask him to sit on a workout bench with the bench at 90 degrees and his back resting against it. With this tall posture and his feet planted on the ground, he can't use his legs to facilitate movement. That means all the power and strength come from his upper body — the shoulders, triceps and pecs — and stability generates from his core. To do it, sit on a bench (as above) and hold a kettlebell or dumbbell in one hand. Rack it to your shoulder and ensure your lower back isn't arching away from the bench. Keeping a straight back, press the weight overhead and extend your arm, biceps close to your ear throughout. Pause, then lower the weight to your shoulder with control. Avoid leaning to one side. Complete 8 reps, then switch sides. Aim for 3-4 sets. The instability of the weight will work the stabilizer muscles in your shoulders and core, including the rotator cuff muscles that surround the shoulder blades, the abdominals that help support your torso, and the erector spinae, which are spinal stabilizers. If you do want to double load and hold a weight in each hand (as above), you can. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.


The Hill
17 hours ago
- The Hill
Kennedy targets vaccination injury program
Health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is targeting a little-known but crucial program that underpins all childhood vaccinations. Kennedy took to social media and the show of conservative activist Charlie Kirk this week to rail against the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and pledge significant changes. 'The VICP is broken, and I intend to fix it,' he wrote on social platform X. 'I will not allow the VICP to continue to ignore its mandate and fail its mission of quickly and fairly compensating vaccine-injured individuals.' Attorneys and other experts say Kennedy is right that the program, which was created in 1986 in order to give quick payouts to families who can prove a child was injured from a vaccine, is badly in need of modernization. 'There's a lot of low hanging fruit that [Kennedy] can act on that would immediately alter the course of the vaccine program for the better,' said David Carney, a vaccine injury attorney in Philadelphia and president of the Vaccine Injured Petitioners Bar Association. Cases could be settled quicker, rather than going through a trial, Carney said. Kennedy could also press Congress to act on legislation that would increase the court staff, increase the pain and suffering caps, and add COVID-19 vaccines to the list of shots eligible for the program. It has too few staff available to handle a massive caseload, leaving patients waiting for years just to have their cases heard. It covers almost three times as many vaccines as when it was first created, but the number of 'special masters' who hear cases has stayed the same. Attorneys who argue vaccine injuries said the government has been more favorable to vaccines than petitioners in recent years, fighting against claims that would have previously been easily settled. 'It's not the fast, informal, petitioner-friendly program that Congress designed. It is very adversarial and litigious. That's absolutely, 100% true,' said Renée Gentry, director of the Vaccine Injury Litigation Clinic at George Washington University Law School. But there's fear the changes Kennedy wants will undermine the program, or tear it down entirely, risking driving drugmakers from the market and threatening access to childhood shots. Kennedy has long targeted the VICP, and his X post echoed many of his previous arguments. He did not elaborate on what changes he is making but said he is working with Attorney General Pam Bondi. He has previously said he wants to expand the program, making it easier for claimants to qualify for awards based on adverse events he claims are associated with vaccines but are not currently part of the program. People can prove injuries two ways, said Dorit Reiss, a vaccine law expert and law professor at UC San Francisco. Either you fit into the table of injuries, and then there's a presumption that the vaccine caused the harm, or you have to show causation for an injury outside the list. Kennedy has the power to add new injuries to the eligible list, like autism, which he has repeatedly linked to vaccines. In an interview with Tucker Carlson earlier in July, Kennedy also suggested vaccines are linked to numerous chronic ailments like diabetes and narcolepsy. 'We have now this epidemic of immune dysregulation in our country, and there's no way to rule out vaccines as one of the key culprits,' Kennedy said. In order to add an injury to the list, Kennedy would have to go through the federal government's cumbersome notice-and-comment rulemaking process. Experts said it's usually a time consuming and expensive undertaking, and often the scientific reviews don't show enough evidence to prove if the vaccine caused harm or not. Kennedy could also unofficially start settling cases for more injuries without adding them to the list. Yet either change could risk bankrupting the program. Families are paid through a trust fund that's funded by an excise tax on vaccine makers, so there's a finite pot of money available. The program's fund covers lawyers' fees and the costs, even for losing cases. In exchange for the tax, vaccine makers have a limited liability shield. Petitioners file claims against the federal government, not the manufacturers, and families can get compensation without having to prove that drugmakers were negligent. Kennedy has suggested he wants to change that. 'The VICP has devolved into a morass of inefficiency, favoritism, and outright corruption as government lawyers and the Special Masters who serve as Vaccine Court judges prioritize the solvency of the HHS Trust Fund, over their duty to compensate victims,' Kennedy wrote. An HHS spokesman declined to say what, if any changes Kennedy is considering, saying the secretary's comments speak for itself. A popular anti-vaccine talking point is the desire to eliminate the vaccine makers' limited liability shield. But that's only something Congress can do. Kennedy does have the power to drop vaccines from the program. Right now, it covers 16 routinely recommended immunizations for children or pregnant women. But if a shot is no longer routinely recommended, it can be removed. In early June, Kennedy abruptly fired all members of the outside advisory group responsible for making vaccine recommendations. He appointed a new group of hand-picked replacements. If that group no longer recommends the HPV vaccine, for instance, Kennedy can revise the injury table to remove it. 'If he takes it away, then those people have no right to be in this program, and they're going to have to be stuck with civil litigation,' said Gentry, which is much more difficult and expensive.


The Hill
18 hours ago
- The Hill
What still causes the plague in the US?
(NEXSTAR) — Northern Arizona recently recorded its first pneumonic plague-related death since 2007. Early last year, Oregon saw its first case of the bubonic plague since 2015. Person-to-person spread of the plague hasn't been seen in more than 100 years in the U.S., but cases occasionally pop up. So what causes them? The plague cases reported in the U.S. today are not exactly the same as those seen in medieval Europe. Between 1347 and 1352 alone, it's estimated that the plague caused the deaths of at least 25 million Europeans. Rats aboard a ship from the Crimea and Asia that docked in Sicily are blamed for bringing the bubonic plague into Europe. Once fleas ran out of host rodents in Europe – those that lacked resistance to the plague also died – they sought out humans. Fungus labeled 'urgent threat' by CDC is spreading rapidly, hospital study finds Eventually, those who were sick or at risk of carrying the plague were isolated and put into quarantine, much like guidance issued during the COVID pandemic. A vaccine in the late 19th century, improved sanitation, better health practices and modern antibiotics have been credited with helping to stop the spread of the plague when it pops up. The U.S. now sees about seven cases annually, on average, according to estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The World Health Organization says most human cases over the last three decades have been in Africa. When cases do occur in the U.S., they're primarily in the West, with most reported in New Mexico and Arizona. Cases have also appeared within the region of southern Oregon, far western Nevada, and California. U.S. cases are, most often, bubonic. There are three main forms of the plague: bubonic (the most common during Europe's Black Death), septicemic, and pneumonic. Generally speaking, plague is brought on by the Yersinia pestis bacterium, with humans and mammals being affected. 'Quiet cracking' is the newest term for a workplace problem — and it's 'pretty pervasive,' expert says The three types of plague present with different symptoms and are caused by different things. Bubonic plague is caused by the bites of fleas that are mostly found on rodents. Symptoms of bubonic plague, the Cleveland Clinic explains, include a sudden high fever; chills; headaches; pain in the abdomen, arms, and legs; and large, swollen lymph nodes that can leak pus. While the bacteria will multiply in the lymph node where it entered the body, it's capable of spreading to other parts of the body if not treated with antibiotics. Septicemic plague has similar symptoms to bubonic plague, including fever, chills, extreme weakness, pain in the abdomen, shock, and the possibility of bleeding into the skin and other organs, the CDC explains. This form of plague can develop from untreated bubonic plague as well as from the handling of infected animals. Should a person with bubonic or septicemic plague go without treatment, and the bacteria reach their lungs, they can develop pneumonic plague. A person can also get pneumonic plague from breathing in 'droplets coughed out by another person or animal with pneumonic plague,' according to the CDC. Like other forms of plague, a person infected with pneumonic plague may develop a fever, headache, weakness, and pneumonia, with the latter developing 'rapidly.' While bubonic and septicemic plague may take a few days to set in, the incubation period for pneumonic plague may be just over a day, the CDC reports. It's the only form that can be spread person-to-person, and it is considered the most serious form of the disease. Between 2020 and 2023, the CDC reported 15 human plague cases were reported. Of those, three died. As the Cleveland Clinic explains, plague has to be treated with antibiotics as quickly as possible — taking antibiotics within 24 hours of symptoms gives you 'the best chance of getting better.' You could begin feeling better within a week or two, as long as you receive treatment, according to health experts. Regardless of the type of plague, about 90% survive with quick treatment. Untreated, 'plague is nearly always fatal,' the Cleveland Clinic said. Health officials have not said how the Arizona resident who died earlier this year of the pneumonic plague became infected. Oregon's case of bubonic plague last year was believed to be brought on by a pet cat. In recent years, Colorado has reported a cat testing positive for septicemic plague and a cat, two prairie dog colonies, and a squirrel testing positive for bubonic plague. Infected fleas are largely to blame for plague cases that occur in the U.S. today, but the handling of infected animals – like cats, rabbits, rats, mice, and squirrels, according to New York's Department of Health – has also been known to lead to the plague. To avoid getting the plague, it's recommended that you take steps to avoid flea bites. That includes wearing bug spray with DEET and clearing up spaces outside where the wild animals fleas love may live. It's also important to speak with your veterinarian about preventing fleas on your pets. Your pets should also not be allowed to roam outdoors freely if you live in an area prone to the plague.